Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:40 AM Mar 2015

There's already a 300+ "live thread" on Cruz' announcement on Free Republic

they're over the moon. convinced he'll win the presidency. Convinced that democrats are terrified of Cruz because he's such a winnah- and lots more delusional thinking.

He's the 2nd coming of you-know-who!

a couple of examples:


Cruz will force everyone to bring their “A” game to the 2016 campaign, on both sides.

Cruz is doing this for America, not necessarily for himself, because someone has to speak the truth.

Because he speaks the truth he has made many enemies, in both parties, and in the White House.

The forces of evil will array against him, and he will need our prayers to intercede for him.

The battle is joined.


My husband and I have created a six-year-old son, a three-year-old daughter, and an 18-month-old daughter. I’m literally crying right now. God, please bless my country. Please bless Cruz! He’s my last hope! I mean this. I fear for my childen.


Ted Cruz is a caucasoid/white.
He is a member of that madeup group, “HISPANIC”, though.
“Hispanics” are of all races, including mixed race and many Cubans are 100% caucasoid.

I’m thrilled!!! He’s always been my #1 pick. And....anyone who trashes him will be labeled a racist because he’s Hispanic. They can dish it out, they better be ready to take it!

.I have to say that such a stroke as that would be epic. A political game-changer. Democrat and GOPe heads would be exploding from sea to shining sea. Could well happen, if some of my sources, usually reliable, are telling me the truth tonight.

You are absolutely correct. A Cruz/Palin ticket would rock the nation. Everyone in America would sent $10 on up and there would be a Huge War Chest. I sincerely hope he makes the announcement and Sarah accepts. Then it's off to the new America! Replenish, Repair and Restore!



64 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
There's already a 300+ "live thread" on Cruz' announcement on Free Republic (Original Post) cali Mar 2015 OP
Delusional is being kind to these people... CherokeeDem Mar 2015 #1
I don't know maxrandb Mar 2015 #9
oh fuck. not this silly stuff. I'm a critic of hers. I HAVE NEVER said cali Mar 2015 #15
Oh, you have run into one of the straw men that Hillary supporters are busily knitting or weaving djean111 Mar 2015 #18
Yeah, that's not going to happen Kelvin Mace Mar 2015 #40
It would rock the nation, but not in the way he thinks jmowreader Mar 2015 #46
even Cruz isn't that dumb. Volaris Mar 2015 #60
Cruz and Palin? Bring. It. On. babylonsister Mar 2015 #2
It's a dream ticket, a sure win! herding cats Mar 2015 #52
That was my favorite. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #54
They'll have the derp vote sewn up. NuclearDem Mar 2015 #64
The FR hamster must be working overtime pinboy3niner Mar 2015 #3
What about Donald Trump? TheCowsCameHome Mar 2015 #4
Freeperville seems to be united. they looove Cruz baby. cali Mar 2015 #5
If he wants some buzz he has toupee Rimjob. nt pinboy3niner Mar 2015 #6
Cruz/Palin? Nah. Cruz/Cotton. Cruz/King. Cruz/Gohmert. Cruz/Cthulhu. Buns_of_Fire Mar 2015 #7
The only Cruz I want is Pablo Cruz n2doc Mar 2015 #20
I can get behind that! :thumbsup: nt Buns_of_Fire Mar 2015 #23
Cthulhu wouldn't want to be on the same ticket with Ted. The Velveteen Ocelot Mar 2015 #58
LOL - they still think Palin is something other than a joke? cyberswede Mar 2015 #8
and we have over 450 maxrandb Mar 2015 #10
nothing like making shit up/ cali Mar 2015 #12
The poster is right Beaverhausen Mar 2015 #14
Your characterization of that post is completely idiotic. Jim Lane Mar 2015 #61
My characterization? Beaverhausen Mar 2015 #62
That's how I understood your post. Jim Lane Mar 2015 #63
Cali -- it's WP. There's now over 465 responses and 310 Recs Hekate Mar 2015 #31
Link please. nt ChisolmTrailDem Mar 2015 #13
Link, as you requested Hekate Mar 2015 #33
I would have guessed more than that. leftofcool Mar 2015 #16
Well then, you better nominate someone else if you feel you need their votes. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Mar 2015 #17
Don't need "their" vote maxrandb Mar 2015 #24
You don't "take our country back" with a status quo candidate. jeff47 Mar 2015 #27
Now it's "depressing the votes of other Democrats"? Seriously? arcane1 Mar 2015 #55
I don't think stating an opinion is "I'll hold my breath until..." cyberswede Mar 2015 #37
Why twist someone's VALID opinion into a child-like, irrational tantrum? arcane1 Mar 2015 #51
"Ted Cruz is a causacoid". Brilliant. n/t LeftinOH Mar 2015 #11
Yep. They have to rationalize voting for a guy that is a little brownish. progressoid Mar 2015 #21
The only brown on Ted Cruz maxrandb Mar 2015 #25
My long-time freeper persona is trolling that thread, hard. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #19
How do you do it? My head explodes reading exerpts! catbyte Mar 2015 #32
Bourbon. nt msanthrope Mar 2015 #41
Too funny! MatthewStLouis Mar 2015 #47
Salute! cyberswede Mar 2015 #38
OMG Mira Mar 2015 #22
LOL Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #26
Cruz/Palin? Be still my heart. Vinca Mar 2015 #28
"caucasoid"? Oh yeah. Winkwink nudgenudge Hekate Mar 2015 #29
It's so pathetic. Just the "Romney Tsunami" was going to obliterate President Obama. catbyte Mar 2015 #30
Free Republic is a great contraindicator. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #34
But what are they saying about Hillary? Capt. Obvious Mar 2015 #35
More evidence of how disconnected these people are from reality. Kelvin Mace Mar 2015 #36
Fascist Eugenicists for Cuban Caucasoids of the 1-percent! Octafish Mar 2015 #39
Jebus on a unicycle juggling fish!!! hifiguy Mar 2015 #42
Wasn't that place suppose to shut down because Mitt Romney got the nom in 2008 LynneSin Mar 2015 #43
LOL! Ted Who? distantearlywarning Mar 2015 #44
Yeah, seriously, "caucasoid" - like reading an anthropology textbook from the 1940s hatrack Mar 2015 #45
Were't these the people that swore Obama couldn't be president because he was Kenyan? Downtown Hound Mar 2015 #48
They are lining up to suck his Canadian bacon Tom Ripley Mar 2015 #49
Cruz / Palin ... I'm LMFAO here. lpbk2713 Mar 2015 #50
Here's the ticket! sheshe2 Mar 2015 #53
Well one can see that in all these years their use of terminology and their spelling hasn't improved notadmblnd Mar 2015 #56
How did she and her husband create a 6 year old? treestar Mar 2015 #57
Everybody send $10........ Historic NY Mar 2015 #59

CherokeeDem

(3,709 posts)
1. Delusional is being kind to these people...
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:45 AM
Mar 2015

This is the line that stood out to me...

A Cruz/Palin ticket would rock the nation.

The idea of this is absolutely frightening to me. I know this would never happen, but to think anyone would consider those two good for the nation, saddens me.

maxrandb

(15,344 posts)
9. I don't know
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:00 AM
Mar 2015

since Hillary did or said something in the past to offend "real" Democrats sensibilities, I'm sure they'll be on this thread in a minute to tell you there's really "no difference between Hillary Clinton and Ted Cruz"....and if we listen to those asshats...the Repukes win and the country loses.

Who the hell would have ever thought this country would elect/select "Dubwa", but hell, I was told at the time that there was "no difference between Bush and Gore"

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
15. oh fuck. not this silly stuff. I'm a critic of hers. I HAVE NEVER said
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:15 AM
Mar 2015

that there's no difference between her and the repuke wingnuts who are running.

I just don't want the corporate hawk Hillary as the nominee.

She's better than the repukes.

she still stinks as a dem presidential nominee.

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
18. Oh, you have run into one of the straw men that Hillary supporters are busily knitting or weaving
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:08 AM
Mar 2015

or whatever. There's a whole bunch of 'em. Don't know what works best on them - matches, a bucket of water, or a good laugh.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
40. Yeah, that's not going to happen
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:42 PM
Mar 2015

Not a HRC fan, but there is one major difference between the two. HRC, for all her faults, is not barking mad.

Volaris

(10,273 posts)
60. even Cruz isn't that dumb.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 07:09 PM
Mar 2015

He's a snake no doubt, but I REALLY am not convinced he believes even half it..
no way he puts her on the ticket Haha

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,791 posts)
54. That was my favorite.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:00 PM
Mar 2015

A perfectly sublime coalition of deranged and stupid.

Would Ted take her on, though? When he was at Harvard Law School he refused even to be in a study group with students who weren't graduates of the top-tier Ivy League colleges. He stood out as an assholish snob at a school that's full of them. Wouldn't he consider dumb-as-a-stump Palin, who sort of graduated only after attending something like six different not-Ivy-League colleges, a bit beneath him?

Or is he cynical enough to want her on the ticket to attract the one-handed, Cheeto-stained typists lurking in parents' basements all over America?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. Freeperville seems to be united. they looove Cruz baby.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:54 AM
Mar 2015

The trumpster has definitely been tossed overboard.

Buns_of_Fire

(17,188 posts)
7. Cruz/Palin? Nah. Cruz/Cotton. Cruz/King. Cruz/Gohmert. Cruz/Cthulhu.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:56 AM
Mar 2015

I've always figured that if you're going to go off the deep end, you might as well go off the DEEPEST PART of the deep end.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,791 posts)
58. Cthulhu wouldn't want to be on the same ticket with Ted.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:06 PM
Mar 2015

Cruz is too evil even for a primal lurker beyond time. I suppose he could check with Hastur the Unspeakable, but I doubt Hastur would return Ted's phone calls. There are lines even the Great Old Ones won't cross.

maxrandb

(15,344 posts)
10. and we have over 450
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:02 AM
Mar 2015

on some idiotic "I'll hold my breath until Hillary's not the nominee" thread here on DU.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
61. Your characterization of that post is completely idiotic.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 12:47 AM
Mar 2015

I agree with cyberswede in #37.

Disclaimer: I don't know if cyberswede would agree with my term "completely idiotic" and it's harsher than I usually use myself -- but already, more than a year before the Democratic National Convention, some of the Clinton supporters have exhausted my patience. Is it really impossible to have a discussion on the merits without silliness like this?

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
63. That's how I understood your post.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 10:09 AM
Mar 2015

In #10, maxrandb said that there was an "idiotic 'I'll hold my breath until Hillary's not the nominee' thread here on DU."

In #12, cali responded to #10 by referring to it as "making shit up".

In #14, you responded to #12 by saying, "The poster is right" and linking to this thread, in which WilliamPitt said, "I do not want Hillary Clinton to be the Democratic nominee."

I interpreted your response to cali as meaning that, in your opinion, "I'll hold my breath until Hillary's not the nominee" was a fair characterization of WilliamPitt's statement. (It's likely that you've identified the thread that maxrandb meant, so that's probably maxrandb's view of it also, but that's not 100% certain, whereas your endorsement of the "hold my breath" language is unambiguous.)

That's my basis for saying that it was your characterization. It wasn't yours originally but you adopted it. If I've misunderstood your post, I apologize, and I'd welcome your explanation of what you actually did mean.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
17. Well then, you better nominate someone else if you feel you need their votes.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 10:44 AM
Mar 2015

And if you don't feel you need their votes, then don't whine if you lose because you wouldn't nominate someone else.

maxrandb

(15,344 posts)
24. Don't need "their" vote
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 01:56 PM
Mar 2015

but it would be nice if they didn't work so hard at depressing the votes of other Democrats.

You may be willing to "die on that hill", but the country can't take one more "shellacking" at the polls in 2016.

We need to pick our battles...and right now, to borrow a phrase from the wingnuts, we need to take our country back.

Our battle should not be with the presumptive Democratic nominee. It should be with the "frickin" asshats that are taking a blowtorch to our unions, our foreign policy, our environment, our civility, our economic prosperity, our social safety net, and our country. These fuckers are still fighting to roll back the New Deal and put St. Ronnie on Mount Rushmore...and they won't stop until they win.

Do we really need to help them in their quest?

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
27. You don't "take our country back" with a status quo candidate.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:16 PM
Mar 2015
These fuckers are still fighting to roll back the New Deal and put St. Ronnie on Mount Rushmore...and they won't stop until they win.

Then perhaps we should stop running candidates that seek common ground with them.
 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
55. Now it's "depressing the votes of other Democrats"? Seriously?
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:00 PM
Mar 2015

You do realize that one can be a Democrat and not like Clinton as a candidate, right. You do realize that? Right? It's not rocket science. Every single person who voted for Obama in the primaries did it.

I know the new marching orders are "discredit anyone who isn't a Clinton Cheerleader, whatever it takes" but a little subtlety can go a long way

cyberswede

(26,117 posts)
37. I don't think stating an opinion is "I'll hold my breath until..."
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:34 PM
Mar 2015

He's just stating that he doesn't want her to be the nominee. The post isn't nasty and only discusses her positions/votes (as opposed to attacking her).

(disclaimer: I didn't see the thread till someone linked to it below, since I have that poster on ignore)

 

arcane1

(38,613 posts)
51. Why twist someone's VALID opinion into a child-like, irrational tantrum?
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 05:55 PM
Mar 2015

Whose side are you on? I wonder...

Mira

(22,380 posts)
22. OMG
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 12:03 PM
Mar 2015

I'm not so often exposed to the delusional and willfully ignorant thinking...
It blows my mind every time.
Off to gather it and try to recover...........

catbyte

(34,416 posts)
30. It's so pathetic. Just the "Romney Tsunami" was going to obliterate President Obama.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:23 PM
Mar 2015

Delusion is the order of the day with them.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
34. Free Republic is a great contraindicator.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:26 PM
Mar 2015

The more they like a candidate the worse he or she eventually does.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
36. More evidence of how disconnected these people are from reality.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:28 PM
Mar 2015

I hope they get their wish. It would be amusing to watch them lose.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
39. Fascist Eugenicists for Cuban Caucasoids of the 1-percent!
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 02:37 PM
Mar 2015

Ted Cruz is a caucasoid/white.
He is a member of that madeup group, “HISPANIC”, though.
“Hispanics” are of all races, including mixed race and many Cubans are 100% caucasoid.

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
42. Jebus on a unicycle juggling fish!!!
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 03:04 PM
Mar 2015

"You are absolutely correct. A Cruz/Palin ticket would rock the nation. Everyone in America would sent $10 on up and there would be a Huge War Chest. I sincerely hope he makes the announcement and Sarah accepts. Then it's off to the new America! Replenish, Repair and Restore!"

And these people are allowed to run around loose and unmedicated?? Don't know whether to or . Think I will go with for the time being. "Good evening everybody, and now it's time to play Spot The Looney!"


LynneSin

(95,337 posts)
43. Wasn't that place suppose to shut down because Mitt Romney got the nom in 2008
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 03:06 PM
Mar 2015

I mean owner Jim Robinson swore up and down that if Mitt Romney or Rudy Guiliani got the nomination in 2008 then he would shut down the Free Republic.

We are still waiting!

Downtown Hound

(12,618 posts)
48. Were't these the people that swore Obama couldn't be president because he was Kenyan?
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 05:41 PM
Mar 2015

Ho, freepers are hypocrites, if only we'd known that.

lpbk2713

(42,763 posts)
50. Cruz / Palin ... I'm LMFAO here.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 05:46 PM
Mar 2015



Anyone want to start a raffle? At what point would The Quitter bail out on him?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
56. Well one can see that in all these years their use of terminology and their spelling hasn't improved
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:02 PM
Mar 2015

Did anyone ask the poster to specify exactly how "the forces of evil will ARRAY against him"?

Historic NY

(37,452 posts)
59. Everybody send $10........
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 06:25 PM
Mar 2015
f--king clueless on just how many people vote and how many will vote for this Putz.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»There's already a 300+ &...