General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am no fan of Hillary Clinton by any means, but...
I am no fan of Hillary Clinton by any means, but I am even less a fan of the "mainstream" news media...and with this email thing, you just have to love how these laggards have managed to go from "Clinton Scandal!" to "Remember The Other Clinton Scandals!" to, now, "Look, The Media Is Back In Clinton-Scandal Mode!"
In essence, they've downshifted so they can report on themselves. Easiest gig in America, and now they get to do it until a year from November. "Wow, look how we do what we do!"
Maybe a cat asleep in a ray of sunlight is lazier than these frauds, but I doubt it.
Clintons and controversy: The circus is back in town
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/the-circus-is-back-in-town/2015/03/10/d941ea78-c74c-11e4-a199-6cb5e63819d2_story.html?hpid=z2
Gad zooks, get a job.
bigtree
(86,004 posts)octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Pathwalker
(6,598 posts)like they admitted doing during the bush years. Maybe they getting koch money, now.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)I find this phenomenon analogous to sportswriting in today's 24-hour news cycle/electronic media environment: basically, it's about filling air time and column inches, period. It is an embarrassment to the profession of political journalism. Also, there is this: Lazy, like water, seeks the lowest level.
Pathwalker
(6,598 posts)the identities of 14,000 Floridians when he revealed all their personal information, can't have that though, because that would require work. I think it could be a bit more than just laziness, because all the networks, and the cable news use the exact same words and phrases, in the same order, as if they are all reading the same script.
Because *cough* they are *cough* reading from the same *cough* script. Provided, of course, by the same script writers...
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)I think on this email crap, as long as Hillary was being truthful in the explanations she gave today at her press conference, especially her emphatic statement that no classified materials were being privately held on President Clinton's server - and there's certainly no reason at present to suggest otherwise - she should survive this kerfuffle easily. It'll then be remembered as just another "tempest in a teapot."
There's SO much more to rightfully criticize when it comes to Hillary regarding real issues. So maybe, for some here who are ardent Hillary supporters, they actually should be somewhat happy with this journalist-created story to the extent it distracts from those issues.
idk, just a thought.
4now
(1,596 posts)I am not a Clinton supporter but this email story is just lame.
bluesbassman
(19,378 posts)Which is itself an oxymoron as so little of it is actually real, but the MSM has figured this out and is fully engaged in "entertaining" the masses. Facts, importance, and reality be damned.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)"We don't want to pay the writers."
Skittles
(153,170 posts)"reality" tv is total bullshit
WillyT
(72,631 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Probably at around 10,000 rpm by now.
Skittles
(153,170 posts)SERIOUSLY
Thank you, Skittles.
WillyT
(72,631 posts)Thank You.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)B Calm
(28,762 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)Sometimes, they have to use mind control techniques.
Prepare for daily treatments for the next 508 days.
Rex
(65,616 posts)What happened to objectivity and unbiased reporting? Did it just almost completely become a web format only? New kind of HTML code?
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)James Carville is an occupational liar, just like his wife, but at least some of what he said here sticks.
There's nothing to see here, at least not enough to make a big fuss about, anyway. Hillary Clinton used a private e-mail account for her state department communications. She turned the e-mails over as required. She asked the government to release them so everyone can see what's in them. No harm, no foul. End of story.
Mrs. Clinton did the right thing. She move to get the facts out there. That should leave her critics with nothing to say. Of course, they will continue to make noise, just as Carville said in the above clip, in between the noise he was making.
If Mrs. Clinton's detractors, of which I am one, want to talk about Mrs. Clinton's close ties to Wall Street, her penchant for seeking military solutions, her unfortunate advocacy for "free" trade deals, then let's talk about those. Those are the matters that give me concerns about her fitness to be President. Of course, the Republicans aren't going to make issues out of those things, because they are even worse than Mrs. Clinton on those fronts. That is why I am looking forward to a Presidential contest between Mrs. Clinton and the survivor of the coming Republican train wreck that will be their primary campaign about as much as I am looking forward to coming down with the flu.
As for e-mailgate, it's just another ginned up "scandal."
mrdmk
(2,943 posts)Being no fan of the Clinton's or their philosophy concerning governing a powerful country, please get my B.S. meter off of eleven.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)Trumping up faux outrage over fake scandals. And the Clinton's are pretty much the nexus of it all. And that's why the Clinton's are fireproof, the American public will tire of this shit in due course. In the meantime we'll enjoy the tabloid near celebrity type nonsense that it generates.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)And actually a rather big deal.
Cosmic Kitten
(3,498 posts)Yet another self-inflicted wound
due to horrible judgement.
After all the previous scandals with Clinton
anyone who thinks her email indiscretions
was just an ooopsie, is ignoring the elephant
in the room
How could she NOT KNOW this would
become yet another scandal?
lewebley3
(3,412 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)communications, which actually belong to you and me. She's fighting for Hillary Clinton, which is the only person you'll ever see her really fight for.
840high
(17,196 posts)lewebley3
(3,412 posts)NewYorkTimes left out facts in the story for a reason, it wasn't an accident!! , they wanted
make money, remember they are famous for having started all the lies
of whitewater that turned out to be just lies. The email with Hillary is just another Fox channel
production. The Media for democrats and progressives is underground,(its us).
GOP and Fox have no ethics, they have a goal to destroy the democrats, that is all, I will
never be one that helps them
Remember, if the GOP win's: people are going to get killed, they want a war, Cotton is owned
by defense contractors.
HIllary's emails is just another stupid story by corporation media. The GOP are like (what Bill Murray said
they are like Vet icon, gofers, and other vermin the will never quit). Don't go over to the other side and
help them by bashing other Democrats For the Sake of every life in American stay focus on stopping the
war the GOP wants to start if they get elected. Thanks Fight! Fight! against GOP wars!!!
still_one
(92,289 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Why yes, you were! You said she "has a sad" and was "disinterested in following the law" (ooops, that was a big fail-wrong) and then you went back into her past in an attempt to smear her with ancient history and "guilt by association" innuendo of the worst sort.
And right here on DU, too:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026305005
She voted for the PATRIOT Act.
She voted for the Iraq War Resolution.
She is snuggled up good and tight with organized crime crews like Goldman Sachs that stole our future.
She got the Keystone XL pipeline ball rolling at the State Department.
Personal liberty...unjust war...Wall Street crime...climate change.
Gosh, seems to me those are the signal issues of our time...and every chance she's had to cast a vote or exert influence, she's gone in absolutely the wrong direction.
Now, it seems, she's disinterested in following the law when it comes to governmental data collection. A poster here who claims to have worked at State says it's because she's a Luddite working within a calcified bureaucratic technology, and she's just more comfortable with her Yahoo account, or whatever it is.
If the Bush administration had unspooled that line, this place would have erupted. And rightly so.
So maybe the trick isn't to try to elect the most "electable" Democrat. As Democrats, maybe the trick is to wrestle this party back from the abyss and rediscover a few DNA-level values.
Like protecting personal liberty...and avoiding unjust war...and holding Wall Street to account...and thwarting climate change.
I'm sorry she has a sad today, but my unavoidable conclusion is that Secretary Clinton - based on her black-letter record - does not strike me as the avatar for that change.
Oh, and P.S.: I'm not being divisive. This is the cold, hard truth. Deploy your coping mechanisms as you will. The facts are on the wall. Read them or don't; you're still free, for now.
Let the million flowers bloom.
You might take your own advice, there.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)P.S. Iraq War Vote, PATRIOT Act, Keystone XL, Wall Street...still waiting for the justification.
Keep swinging, MADem. You're nothing if not persistent.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I'm not swinging--I'm hitting the bullseye. I can tell by your reaction.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Still waiting.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Why not give us some of your trademark "argle bargle" while you're at it?
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)IWR: = "Yes" vote
Patriot Act: "Yes" vote
Etc.
Insinuation? Association?
Black-ink legislation.
You are really shameless. It's a strength...and an indelible stain.
...and I forgot my first rule: don't feed the ___________.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Oh wait--she has. But that doesn't fit your narrative, so you gloss over it.
Your remarks are as rigid as someone saying "Can't trust Betsy Warren--she was a REPUBLICAN in 1996!!! She loved Saint Ronnie's approach to markets--never minded his views on AIDS, women, "Welfare Queens," and so forth...!"
See how absurd THAT sounds?
You have the moxie to call me shameless? For pointing out YOUR OWN WORDS, too?
No one is more shameless than you, Will. I'm a rank amateur compared to your prodigious talents on that score.
FWIW, calling me a troll isn't cool, either. I've never been PPR'd and reinstated from this forum--can you say the same? Just because you don't fill in the blank on your little
...and I forgot my first rule: don't feed the ___________.
comment, that doesn't mean one can't figure out what you mean. I won't alert, but it wouldn't make me "has a sad" if someone else did--it would serve you right.
RandiFan1290
(6,239 posts)"Guilt by insinuation and association"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6345491
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
Calling someone a troll isn't cool, and even Will Pitt shouldn't get a pass for it.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Wed Mar 11, 2015, 03:46 AM, and the Jury voted 2-5 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Will Pitt used a loophole - didn't actually use the troll word.
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Get over yourselves, stalkers. Will is still here
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Andy823
(11,495 posts)Most definitely the bullseye!
MADem
(135,425 posts)joshcryer
(62,276 posts)You contributed to this spectacle. And continue to do so with the petulant repetition.
Fucking rich.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)Yeah, it was me.
joshcryer
(62,276 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)Of course, I'm using the GERMAN definition of "gift."
It certainly does have that effect on this board...!
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)the bastion of the "liberal" media, the NYT got Whitewater started, hid Bush's illegal wiretapping through the 2004 election, and now this.
It's really about being the fan I'm not at all or not, but the myth of a liberal media that bugs me. I'm confident that the "clowns" will prove me right.
WilliamPitt
(58,179 posts)with the help of the American Standard. The NYT definitely picked up the baton, tho.
DFW
(54,415 posts)Right, neither do most of us. It was a phrase coined by Fox and Frauds to refer to a bunch of scandals that weren't. They evaporated when the Republicans, Fox Noise and National Hate Radio (pardon my redundancy) decided that the horse they had been kicking was really dead.
In the meantime, 47 Republicans Senators send a letter to the Iranian Ayatollahs in an effort to usurp the President's ability to conduct foreign policy. Now just what do you think the Republicans' reaction would have been if Tom Daschle had been trying to conduct discussions with Saddam Hussein behind Cheney's back? The only subject of discussion to which they would have been open would have been whether to put the Democratic Senators responsible in front of a firing squad or pack them in a gas chamber.
On a lighter note, the kind of note we all need every now and then, Andy Borowitz heard that North Korea's Kim Jong Un is furious with the 47 Senators for not sending HIM a letter.
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)the mess of the Iran letter.
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)It's not about being a fan, or popularity or even electoral winnability.
It's about the rule of law and whether or not it matters to have them, if no one is going to abide by them anymore.
If not, we should stop the BULLSHITTING and admit it.
Stop pointing fingers at others and look at ourselves in the mirror for change.
Things like that..........
Rex
(65,616 posts)Somewhere around between the JFK assassination and Ford pardoning Nixon.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)CAN tell it's not butter
ReRe
(10,597 posts)... and it's going to get worse as each day passes. And when she's elected, the wingers will have another one of those back-of-the-dining-room meetings. They'll just make the same pledge as they made on how to "not" deal with PO. And there will be 8 years of it. And the M$M will follow right along, booking their wingers for the Sunday morning shows, asking the wingers questions for them.
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Yes the MSM was lazy in their salacious reporting, so much so I completely gave him a pass for his reckless behavior. I'm not going to get sucked into the vortex again. Hillary is in this pickle because of her reckless behavior in defying protocol. Yes the MSM is acting the fool again, but I'm not giving another Clinton another pass for a shitstorm they brought on themself.
olddots
(10,237 posts)you have 3 minutes of material and an hour to fill .