Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:42 PM Mar 2015

Study: The U.S. Is an Oligarchy

[center][/center]

A new study by researchers from Princeton and Northwestern Universities finds that America's government policies reflect the wishes of the rich and of powerful interest groups, rather than the wishes of the majority of citizens.

The researchers examined close to 1,800 U.S. policy changes in the years between 1981 and 2002; then, they compared those policy changes with the expressed preferences of the median American, at the 50th percentile of income; with affluent Americans, at the 90th percentile of income; and with the position of powerful interest and lobbying groups.

"The central point that emerges from our research is that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while mass-based interest groups and average citizens have little or no independent influence. Our results provide substantial support for theories of Economic Elite Domination and for theories of Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism...

Recent research by Larry Bartels and by one of the present authors (Gilens), which explicitly brings the preferences of "affluent" Americans into the analysis along with the preferences of those lower in the income distribution, indicates that the apparent connection between public policy and the preferences of the average citizen may indeed be largely or entirely spurious."


The theory of Economic Elite Domination is fairly self-explanatory. The theory of Biased Pluralism holds that policy outcomes "tend to tilt towards the wishes of corporations and business and professional associations." In essence, the researchers found that government policy changes are correlated with the wishes of the wealthy and with interest groups, but not with the wishes of the average American—even though the whole idea of "Democracy" is to ensure that the wishes of the majority tend to carry the day.

The study notes that the position of the median American and the position of the affluent American are often the same; therefore, regular people tend to think that their political interests are being represented when they see the triumph of some political position that they agree with. In fact, the researchers say, this is a mere coincidence. Yes, the average American will see their interests represented—as long as their interests align with the interests of the wealthy.


Source.

Agree or disagree?
19 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
Total Oligarchy...
19 (100%)
Lemme Explain...
0 (0%)
Nah...
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Study: The U.S. Is an Oligarchy (Original Post) Agschmid Mar 2015 OP
Plutocracy with a disaster capitalism economy. Rex Mar 2015 #1
Good explanation. Agschmid Mar 2015 #2
Depressing. Isn't it? salib Mar 2015 #3
While it is true that we have the best democracy money can buy.... chknltl Mar 2015 #4
Maybe a hagiocracy. immoderate Mar 2015 #5
No, its a kleptocracy corkhead Mar 2015 #6
It is? Agschmid Mar 2015 #7
Loosely, in the context of the BFEE and the MIC for example, I would say yes corkhead Mar 2015 #9
K&R. The US is without a doubt an oligarchy. liberal_at_heart Mar 2015 #8
This is a very important thread malaise Mar 2015 #10

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
2. Good explanation.
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:45 PM
Mar 2015

I don't think it's an Oligarchy but I agree it sure isn't a healthy political system.

salib

(2,116 posts)
3. Depressing. Isn't it?
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 08:47 PM
Mar 2015

The only arguments are subtle ones.

Oligarchy is an accurate enough term for me.

chknltl

(10,558 posts)
4. While it is true that we have the best democracy money can buy....
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 09:02 PM
Mar 2015

...we still have the best 'democracy' money can buy. In that statement is the word democracy. We still vote and I believe that when push comes to shove the electorate can be the final arbiter. IMO should enough of the electorate decide that things need to tip away from oligarchy back to democracy, the citizenry can still make it happen via democratic processes. If this were not the case, Senator Sanders would not be researching a run for the Presidency. I am not familiar enough with the workings of a full economic Oligarchy to know if such a system of government can be changed into a democracy but I suspect that it can not. Call me an optimist if you want but as Thom Hartmann is fond of saying: "Despair is not an option!"

Agschmid

(28,749 posts)
7. It is?
Sun Mar 22, 2015, 10:03 PM
Mar 2015
Kleptocracies are generally associated with corrupt forms of authoritarian governments, particularly dictatorships, oligarchies, military juntas, or some other forms of autocratic and nepotist government in which no outside oversight is possible, due to the ability of the kleptocrat(s) to personally control both the supply of public funds and the means of determining their disbursal. Kleptocratic rulers typically treat their country's treasury as though it were their own personal bank account, spending the funds on luxury goods as they see fit. Many kleptocratic rulers also secretly transfer public funds into secret personal numbered bank accounts in foreign countries in order to provide themselves with continued luxury if/when they are eventually removed from power and forced to leave the country.

Kleptocracy is most common in developing countries whose economies are based on the export of natural resources. Such export incomes constitute a form of economic rent and are therefore easier to siphon off without causing the income itself to decrease (for example, due to capital flight as investors pull out to escape the high taxes levied by the kleptocrats).

Kleptocracy, alternatively cleptocracy or kleptarchy, from Greek: ??έ???? (thief) and ??ά??? (rule), is a term applied to a government subject to control fraud that takes advantage of governmental corruption to extend the personal wealth and political power of government officials and the ruling class (collectively, kleptocrats), via the embezzlement of state funds at the expense of the wider population, sometimes without even the pretense of honest service. The term means "rule by thieves". Not an "official" form of government (such as democracy, republic, monarchy, theocracy), the term is a pejorative for governments perceived to have a particularly severe and systemic problem with the selfish misappropriation of public funds by those in power.

corkhead

(6,119 posts)
9. Loosely, in the context of the BFEE and the MIC for example, I would say yes
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:19 AM
Mar 2015
a term applied to a government subject to control fraud that takes advantage of governmental corruption to extend the personal wealth and political power of government officials and the ruling class (collectively, kleptocrats), via the embezzlement of state funds at the expense of the wider population
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Study: The U.S. Is an Oli...