Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVictorian romance: The GOP’s “Oliver Twist” budget and the comeback of class warfare
Tom Cotton and Ted Cruz call for more prisons and less gruel in Big Capital's Dickensian war against the poorANDREW O'HEHIR
To make sense of the distorted dream world of American politics and its perplexing Lewis Carroll rhetoric, we sometimes have to look beyond familiar categories and recent history. This week, for instance, we get to look clear back to Victorian England, a longtime source of fascination for American conservatives and, at least in its stereotypical form, a cryptic role model for todays Republican Party. The GOPs House and Senate majorities have unveiled their budget proposals, a fantastical and mendacious set of documents worthy of Mr. Bumble, the comic villain and font of incoherent conventional wisdom in Dickens Oliver Twist. Most people will ignore these proposals, for the sensible reason that they will not be enacted. But behind the patriotic-imperial posturing and foreign-policy bluster that have grabbed headlines lately, these imaginary budgets provide a glimpse of the rapacious utopia envisioned by the Koch brothers and their Tea Party-infused ideological mouthpieces, including Tom Cotton, Ted Cruz and Scott Walker foremost among them.
The Kochs and their allies are not conservatives at all, in any traditional meaning of that word. They represent the revolutionary resurgence of Big Capital as a class enlightened, self-aware and devoted to its own interests. If that terminology sounds impossibly old-fashioned, their impossible dream to undo a century and more of welfare-state policies is a throwback as well. When you hear Cotton call for the building of more and more prisons by far the most expensive and least effective means of addressing poverty or declare that food stamps (which feed roughly one in six of his fellow Arkansans) nurture a slothful underclass of criminals and drug addicts, something deeper is at work than the obvious level of dog-whistle racist pandering. He is also channeling the Victorian establishments ideology on poverty, virtually without alteration.
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/03/21/victorian_romance_the_gops_oliver_twist_budget_and_the_comeback_of_class_warfare/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 500 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Victorian romance: The GOP’s “Oliver Twist” budget and the comeback of class warfare (Original Post)
DonViejo
Mar 2015
OP
enlightenment
(8,830 posts)1. Interesting -
once I slogged past the very poorly written first two paragraphs. They left me shaking my head trying to puzzle out what the hell Lewis Carroll had to do with it, since the author feels that Dickens' Mr. Bumble is incoherent (pompous and self-important, I'll grant - but rarely incoherent), and where the "old-fashioned" terminology was located (is it "Big Capital" or "enlightened, self-aware and devoted to its own interests"? None of it seems terribly old-fashioned, but perhaps I'm just showing my age).
Fortunately, it did improve enough that the point he was trying to make could raise its head sufficiently high to be seen, before sinking under the weight of the author's literary aspirations.
Thanks for posting.