General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsKshama Sawant: The Most Dangerous Woman in America
Being a Democrat, I think that third parties are mostly useless. They can win only in large urban areas, in small towns with major universities, and in those rural areas where there are large numbers of refugees from Woodstock Nation. Far more of the total population does not live in such areas.
In 2013, she had substantial support from Democrats, some of it even public. The PCO coordinator for the 37th LD (the legislative district with the highest population of minorities) was publicly attacked by their executive board. In my more conservative 34th LD, three eboard members admitted to voting for her.
On New Year's Eve I attended a socialist event, and sat a a table with people who talked about how great their Democratic state representatives were, but they will never endorse a Democrat. Similarly, no Dem LD organization will ever state that Sawant stands for more of our platform principles than her opponents, so why not endorse her? Never happen.
If you'd like to support her campaign this year (all council candidates must run again because Seattle now has district elections) her website is https://votesawant.nationbuilder.com/donate
http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/03/16/kshama-sawant-most-dangerous-woman-america
Sawant said it is incumbent upon socialists and the entire U.S. left to swiftly begin the task of building working-class political campaigns independent of the Democratic Party in order to create the space for a viable national party. Efforts to reform the Democratic Party, whose leaders are in the service of the corporate oligarchy, amount to pouring energy into a black hole, she said. The Democratic elite dominate Seattle government, and the Democratic elite, as they did with Ralph Nader, have declared war against Sawant. As long as she remains in office she will expose the leaders in the Democratic Party for who they arecorporate puppets.
Sawant believes that because of the presidency of Barack Obamawho has served corporate power, expanded imperial wars, carried out a massive assault on civil liberties and failed to address the needs of the mounting numbers who are unemployed or underemployedmany people, especially young people, are hungry for political alternatives to the two big business parties. Poll after poll, she pointed out, shows the American majority to be disgusted with the Congress. And she cited the problems of Chicago Democratic Mayor Rahm Emanuel in seeking re-election as evidence that even the very beginnings of movements by working people and communities of color can shake and weaken the Democratic Party establishment. He was considered undefeatable, she said of Emanuel. But look now at his vulnerability. Look at the campaign ad he just put out saying, yes, I made mistakes, but I am a human being. Who could have imagined that kind of false humility from him? Even spending $15 million on a mayoral race and having President Obama come and campaign wasnt enough to buy him an easy victory. This demonstrates the wide opening for the U.S. left to present a principled working-class alternative. This is why we need to begin that project now. It wont be easy. But this moment is qualitatively different from the period when Ralph Nader ran. The consciousness of the American people has changed. Uprising is in the air.
brooklynite
(94,585 posts)Somehow, forcing Rahm Emanuel into a runoff (he's still likely to win) seems like a pretty low bar.
eridani
(51,907 posts)brooklynite
(94,585 posts)...which, personally, I don't see.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)What of those striving to maintain union jobs, public sector jobs and the current social safety net, which will be lost if she won't work with them, only with her own brand?
That is why her prodigy lost the election this last time. And why groups I work with didn't support their candidate, even though the 'ideal' goal may be the same. We work for non-profit, union, public environments to help the poor and disabled.
The planned elimination of the speaker would not create a socialist leader in the house, as that takes years. So what protections there are would have been lost and people can't afford it.
There is no luxury of being able to find the perfect solution in the future when lives are at stake now. We are getting victories now as the nation is waking up to the theft of the Commons which we resist.
eridani
(51,907 posts)That is only in the limited areas I noted in the OP. Otherwise, I support Democrats. Sure, Sawant got elected in Seattle on advocating for $15/hr. But only Democrats ran in the South King County cities of Burien and SeaTac. Kathryn Campbell campaigned on $15/hr in the city where the fight was first joined, and won. Another Democrat who refused to comment on the issue lost. I did the election data analysis showing a strong correlation of the Campbell vote with the Yes on 15 vote.
In Burien, a young labor activist, Lauren Berkowitz won her council seat advocating against income inequality. She is currently fighting legal attacks on the homeless there mounted by the view property crowd. Democrats, and only Democrats, are carrying these fights to the smaller suburban cities, which in South King County are significantly poorer than Seattle.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Our initatives on the income tax failed and our pushes against the regressive sales taxes have gone unheeded. We are just as concerned about income inequality as any group out there, but we don't have a new 'brand' to offer.
We are flexible, but are seen as old fashioned, New Deal Democrats. We hate the DINOs we have to fight with, too. Splintering the left does not help us in what we are trying to do. But I said, despite losses we are getting some victories as members go to Olympia and D.C. to push our case.
Thanks, Eridani for your continuing to support this state group.