Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cal04

(41,505 posts)
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 10:06 PM Mar 2015

Tim Cook: Pro-discrimination ‘religious freedom’ laws are dangerous

There’s something very dangerous happening in states across the country.

A wave of legislation, introduced in more than two dozen states, would allow people to discriminate against their neighbors. Some, such as the bill enacted in Indiana last week that drew a national outcry and one passed in Arkansas, say individuals can cite their personal religious beliefs to refuse service to a customer or resist a state nondiscrimination law.

Others are more transparent in their effort to discriminate. Legislation being considered in Texas would strip the salaries and pensions of clerks who issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples — even if the Supreme Court strikes down Texas’ marriage ban later this year. In total, there are nearly 100 bills designed to enshrine discrimination in state law.

These bills rationalize injustice by pretending to defend something many of us hold dear. They go against the very principles our nation was founded on, and they have the potential to undo decades of progress toward greater equality.

(snip)
Men and women have fought and died fighting to protect our country’s founding principles of freedom and equality. We owe it to them, to each other and to our future to continue to fight with our words and our actions to make sure we protect those ideals. The days of segregation and discrimination marked by “Whites Only” signs on shop doors, water fountains and restrooms must remain deep in our past. We must never return to any semblance of that time. America must be a land of opportunity for everyone.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/pro-discrimination-religious-freedom-laws-are-dangerous-to-america/2015/03/29/bdb4ce9e-d66d-11e4-ba28-f2a685dc7f89_story.html

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Tim Cook: Pro-discrimination ‘religious freedom’ laws are dangerous (Original Post) cal04 Mar 2015 OP
It's so very wrong marym625 Mar 2015 #1
We are imploding from within. Baitball Blogger Mar 2015 #2
this is that can of worms that indivisibleman Mar 2015 #3
That's why it is IMPERATIVE that we elect a democrat to the White House Chipper Chat Mar 2015 #5
Eventually the SC will have to rule on these laws. world wide wally Mar 2015 #4
Put your money where your mouth is, Cook. Refuse to sell Apple products in Indiana. nt Dreamer Tatum Mar 2015 #6

marym625

(17,997 posts)
1. It's so very wrong
Sun Mar 29, 2015, 10:11 PM
Mar 2015

But it makes me want to wear a button saying "I am part of the LGBT Community" I don't want to "pass" when some of my brothers and sisters wouldn't be able to, or because of their upcoming wedding, or whatever, it is known that they're not straight or cisgender. Besides I am proud to be a bisexual.

indivisibleman

(482 posts)
3. this is that can of worms that
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 12:48 AM
Mar 2015

Justice Ginsburg warned about. If they had just ruled that Hobby Lobby's desires to discriminate ended at the church doors none of this would be taking place. It is time to drive this stupid "religious freedom" nonsense back into the hole it crawled out of.

Chipper Chat

(9,686 posts)
5. That's why it is IMPERATIVE that we elect a democrat to the White House
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 01:09 AM
Mar 2015

in 2016. Or else we will see another ScaliaThomasAlito on the SCOTUS and more laws like this.

world wide wally

(21,754 posts)
4. Eventually the SC will have to rule on these laws.
Mon Mar 30, 2015, 01:08 AM
Mar 2015

They could go either way as I see it. Yes, they have been somewhat friendly to gays, but they have also ruled on the side of allowing discriminatory practices quite often too. ie… stripping the Voting Rights Act.
Hold your breath, it could go either way and I don't think the SC has any great love for the America we grew up in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Tim Cook: Pro-discriminat...