Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:00 PM Mar 2015

Hillary Clinton: The United States needs solutions to income inequality

WASHINGTON (AP) — Approaching a likely presidential campaign announcement next month, Hillary Rodham Clinton said Monday that income inequality and wage stagnation are problems that go hand-in-hand and the nation needs creative solutions to bolster job opportunities and living conditions in the cities.

Clinton, at a discussion about urban areas, cited the benefits of partnerships between the private and public sectors and updated policies to improve social mobility. The policy event offered a preview of economic themes she is likely to address in a campaign.

"We need to think hard about what we're going to do now that people are moving back into and staying in cities to make sure that our cities are not just places of economic prosperity and job creation on average," Clinton said. "But do it in a way that lifts everybody up to deal with the overriding issues of inequality and lack of mobility."

Her appearance at the Center for American Progress, a Democratic think tank founded by allies of her husband, former President Bill Clinton, offered no new clues on the timing of her announcement, but plenty of presidential atmospherics. Clinton was joined by Housing Secretary Julian Castro, considered a potential running mate for Clinton by some Democrats, and the heads of a public workers union and teachers union, two of Clinton's most ardent labor allies.

http://news.yahoo.com/clinton-us-needs-solutions-income-inequality-153435808--election.html

121 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton: The United States needs solutions to income inequality (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 OP
As I wrote earlier, she's deadly serious about MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #1
I trust you are more efficacious at your day job./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #7
Tres drole! MannyGoldstein Mar 2015 #10
Being the plebe I am I never had the opportunity to learn French. DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #11
What did Hillary actually say in that address? 'We NEED solutions' 'We need to do them in sabrina 1 Mar 2015 #58
Another Sociopath on the way to the white house. imthevicar Mar 2015 #88
"Sociopath" ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #89
What, That I have Feelings. imthevicar Mar 2015 #116
Yeah ... Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #117
Yes, she, Her Husband, and anyone who seeks power as they do, or wishes and Manipulates for war. imthevicar Mar 2015 #119
Yeah, okay .. 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #120
This is fun! imthevicar Mar 2015 #121
Center for Economic Policy Research: Hillary's TPP will cut wages of 90% of American workers. woo me with science Mar 2015 #2
What part of TTP do you dislike most? Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #4
Hillary's assaults on American jobs and wages extend even beyond the vicious TPP. woo me with science Mar 2015 #14
And let's not forget the secrecy with which this . . . . treaty is being negotiated hatrack Mar 2015 #15
+100000 The secrecy and lies are beyond insulting. They should ENRAGE every American. woo me with science Mar 2015 #18
Interesting, since this is being negotiated in private it will be interesting to see if all the Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #19
so very many things about it are bad from the cali Mar 2015 #26
Did not find ISDS except independent school districts in Texas. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #29
Investor-State Dispute Settlement. And funny, I type it in and that the first cali Mar 2015 #31
I do not normally use google as a search engine. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #32
Time is exactly what they don't want to give us starroute Mar 2015 #39
As I state again I will reserve my opinion when the treaty is formally produced. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #48
Then you must support it ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #92
Do not rewrite my post, if I supported it I can say I do, if I don't support it I can say so. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #93
I apologize ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #94
I understand, they are running out making opinions as tge RW did about Obamacare. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #95
Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #101
Wish i could say you are wrong. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #104
All the parts that have been agreed to! n/t 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #90
actually it is barack obama's TPP....and his wars as well nt msongs Mar 2015 #21
Good god. woo me with science Mar 2015 #23
Hawk Friedmanite Republican, Theo-Neo-Fascist, Libertarian, Eventually .001% of the vote candidate. HughBeaumont Mar 2015 #34
Thank you woo. I was wondering about income inequality and TPP. midnight Mar 2015 #91
The road bed is getting laid, a few things at a time, sounds good. Thinkingabout Mar 2015 #3
One of Bill Clinton's first acts was to increase the income tax rate on the 1% by 8.6%. Nye Bevan Mar 2015 #5
And he ushered in the longest economic expansion in the history of the republic./NT DemocratSinceBirth Mar 2015 #8
And my colleagues lost our jobs due to outsourcing and Nafta. Phlem Mar 2015 #35
Actually the tech boom did that. Fearless Mar 2015 #37
I suppose but economic expansion's have consequences his was welfare reform azurnoir Mar 2015 #38
Hillary has a great remedy for that problem we face Oilwellian Mar 2015 #6
+100000 Hillary=More Third Way predatory policies woo me with science Mar 2015 #9
Please put this in your journal and/or create a new OP. NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #24
The United States needs solutions to income inequality......... Bonhomme Richard Mar 2015 #12
Comedy MFrohike Mar 2015 #13
Maybe we could work some charter schools into the mix too . . . hatrack Mar 2015 #16
Clinton Foundation will broker the deal for a generous percentage! Divernan Mar 2015 #82
How praytell do expanded H1-B visas and passage of TPP provide solutions to income inequality? nt kelly1mm Mar 2015 #17
Maybe she'll get us all positions at CGI so we can get lucrative foreign contracts. Nuclear Unicorn Mar 2015 #86
exactly. HRC: "Outsourcing will continue..." antigop Mar 2015 #87
* L0oniX Mar 2015 #20
Thank Occupy for that RobertEarl Mar 2015 #22
Mouthing general rhetoric while steadfastly and concurrently pushing fascism isn't playing along. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #96
True RobertEarl Mar 2015 #98
Gotcha, right on. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #99
"income inequality and wage stagnation are problems that go hand-in-hand"??? NYC_SKP Mar 2015 #25
It's a good sign that she is discussing income inequality Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #27
Oh, wow, she feels our pain. closeupready Mar 2015 #28
I'll take her seriously when moondust Mar 2015 #30
That was sweet. NOW give us some specifics of how you are going to achieve this goal? You are jwirr Mar 2015 #33
The moment is ripe Hillary........wait Phlem Mar 2015 #36
She has never talked about income inequality before!!!! NCTraveler Mar 2015 #42
Right, because that's exactly what I said. Phlem Mar 2015 #44
"But yes since your running for POTUS let's bring it up now." NCTraveler Mar 2015 #50
As I suspected. Phlem Mar 2015 #55
Content-free rhetoric starroute Mar 2015 #40
Love Hillary Talking About All Of The Important Issues We Face. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #41
Yes please, Go Hillary. Phlem Mar 2015 #46
She is here to stay. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #53
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,!!! Phlem Mar 2015 #56
Clearly you need three more ha ha's.... NCTraveler Mar 2015 #61
I don't want solidarity with you at all. Phlem Mar 2015 #64
I am a part of the Hillary, Warren, Sanders, Nelson, etc. crowd. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #67
Hillary, Warren, Sanders, Nelson Phlem Mar 2015 #69
Please, tell me which one doesn't belong. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #71
That is exactly the problem. Phlem Mar 2015 #72
As I suspected. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #73
ooooo Phlem Mar 2015 #74
Going to tell me which one doesn't fit? NCTraveler Mar 2015 #76
What fucking claim? Your just babbling thinking Phlem Mar 2015 #78
Seems like things are flying by you. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #79
Oh OK then. Phlem Mar 2015 #80
Hint. They are all good democrats. Every one of them. NCTraveler Mar 2015 #81
The ha ha's!!?? Phlem Mar 2015 #85
Looks like two and two to me. Two at least moderates and two conservatives. TheKentuckian Mar 2015 #97
I know Phlem Mar 2015 #108
Tax the rich. Orsino Mar 2015 #43
^ Well that's not going to work. TBF Mar 2015 #45
This would require new legislation that would have to pass a GOPer controlled Congress Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #47
They will never pass anything like that... Orsino Mar 2015 #49
So when would they pass something like that? Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #54
Right after enough of us demand it. Orsino Mar 2015 #57
Face it... Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #60
You think no partial or temporary tax hikes are possible? Orsino Mar 2015 #62
Even partial or temporary tax hikes would require new leglsiation Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #63
GOTV is stalling. Orsino Mar 2015 #65
Lobbying the GOP is not going to work Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #68
Lobbying works. Orsino Mar 2015 #70
Can you explain to me how you're going to get people like Ted Cruz to raise taxes on the wealthy? Cali_Democrat Mar 2015 #75
Yes, I think it's possible. Orsino Mar 2015 #77
I think you have it backwards: winter is coming Mar 2015 #83
We can relate to the Clintons Capt. Obvious Mar 2015 #51
Till Clinton Foundation expediter's fees brought in millions. Divernan Mar 2015 #84
DU rec for pissing off all the right people... SidDithers Mar 2015 #52
Funny ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #102
You know what else? Funny how she's got 50 bazillion fiscal advisers, and she's like, 'who me?' closeupready Mar 2015 #59
Yes ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #103
Um ... what? Can you just speak English? Do you want a President, or a poker player? closeupready Mar 2015 #105
My Too Darn Smartphone ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #106
I thought that was an 'urban' reference to something else, lol. Anyway, closeupready Mar 2015 #109
And my original response stands ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #110
Okay, well, we'll see how things unfold. closeupready Mar 2015 #111
Wow....that's really going to draw voters to the Polls for Dems... Such enthusiasm! KoKo Mar 2015 #66
Serious Question ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #107
Restore the tax rate on the wealthy to where it used to be 70%. on point Mar 2015 #112
Is this true? Or, is that ... 1StrongBlackMan Mar 2015 #113
It is true if she made it a policy to pursue, and not a sound bite. on point Mar 2015 #114
There are. You've rejected them all. n/t lumberjack_jeff Mar 2015 #100
You want a solution? Make it so the bigger the gap the higher the income tax for the wealthy. cstanleytech Mar 2015 #115
If I thought she really cared... CrispyQ Mar 2015 #118

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,714 posts)
11. Being the plebe I am I never had the opportunity to learn French.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:31 PM
Mar 2015

That's why I deign or rise to post here, depending on one's perspective , to bask in the glow of the privileged.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
58. What did Hillary actually say in that address? 'We NEED solutions' 'We need to do them in
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:57 PM
Mar 2015

creative ways'.

WE know that. I didn't hear anything other than telling us what we 'need'.

Compare that speech to eg, any one of FDR's speeches addressing similar issues.

First he acknowledges what people surely knew, followed almost immediately with well-thought out solutions which he then managed to force Congress into implementing.

Whenever I hear a politician say 'we need ..... ' not followed by what should be the most important part of any speech, it sounds like rhetoric to me.

Her reference to 'public and private' funds, worries me a lot. And should worry any Democrat since that is a Heritage Foundation policy, for Public Funds to be taken over by Private Institutions.

Public funds should not be controlled by any Private institution. We've seen what happens to them when they are.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
89. "Sociopath" ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 08:31 AM
Mar 2015

It you sure that you are on the correct board?

BTW ... Such comments say way more about you than about the presumed candidate.

 

imthevicar

(811 posts)
116. What, That I have Feelings.
Thu Mar 26, 2015, 08:36 AM
Mar 2015

That I have always cared about the plight of the working man/woman? well yes.

 

imthevicar

(811 posts)
119. Yes, she, Her Husband, and anyone who seeks power as they do, or wishes and Manipulates for war.
Fri Mar 27, 2015, 04:36 AM
Mar 2015

Even though they can’t treat psychopaths effectively with therapy, it doesn’t mean we can’t protect ourselves, the most important factor in keeping psychopaths at bay is to know your vulnerabilities. We need to realize our own potential and maximize our strengths so that our insecurities don’t overcome us. Because, a psychopath is a chameleon who becomes an image of what you haven’t done for yourself. Over time, their appearance of perfection will begin to crack, but by that time you will have been emotionally and perhaps financially scathed. There comes a time when you realize there’s no point in searching for answers; the only thing is to move on.


Glibness and Superficial Charm

Manipulative and Conning
They never recognize the rights of others and see their self-serving behaviors as permissible. They appear to be charming, yet are covertly hostile and domineering, seeing their victim as merely an instrument to be used. They may dominate and humiliate their victims.

Pathological Lying
Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis. Can create, and get caught up in, a complex belief about their own powers and abilities. Extremely convincing and even able to pass lie detector tests.
Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. Instead of friends, they have victims and accomplices who end up as victims. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.

Callousness/Lack of Empathy
Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.
Believe they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no sense of personal boundaries, no concern for their
impact on others.


Irresponsibility/Unreliability
Not concerned about wrecking others' lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.

Lack of Realistic Life Plan/Parasitic Lifestyle
Tends to move around a lot or makes all encompassing promises for the future, poor work ethic but exploits others effectively.


Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility
Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily.

Psychopaths have only a shallow range of emotions and lack guilt, says Hare. They often see themselves as victims, and lack remorse or the ability to empathize with others. Psychopaths play on the fact that most of us are trusting and forgiving people, The warning signs are always there; it’s just difficult to see them because once we trust someone, the friendship becomes a blinder.

Source: http://chericola57.tripod.com/infinite.html

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
2. Center for Economic Policy Research: Hillary's TPP will cut wages of 90% of American workers.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:08 PM
Mar 2015

[font size=3]Spare the insulting, lying Third Way rhetoric, Hillary. Your predatory TPP will slash jobs and cut wages. [/font size]




[font size=3]Hillary's TPP will mean a pay cut for 90 percent of American workers.
[/font size]
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023661805

The verdict is in: most U.S. workers would see wage losses as a result of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a sweeping U.S. "free trade" deal under negotiation with 11 Pacific Rim countries. That's the conclusion of a report just released by the non-partisan Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR).



One cannot simultaneously want the TPP and economic justice for the 99%
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4318351

One cannot simultaneously want the TPP and economic justice for the 99% [View all]

They are violently mutually exclusive.

They absolutely know it's awful for the already-eviscerated 99%, otherwise they wouldn't hide behind an unprecedented veil of secrecy. They are sociopaths.

Wake up! We are being disembowled by sick, sick people. If we don't fight back, and quick, we will be dinner.


Hillary Clinton's leading role in drafting the TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101667554

Hillary Clinton and Trade Deals: That “Giant Sucking Sound”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016101761




[font size=3]No more Third Way corporatists and warmongers, period. We need a real Democrat this time.


[/font size] [/font color]









woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
14. Hillary's assaults on American jobs and wages extend even beyond the vicious TPP.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:03 PM
Mar 2015
[font color=red]Do not engage Third Way attempts at deflection:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5767160
[/font color]


[font size=3]The nonpartisan Center for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) has already concluded that Hillary's TPP will be a vicious assault on the jobs and wages of the vast majority of American workers. Fully NINETY PERCENT of American workers will see a pay cut as a result of this axe to the throat of the American worker, and that is not even counting the jobs that will be lost altogether.

But Hillary is not even stopping there. She is also pushing for predatory increases in H1B visas that take jobs from Americans:

Hillary pushes for increases in H1B visas and outsourcing.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6405669


Reject Third Way lies. Watch the policies, not the pretty rhetoric.

This is the stunning level of corruption and dishonesty we have come to expect from corporate politicians like Hillary, who LIE TO OUR FACES claiming to care about income inequality while simultaneously supporting and even AUTHORING major policies that take a sledgehammer to American jobs, wages, and futures.
[/font size]

[font color=red]
Do not engage Third Way deflection, diversion, and propaganda:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=5767160
[/font color]

hatrack

(59,593 posts)
15. And let's not forget the secrecy with which this . . . . treaty is being negotiated
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:10 PM
Mar 2015

Oh yeah, "democracy" is just as beautifully exemplified by the negotiations for TPP as Mrs. Clinton's deep, deep concern for "income inequality" is in this steaming pile of a speech.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
18. +100000 The secrecy and lies are beyond insulting. They should ENRAGE every American.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:22 PM
Mar 2015

We have had enough of corporate predators in Democrat suits.

We have had enough of Third Way secrecy and lies.

Bait and switch is the corporate MO, as we have learned well in recent years. Corporate Republicans and Third Way "Democrats" are liars and predators. The Third Way has NEVER been a grass roots movement in our party. They are a Wall Street-funded, deliberate infiltration of our party by corporate predators, working with corporatist Republicans to usher in the dismantling of our democracy itself.

Hillary is an author of the antidemocratic TPP, a cozy war profiteering buddy of Kissinger, and the Kevin Bacon of Wall Street, with close connections to virtually every corporate predator in the .1 percent.

Creepy interactive graphic of Hillary Clinton's connections
to the Forbes top 400

http://www.forbes.com/sites/carolinehoward/2013/10/30/one-degree-of-hillary-how-clinton-is-connected-to-the-worlds-most-powerful/
(Load the link twice if necessary.)


This nation cannot endure four more years of predatory corporatism and warmongering.




Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
19. Interesting, since this is being negotiated in private it will be interesting to see if all the
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 09:29 PM
Mar 2015

Hillary statements will actually be in the final treaty.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
26. so very many things about it are bad from the
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:28 PM
Mar 2015

intellectual property chapter which expands corporate rights and diminishes the rights of consumers to the ISDS. I really hate the ISDS. It's been used HORRIFICALLY under other trade deals.

Oh, you don't know what the ISDS is? Look it up. From your question, I'm assuming you actually know something about the TPP.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
31. Investor-State Dispute Settlement. And funny, I type it in and that the first
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 06:42 AM
Mar 2015

thing that comes up on google.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
32. I do not normally use google as a search engine.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:06 AM
Mar 2015

I did read the information and of course it mentioned NAFtA many times but since the TPP is negotiated in secret I am withholding my opinion. Leaks are not always reliable but time will tell.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
39. Time is exactly what they don't want to give us
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:11 PM
Mar 2015

That's the whole point of fast-track authority. It's about pushing this thing through with no amendments allowed, limited time for Congressional debate, and not enough room for the public to absorb it and digest its implications and weigh in on the discussion.

Leaks are all we have at this point -- and though they don't represent final versions, nobody's disputing their accuracy.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
48. As I state again I will reserve my opinion when the treaty is formally produced.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:37 PM
Mar 2015

Leaks are not always accurate and just as in the case of the ACA, the GOP had many statements about it which was not true and they had the documents, as you can see there are some who wants to deliver information they want others to believe, I would rather go with the truth.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
92. Then you must support it ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 08:41 AM
Mar 2015

Because universe knows the loudest voices on this message board have a proven record with their predictions and speculation.

Even where they post link upon link of analysis, they are proven wrong by reality.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
93. Do not rewrite my post, if I supported it I can say I do, if I don't support it I can say so.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 10:33 AM
Mar 2015

I have the right to wait until the contents are released before I make my decision, again I am waiting until the contents are released before I make my decision. I do not have any concern about the loudest voices and their predictions and speculations.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
94. I apologize ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 01:24 PM
Mar 2015

I should have inserted the sarcasm thingy!

Though I have yet to state an opinion on the TPP, other than to state I cannot form an opinion on something that isn't at this point, I have been called all kinds of "vile" names and cast as feeding on the flesh of the American worker, for merely pointing out that TPP is still being negotiated and that the US negotiating Objectives are inconsistent with the analysis that the anti-TPP crowd uses.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
95. I understand, they are running out making opinions as tge RW did about Obamacare.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 01:45 PM
Mar 2015

Until the final is out they are jumping into the same pool as RWers.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
101. Yep ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:06 PM
Mar 2015

Same fear-mongering, same opinion passing as concluded fact; but more, same brow-beating for non-compliancy.

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
23. Good god.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:19 PM
Mar 2015

1. I will grant you that Barack and Hillary BOTH love the TPP. They are two Third Way peas in a pod that way. However, it is flat out disingenuous to try to deny Hillary's major role in drafting this piece of predatory shit:

Hillary Clinton's leading role in drafting the TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101667554


2. That's almost as absurd as trying to suggest that she does not run to the right even of Obama on warmongering policy:

The Warmongering Record of Hillary Clinton "I urged him to bomb..."
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026219783

Hillary Clinton criticizes Obama's foreign policy 'failure'; strongly defends Israel
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014867136

Hillary defends Israel on Gaza carpet bombing
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025274041

Hillary tacks right of Obama on foreign policy.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024707589

Dissecting Hillary Clinton's Neocon Talking Points - Atlantic Interview
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017209519

NYTimes notices Hillary's natural affinity toward the neocons.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025205645

Hillary Clinton, the unrepentant hawk
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024876898

Hillary Clinton Praises George W. Bush and the Art of Compromise
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026394878

Hillary Clinton's role in right-wing Honduran coup and aftermath
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025601610#post29

Hillary Clinton's Horrifying Iraq War Vote Still Matters.
http://nationalinterest.org/commentary/hillary-clintons-iraq-war-vote-still-matters-9737

Secret recordings show US military and a Democratic congressman distrusted Hillary Clinton on Libya (lying, manipulating intelligence)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026157088

Hillary Clinton Blasts ‘Unfair’ World Reaction Over Gaza, Cites Anti-Semitism As Factor
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025364869

Obama didn't go as far as Hillary now says she wanted to go in smashing Syria
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251375376

Hand in Hand With Kissinger: A Review of Hillary Clinton’s Review
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016102317

Hillary Clinton Serves Us KISSINGER KOOL-AID
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025504036

MJ - Hillary Clinton Praises a Guy With Lots of Blood on His Hands
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025493748






















HughBeaumont

(24,461 posts)
34. Hawk Friedmanite Republican, Theo-Neo-Fascist, Libertarian, Eventually .001% of the vote candidate.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:49 AM
Mar 2015

AWESOME menu, UhMerica.

When are we going to start taking elections seriously in this country?

Is GOTV worth it if all the candidates inevitably suck?

midnight

(26,624 posts)
91. Thank you woo. I was wondering about income inequality and TPP.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 08:36 AM
Mar 2015

Now I understand that most of the secrets are unknown, but the free trade movement is just as bad as right to work movement.

Nye Bevan

(25,406 posts)
5. One of Bill Clinton's first acts was to increase the income tax rate on the 1% by 8.6%.
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:10 PM
Mar 2015

Perhaps Hillary will do something similar.

azurnoir

(45,850 posts)
38. I suppose but economic expansion's have consequences his was welfare reform
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:53 PM
Mar 2015

an act which provide low level employers like walmart mikeyd's and whole host of others with a forever supply of near slave labor

maybe you don't remember but I do just prior to that 'reform' those same employers were having to offer their prospective employees all kinds of stuff they never had before like paid holidays and higher wages in some cases higher than they maybe now at least in the case of fast food places in my area

woo me with science

(32,139 posts)
9. +100000 Hillary=More Third Way predatory policies
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:25 PM
Mar 2015

Thank you. Watch the actual policies they support, not the pretty rhetoric.

Nothing is more important than stopping Hillary or any other Third Way corporatist in a Democrat suit from being shoved down our throats as the Democratic nominee in 2016.

Corporate Republicans and the corporate Third Way are not just another flavor of politician within an essentially functioning representative government. They are building perpetual war, a police and surveillance state, and using our own laws and intelligence agencies to empower corporations over the will of the American people to dismantle democracy itself.



Hillary Clinton's leading role in drafting the TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101667554

Hillary Clinton and Trade Deals: That “Giant Sucking Sound”
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016101761

Hillary Clinton Cheerleads for Biotech and GMOs
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112772326

Dissecting Hillary Clinton's Neocon Talking Points - Atlantic Interview
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017209519

NYTimes notices Hillary's natural affinity toward the neocons.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025205645

Hillary Clinton, the unrepentant hawk
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024876898

More from Hillary Clinton's State Department: The fascistic TISA (Trade in Services Agreement)
http://m.thenation.com/blog/180572-grassroots-labor-uprising-your-bank

How Hillary Clinton's State Department sold fracking to the world
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251376647

Hillary Clinton Sides with NSA over Snowden Disclosures
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101695441

On the NSA, Hillary Clinton Is Either a Fool or a Liar
http://m.thenation.com/article/180564-nsa-hillary-clinton-either-fool-or-liar

Corporate Warfare: Hillary Clinton admits role in Honduran coup aftermath
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025601610#post29

The Bill and Hillary Clinton Money Machine Taps Corporate Cash
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025189257

Hillary's Privatization Plan: TISA kept more secret than the TPP
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014829628

Hillary Clinton criticizes Obama's foreign policy 'failure'; strongly defends Israel
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014867136

Some of Hillary Clinton's statements on Social Security.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024379279

Hillary Clinton's GOLDMAN SACHS PROBLEM.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025049343

Ring of Fire: Hillary Clinton - The Perfect Republican Candidate
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017209285

How Americans Need Answers From Hillary Clinton On TPP, KXL, Wall St & More
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017181611

Hillary Clinton Left Out By Liberal Donor Club
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025809071

Why Wall Street Loves Hillary
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016106575

Hillary Clinton: Neocon-lite
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101684986

Interactive graphic of Hillary Clinton's connections to the Forbes top 400 (Follow link in post)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025824981#post9



MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
13. Comedy
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 08:58 PM
Mar 2015

Public-private partnerships? Well, we could try selling all the revenues from parking meters to a private company for 75 years for a fraction of the income stream. I can't see how that would ever fail.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
82. Clinton Foundation will broker the deal for a generous percentage!
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 05:32 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Wed Mar 25, 2015, 08:42 AM - Edit history (2)

The Clinton Foundation's theme song should be Les Miserables' Master of the House.

Master of the house
Doling out the charm
Ready with a handshake
And an open palm
Tells a saucy tale
Makes a little stir
1 percent appreciates a bon-viveur
Glad to do a friend a favor
Doesn't cost me to be nice
But nothing gets you nothing
Everything has got a little price!

Master of the house
Keeper of the zoo
Ready to relieve 'em
Of a $mil or two
Skimming off the top
Making up the weight
Pickin' up their knick-knacks
When they can't see straight
Everybody loves a landlord
Everybody's bosom friend
I do whatever pleases
Jesus! Won't I bleed 'em in the end!

Residents are more than welcome
Bridal suite is occupied
Reasonable charges
Plus some little extras on the side!

Charge 'em for the lice
Extra for the mice
Two percent for looking in the mirror twice
Here a little slice
There a little cut
Three percent for sleeping with the window shut
When it comes to fixing prices
There are a lot of tricks he knows
How it all increases
All those bits and pieces
Jesus! It's amazing how it grows!

antigop

(12,778 posts)
87. exactly. HRC: "Outsourcing will continue..."
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 08:35 PM
Mar 2015
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/07/AR2007090702780.html

When Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton flew to New Delhi to meet with Indian business leaders in 2005, she offered a blunt assessment of the loss of American jobs across the Pacific. "There is no way to legislate against reality," she declared. "Outsourcing will continue. . . . We are not against all outsourcing; we are not in favor of putting up fences."



So which outsourcing IS she against? And who is "we"? The DLC/Third Way/Corporate Dems?
 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
22. Thank Occupy for that
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:10 PM
Mar 2015

It was Occupy Wall Street that got that ball rolling, and now even the Clintons are playing along.

TheKentuckian

(25,029 posts)
96. Mouthing general rhetoric while steadfastly and concurrently pushing fascism isn't playing along.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 01:59 PM
Mar 2015

It is selling snake oil to marks to get more power.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
98. True
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 02:17 PM
Mar 2015

That is why I say the Clints are playing... didn't say fighting for, did I?

My point is to make sure folks realize how much impact Occupy has had. It's a shame Occupy wasn't embraced by many more, but then as long as the bank cashes your paycheck, what is there to worry about?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
25. "income inequality and wage stagnation are problems that go hand-in-hand"???
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:25 PM
Mar 2015

Also, water is wet.

Then this: "But do it in a way that lifts everybody up to deal with the overriding issues of inequality and lack of mobility."

It sounds disturbingly like "a rising tide lifts all boats".

She ignores a basic principal of economics: "zero sum". you can't lift all boats, you can't lift everybody up.

To improved the lives of the dispossessed, you have to shift wealth.

You'll never hear it from her.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
27. It's a good sign that she is discussing income inequality
Mon Mar 23, 2015, 11:31 PM
Mar 2015

Right now I'm pretty undecided about who I'll support in 2016.

We need as many people talking about this as possible so we can all work together to develop solutions.

The more people we have discussing income inequality, the better!

moondust

(20,006 posts)
30. I'll take her seriously when
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:19 AM
Mar 2015

she starts devoting those $200,000 speeches at Goldman-Sachs to the subject.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
33. That was sweet. NOW give us some specifics of how you are going to achieve this goal? You are
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:38 AM
Mar 2015

not going to convince voters without specifics this time Hillary. We want to be in on the plan. No secret deals.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
36. The moment is ripe Hillary........wait
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 11:41 AM
Mar 2015

The moment is more than ripe, it's passed it's due date. The moment has gone from bad to worse, it's a rotten pile of refuse.

But yes since your running for POTUS let's bring it up now.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
44. Right, because that's exactly what I said.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:35 PM
Mar 2015

very poor attempt.

So if she's talked about it before, what's she done about it. Where's the affect? I promptly lost my job after NAFTA, that was an effect.

She's a Third Way tool.

But do go on and convince me she's a progressive left leaning liberal.

Oh and if you happened to "miss it", see post #9. I'm sure none of that matters huh because "Go Hillary"!!!!!!

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
50. "But yes since your running for POTUS let's bring it up now."
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:47 PM
Mar 2015

It is a great time for her to bring it up. It's always a good time to bring it up. It's why she talks about it. Sorry about your employment issues. NAFTA hurt a lot of people. I don't need to convince you she is a progressive. She clearly is. No secret there. "Third Way Tool." Always liked that one.

starroute

(12,977 posts)
40. Content-free rhetoric
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:24 PM
Mar 2015

I was particular struck by "We need to think hard about what we're going to do ... But do it in a way that lifts everybody up."

There's a huge gap between thinking about what to do and doing "it" in a way what lifts everybody us. What's the "it" that should come in between? She doesn't say. Just that it will be good for everyone.

And though she's not wrong to focus on the cities, the real problem there has to do with the way gentrification is squeezing low-income residents out of the inner cities where the jobs are -- while public transportation is either not being constructed all or not being constructed where it would serve the people who are being displaced to the decaying inner suburbs.

Housing and transportation are the key issues, and no amount of focus on "jobs" in the abstract or public-private partnerships will address that.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
41. Love Hillary Talking About All Of The Important Issues We Face.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:27 PM
Mar 2015

Fucking hilarious to see Cruz talking about wealth disparity. Go Hill!!!!!!!!!!

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
53. She is here to stay.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:53 PM
Mar 2015

That is a very good thing for our party. We are now in year 14 of honoring the love of the wealth gap at the presidential level. Hillary is out there talking about it. Great for her and us. I know. You hold here completely accountable for NAFTA. I hear she is going to renegotiate NAFTA. Wait. Your right. That was someone else.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
56. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha,!!!
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:54 PM
Mar 2015

Rah rah rah sis boom bah!

You obviously didn't read #9 or if you did you've chosen to ignore it. That speaks volumes.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
61. Clearly you need three more ha ha's....
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:06 PM
Mar 2015

and one more non sequitur in order to make a legitimate point. I get it. Obama and Hillary are turd wayers. lol. Your brilliant retort helped me to form my new position in solidarity with you. Obama, Hillary, turn in your democratic credentials, with a complete lack of respect, phlem/traveler. Going to mail that to her campaign and the WH now. I will use the proper number of ha ha's and non sequiturs.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
64. I don't want solidarity with you at all.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:12 PM
Mar 2015

You just proved to me the clear lack of critical thinking from the Hillary crowd. Go on now, travel.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
67. I am a part of the Hillary, Warren, Sanders, Nelson, etc. crowd.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:16 PM
Mar 2015

We are a really good group and would love it if you would tag along. You can ha ha and non sequitur all the way. We will keep you company.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
69. Hillary, Warren, Sanders, Nelson
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:19 PM
Mar 2015

"One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong,
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?"

have a beautiful day.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
71. Please, tell me which one doesn't belong.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:25 PM
Mar 2015

I do like being sang to. Maybe you can sing it for me.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
73. As I suspected.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:32 PM
Mar 2015

Nothing. <- copy and pasted that from somewhere. ha ha ha ha ha ha <- for dramatic flare.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
76. Going to tell me which one doesn't fit?
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:40 PM
Mar 2015

Seems you are walking away from the claim. "speaks volumes" <copy and paste

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
78. What fucking claim? Your just babbling thinking
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:48 PM
Mar 2015

your making sense. You still haven't answered if you read post #9. I asked 1st. Either be honest or end this.

I'll read you response later as I have a life to lead right now.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
79. Seems like things are flying by you.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:50 PM
Mar 2015

This post was probably under thirty minutes ago. I can see why life is now important for you. The ha ha's and non sequiturs have run their course and their is nothing left.





"One of these things is not like the others,
One of these things just doesn't belong,
Can you tell which thing is not like the others
By the time I finish my song?"

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
80. Oh OK then.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:54 PM
Mar 2015

I see your just full of , you know. Through out our discussion you have not provided one shred of fact, just babble.

The thread speaks for itself. Buh by.

 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
81. Hint. They are all good democrats. Every one of them.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 03:14 PM
Mar 2015

I was responding to ha ha's. Not much to work with. I will still forward our letter to Obama and Clinton letting them know they are third wayers. Hillary, Warren, Sanders and Nelson would truly love your support. They are great D's. It's better than supporting the other team. Have a blessed day.

Phlem

(6,323 posts)
108. I know
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:40 PM
Mar 2015

but as you can see in this thread, complicating things would have been much worse. It's 15 to 20 minutes of my life spent in crazy that I'll never get back, and I just wanted it to be done.

Thanks for noticing bud.

TBF

(32,102 posts)
45. ^ Well that's not going to work.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:35 PM
Mar 2015

She wants "creative" solutions like all of the peons agreeing to move to 200 sq foot houses so Wall Street can continue to get rich off us. And the military industrial complex can continue to do it's thing (newest target: IRAN).

Good luck w/all that Mrs. Clinton.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
47. This would require new legislation that would have to pass a GOPer controlled Congress
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:37 PM
Mar 2015

This is why I'm baffled when people think that all we need to do is elect Warren or Sanders and everything will be all better.

Republicans would never raise taxes on the wealthy/corporations.

It's important to GOTV.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
49. They will never pass anything like that...
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:42 PM
Mar 2015

...when the Democratic nominee is pretending not even to have thought of such a thing.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
57. Right after enough of us demand it.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:57 PM
Mar 2015

Our next president isn't leading yet on this issue.

It's early yet, but I'm not very hopeful.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
60. Face it...
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:03 PM
Mar 2015

The Republican-controlled Congress would never pass anything like that.

That's why I said it's important to GOTV and get them out of there.

It won't matter who the President is, Republicans will NEVER raise taxes on the wealthy/corporations.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
62. You think no partial or temporary tax hikes are possible?
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:07 PM
Mar 2015

I disagree, except with your notion that the president's identity isn't so important.

We would have to demand such a thing in great numbers--so much so that filibustering it becomes politically dangerous.

But your call to "face it" sounds too uncomfortably like not facing the problem. We must lobby unceasingly.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
63. Even partial or temporary tax hikes would require new leglsiation
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:10 PM
Mar 2015

It would have to pass a GOP-controlled House and Senate.

Good luck with that.

We could demand it all we want, but Republicans would never pass a bill which raised taxes, even temporarily. It doesn't matter how much you lobby them.

The only solution is to GOTV and get them out of there.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
65. GOTV is stalling.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:13 PM
Mar 2015

I agree that it's vital, but we need to get our lobby on in between elections. We need to lobby on both sides of the aisle to pull the center leftward.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
68. Lobbying the GOP is not going to work
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:18 PM
Mar 2015

They are constantly moving to the right.

Getting them to agree to tax hikes would be like getting the Pope to convert to Judaism.

It's not going to happen.

There's only one solution.

GOTV.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
70. Lobbying works.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:21 PM
Mar 2015

We just haven't done a good enough job of it yet.

We need better Republicans, but might have to settle for more Citizen's United Democrats. We need better Democrats, too, who will say what Secretary Clinton will not.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
75. Can you explain to me how you're going to get people like Ted Cruz to raise taxes on the wealthy?
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:38 PM
Mar 2015

These are the same folks who shut down the government and nearly crashed the global economy during the debt ceiling and budget fight in late 2013....all because they wanted to repeal Obamacare.

You think it's possible to lobby these folks and get them to move left and raise taxes on the wealthy?

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
77. Yes, I think it's possible.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:46 PM
Mar 2015

Cruz won't be president, and if encouraged by enough demand, even he will find a weasel way toward letting some sort of tax increases happen. He could even be intimidated out of a filibuster, if he gelieved his career was on the line.

Possible doesn't mean likely, and our track record of polite requests wouldn't seem to make a sea change in politics inevitable. I'll note, though, that simply voting in more of the same old Democrats may not accomplish much more--unless we've made it perfectly clear what we need from them, and that our vouces trump their dollars.

winter is coming

(11,785 posts)
83. I think you have it backwards:
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 05:37 PM
Mar 2015

The candidate who can credibly lead on this issue has a huge advantage WRT becoming the next President.

Divernan

(15,480 posts)
84. Till Clinton Foundation expediter's fees brought in millions.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 05:48 PM
Mar 2015

Last edited Wed Mar 25, 2015, 08:40 AM - Edit history (1)

Funny thing - how did all these foreign nations ever manage to make any charitable contributions re national disasters (like Haiti) before Bill showed them the light?

THENARDIER & CHORUS
Servant to the poor. Butler to the great.

MME. THENARDIER
Hypocrite and toady and inebriate!

THENARDIER & CHORUS
Everybody bless the landlord!
Everybody bless his spouse!

THENARDIER
Everybody raise a glass

MME. THENARDIER
Raise it up the master's arse.

ALL
Everybody raise a glass to the master of the house!


http://www.allmusicals.com/lyrics/lesmiserables/masterofthehouse.htm
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
102. Funny ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:16 PM
Mar 2015

The/a reason cited for a Sanders and/or Warren primary, has been (failing the more progressive's win) it would pull presumed Candidate Clinton to the left and get her talking about income inequality.

Now that presumed Candidate Clinton IS talking income inequality ... it's not believed or good enough or just another reason to gripe.

Funny how that works, huh?

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
59. You know what else? Funny how she's got 50 bazillion fiscal advisers, and she's like, 'who me?'
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:01 PM
Mar 2015

when it comes to devising schemes to equalize income more equitably.

Honey, if you can't do it with all that brainpower on your team, you certainly won't be doing it as president.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
103. Yes ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:21 PM
Mar 2015

Presumed Candidate Clinton should open up her playbook {Edited to correct my darned Too Smartphone's typing} before announcing her candidacy.

That's some brilliant campaign strategy, right there!

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
106. My Too Darn Smartphone ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:34 PM
Mar 2015

typed "playboy" instead of "playbook" ... I apologize on behalf of the phone.

Do you want a President, or a poker player?


Both ... if by "poker player" you mean someone that uses strategy and/or plans out their moves.
 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
109. I thought that was an 'urban' reference to something else, lol. Anyway,
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:43 PM
Mar 2015
, my original point was this:

She has all this fiscal brainpower on her team, and she's not using it, or else she thinks she's playing Texas Hold Em.

In either case, she's wasting the American people's time being obtuse. Out with it. What is your plan, Hillary.
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
110. And my original response stands ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 03:58 PM
Mar 2015

Why should she say anything other than generalities before she announces her candidacy ... and even then, before she faces an opponent?

In either case, she's wasting the American people's time being obtuse.


I doubt that the vast majority of "American people", even knew/heard of her appearance at the Center for American Progress ... and those that did ... their opinions aren't going to be swayed by what she said or didn't say.

And oh yeah ... Mirror Moment!!! ... "Urban references" are spoken in English.
 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
113. Is this true? Or, is that ...
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 04:50 PM
Mar 2015

what you want to hear before saying you don't believe her and moving on to the next thing that you want to hear, but won't believe her if she said it.

Note: I use the "you" in its generic sense ... I really suspect that those most critical of what HRC isn't saying, would be unswayed were she to recite chapter and verse of their progressive manifesto.

on point

(2,506 posts)
114. It is true if she made it a policy to pursue, and not a sound bite.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 05:03 PM
Mar 2015

This would be a fundamental shift in her perspective

cstanleytech

(26,322 posts)
115. You want a solution? Make it so the bigger the gap the higher the income tax for the wealthy.
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 11:05 PM
Mar 2015

Believe me when it starts hitting the wealthy in their own pockets with taxes they will sing a different tune on things like raising the minimum wage.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hillary Clinton: The Unit...