General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDo taxpayers REALLY pay for Pub staffer lunches?
Since [CEO Dan Cathy] made his controversial comments, House Republicans have spent nearly $13,000 in taxpayer money ordering Chick-fil-A, according to expenditure reports filed through July 2014 (the latest available). That's the equivalent of 3,900 original chicken sandwiches, and it represents a 37-fold increase over the paltry $345 the House GOP had spent on Chick-fil-A the previous three years. (It also may be an undercount, since some receipts say only "food and beverage" without specifying a source.) Figures for the Senate were not available, but the GOP's campaign arms have been eating "mor chikin" as well: The Republican National Committee has doubled its Chick-fil-A spending, while the National Republican Congressional Committee spends more than 10 times as much as it used to.
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2015/03/19/1371371/-Send-help-Republican-staffers-buried-under-avalanche-of-God-fearing-chicken-sandwiches?detail=email#
WHY? The only time MY lunch was ever paid for was if the boss took me to lunch...RARELY! I don't think the taxpayer should pay for their lunch!
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)And I agree I got a free lunch twice from my boss. First day and a birthday one year. If Congess can't afford to buy their own 5 dollar sandwich then pack a lunch like the rest of us.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)On the one hand that's a lot of chicken sandwiches; on the other hand if want to restrict Congress to only the wealthy we should make it more expensive to serve.
Bryant
alarimer
(16,245 posts)Chik-fil-A really? I guess these people are really nothing but hayseeds.
Washington, DC has a zillion restaurants. Surely they could do better than that.
daredtowork
(3,732 posts)That's a lot of heart attacks from greasy food!
But seriously, congress people are paid a lot compared to average people! I don't see why they get any perks at all.