General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNYT To Conservatives: No, We Didn't Crop George W. Bush Out Of Selma Photo
The New York Times on Monday answered criticism from conservatives alleging that the paper cropped out President George W. Bush from a front-page photo of Saturday's commemorative march in Selma, Alabama.
-snip-
The conservative site Newsmax also speculated on Monday whether the Times had purposefully cropped Bush, noting that a local station ran a wider shot of the march "and mentioned in its post that Bush was in attendance." (The Times story also mentioned Bush's attendance and noted that the former President signed the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act in 2006.)
But according to Sullivan, the Times didn't edit the photo at all.
There was no crop, ranking photo editor Michele McNally told her. This was the photo as we received it.
The photographer, Doug Mills, provided Sullivan with more detail. "Bush was in the bright sunlight," he explained. "I did not even send this frame because its very wide and super busy and Bush is super-overexposed because he was in the sun and Obama and the others are in the shade."
Sullivan concluded that the explanation made sense to her, and that she detected no political bias in the photo decision.
full article
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nyt-george-w-bush-selma-crop
C_U_L8R
(45,012 posts)that Bush's only significant act
promoting civil rights
was attending this parade.
I hope he got a balloon and cake.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Was it any good? Oops must have been since Republican Governors are trying to destroy voting rights of millions.
Deertoil
(31 posts)Why is this even an issue?
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)have been screaming the Times intentionally cropped a picture of W. attending the ceremonies. The Times is saying no, they didn't.
calimary
(81,371 posts)They routinely slam the NYTimes. I don't know why they should. The Times was a willing and eager accomplice during the run-up to the Iraq War. Screamed out the bush/cheney line-of-the-week on the front page in large print above the fold. Week after week after week.
calimary
(81,371 posts)Glad you're here! The overexposure can definitely be a factor in the ultimate photo that is widely released. Sometimes you have to trim photos - for all kinds of reasons. You trim the photo if there's a guy picking his nose or making an obscene gesture over at one side. You crop away any parts that are blurry. Overexposure and underexposure both need to be either deemphasized or cut outright. It happens. No political under-agenda at work here. Unless one is so freakin' paranoid that he/she suspects a political under-agenda is at work everywhere at all times.
monmouth4
(9,708 posts)happy, interacting with people that were watching. It was almost like the doofus that was finally asked to sit at the "cool kids table"...