Are going against federal law with legalized marijuana?

The same cannot be said of laws prohibiting persecution of gays.

on both counts. They believe the horseshit drug war propaganda about pot and believe the horseshit theocratic propaganda about gays.

It isn't sedition or insurrection, that is just hyperbole. It could become either if taken to an extreme, which is not likely to happen.

The real difference is that cannabis prohibition seems to have a perhaps addressable 10th amendment/commerce clause conflict that could be settled in the courts in favor of the states, while gay rights are within the domain of the 14th amendment - we all have all the same rights at a national, not a state, level.

They would tell the state to stop selling. There would be an inconsistency on the matter of LGBT marriage right where the feds allow gay marriage and the states do not. The LGBT question is about civil right and equal protection. Marijuana legalization does not fall in that particular arena. I can see the conflict with marijuana.

The canabis laws are about STATE criminality. State laws do not change a Federal law. If the FBI or DEA wanted to arrest people on Federal Charges, they could.

The Federal law does not require the states to criminalize canabis.

to the United States.

Would be nice if someone would remind them.

Rep. Thaddeus Stevens and General William Tecumseh Sherman both advised President Lincoln on what it would take to really end slavery and defeat the South, Lincoln chose a different path that has been proven time and time again for over 150 years to be a failure and we are still living with Lincoln’s screw up today.

As in banning BATF from operating in Missouri. Governor Jay Dixon.. (of Ferguson MO fame) vetoed that law. That was sedition

on the relationship between the federal government and state governments.

This sounds like the failure to obey the law after Brown v. Board of Education, where the national guard has to be invoked. As a practical matter, it is a bit tougher, since forcing them to let children go to school is easier than making them perform a gay marriage. They would need the help of what few people there are in the state who are for it. It's a very red state but there must be someone in favor of gay marriage who would cooperate with the feds to enforce the law.

For all to see & let it be know that this will not be tolerated.

are "fiscally responsible".

See Constitution of the United States, Article VI, Clause 2.