General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOverreaching: Politics is one thing. Espionage is quite another.
So, according to WaPo, Bibi and company spied on the Iran talks and gave what they learned to the US congressional Republicans.
Sorry, but that goes beyond politics. That is espionage. That's a Big.Fucking.Deal. If the Republicans who got that information from Bibi failed to report that, they are accomplices.
Kind of simple, really.
I am already of a mind that there will be no consequences for anyone involved.
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Next up, Kiev. Then, Moscow. Least we can do.
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)JonLP24
(29,322 posts)The US spies on everybody pretty much but an American citizen or more consorts with a foreign head of state to spy on the US - Iran talks is a lot closer, I'd consider it treason generally -- depends on how laws are written I guess. Technically, Israel is a friend & Iran is the enemy but the US President is in talks to end that or talk about it so I'd call that treason.
When people affiliated with Reagan went to Iran to try to get them to keep the hostages until Reagan is inaugurated is 100% treason.
maindawg
(1,151 posts)The Dems had done something like that 12 years ago? They would still be in prison.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)Why in the world would you suggest otherwise? There is enough people running around with their hair on fire already.
jalan48
(13,888 posts)gordianot
(15,245 posts)erronis
(15,355 posts)And there was remarkably little discussion of this in the press at the time.
Unlike the fabricated Gulf of Tonkin incident.
gordianot
(15,245 posts)On a ship with the worlds most sophisticated electronic monitoring equipment at the time without response to maritime SOS. One of the few times in modern history a ship was attacked with napalm, rockets, cannon fire, and torpedoes.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)marble falls
(57,262 posts)there'll be a shit storm to follow!
valerief
(53,235 posts)Savannahmann
(3,891 posts)Seriously? Ok, let's make sure I understand the scandal here. The problem is not the spying. Since our defense during the Snowden document dump was that everyone does it. So we can't really complain about Israel spying on us. Especially since we found out by spying on them.
What we are complaining about is that Israel told Congress. Because Congress isn't supposed to know what the Administration is doing. Now, how the hell do we square that with the complaints of a decade ago from Democrats about how awful it was that the Republicans in Congress were not conducting oversight of the Bush Cabal? We only believe in Oversight when their guy is in the White House? Do you realize how hypocritical that makes us look? Well, others do and they aren't all that supportive of the argument. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/28/white-house-cia_n_6064114.html
In fact, it was pretty well known here that the Democrats when they took control of Congress were finally going to give the Bush Cabal the oversight they had lacked. From the old DU site by a user known as ProSense back in the day.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x692481
It wasn't just the CIA either. It was a complaint about wide ranging lack of oversight.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................1
I. MANIPULATION OF IRAQ INTELLIGENCE...............................................................................2
II. TREATMENT OF DETAINEES.............................................................................................5
III. LEAK OF A COVERT CIA AGENTS STATUS........................................................................7
IV. AWARD OF HALLIBURTON CONTRACTS ...........................................................................9
V. WHITE HOUSE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE ..............................................10
VI. SECRET NSA WIRETAPS .....................................................................................11
VII. VICE PRESIDENTS ENERGY TASK FORCE...................................................................12
VIII. WITHHOLDING OF MEDICARE COST ESTIMATES ..........................................................13
IX. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AT MULTIPLE FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE WHITE HOUSE.................14
X. POLITICIZATION OF THE FEDERAL SCIENCE-BASED AGENCIES ..........................................15
XI. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ENFORCEMENT OF VOTING RIGHTS LAWS ........................................16
XII. CONTRACT ABUSES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ................................17
XIII. INFLUENCE OF LOBBYISTS AT EPA ....................................................................18
XIV. INFLUENCE OF TOBACCO INDUSTRY LOBBYISTS ON U.S. TOBACCO POLICIES .....................19
XV. FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFTS CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES.............19
If we're going to pretend that Congress learning anything that the Administration doesn't want them to know is a bad thing, can we at least go back and delete all of our complaints about lack of oversight and the complaints of secrecy in the Bush years?
http://www.dpc.senate.gov/dpcdoc.cfm?doc_name=fs-110-2-173
Because this is getting to be our pattern. We do what we objected the other guys were doing. At best Democrats look like opportunistic weasels, at worst hypocritical asses. I'm tired of losing the propaganda battle to the damned Republicans. Now when our side goes out and tries to explain why this is wrong, what are the chances that the RW won't point out the hypocrisy of our current position versus our previous position on similar issues?
Congress not knowing what a Republican is up to. Bad, very bad. Congress not knowing what a Democratic administration is doing, good, very good.
Stinky The Clown
(67,819 posts)Hahahahahaha
Botany
(70,589 posts)All right Stinky stop that pattern stuff right now.
RedstDem
(1,239 posts)But the rest of us think it sux.
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)his efforts?
I must have missed that part. Otherwise,it is exactly the same...but different.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Democrats never took intelligence from a foreign nation. If you can't see the difference here, you are either blind or a republican apologist.
yodermon
(6,143 posts)not. It is the method by which they obtained the information, namely espionage by a foreign country.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)diplomacy and foreign policy?
Um, ok. Right. Whatfuckingever.
C Moon
(12,221 posts)I wouldn't be surprised if they covered their butts by getting some Dems involved.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)we aren't charging people guilty of high crimes
Stinky The Clown
(67,819 posts)Wella
(1,827 posts)deal, I can understand trying to get information where you can. Imagine if the situation were reversed: a Republican President trying to make a secret deal and not telling the Democratic Congress a thing about it. Don't you think the Democratic leadership would be looking to get whatever information they could?
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)Wella
(1,827 posts)Quick quiz: it was after Lyndon Johnson and before Jimmy Carter.
world wide wally
(21,755 posts)Wanna buy some swamp land in Arizona?
PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)Government documents have revealed that LBJ had almost achieved peace, but then Nixon called up some friends in State and asked them to torpedo the talks until he was elected - you know, so he'd win the election and be President instead of Hubert Humphry, the guy the Dems put up when Bobby was killed. Why? Because Nixon worshipped power above all else, even above doing the right thing for the American people.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Nice try.
Wella
(1,827 posts)It's part of what they do. It's naive to believe in the purity of motive for any political party. Mind you, I am not saying I approve of what Israeli spies and the GOP leadership did: however, realpolitik works the way it does, regardless of stated ideals.
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)Everybody does it! So you can't call us out!!! BS.
PatrickforO
(14,592 posts)Treason.
But, hey, we never had any war crimes trials for Bush, Cheney and the rest of the Neocon cabal that positioned us for a never ending war that's already cost $4 trillion, either, so I don't expect much.
Still, it is treason.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Pushing the US into another war in the Middle East.
Sick fucks.
Cosmocat
(14,574 posts)This is ... beyond any description of how bad it is.
And, if the OTHER party did this, there would be LOUD cries for people to, literally, be hung.
But, since the republicans did it ... Much ado about nothing, and some democrat did something once, so they are all the same.
There quite literally at this point is nothing they can do that they will be held accountable for, and each time they do some kind of shit and don't get held accountable for it, they go one step further.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)That laws do not apply to billionaires or politicians.
Laws are only for the little people, for those above the law, we have something called looking forward that negates any law broken by the elite, effectively an indisputable get out of jail free card.
It is just a fact of life in this country now.
The rest of us on the other hand can serve time for the slightest of offenses, and often do, we have the largest percentage of a population serving time, but no justice for anyone at the top. Period. End of story.