Just a little nit-picking > refuge from the dangerous and exhausting society that SOME men have made.

Most, if not all, of the men on this forum, despise the pieces-of-human-trash also.

And I have no doubt that many Duers could do a far better job than many of the Guardian staff

The idea that men in general have produced a "dangerous and exhausting society" is part of the caricature that she objects to - "what’s more hateful to –and of – men than the idea that they cannot be trusted to even imagine comporting themselves with good sense and dignity unless the women stay hidden away, toiling to create a refuge from the dangerous and exhausting society that men have made?

...is"

A "whimsical sketch of a real person" (caricature) is held by some men and women but the writer implies that his meaning is the "Standard of thinking".
I don't see that in my everyday life.

who have, she says, an "unlikely common cause" in this. What in the article implies it's a 'standard of thinking?

Caricatures don't have to be 'whimsical'; they can be savage too.

(rereading it, I realise it's not feminism she says they see that as - she's saying those 2 groups agree women should retreat from the public world, because they paint the public world as 'dangerous and exhausting' for women. So perhaps she could have expressed it better, if more than one of us is not getting her meaning quickly).

What you just posted though, is something I fully agree with.