General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHey Monica Lewinsky - goafuggingway
Hillary Clinton had nothing to do with your story. All you want is to make some money and help out the right wing vultures. Please to fugg off.
still_one
(92,190 posts)malaise
(269,003 posts)President Bill Clinton
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/monica-lewinsky-details-clinton-affair-aftermath-lost-my-reputation-2015203
<snip>
She wants to bury the blue dress. Monica Lewinsky gave a TED Talk at the 2015 event in Vancouver, Canada, on Thursday, Mar. 19, during which she brought up her infamous affair with former President Bill Clinton back in 1998, while she was a White House intern and he was the leader of the free world.
"At the age of 22, I fell in love with my boss," Lewinsky, now 41, said. "At the age of 24, I learned the devastating consequences... Who didnt make a mistake at 22?"
"Not a day goes by that I am not reminded of my mistake, and I regret that mistake deeply," she revealed. "In 1998, after having been swept up in an improbable romance, I was then swept up into the eye of
Read more: http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity-news/news/monica-lewinsky-details-clinton-affair-aftermath-lost-my-reputation-2015203#ixzz3Uw0Q9bTP
Follow us: @usweekly on Twitter | usweekly on Facebook
------------------------------------
I didn't make any mistakes like that at 22 - celebrities never fazed me.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)Aristus
(66,369 posts)Apologize!
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)she didnt lose it like it was some accident she went after the president according to her own words and f bill for not keeping it in his pants
Aristus
(66,369 posts)Don't pretend it wasn't...
reflection
(6,286 posts)I interpreted that Romeo.lima333 was responding to Monica's statement that " she) lost (her) reputation and dignity."
I can't logically see it interpreted any other way.
Aristus
(66,369 posts)It seemed clear to me what romeo was referring to.
reflection
(6,286 posts)I'm not seeing it, but I'm told I've been wrong once or twice.
Quantess
(27,630 posts)"you gave it away" in reference to Lewinski's respect and dignity.
MADem
(135,425 posts)There's no logical reason or nexus for your interpretation of the conversation.
N/T
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)she didnt lose it like a misplaced set of keys she sought after the president and found him
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Where was Hillary to speak up for abused women, like "that woman, Ms. Lewinsky"? No instead, all of Hillary's friends disparaged Monica, making her out to be a crazed stalker.
Disgusting behavior on Hillary's part if you ask me.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)I can understand giving a cheating spouse one get-out-of-the-doghouse-free card the first time they cheat, with the understanding that if it happens again, it will be D-I-V-O-R-C-E time. That Yale law degree was made for walkin' - she was pulling in more income than Bill did in Arkansas and could have had a great career on her own. And probably found a husband who was secure enough to honor their wedding vows.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Maybe that's small minded of me, but I would be nasty.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)who owed you something -- like loyalty.
She, on the other hand, is someone you likely don't even know.
Response to Aristus (Reply #21)
reflection This message was self-deleted by its author.
Autumn
(45,084 posts)I think you are seeing what isn't there. The OP is about Monica and the poster responded to that.
appalachiablue
(41,132 posts)WhiteTara
(29,715 posts)with intent. She went to give a President a bj and bragged to her friends that she would.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,122 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)most powerful man in the world and she was an intern. I do remember everyone losing their shit when that Tom Foley guy was having sex with interns. Remember him? The rep from Texas who was having sex with the boy interns? How is there a difference between that fucker and Bill Clinton?
She has a right to say what she wants. She can't get a job, she can't do shit with her life because she's Monica Lewinsky. If she was a predator that got the president, bill who never could keep it in his pants ever anyway and didn't care that it humiliated his wife and daughter, then I suppose we have to assume that the boy interns that Tom Foley had sex with were asking for it too.
He was the fucking president. He should have said no no matter what. he didn't because he never could and he still hasn't. I suppose we could say that the boy interns just 'gave it away' to Tom Foley too. Or do they get a pass because they're guys and she isn't?
Jenoch
(7,720 posts)Tom Foley was speaker of the house. He was also the first sitting speaker lose a re-election campaign since the 1860s.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)the rampant grotesque hypocritical crap sexism that appears in any op about Lewinski is sickening.
fuck billy boy.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)he should have behaved himself as well - it isn't sexism-
cali
(114,904 posts)What part of he was 30 years her senior and her boss is so difficult to understand?
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)she said it was a mutual affair -
cali
(114,904 posts)whatever she said. And it has nothing to do with her willingness. Again, he was HER BOSS, the most powerful man in the world and 30 years older- not to mention married.
Who had the greater responsibility to ensure that they didn't become sexually involved?
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)that it was no accident - youre trying to drag this off into something I didn't say and start some sexism argument over greater responsibility. have a nice day
cali
(114,904 posts)to decide the boundaries of this discussion.
You said a lot more than that it was no accident. You made sexist comments about her.
bye bye
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)If she were older maybe she would have handled it differently. Who knows.
valerief
(53,235 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)You are saying that President Clinton was tricked? Where is your link proving Monica was paid to get the president in a compromising position. If someone were to pay I can't imagine they would have picked Monica.
valerief
(53,235 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Obviously can't back it up. And you get angry with me? How does that happen?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Absolute epistemological closure is just a click away.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I still don't think my reply justified an ignore. I guess some just don't want to prove their opinions.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Or conspiracy theories?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)Seriously? I don't have any problem with what people do in their personal lives, but the moment she got on her knees and sucked off the President of the United States, I'd say her "reputation and dignity" were sealed in fate. You didn't just make a mistake, you blew the president, and now you're famous for it! That's your legacy, baby. Maybe you should have just gotten a tattoo instead, or something. Cry me a river...that blow job will be your retirement fund and you know it.
Botany
(70,504 posts)and that was to have sex w/her boss .... aka teachers in high school and college ..... she was
hardly a 22 year old kid who made a mistake. Bill Clinton should have known better because he
knew the GOP and the right wing were hunting for him.
Atman
(31,464 posts)But when a cute 22 year girl has your dick in her mouth, saying "Don't...stop...don't...stop" can be difficult, even for the leader of the free world. Just sayin'. They both made their choices.
cali
(114,904 posts)entering her mouth? incredible. She was 22. He was in his forties. He was her boss and the most powerful man in the world. He was married. It was FAR MORE his responsibility to not have sex with him than hers.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)It's rules are that, however young and Powerless the female is, she is the one SHAMED
and called ugly names like "Whore", while HE, a married, powerful male about Thirty
years her senior, is just having a "boys will be boys" episode which will, at worst, be
'forgiven' with no more than a wink and a smile, and at best, actually INCREASE his status
rather than "shame", or degrade him as it does her.
It's all SO wonderfully fair.
"Pity the tender sex for they must deal with Men who are at once their
Seducers and their Judges" Thomas Paine.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Whatever the reason, she didn't deserve all the shit that's been thrown at her..She was only
22. I'd say that after almost 20 years, she should probably be "forgiven" He certainly
has been.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)While Gingrich was out finding his third wife. When Larry Flynt started bringing down the Republicans one by one they saw the light and got off of the Clintons. Maybe this will need to restart.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)napi21
(45,806 posts)She would have been better uf she would have just kept her mouth shut and made her life. But noooo. She has to go back into the public and look for pity....AGAIN! I have no sympathy for her. She did what thousands if not millions of women do in the workplace all the time. Problem is she got caught!
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 21, 2015, 12:10 PM - Edit history (1)
and I see no reason why, after 20 years -- a time of great success and acceptance for Bill Clinton -- she would still need to "keep her mouth shut"
I mean why not just give her a Scarlet Letter and forget about it? Her emergence into public life after 2 decades, is not, as you charge, to look for "pity", it's to speak out against public shaming and cyber bullying, a subject she obviously knows something about.
Yupster
(14,308 posts)If she didn't, Carville and the other Clinton enablers would still be calling her a wacko and a liar today.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Clinton was an ass bandit and everybody knows that. Totally on him, what happened. This business of men being the victims of their powerful sex drives is a crock.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Atman
(31,464 posts)Men jerk off all the time, so be it. But not that many, relatively speaking, get in such positions of power where 22 year old women are falling on their knees just to felate them. I'm not saying Bill (or Monica) couldn't have or shouldn't have made better choices. But they BOTH made choices. Once again, I don't see anything anywhere where it says Bill Clinton forced himself on Monica Lewinsky. They both were will partners, but now she's playing the whining victim. I call bullshit. You're perpetuating the "victimhood" status by saying women are apparently unable to guide their own destiny. Monica knew what -- and whom -- she was doing.
Atman
(31,464 posts)I'm not passing any judgement at all. It's not like she accidentally blew the guy, or that his unit just accidentally fell into her mouth. I'm simply stating that they both knew what they were doing, and I don't care for the "woe is me, I'm a poor innocent victim!" act. She knew what she was doing, and now she's famous for it. Oh well.
cali
(114,904 posts)responsibility for his actions. You said jackfuckingshit about his responsibilities- which damn well were greater than his.
cute backtrack though.
the sexism over this is vile putrid. makes me sick. defend the most powerful man in the world. condemn the 22 year old as a slut.
gross.
Botany
(70,504 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 20, 2015, 12:47 PM - Edit history (1)
Now, I don't doubt that Bill and Hillary love each other and have "an arrangement"
as per the marriage and Bill's actions might have well ended up in a divorce court
but not in front of the SCOTUS and congress but Bill should have found "his loving" some-
place else. I have also wondered if Monica was not placed into the White House in
order to get to President Clinton.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Again, as I stated, I make no apologies for Bill Clinton. Pretty damned stupid and reckless. But there does come a point where it is pretty difficult to say "STOP!" to a 22 year old girl sucking your dick. It never should have gotten that far in the first place, to be sure. It does make one wonder how on earth "that woman" got there in the first place. Who does that? Who would even think "Hey, I'm going to blow the President!" And then they spent $77 million dollars "investigating" it. Yeah, right.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)Just as Bill wasn't Monica's first older guy in a position of authority, Monica was far from the first other woman for Bill. Hillary wouldn't divorce Bill if he was caught at a college sorority orgy.
The truth is that this arrangement would have worked out fine for both of them if the GOP hadn't made a stink about it. Hillary wouldn't have done anything, and Monica would have remained gossip to this day. Which would have pleased all parties.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)It's typical "boys will be boys" think -- Yeah, she must have FORCED that dick in his mouth, right?
While you SNEER with contempt at this young woman who was, like THIRTY years his junior.
Typical slut-shaming "She's the whore" "Double Standard" mentality.
Atman
(31,464 posts)She did what she did. He did what he did. They did it together. Period.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Except one of them had quite a bit more power than the other. So, not equal.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Hmmm.
Demit
(11,238 posts)And that's probably the most disingenuous post of yours I've ever read.
cali
(114,904 posts)I
sexist dogshit does that to me.
Atman
(31,464 posts)One of them became famous. Again, who had the power? I am absolutely NOT "slut shaming," just the opposite. I don't give the slightest little shit what two people do behind closed doors, and I don't care if it's the POTUS, or an intern, or a grandma, or two men or two women or whatever. If the two people consent, it is none of our fucking business. Bill and Hillary are still married. Apparently it concerns you more than it concerns them. Why is that?
How is that slut shaming? How does that viewpoint make me sexist?
PassingFair
(22,434 posts)Bill Clinton is a jerk.
I feel sorry for Monica. She was young and impressionable.
I think she really believed he loved her.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Also do you have proof that she had sex with her teachers & professors?
Slut shaming is a nasty way to defend a boss-subordinate case of abuse of power. Where I work, a few years ago the guy slated to become CEO a couple of months later was fired for having a sexual relationship with a subordinate.
Botany
(70,504 posts)Both her former teacher and Ms. Lewinsky's lawyer have publicly acknowledged the affair.
And yes Bill was 100% wrong in fooling around w/Ms. Lewinsky.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)kwassa
(23,340 posts)In an account questioning Lewinsky's credibility, Andy J. Bleiler, 32, said through an attorney that Lewinsky had called him as often as four or five times a day after coming to Washington in 1995 as a White House intern, and that she talked obsessively about sex, including boasts that she was involved in a sexual relationship with a "high ranking White House official."
Standing beside Bleiler and his wife at a news conference outside their home in Portland, attorney Terry Giles said the Bleilers "would both describe Monica as having a pattern of twisting facts, especially to enhance her version of her own self-image."
namastea42
(96 posts)Lots of people of all ages do.
Or do some still think a woman's virginity is her best quality?
still_one
(92,190 posts)would have been sexual harassment.
However, as the OP said this has nothing to do with Hillary
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Where I work, a few years ago the guy slated to become CEO a few months later was fired for having a sexual relationship with a subordinate. If they'll fire the soon to be CEO, they'll sure as heck will can any other manager for it too.
I hear a story once about a guy that was set to retire in a week. He went to some company dinner event, a big thing, made an inappropriate sexual joke to the audience and was fired before he could retire.
still_one
(92,190 posts)were required to take a course and test on sexual harassment, and what it means
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)Why, oh why, do the Democrats want to ask feminists to vote for a sexual harasser to be the next First Spouse? Is this really the best we as a party can do?
This does have to do with Hillary. A vote for Hillary is a vote for Bill as First Gentleman.
still_one
(92,190 posts)BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)It takes two to tango and Ms. Lewinsky wasn't pressured to do anything.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)to prevent him from having affairs, he wouldn't have had to worry about the GOP.
I defended him passionately at the time, not because I thought it was okay to do what he did, but because it was being USED for political purposes and by some of the most hypocritical creeps on the planet, as Larry Flynt proved and finally shut them up.
But he made it very difficult for those of us who supported him by allowing it to happen.
It's interesting to see people here who no doubt claim to support women, trashing Monica Lewinsky, while grudgingly adding 'and Bill should have been more careful'.
I'm remembering all the other situations like this where we are told that when something like this happens, it's always the man's/boss's fault because of his position of power.
As I said, the hypocrisy of the Right on this was sickening. But hypocrisy isn't confined, we've learned, to them.
Atman
(31,464 posts)Some people have "arrangements." You're only assuming it was cheating. You're assuming Mr. Clinton did something nefarious, yet the Clinton's are still married. They're hippies from the 60's. Oh well, maybe that's just how they roll. I actually know people like this. It happens, even if it's not your cup of tea. It doesn't necessarily mean he "cheated" on Hillary just because you don't like it.
Aside from being the most powerful man on earth, Bill Clinton was tall and handsome. A young girl could be easily seduced.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)that she had a pattern of having sex with her high school and college teachers? Never heard that before.
ProdigalJunkMail
(12,017 posts)because he was an adult and married.
sP
malaise
(269,003 posts)I don't know why people don't think out consequences before they act.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 21, 2015, 01:24 PM - Edit history (1)
nice. The president doesn't seem to be responsible from what I read here. She was the aggressor, she was the slut, boo hoo on her. How about Bill-o keeping it in his pants, not playing on a 25 year old girl to blow him in the oval office. He's a predator who has cheated on his wife since FOREVER and she's the bad guy here. Fuck bill clinton. His wife should have beat his ass for all he has done. Jennifer Flowers onward, he is disgusting.
edited for Mark Foley
Atman
(31,464 posts)I said she knew what she was doing. I never read any account of this story , except your post, wherein Ms. Lewinsky claimed the president forced himself on her.
whathehell
(29,067 posts)She was in love with him. He told her he might "be alone" when he left
the White House and she was actually hoping to marry him.
ND-Dem
(4,571 posts)Older now, I know that it could have happened, if:
a. The boss had come on to me
b. I'd been a different, more Machiavellian person, looking to use the boss for my benefit or advancement
c. I'd been some kind of political operative
Interesting: this man was her stepfather: very connected.
Ronald Peter Straus, who almost never used his first name, was born in Manhattan on Feb. 15, 1923, the son of Nathan Straus Jr. and Helen Sachs Straus. His father, who became director of the United States Housing Authority under President Franklin D. Roosevelt and a New York State senator, bought WMCA in 1943. The company, Straus Communications, later owned many radio stations and newspapers in the Hudson Valley and New Jersey.
Peter had other notable antecedents: his grandfather, Nathan Straus Sr., was a philanthropist who co-owned the R. H. Macy and Abraham & Straus department stores. A great-uncle, Isidor, who went down on the Titanic in 1912, was a congressman and co-owner of Macys; another, Oscar Solomon, was ambassador to the Ottoman Empire and President Theodore Roosevelts secretary of commerce and labor.
After attending the Lincoln, Riverdale Country Day and Loomis schools, Mr. Straus majored in international relations and American government at Yale and graduated in 1943, a year early, under a World War II program. He became a B-17 pilot and flew 35 bombing missions over Germany. After the war he worked in public relations for a time, then joined WMCA as program director in 1948.
In 1950 he married Ellen Louise Sulzberger, a niece of Arthur Hays Sulzberger, publisher of The New York Times. She died in 1995.
Mr. Straus and his second wife, Marcia Lewis, mother of the former White House intern Monica Lewinsky, were married in 1998. They were introduced by a mutual Washington friend in 1997, months before the scandal of Ms. Lewinskys relationship with President Bill Clinton became public in January 1998. Mr. Straus said later that he had met Ms. Lewinsky once or twice, but declined to comment on her or the president, whom he had known for years. Ms. Lewis was divorced from Ms. Lewinskys father, Bernard Lewinsky, a California doctor, in 1987.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/09/business/r-peter-straus-wmca-radio-pioneer-dies-at-89.html?_r=0
still_one
(92,190 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)It may be a delusion, but if so, it's probably a fairly common delusion when it comes to affairs.
Lots of folks confuse sex with romance.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)whathehell
(29,067 posts)Just because HE may have thought of her as nothing more than a sexual plaything,
that's not how she thought of him.
former9thward
(32,006 posts)But I'm guessing you were not an intern to POTUS at that age.
still_one
(92,190 posts)Bill Clinton is a sexual predator, and in some cases if he worked for private enterprise it would be considered sexual harassment
whathehell
(29,067 posts)Maybe you and the rest of the slut-shaming crowd should 'go away'.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)malaise
(269,003 posts)I was on the road most of the day
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)Haven't heard anything on the news lately....
Or is this reverse psychology to bring up her name again? Clever...
Autumn
(45,084 posts)brought her up. I'm not sure why anyone would ever think that malaise brought it up just to stir things up, that's just ridiculous.
Get used to more Monica she's going to be brought up often.
fadedrose
(10,044 posts)haven't been on much, and I thought maybe Monica did something that made the news....I was happy she was getting a new beginning, and now it seems she's had another "ending."
What congressman was it? The only one I've heard about is the guy who charged for gas that he didn't use and took a bunch to see Katy Perry....
Autumn
(45,084 posts)I think she "fell over a desk" if I remember correctly. Monica will never end. She will forever be tied to Bill and Hillary. The media and the republicans will see to that.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Only the second time she's talked in public since the whole thing with Bill.
Rather ironic that the response to her talk on cyberbullying should be, essentially, cyberbullies telling her to be quiet and hide her "shame". Heaven forbid that she do what so many others in life do, learn important lessons from past mistakes and try to pass them on to others.
femmedem
(8,203 posts)Tyler Clementi was a college freshman who committed suicide after being cyberbullied after his roommate secretly videotaped him kissing another man. (I realize you probably know this, but I'm writing it for other DU'ers who don't.)
I found both the OP and most responses extremely disheartening. Thank you for coming to her online defense.
lostnfound
(16,179 posts)I'm happy she's finding a way to take back her own narrative. And there's WAY too much sexism in the attitudes about her personal history. If it was a young man with an attractive well-known female boss, people would say "oh yeah, who could blame him?"
People are SO judgmental. The ONLY third party entitled to have an opinion about what happened between Bill and Monica is Hilary.
Good for Monica for finally pushing back against all of the public crap. I hope she THRIVES. Why not? People suck for judging women solely for their sexual experiences.
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)nt
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)She always has. Her motives back in the day are insignificant. She was a very young woman, somewhat out of her league. She had a path she was forging at a young age that many of us would be proud of our own daughters for. She made a mistake of trusting others and other bad judgments. She also trusted others when she shouldn't have. Something many of us did at her age, we just weren't assertive/lucky enough to get into the position she was in. That mistake changed her life dramatically. It is easy to sit behind a keyboard making judgments. Not one single person here has been in the light as she was, regardless of her role. What happened would take a toll on any of us and have a serious effect on the rest of our lives. Yes, some would have gone a different direction than her.
Shit, we have people here who fawn over Gowdy and the email situation. They just think they are cute by not mentioning how excited Gowdys "find" was for them. Their actions in supporting a nut job and his pathetic witch hunt hurts more than anything Lewinsky is doing. They are the true fools among us.
Lewinsky was young and the event was life changing. I fault her in no way at this point. I wish her the best and I say that as a big Hillary supporter.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)To give her a pass for a mistake when she was young, but clearly she is trying to keep her name out now as it becomes Hillary's time.
She is not acting like she wants to get over it and make a new life.
Correct......go the flip,away!
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)If she can make some bucks off of it, good for her. I also don't see this as "Hillarys time." It is our time. That is what the process is about.
global1
(25,248 posts)Think about such a book coming out during the run-up to 2016 election. She doesn't even have to write it. It could be ghosted by some Repug operatives that depict Hillary behind the scenes during that period (from Monica's viewpoint). Even if not a shred of it would be true - it could be used to further drive Hillary's poll numbers and chances to become President down.
Monica could spend her mid life years a wealthy woman and I'm sure one or more of those Repug donors would pay her mucho dinero to front such a book. Imagine the book tour associated with such a book. There would be a bus of reporters following her from city to city and covering every word she says. Fox News and the RW Radio talk shows would have a field day. MSM would eat this up.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)Why people haven't figured that out is beyond me. People see this kind of stuff for what it is and Hillary always benefits. Always. It is a part of the human psyche. The only ones who will fawn over such a thing are those who already hate her and are immature to boot. All of what you just said will hurt Hillary in no way at all. I really don't get why people haven't figured that out. You can even look at old Bills numbers after Starr got done with him. It works in the Clintons favor every single time. Write away Monica, or ghostwriter. I see know reason why Hillary herself wouldn't financially support such a book.
mainstreetonce
(4,178 posts)She already wrote a book.
Demit
(11,238 posts)Lewinsky is living her own life, or trying to. She has every right to try to reclaim herself. I applaud and support her for doing it. Not everything is about Hillary Clinton.
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)Demit
(11,238 posts)Do you carefully check to make sure that your life isn't interfering with a famous person's?
Besides, if it's all about timing, blame the people who run for president two years before the election. And Clinton hasn't even declared her candidacy yet.
Monica Lewinsky is not owned by the Clinton family. She doesn't owe anything to them.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)840high
(17,196 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)yes she kept quiet all these years and now that hillary is a possible candidate out comes monica . i know the hillary haters are happy about this cause you know why not throw some dirt. the gop is happy cause it's more poop flinging for them to feast on.
Demit
(11,238 posts)And what dirt is supposedly going to fall on her anyway? The dirt of being a cheated-on wife?
I don't know how old you are, but Monica Lewinsky has had a famous name, continuously, since 1998. Anywhere she goes, if people don't recognize her face they recognize the name. She has to live knowing that people know intimate things about her.
I think Hillary Clinton is an old hand at dealing with scandal. She'll be just fine. The Clintons always do just fine. It's the people they encounter along the way who get broken. Monica Lewinsky will never live it down. Anything she can do to make a life, I'm on her side.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Recently and I imagine Monica was questioned about it. I think she has actually conducted herself pretty well since the 90's.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Was able to go on to a successful life.
840high
(17,196 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)quite a few times of the years.
That she is simply using her "youthful exploits" for financial gain and noteriety STILL after all these is disgusting.
Certainly not something I, as a feminist, applaud.
If she were just living her life, we would have stopped hearing anything from her years ago.
Demit
(11,238 posts)I don't know whose phrase "youthful exploits" is, but it's not mine.
And goody for you, being a feminist. It doesn't give you any more authority on the topic than I, (as a feminist! woohoo!) have. You want to ascribe motives to her, fine. You want to think she enjoys being slut-shamed for going on 20 years, fine. I think she's a person, and not just some detail in Hillary Clinton's career.
strawberries
(498 posts)way back when. She did fall in love with Clinton and she did think he was going to leave his wife for her.
Let those of us who have not sinned cast the first stone, because I remember being 22
valerief
(53,235 posts)strawberries
(498 posts)KG
(28,751 posts)he latches onto that symbol of detachment
attracted by the peeling away of feeling
the celebrity of the abused shell, the belle
ooh, western woman, ooh, western girl
ooh, western woman, ooh, western girl
Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)Romeo.lima333
(1,127 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It seems like she's trying to make money off her personal history. That's something politicians and celebrities do everyday. It's arguable that she sustains celebrity status, but it is what it is.
Bill Clinton chose, from the power side of a power asymmetry, to become involved in Lewinsky's personal history. Because of his significance to history that dominates Lewinsky's story and there is no escaping that.
Relative to current politics, HRC is the woman married to Bill Clinton. Period.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I say that as a big Hillary supporter. Hillary uses her past and present every single day to make money, but Monica needs to STFU. Not in my opinion.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)If she wants celebrity stemming from her stupid mistakes back in the day, then she makes herself a target.
She can't have it both ways.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)The more people disparage her (and Bill Clintons complicity) the more money she makes.
Getting her to fade away demands she gets no attention -at all-.
Response to malaise (Original post)
m-lekktor This message was self-deleted by its author.
sendero
(28,552 posts)... your 15 minutes is up. For god's sake have the decency to shut the fuck up about it.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)She has nothing to do with Clinton's chances to get into the WH. If anything, I would think the Clinton people would be jumping for joy. Wouldn't this drum up a bit of sympathy for Hillary.
DefenseLawyer
(11,101 posts)I don't care what she did with the President. That's between the two of them. Any judgment as to it being "right or wrong" as far has his marriage goes is between him and his wife. Of course I'm less judgmental about consensual sex between adults than most.
Skinner
(63,645 posts)The presidential campaign hasn't even started yet. Outside of places like DU, nobody is paying any attention to the presidential candidates from either party. Only the political media and political geeks are paying attention.
Why is this important?
Because EVERY so-called scandal we can dispose of NOW is a scandal that will have much less potency one year from now...
Hillary Clinton's email? OLD NEWS. We thoroughly discussed that way back in March of 2015, and it went nowhere. Nobody cares now.
Monica Lewinsky? OLD NEWS. We thoroughly discussed her when she was doing those TED Talks and getting her picture in Vanity Fair. Nobody cares now.
Columba Bush's spending habits? OLD NEWS. This was a story for five minutes last year and nobody cares now.
Chris Christie is squishy on vaccines? OLD NEWS. He clarified his position long ago and nobody cares now.
Over the next few months, there are going to be MORE of these "scandals" coming out. And you know who is probably feeding them to the media? THE CAMPAIGNS THEMSELVES. They know this stuff is going to come out eventually, and they would rather have to deal with it now, when nobody is paying attention, rather than deal with it in October of 2016.
I say BRING IT ON. The more bullshit non-story "scandals" we can get out of the way now, the better Hillary Clinton will do next year.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)The point of the emails issue being released now well in advance, and those stories breaking in the NY Times, not conservative outlets is a dead giveaway to me. I think Hillary's camp did it, and I think it was smart of them to do so now.
See starting at 5:30
karynnj
(59,503 posts)Imagine if the story would have come out in spring 2014 - and the story was just that the SD had discovered that they did not have all the email. The SD had to comply and stone walling would delay when they called HRC as they said they wanted emails first. Delaying, thus would hurt Clinton.
Instead, you have the story of the SD working with the Clinton people back in early summer 2014 to get the emails -- and simultaneously asking other former Secretaries of State.
In addition to putting out the story when Clinton had already done what was likely to be demanded (other than to give access to the server itself), it shows the State Department working to comply with the Congressional requests.
The fact is as soon as the committee got the emails, they would have noted this odd address. The SD HAD to supply the emails. This let the story come out in the best form possible - in spite of the amount that Clinton loyalists screamed.
The timing is as good for Clinton as any. Spring 2014 would have been bad, later would have been closer to an election and it likely was coming out as soon as SD handed over the emails.
strawberries
(498 posts)will never get old. Monica is with the Clinton's for life.
the other things you mentioned I agree will die out as old news
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)against him in their primary which had the effect you're describing since John McCain used those things though regarding Monica Lewinsky I fail to see in any way at-all as an indictment against Hillary Clinton which is weaker than those guilty by association scandals which were some pretty weak stuff.
I don't disagree at-all with your overall argument and no-doubt they heavily vet themselves & deal with the problematic stuff best they can & the public & media moves on to new things pretty quickly & nobody cares about scandals real or bullshit, especially in how it relates to Monica Lewinsky though the right is pretty good at coming up with bullshit scandals. Whitewater?
Feron
(2,063 posts)Hillary and Monica have a lot in common even if they come from two different walks of life.
Hell just look at the double standard alive in this so-called progressive board.
Bill's great even though he is a womanizer, but Monica is a whore that should be shunned.
Sigh.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)I truly can't believe that the feminist choice in the 2016 election is shaping up to be..... voting to return Bill Clinton to the White House as First Gentleman.
Surely I can find Alice if I keep looking around this rabbit hole.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)them out. They were boys. She does this because THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES wanted her because he could and she's the slut. From Jennifer Flowers to the chick he's probably sleeping with even now, Bill Clinton has the morals of a weasel. He has shamed his wife before the world with his bullshit and his lies but Monica Lewinsky is the slut. Too bad she wasn't a boy and no one would be bad mouthing her now. So it would seem to me comparing the two examples of powerful political men screwing interns.
840high
(17,196 posts)Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)Last edited Fri Mar 20, 2015, 12:52 PM - Edit history (1)
Monica Lewinsky has every right to speak anywhere she is invited.
Many Democrats seem to think that Bill Clinton is the absolutely best person in the country to be the next First Spouse. What's the problem of fully detailing his history to a new generation of voters? Many young voters were not old enough to be paying attention during the blue dress days. They deserve to fully understand the sexual harassment history of the man that the Democrats are asking they vote to be First Gentleman.
ETA: Apologies to malaise, I have edited the top line of my post. I was echoing the first line of the OP, but it was inappropriate.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)But a long time DU'er can't post her feelings about Lewinsky.
No, that ain't right.
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)Hillary is going to use her past to bolster her chances of becoming President.
Very few people can make a living off of the what they have not already done.
MADem
(135,425 posts)I've never seen a spouse's name on the ballot.
Nice insult towards a DUer, there--real classy.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)My own beloved mother voted for GHWBush because she liked Barbara.
When I voted for Obama, I knew that I was also voting for Michelle Obama to become the First Lady, and I was quite pleased about that. Six plus years later and I still have positive feelings about the First Lady and First Grandma and First Daughters, and it's a factor in my positive feelings toward President Obama, in spite of some policy disagreements with him. Michelle has done a great job encouraging American children to eat right and get some exercise, and it's actually shown up in improved childhood obesity stats. Good job, Michelle. And I smile when I see a pic of Sasha in a Tshirt with a big peace sign, or a pic of the First Grandma joining the family at the Christmas tree or the Selma march.
When I vote for Hillary, assuming she's the nominee (and I will), it will be with disgust at the idea of Bill Clinton returning to the White House as first horndog, and no joy at the thought of a couple of hedge fund sharks as first daughter and son-in-law. I'm sure the first grandbaby will be a cutie, though, so there's that.
Bill's involvement with Monica, Burkle, Epstein, etc will be fully and exhaustively detailed for months on end in the run-up to the election. Better get used to it.
p.s. I have edited my first post to remove the line directed at malaise. Apologies to malaise.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I'm pretty sure but I'd have to double-check to be sure.
I imagine Hillary Clinton, if she does run, will have a variation of that for her campaign though not sure this early what the Bill strategy will be but likely I'd expect him to have a very public role though with his exit approval ratings and was comfortable re-election the campaign plus he is her husband so a distancing strategy wouldn't be smart for many reasons but if she does use him as part of her campaign I think it is fair to address topics that relate to him.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Her husband behaved badly, sure, but she stayed dignified and classy throughout. Trying to use this to attack Hillary will be even more counterproductive for the Republicans than impeaching Bill was.
still_one
(92,190 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I know OP was not doing so, but several comments seemed to do that to Monica or Bill or both.
There is plenty of work to do to stop adults from sexually assaulting other adults and children.
There is plenty of work to do to ensure that the LGBT community isn't discriminated against for their consensual relationships.
All that comes before worrying about the morality of individual consensual relationships between adults.
Logical
(22,457 posts)fault 100%. He could of said no. It was his issue not Monica's.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)find a job or a boyfriend.
And now the Democratic party wants to elevate Bill further, and return him to the White House as First Gentleman. This feminist has real trouble with this idea.
Logical
(22,457 posts)Response to malaise (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Response to malaise (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)Response to stevenleser (Reply #92)
Name removed Message auto-removed
FSogol
(45,485 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)I would imagine MIRT is taking a look, since they have a post hidden.
4Q2u2
(1,406 posts)Do they look like buttons.
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Response to FSogol (Reply #105)
Name removed Message auto-removed
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Response to HappyMe (Reply #119)
Name removed Message auto-removed
HappyMe
(20,277 posts)Tell me - which people will be crying when Hillary lowers their government checks?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026391213#post6
FSogol
(45,485 posts)People just shouldn't pick that Name Removed username. Bad stuff happens to them every time!
FSogol
(45,485 posts)HappyMe
(20,277 posts)one of those number dispenser doodads that they have in delis.
NOW SERVING...NUMBER 92!!!
freshwest
(53,661 posts)I predict faster take offs and crashes this time, though.
Autumn
(45,084 posts)LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Your martyrdom is adorable...
Welcome back!
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)messages?
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)trying to paint Hillary as being "insufficient" for Bill, that will backfire badly.
Millions of women will not tolerate seeing a wife faulted for a husband's infidelity.
stone space
(6,498 posts)I'm afraid that I don't follow these sorts of things very closely.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)She gave a Ted Talk about cyber bullying and included her own experiences.
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/03/22/fashion/monica-lewinsky-ted-talk.html?referrer=
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)Mrs Clinton had nothing to do with her husband's epic poor decisions.
Looks as though Monica is now up for sale to republicans to smear the Clintons. I guess she forgot how badly it backfired on the right when the whole thing went down.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I saw it with my own eyes!
MADem
(135,425 posts)I was one of those people that saw a pale blueish white dress with gold trim, not a dark blue dress with black trim!!
Rex
(65,616 posts)to shit like that. Maybe she needed some quick cash. No doubt Linda Tripp will want her cut. Sharks and vultures. Last time I checked, nobody forced her to give Bill a blowjob. Let me check again, yep still the same.
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)This thread is so full of fail.
Rex
(65,616 posts)Thanks for clearing that up.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)Last edited Sat Mar 21, 2015, 01:25 PM - Edit history (1)
much shit when Bill is the predator here, he is the bad guy. Mark Foley was the bad guy when he was screwing interns and none of those boys were stained and tainted FOREVER like her. How is this different? Powerful men screwing interns. The boys get a pass, the girl doesn't. Think about it.
edited mark foley
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)and do the President of the U.S. Just what insane thing were you thinking? Were you going to be the home wrecker of Hillary and Bill? And why NOW that Hilary is on the verge of announcing her candidacy for President? Who's paying you Monica? If you were that demoralized and humiliated, then leave the country. Sometimes ''mistakes'' have consequences that last for an eternity. Monica, go flip some burgers a Burger King .. I'm sure you can ''work'' your way to management in no time.
cali
(114,904 posts)he was literally the most powerful man in the world. he was married. she was 22. The first time she flashed her underwear at him, he should have told some aid to get rid of her
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)She was an ambitious young woman who has paid for her "mistake" by folks who have slut shamed her her entire life while defending Bill. Now, she has a chance to make a little cash again while Bill has reaped MILLIONS despite his "mistake." Good for her.
Go Monica! I plan on watching your tedtalk and while I'm at it, I'll get my teens to watch it, as well.
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)in any case except this one I know where DU would stand, beyond a shadow of a doubt
with the woman who was taken advantage of, not the man, and not the people around that man who slut-shamed her in front of the whole world
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I'm well beyond disgusted at the double standard being displayed here.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)Smells like a huge pile of hypocrisy to me.
And no, Monica won't "goafuggingway" anytime soon. Deal with it, HRC and friends.
UTUSN
(70,695 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Republicans call for the Clinton-server to be investigated by a 'third party'.
IMO, The server was email hacked long ago and someone has juicy personal emails between the Clintons over the blowjob. Republicans need that server 'investigated so someone can leak the emails.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)Mike Nelson
(9,956 posts)...Money!
tavernier
(12,388 posts)She has made a cottage industry out of her affair with the president!!
She's been on every talk show, game show, news show on TV; she has written a book, hawked her homemade purses (ugly, but the free publicity and her notoriety probably earned her a few bucks); she was wined and dined by a few celebrities (I believe she attended the Oscars), and I'm certain more than a few political politicians, since an opportunity never passes to remind the public of the blue dress whenever Hillary's name is even whispered.
Well, go for it Monica! You earned it. The man was a sleaze and "done you wrong". Just please, please don't insult our intelligence by telling us that you are doing this as a public service. Perhaps money isn't crossing your palm, but somewhere there are perks from certain folks who love your perfect timing to revisit your innocent crush... AGAIN.
B Calm
(28,762 posts)cali
(114,904 posts)MrTriumph
(1,720 posts)Maybe many of the posts are angry in tone because people get angry remembering two years of non-stop Bill & Monica. The story consumed the press. It was everywhere. Parents and teachers had the awful task of trying to explain to their kids what headlines and news stories were about. It was an ugly story in so many ways.
Perhaps what we are angriest at the scandal 1) it lessened our government's attention to real problems facing the nation and 2) lessened the cooperation necessary between the executive and legislative branches to solve the pressing problems of the time.
cali
(114,904 posts)1) showed spectacularly bad judgment in boinging a 22 year old aide.
2) lied about it thus bringing us the awful and inevitable investigation.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)I have no idea what she done or said recently but spending the rest of your life as Monica Lewinsky is probably not a very good life at all though my first look at her wiki page details quite a bit she profited from her celebrity status so not too bad but can't imagine that kind of thing is very rewarding though that appears to be mainly at first but I can see why telling her story would be important.
I don't have any judgments, from what I read so far she describes the aftermath or the scapegoat she became not the relationship which she maintains was consensual, does mention the boss angle but he is a President. I think it is legitimate but doesn't make an issue of it, like I said, living the rest of your life as Monica Lewinsky is a life I wouldn't want to imagine.
840high
(17,196 posts)daughter to live a life like she has. I do feel sorry for her.
Response to malaise (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed