Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Stinky The Clown

(67,819 posts)
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 10:11 AM Mar 2015

Overreaching: Politics is one thing. Espionage is quite another.

So, according to WaPo, Bibi and company spied on the Iran talks and gave what they learned to the US congressional Republicans.

Sorry, but that goes beyond politics. That is espionage. That's a Big.Fucking.Deal. If the Republicans who got that information from Bibi failed to report that, they are accomplices.

Kind of simple, really.

I am already of a mind that there will be no consequences for anyone involved.

42 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Overreaching: Politics is one thing. Espionage is quite another. (Original Post) Stinky The Clown Mar 2015 OP
What are friends for? Octafish Mar 2015 #1
Isn't clandestine consorting with a foreign power against your own country still called treason? world wide wally Mar 2015 #2
Yes. The other person spying on America is called the enemy, also punishable by the death penalty. Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #11
According to some DUers, nothing whatsoever qualifies as treason. FiveGoodMen Mar 2015 #17
I don't think the letter qualifies more JonLP24 Mar 2015 #35
Can You Imagine? maindawg Mar 2015 #3
Looks like it will come down to which side our military is on. jalan48 Mar 2015 #4
Let's assume the military is comprised of honorable individules and will follow the law. fleabiscuit Mar 2015 #5
It's a strange world we live in. I was referring to the brass, not the common soldier. jalan48 Mar 2015 #7
U.S.S. Liberty circa 1967 in international waters was kinda harsh treatment. gordianot Mar 2015 #6
I think most have forgotten that Israel blew up a US ship erronis Mar 2015 #8
By unmarked Mirage aircraft (depends on source) followed by torpedo boats. gordianot Mar 2015 #9
Bibi can be taken at his word....the question is, what word? Fred Sanders Mar 2015 #10
You definately put your size 15's squarely into it this time, stinky. But I think you nailed it..... marble falls Mar 2015 #12
Republicans are enemies of Americans based on their platform. nt valerief Mar 2015 #13
Oh FFS. Savannahmann Mar 2015 #14
"We" Stinky The Clown Mar 2015 #15
"Because this is getting to be our pattern." Botany Mar 2015 #24
look bibi, I know you ain't got no problem RedstDem Mar 2015 #18
Did Dems use a foreign power to gather intelligence on Bush and then cosort with them to undermine world wide wally Mar 2015 #19
What a crock! BillZBubb Mar 2015 #26
It's not the strawman argument you have laid out as to "whether" Congress knows the information or yodermon Mar 2015 #28
so you think it is ok for congress to collude with foreign government spies to undermine our magical thyme Mar 2015 #30
They're Republicans. So all is good. :/ C Moon Mar 2015 #16
thats why the country is going downhill PatrynXX Mar 2015 #20
I wonder why. Stinky The Clown Mar 2015 #29
If you're Congress and the President isn't telling you anything about an extremely serious nuclear Wella Mar 2015 #21
A Republican would never make a deal geared toward "peace" world wide wally Mar 2015 #25
Who was president when peace in Vietnam came about? Wella Mar 2015 #33
Are you even suggesting that Nixon worked for a peace treaty? world wide wally Mar 2015 #34
Uh, you're forgetting one happy little fact: PatrickforO Mar 2015 #41
Gosh, we're all the same, aren't we! BillZBubb Mar 2015 #27
Politicians are the same when it comes to power and denying power to others Wella Mar 2015 #32
Baloney. That's a typical false equivalency always used by the right. BillZBubb Mar 2015 #36
No, sorry, there's only one word for that letter, and then this: PatrickforO Mar 2015 #42
WTF? blackspade Mar 2015 #22
You are correct Cosmocat Mar 2015 #23
Politics is a game where the winners get more spoils than the losers. Never any hard feelings. nm rhett o rick Mar 2015 #31
It doesn't really matter what they did, it is pretty well established these days Dragonfli Mar 2015 #37
Exactly! ctsnowman Mar 2015 #38
Must move forward. ctsnowman Mar 2015 #39
turn it around and the house would already be holding hearings spanone Mar 2015 #40

JonLP24

(29,322 posts)
35. I don't think the letter qualifies more
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 08:44 PM
Mar 2015

The US spies on everybody pretty much but an American citizen or more consorts with a foreign head of state to spy on the US - Iran talks is a lot closer, I'd consider it treason generally -- depends on how laws are written I guess. Technically, Israel is a friend & Iran is the enemy but the US President is in talks to end that or talk about it so I'd call that treason.

When people affiliated with Reagan went to Iran to try to get them to keep the hostages until Reagan is inaugurated is 100% treason.

fleabiscuit

(4,542 posts)
5. Let's assume the military is comprised of honorable individules and will follow the law.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 11:05 AM
Mar 2015

Why in the world would you suggest otherwise? There is enough people running around with their hair on fire already.

erronis

(15,355 posts)
8. I think most have forgotten that Israel blew up a US ship
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 11:24 AM
Mar 2015

And there was remarkably little discussion of this in the press at the time.

Unlike the fabricated Gulf of Tonkin incident.

gordianot

(15,245 posts)
9. By unmarked Mirage aircraft (depends on source) followed by torpedo boats.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 11:35 AM
Mar 2015

On a ship with the worlds most sophisticated electronic monitoring equipment at the time without response to maritime SOS. One of the few times in modern history a ship was attacked with napalm, rockets, cannon fire, and torpedoes.

marble falls

(57,262 posts)
12. You definately put your size 15's squarely into it this time, stinky. But I think you nailed it.....
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:02 PM
Mar 2015

there'll be a shit storm to follow!

 

Savannahmann

(3,891 posts)
14. Oh FFS.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:16 PM
Mar 2015

Seriously? Ok, let's make sure I understand the scandal here. The problem is not the spying. Since our defense during the Snowden document dump was that everyone does it. So we can't really complain about Israel spying on us. Especially since we found out by spying on them.

What we are complaining about is that Israel told Congress. Because Congress isn't supposed to know what the Administration is doing. Now, how the hell do we square that with the complaints of a decade ago from Democrats about how awful it was that the Republicans in Congress were not conducting oversight of the Bush Cabal? We only believe in Oversight when their guy is in the White House? Do you realize how hypocritical that makes us look? Well, others do and they aren't all that supportive of the argument. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/10/28/white-house-cia_n_6064114.html

In fact, it was pretty well known here that the Democrats when they took control of Congress were finally going to give the Bush Cabal the oversight they had lacked. From the old DU site by a user known as ProSense back in the day.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=364x692481

It wasn't just the CIA either. It was a complaint about wide ranging lack of oversight.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................................1
I. MANIPULATION OF IRAQ INTELLIGENCE...............................................................................2
II. TREATMENT OF DETAINEES.............................................................................................5
III. LEAK OF A COVERT CIA AGENT’S STATUS........................................................................7
IV. AWARD OF HALLIBURTON CONTRACTS ...........................................................................9
V. WHITE HOUSE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE KATRINA RESPONSE ..............................................10
VI. SECRET NSA WIRETAPS .....................................................................................11
VII. VICE PRESIDENT’S ENERGY TASK FORCE...................................................................12
VIII. WITHHOLDING OF MEDICARE COST ESTIMATES ..........................................................13
IX. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AT MULTIPLE FEDERAL AGENCIES AND THE WHITE HOUSE.................14
X. POLITICIZATION OF THE FEDERAL SCIENCE-BASED AGENCIES ..........................................15
XI. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT ENFORCEMENT OF VOTING RIGHTS LAWS ........................................16
XII. CONTRACT ABUSES AT THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ................................17
XIII. INFLUENCE OF LOBBYISTS AT EPA ....................................................................18
XIV. INFLUENCE OF TOBACCO INDUSTRY LOBBYISTS ON U.S. TOBACCO POLICIES .....................19
XV. FORMER ATTORNEY GENERAL JOHN ASHCROFT’S CAMPAIGN FUNDRAISING ACTIVITIES.............19


If we're going to pretend that Congress learning anything that the Administration doesn't want them to know is a bad thing, can we at least go back and delete all of our complaints about lack of oversight and the complaints of secrecy in the Bush years?

http://www.dpc.senate.gov/dpcdoc.cfm?doc_name=fs-110-2-173

Because this is getting to be our pattern. We do what we objected the other guys were doing. At best Democrats look like opportunistic weasels, at worst hypocritical asses. I'm tired of losing the propaganda battle to the damned Republicans. Now when our side goes out and tries to explain why this is wrong, what are the chances that the RW won't point out the hypocrisy of our current position versus our previous position on similar issues?

Congress not knowing what a Republican is up to. Bad, very bad. Congress not knowing what a Democratic administration is doing, good, very good.

world wide wally

(21,755 posts)
19. Did Dems use a foreign power to gather intelligence on Bush and then cosort with them to undermine
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:37 PM
Mar 2015

his efforts?
I must have missed that part. Otherwise,it is exactly the same...but different.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
26. What a crock!
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 01:52 PM
Mar 2015

Democrats never took intelligence from a foreign nation. If you can't see the difference here, you are either blind or a republican apologist.

yodermon

(6,143 posts)
28. It's not the strawman argument you have laid out as to "whether" Congress knows the information or
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 02:37 PM
Mar 2015

not. It is the method by which they obtained the information, namely espionage by a foreign country.

 

magical thyme

(14,881 posts)
30. so you think it is ok for congress to collude with foreign government spies to undermine our
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 06:49 PM
Mar 2015

diplomacy and foreign policy?

Um, ok. Right. Whatfuckingever.

C Moon

(12,221 posts)
16. They're Republicans. So all is good. :/
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:27 PM
Mar 2015

I wouldn't be surprised if they covered their butts by getting some Dems involved.

 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
21. If you're Congress and the President isn't telling you anything about an extremely serious nuclear
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:53 PM
Mar 2015

deal, I can understand trying to get information where you can. Imagine if the situation were reversed: a Republican President trying to make a secret deal and not telling the Democratic Congress a thing about it. Don't you think the Democratic leadership would be looking to get whatever information they could?

 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
33. Who was president when peace in Vietnam came about?
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 08:03 PM
Mar 2015

Quick quiz: it was after Lyndon Johnson and before Jimmy Carter.

PatrickforO

(14,592 posts)
41. Uh, you're forgetting one happy little fact:
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 10:05 AM
Mar 2015

Government documents have revealed that LBJ had almost achieved peace, but then Nixon called up some friends in State and asked them to torpedo the talks until he was elected - you know, so he'd win the election and be President instead of Hubert Humphry, the guy the Dems put up when Bobby was killed. Why? Because Nixon worshipped power above all else, even above doing the right thing for the American people.

 

Wella

(1,827 posts)
32. Politicians are the same when it comes to power and denying power to others
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 08:02 PM
Mar 2015

It's part of what they do. It's naive to believe in the purity of motive for any political party. Mind you, I am not saying I approve of what Israeli spies and the GOP leadership did: however, realpolitik works the way it does, regardless of stated ideals.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
36. Baloney. That's a typical false equivalency always used by the right.
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 08:54 PM
Mar 2015

Everybody does it! So you can't call us out!!! BS.

PatrickforO

(14,592 posts)
42. No, sorry, there's only one word for that letter, and then this:
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 10:10 AM
Mar 2015

Treason.

But, hey, we never had any war crimes trials for Bush, Cheney and the rest of the Neocon cabal that positioned us for a never ending war that's already cost $4 trillion, either, so I don't expect much.

Still, it is treason.

Cosmocat

(14,574 posts)
23. You are correct
Tue Mar 24, 2015, 12:56 PM
Mar 2015

This is ... beyond any description of how bad it is.

And, if the OTHER party did this, there would be LOUD cries for people to, literally, be hung.

But, since the republicans did it ... Much ado about nothing, and some democrat did something once, so they are all the same.

There quite literally at this point is nothing they can do that they will be held accountable for, and each time they do some kind of shit and don't get held accountable for it, they go one step further.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
37. It doesn't really matter what they did, it is pretty well established these days
Wed Mar 25, 2015, 01:16 AM
Mar 2015

That laws do not apply to billionaires or politicians.

Laws are only for the little people, for those above the law, we have something called looking forward that negates any law broken by the elite, effectively an indisputable get out of jail free card.

It is just a fact of life in this country now.

The rest of us on the other hand can serve time for the slightest of offenses, and often do, we have the largest percentage of a population serving time, but no justice for anyone at the top. Period. End of story.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Overreaching: Politics is...