Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 06:37 AM Apr 2015

A crime against peace

How do we use this?

http://www.commondreams.org/views/2015/03/31/leading-papers-incite-supreme-international-crime

Leading Papers Incite ‘Supreme International Crime’
byJim Naureckas

After the New York Times printed John Bolton’s “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran” (3/26/15; FAIR Blog, 3/26/15), following the Washington Post publishing Joshua Muravchik’s “War With Iran Is Probably Our Best Option” (3/13/15), veteran investigative reporter Robert Parry made an excellent point (Consortium News, 3/28/15):


If two major newspapers in, say, Russia published major articles openly advocating the unprovoked bombing of a country, say, Israel, the US government and news media would be aflame with denunciations about “aggression,” “criminality,” “madness” and “behavior not fitting the 21st century.”

But when the newspapers are American – the New York Times and the Washington Post – and the target country is Iran, no one in the US government and media bats an eye. These inflammatory articles – these incitements to murder and violation of international law – are considered just normal discussion in the Land of Exceptionalism.



Advocating for war is not like advocating for most other policies because, as peace activist David Swanson points out, war is a crime. It was outlawed in 1928 by the Kellogg-Briand Pact, in which the United States, the Soviet Union, China, Britain, Germany, France, Japan and 55 other nations “condemn[ed] recourse to war for the solution of international controversies, and renounce[d] it, as an instrument of national policy in their relations with one another.”

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A crime against peace (Original Post) Skidmore Apr 2015 OP
Leaving Bolton aside for the moment -- Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #1
K&R Pooka Fey Apr 2015 #2
K&R Octafish Apr 2015 #3

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
1. Leaving Bolton aside for the moment --
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 07:24 AM
Apr 2015

Every signatory mentioned went on to fight WW2, so whatever pact they signed, however binding it may or may not have been, was abrogated by events. Since then these nations have signed the UN charter and that does recognize war as a means of defense and a remedy for aggression; see Korea and Gulf War 1.

And, while Bolton is overly anxious for war, it is US declared policy that all options are on the table including the use of force. Bolton, however, has no policy making power whereas State Department policy statements reflect the decisions of President Obama.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A crime against peace