Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 02:07 PM Mar 2015

Jodi Arias escapes death penalty after Arizona jury deadlocks

Source: Reuters

Jodi Arias escapes death penalty after Arizona jury deadlocks

BY DAVID SCHWARTZ
PHOENIX Thu Mar 5, 2015 12:52pm EST

(Reuters) - A jury in Arizona failed to reach a verdict on Thursday in the sentencing retrial of Jodi Arias, sparing the former waitress from the death penalty for murdering her ex-boyfriend in 2008.

Arias, 34, was found guilty of the murder in 2013 but jurors at that trial deadlocked on whether to give her the death penalty. A new jury of eight women and four men was seated in October to hear a sentencing retrial but announced on Thursday it could not decide on a punishment.

Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Sherry Stephens said the jury was hung and declared a mistrial. The judge now will sentence Arias to life in prison or to life in prison with the possibility of parole after 25 years.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/03/05/us-usa-crime-arias-idUSKBN0M11VF20150305
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Siwsan

(26,268 posts)
1. Eleven for death penalty - one hold out
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:34 PM
Mar 2015

As a disclaimer, I do not support the death penalty. However, it sounds like a really bad case of voir dire in picking the jury. The hold out seemed questionable in her ability to even consider the DP. And the jury said she was pretty non-communicative in her reasoning for holding out. It actually sounds like she should have been pulled for violating her oath to participate. The other jurors said it became obvious that she lied, during voir dire, and she would never consider the death penalty in any situation.

I heard someone say that maybe it's time to re-look at the jury system and instead of unanimous decisions in criminal cases, go more the route of the civil case rules where a majority rules. It just takes one wild card.

I feel so deeply for the Alexander family but putting this horrible individual to death wouldn't really solve anything.

I'm pretty sure the judge will go for LWOP because the alternative would be political suicide.

BainsBane

(53,035 posts)
3. the first jury was hung too
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:38 PM
Mar 2015

It was ridiculous of the state to take it to the penalty stage a second time. The woman is a socipath, but killing her won't help anything.

I do not support majority verdicts for criminal cases, in either guilt or death penalty phase. The burden is high for a reason.

Siwsan

(26,268 posts)
5. Yea - that's whole lot of money funneled towards revenge
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:43 PM
Mar 2015

I got a big kick out of watching the prosecutor and wish they had televised this trial, too. But I think he was wrong headed in going after the death penalty, after the first hung jury.

I've served on 3 murder juries and can speak from experience that there are some really questionable people who get through voir dire.

Siwsan

(26,268 posts)
9. I've thought about that, but don't know if I could
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:47 PM
Mar 2015

Especially in a high profile case, like this. I've watched and followed this trial from the beginning and just hope she gets LWOP because I seriously doubt someone with her degree of psychopathy could ever be helped.

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
8. I think majority rules doesn't go far enough
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:45 PM
Mar 2015

Death penalty should be decided by a coin flip. Take emotion out of it.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
2. Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster.
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:38 PM
Mar 2015
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you. Friedrich Nietzsche

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
11. I read this story on an MSN click-through
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:49 PM
Mar 2015

Wow, some of the comments! I probably wouldn't want to have Jodi Arias as my neighbor (would certainly turn down any dinner invitation), but many of the commenters seem to have an indecent preoccupation with putting other people to death in ever more gruesome manners. Hope none of them live anywhere near me, but the laws of probability say that at least one of them does.

Spazito

(50,365 posts)
10. I would have been surprised if they had decided for the death penalty...
Thu Mar 5, 2015, 04:47 PM
Mar 2015

Sentencing a woman to death is unusual.

I hope Judge Stephens sentences her to life without the possibility of parole.

Disclaimer: I am a death penalty opponent.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
12. Life without parole works for me.
Fri Mar 6, 2015, 01:23 AM
Mar 2015

Arias should never see the outside of a prison again, but I think it was a mistake to try a second time for the death penalty.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jodi Arias escapes death ...