General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJodi Arias escapes death penalty after Arizona jury deadlocks
Source: Reuters
BY DAVID SCHWARTZ
PHOENIX Thu Mar 5, 2015 12:52pm EST
(Reuters) - A jury in Arizona failed to reach a verdict on Thursday in the sentencing retrial of Jodi Arias, sparing the former waitress from the death penalty for murdering her ex-boyfriend in 2008.
Arias, 34, was found guilty of the murder in 2013 but jurors at that trial deadlocked on whether to give her the death penalty. A new jury of eight women and four men was seated in October to hear a sentencing retrial but announced on Thursday it could not decide on a punishment.
Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Sherry Stephens said the jury was hung and declared a mistrial. The judge now will sentence Arias to life in prison or to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/05/us-usa-crime-arias-idUSKBN0M11VF20150305
Siwsan
(26,268 posts)As a disclaimer, I do not support the death penalty. However, it sounds like a really bad case of voir dire in picking the jury. The hold out seemed questionable in her ability to even consider the DP. And the jury said she was pretty non-communicative in her reasoning for holding out. It actually sounds like she should have been pulled for violating her oath to participate. The other jurors said it became obvious that she lied, during voir dire, and she would never consider the death penalty in any situation.
I heard someone say that maybe it's time to re-look at the jury system and instead of unanimous decisions in criminal cases, go more the route of the civil case rules where a majority rules. It just takes one wild card.
I feel so deeply for the Alexander family but putting this horrible individual to death wouldn't really solve anything.
I'm pretty sure the judge will go for LWOP because the alternative would be political suicide.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)It was ridiculous of the state to take it to the penalty stage a second time. The woman is a socipath, but killing her won't help anything.
I do not support majority verdicts for criminal cases, in either guilt or death penalty phase. The burden is high for a reason.
Siwsan
(26,268 posts)I got a big kick out of watching the prosecutor and wish they had televised this trial, too. But I think he was wrong headed in going after the death penalty, after the first hung jury.
I've served on 3 murder juries and can speak from experience that there are some really questionable people who get through voir dire.
BainsBane
(53,035 posts)Wow. I've been on one jury in a personal injury case.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Siwsan
(26,268 posts)Especially in a high profile case, like this. I've watched and followed this trial from the beginning and just hope she gets LWOP because I seriously doubt someone with her degree of psychopathy could ever be helped.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)Death penalty should be decided by a coin flip. Take emotion out of it.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Wow, some of the comments! I probably wouldn't want to have Jodi Arias as my neighbor (would certainly turn down any dinner invitation), but many of the commenters seem to have an indecent preoccupation with putting other people to death in ever more gruesome manners. Hope none of them live anywhere near me, but the laws of probability say that at least one of them does.
Spazito
(50,365 posts)Sentencing a woman to death is unusual.
I hope Judge Stephens sentences her to life without the possibility of parole.
Disclaimer: I am a death penalty opponent.
NaturalHigh
(12,778 posts)Arias should never see the outside of a prison again, but I think it was a mistake to try a second time for the death penalty.