Could be struck down by a judge? What if they want to discriminate against Blacks, Hispanics and Asians saying its against their religion to serve them? How far do they want to go with this?

to tell one what equal means. I would neither step foot in that bellicose state nor open a business in that state. There is no limit, next up with this precedent will be Blacks, Hispanics and Asians, and more. It just lets one know what that creepy state is about. These guys were voted in, apparently that's what the populace wants.

Indiana, another flyover state.

Arizona tried this about a year ago and it made national headlines and humiliated the state so badly that Jan Brewer had to veto it (though I don't think she would have if not for the media attention).

Why Indiana is flying under the radar with this is beyond me. I think something similar is being debated in my state of Michigan too except I had heard that an amendment was proposed that would require businesses that want to discriminate to post openly on their doors exactly who they will refuse to serve. This seems perfectly fair to me. Why should a homosexual person be forced to be publically humiliated by finding out at the register of a store that they won't be served in front of other guests?

I like the idea of forcing businesses to post this as well because even though I'm heterosexual I would NOT want to shop anywhere that would refuse to serve homosexuals. I think this would cost businesses that decide to discriminate about 50% of their business and do them in for good, which I have no problem with! Let them go under and be replaced by new owners that aren't bigots!

Is the "religious freedom restoration act" Constitutional? No. But I don't think it has been brought before SCOTUS for them to decide on yet.