General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Bolton: In 2017, when Obama is gone, we should attack Iran and claim self defense. Screw the UN
The neocons are itching for war with Iran.
This is a new op-ed from John Bolton.
He argues that the UN can do nothing to stop America from attacking Iran in the future....so don't worry about any Obama/Iran/UN nuclear agreement.
-------
A U.N. Vote Is Irrelevant to the Iran Deal
The Security Council cant stop the U.S. from using force to protect itself from anyones nuclear weapons.
By JOHN BOLTON
March 16, 2015 7:14 p.m. ET
Press reports that President Obama will enlist the U.N. Security Council to bless his imminent nuclear agreement with Iran have unleashed considerable controversy. Many worry council action would bind the U.S. to the deal, circumventing congressional scrutiny. Moreover, Iran may see U.N. action as protecting it from a subsequent change in U.S. policy.
There is no need for worry. The Security Council can do nothing to limit Americas freedom to break from this agreement or take whatever action it deems necessary to protect itself.
<...>
...no Security Council action can prevent the U.S. from using force to protect itself from Iranian nuclear weapons. Article 51 of the U.N. Charter affirms the inherent right of individual and collective self-defense, which means that decisions relating to self-defense rest with each member state.
<...>
Suppose the new U.S. president in 2017 decided to use military force to break Irans control over the nuclear-fuel cycle at one or more points. The U.S. could veto any draft resolutions designed to forestall an attack or halt one in progress, or impose sanctions afterward.
http://www.wsj.com/articles/john-bolton-a-u-n-vote-is-irrelevant-to-the-iran-deal-1426547690
Xipe Totec
(43,890 posts)which is to say, not at all.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Sadly, too many in the Home of the "Brave" will eat this crap up, and vote accordingly
Renew Deal
(81,861 posts)Because there is no difference between Democrats and Republicans (according to them). They are the same people that said the same thing about Bush and Gore. They were proven disastrously wrong.
Gman
(24,780 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,742 posts)Too bad they still won't admit how wrong they are.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Who say how they can never support Clinton had how she is a Republican and how that's always the toped reced thread?
freshwest
(53,661 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)Then run him out of town on a rail.
Panich52
(5,829 posts)Gman
(24,780 posts)Of course he was recess appointed and couldn't get confirmed by a Republican Senate. (I mean, for Republican that's as bad as it gets. Even Republicans think he's nuts.). His opinion isn't shit. This is just a reminder of why we MUST elect a Democrat next year
niyad
(113,329 posts)global1
(25,251 posts)in 2016. First the Bibi speech in Congress without going through the Executive Branch. Then the letter to Iran signed by 47 Repug senators. And now Bolton saying this.
Why are they so confident that they will be in power in 2016? What do they know or what are they going to do to take the Presidency?
I'm beginning to get worried about their overconfidence here. Should I be worried?
spanone
(135,843 posts)Cha
(297,275 posts)pampango
(24,692 posts)Classic RW unilateralism, based on our 'exceptionalism', at work. "It doesn't matter what the rest of the world wants. The US does what it wants to do. Other countries negotiate disagreements with each other. We just act."