Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 08:58 PM Mar 2015

NYT To Conservatives: No, We Didn't Crop George W. Bush Out Of Selma Photo

The New York Times on Monday answered criticism from conservatives alleging that the paper cropped out President George W. Bush from a front-page photo of Saturday's commemorative march in Selma, Alabama.

-snip-

The conservative site Newsmax also speculated on Monday whether the Times had purposefully cropped Bush, noting that a local station ran a wider shot of the march "and mentioned in its post that Bush was in attendance." (The Times story also mentioned Bush's attendance and noted that the former President signed the reauthorization of the Voting Rights Act in 2006.)

But according to Sullivan, the Times didn't edit the photo at all.

“There was no crop,” ranking photo editor Michele McNally told her. “This was the photo as we received it.”

The photographer, Doug Mills, provided Sullivan with more detail. "Bush was in the bright sunlight," he explained. "I did not even send this frame because it’s very wide and super busy and Bush is super-overexposed because he was in the sun and Obama and the others are in the shade."

Sullivan concluded that the explanation made sense to her, and that she detected no political bias in the photo decision.

full article
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/nyt-george-w-bush-selma-crop

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NYT To Conservatives: No, We Didn't Crop George W. Bush Out Of Selma Photo (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2015 OP
They forgot the footnote C_U_L8R Mar 2015 #1
They mention he signed a civil right voting bill yeoman6987 Mar 2015 #2
They crop many photos Deertoil Mar 2015 #3
Because Republicans/Conservatives/Tea Partiers... DonViejo Mar 2015 #4
They LOVE using the New York Times as a punching bag. A leading member of the "liberal media." calimary Mar 2015 #5
Welcome to DU, Deertoil! calimary Mar 2015 #6
Not only that, but the pictures I've seen of W and Laura, they were both smiling and seemed to be monmouth4 Mar 2015 #7

C_U_L8R

(45,012 posts)
1. They forgot the footnote
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 09:43 PM
Mar 2015

that Bush's only significant act
promoting civil rights
was attending this parade.

I hope he got a balloon and cake.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. They mention he signed a civil right voting bill
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 10:11 PM
Mar 2015

Was it any good? Oops must have been since Republican Governors are trying to destroy voting rights of millions.

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
4. Because Republicans/Conservatives/Tea Partiers...
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 10:54 PM
Mar 2015

have been screaming the Times intentionally cropped a picture of W. attending the ceremonies. The Times is saying no, they didn't.

calimary

(81,371 posts)
5. They LOVE using the New York Times as a punching bag. A leading member of the "liberal media."
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 11:00 PM
Mar 2015

They routinely slam the NYTimes. I don't know why they should. The Times was a willing and eager accomplice during the run-up to the Iraq War. Screamed out the bush/cheney line-of-the-week on the front page in large print above the fold. Week after week after week.

calimary

(81,371 posts)
6. Welcome to DU, Deertoil!
Mon Mar 9, 2015, 11:09 PM
Mar 2015

Glad you're here! The overexposure can definitely be a factor in the ultimate photo that is widely released. Sometimes you have to trim photos - for all kinds of reasons. You trim the photo if there's a guy picking his nose or making an obscene gesture over at one side. You crop away any parts that are blurry. Overexposure and underexposure both need to be either deemphasized or cut outright. It happens. No political under-agenda at work here. Unless one is so freakin' paranoid that he/she suspects a political under-agenda is at work everywhere at all times.

monmouth4

(9,708 posts)
7. Not only that, but the pictures I've seen of W and Laura, they were both smiling and seemed to be
Tue Mar 10, 2015, 09:24 AM
Mar 2015

happy, interacting with people that were watching. It was almost like the doofus that was finally asked to sit at the "cool kids table"...

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»NYT To Conservatives: No,...