Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 03:26 PM Apr 2015

Chorus of Outrage as Obama Administration Approves Arctic Drilling for Shell Oil



Wednesday, April 01, 2015

Department of the Interior ignoring its own report on threat to climate, say environmental groups

Environmental activists expressed shock and outrage on Tuesday after the U.S. Department of the Interior upheld a 2008 lease sale on the Arctic's Chuchki Sea, opening the door for continued oil exploration in a region long eyed for drilling by Shell Corporation and increasingly strained under the effects of climate change.

The decision opens up 30 million acres in the Chuchki Sea to fossil fuel exploration and drilling, a move which state and national green groups called "unconscionable."

"Our Arctic ocean is flat out the worst place on Earth to drill for oil," said Niel Lawrence, Alaska director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. "The world’s last pristine sea, it is both too fragile to survive a spill and too harsh and remote for effective cleanup."

In January 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled that the Interior Department had violated the law when it sold those 2008 leases—a deal that came about during George W. Bush's presidency, but was upheld two years later by the Obama administration.

The 2014 decision ordered the Interior Department to reconsider the leases. A month later, the department admitted that drilling in the Chucki Sea was likely to have devastating consequences, with a spill risk of 75 percent or more.


"It is unconscionable that the federal government is willing to risk the health and safety of the people and wildlife that live near and within the Chukchi Sea for Shell’s reckless pursuit of oil," said Marissa Knodel, a climate campaigner with Friends of the Earth. "Shell’s dismal record of safety violations and accidents, coupled with the inability to clean up or contain an oil spill in the remote, dangerous Arctic waters, equals a disaster waiting to happen."

"Ignoring its own environmental review, the U.S. Department of the Interior has opened the door for drilling in the remote and iconic Arctic Ocean," said the Sierra Club on Tuesday.

"It's shocking that the Department of the Interior would knowingly move forward with a plan that has a 75 percent chance of creating a major spill in the Chukchi Sea. We can’t trust Shell or any other oil company with America’s Arctic," Cindy Shogan, executive director of the Alaska Wilderness League, added. "Shell has proposed an even dirtier and riskier Arctic drilling program for this summer. The Obama administration has seen the impacts of what a major oil spill looks like."

The Bureau of Ocean Management will next conduct an environmental assessment on Shell's exploration plan for the Chuchki Sea, which could take 30 days or more.

The Chuchki Sea is home to an estimated 2,000 polar bears and serves as the feeding grounds for migratory gray whales.


"The industrial oil development that Interior hopes will flow from its decision to approve the Chukchi lease sale gives us a 75 percent chance of a large oil spill and a 100 percent chance of worsening the climate crisis," Rebecca Noblin, Alaska director for the Center for Biological Diversity, added. "I don’t like those odds."

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
http://www.commondreams.org/news/2015/04/01/chorus-outrage-obama-administration-approves-arctic-drilling-shell-oil
72 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chorus of Outrage as Obama Administration Approves Arctic Drilling for Shell Oil (Original Post) KoKo Apr 2015 OP
Oil for petrol is no longer necessary nationalize the fed Apr 2015 #1
Mirai no karuma wa totemo kakkoii desune! yuiyoshida Apr 2015 #28
Fugly IMHO rjsquirrel Apr 2015 #48
even so, it is the future... yuiyoshida Apr 2015 #51
Medicare is bankrupting this nation! merrily Apr 2015 #31
Nah, I'm betting on electric. F4lconF16 Apr 2015 #52
95% of hydrogen in the US is made from natural gas NickB79 Apr 2015 #60
One better. DeSwiss Apr 2015 #68
This really disturbs me, Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #2
Can't blame you. merrily Apr 2015 #32
Pop Quiz: bvar22 Apr 2015 #3
Must have been candidate Obama, judging by his decisions Dragonfli Apr 2015 #4
That must be it. bvar22 Apr 2015 #5
Guess US Thespian2 Apr 2015 #6
Heh. I posted Reply 29 before I read your post. merrily Apr 2015 #34
Um, well, at least she was honest about where she stood! So we knew sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #36
Yep, Palin would have been so much better for the country! bettyellen Apr 2015 #62
Like I said, we knew, thanks to her telling us what she stood FOR, NOT to vote for her. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #65
... Duppers Apr 2015 #7
Nothing to worry about, no one will notice it. zeemike Apr 2015 #8
We* need more oil. Octafish Apr 2015 #9
Ironic, wot? merrily Apr 2015 #35
This very disappointing. But not entirely unexpected. Enthusiast Apr 2015 #10
The Bait and Switch Presidency. woo me with science Apr 2015 #20
Please see Reply 29. merrily Apr 2015 #30
Fuckity fuck fuck fuck. catbyte Apr 2015 #11
And that spill was 26 years ago Art_from_Ark Apr 2015 #49
those people don't understand chess, or civics. And...SCOTUS!!!!1!11! he's giving shell Doctor_J Apr 2015 #12
Best president EVER - read it right here DrDan Apr 2015 #72
And they're racists, who never liked him. They are probably all Romney voters Doctor_J Apr 2015 #13
most corporate friendly president since Hoover Doctor_J Apr 2015 #14
I wonder why we haven't heard from the other side as to why this is a good rhett o rick Apr 2015 #15
It takes a while when something as difficult as this is to explain away, to come up with sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #37
Noooooooooooooooooooo BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2015 #16
ronny reagan is dancing in the grave Jakes Progress Apr 2015 #17
Geee,,,, what could possibly go wrong Cryptoad Apr 2015 #18
There's a new one every day. nt woo me with science Apr 2015 #19
Not an April Fool's Joke? I was hoping it was. CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2015 #21
I actually support this - weird, I know, for an aging hippie - raven mad Apr 2015 #22
Really, well we also need this planet and there are better ways to create jobs. More sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #38
I'd LOVE to see solar get a real foothold here! raven mad Apr 2015 #41
It's beginning to get a foothold here in upstate NY. We even have a local Solar Company. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #42
Not enough wind to deal with - we're in a "bowl" between mountain ranges. raven mad Apr 2015 #43
I think they can overcome a lot of these things now. If the will is there to do it. sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #44
Coal? Try Usibelli............... and don't fuck with 'em. raven mad Apr 2015 #45
Anchorage is in a better position to take advantage of alternative energy. Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #47
I'm with you Raven xenoturkey Apr 2015 #63
kick woo me with science Apr 2015 #23
And with Hillary Clinton expect more of the same Cheese Sandwich Apr 2015 #24
Disgusting Oilwellian Apr 2015 #25
goddamnit! AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #26
no wonder he hasnt nixed the XL Pipeline MFM008 Apr 2015 #27
"Drill, baby, drill." Applause line at 2008 Republican National Convention for McCain/Palin. merrily Apr 2015 #29
And 'Drill baby Drill' was a rallying cry for Obama supporters. Especially since he sabrina 1 Apr 2015 #40
Yep, which is why saying wait until Hillary tells us what she's running on is hilarious. merrily Apr 2015 #53
I thought he already said no to this? Am I mistaken? ND-Dem Apr 2015 #33
No, you are not mistaken. merrily Apr 2015 #54
so why would he turn around and say "yes" now? ND-Dem Apr 2015 #56
I can't speak to the motivations of others. merrily Apr 2015 #57
This is a geopolitical move in Cold War 2 or WW3 or... Anansi1171 Apr 2015 #39
Hooray! progressoid Apr 2015 #46
Heck of a job! RandiFan1290 Apr 2015 #50
arctic oil spill away from catastrophe bigtree Apr 2015 #55
And WHEN they fuck up, there will be no way - NONE - to clean it up hatrack Apr 2015 #58
kick woo me with science Apr 2015 #59
kick woo me with science Apr 2015 #61
As an Alaskan I tentatively support this and glad Obama approved it xenoturkey Apr 2015 #64
We don't get revenue from the offshore drilling. Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #67
don't even get me started on the tax credits... xenoturkey Apr 2015 #70
I find it fascinating (and more than a little horrifying) Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #71
Here's a little more info Blue_In_AK Apr 2015 #66
K&R DeSwiss Apr 2015 #69

nationalize the fed

(2,169 posts)
1. Oil for petrol is no longer necessary
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 03:51 PM
Apr 2015

Thanks to the Japanese








Instead of interfering in Ukraine or Syria, that money could be used to replicate the above Honda Hydrogen station. The crooks in DC are spending >$10 million dollars PER HOUR right now on the wars, which will never ever benefit any of the 99%.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
31. Medicare is bankrupting this nation!
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:16 AM
Apr 2015


I like the looks of Toyota Mirai, but I want to hand it a giant tissue for some reason.

F4lconF16

(3,747 posts)
52. Nah, I'm betting on electric.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 10:52 AM
Apr 2015

Fuel cells are far too problematic. http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/08/05/3467115/tesla-toyota-hydrogen-cars-batteries/

Edit: also, Toyota has managed to turn out what imo is the ugliest car I have seen, and that is saying something. They need to fire their whole design team--Lexus and Toyota have gotten nothing but worse, and given their competitors are really shaping up, they're going to have a problem at some point.

NickB79

(19,258 posts)
60. 95% of hydrogen in the US is made from natural gas
Sat Apr 4, 2015, 12:15 AM
Apr 2015

Hydrogen cars, petrol cars, both are still tethered to the fossil fuel industry.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
2. This really disturbs me,
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 03:53 PM
Apr 2015

especially after the comedy of errors that was Shell's first attempt up there.

Dragonfli

(10,622 posts)
4. Must have been candidate Obama, judging by his decisions
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:04 PM
Apr 2015

Not entirely sure however, my memory is not what it used to be. He never pretended to care about excessive drilling in environments ill equipped to handle it, judging by the "drill baby drill" campaign promise, the problem is we didn't listen to him when he said it, so it must be our fault.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
5. That must be it.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:14 PM
Apr 2015

The Left must not have been listening and paying attention.
Obama has always been for more drilling in protected areas.

/sarcasm

Thespian2

(2,741 posts)
6. Guess US
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:24 PM
Apr 2015

didn't have to elect Palin after all. Drill, Baby, Drill...as the planet slowly kills its human inhabitants.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
65. Like I said, we knew, thanks to her telling us what she stood FOR, NOT to vote for her.
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 02:02 AM
Apr 2015

McCain promised to lift the ban on Offshore Drilling and was trashed in a debate by Obama who promised he would keep that ban in place.

I believed him.

I believed a lot back then.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
8. Nothing to worry about, no one will notice it.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:45 PM
Apr 2015

We are too consumed with Indiana right now to care.
There may be other things that will slip in there while we are outraged over that state of affairs.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
9. We* need more oil.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:51 PM
Apr 2015

To sell to Japan.

"We" in the Corporate sense, of course, in the Royal Dutch Shell sense of the term.

catbyte

(34,447 posts)
11. Fuckity fuck fuck fuck.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 05:57 PM
Apr 2015

I am soooooooo disappointed. They're still dealing with that fucking Exxon spill in Prince William Sound.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
12. those people don't understand chess, or civics. And...SCOTUS!!!!1!11! he's giving shell
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 06:04 PM
Apr 2015

Oil enough rope to hang themselves!

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
15. I wonder why we haven't heard from the other side as to why this is a good
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 06:17 PM
Apr 2015

idea. Rhetorical question.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
37. It takes a while when something as difficult as this is to explain away, to come up with
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:34 AM
Apr 2015

the excuses. If interest in this goes away, no time will be wasted on talking points.

However they do have some old ones from the time when Obama unbelievably, at that time anyhow, reversed his Campaign promise NOT to lift the ban on offshore drilling, and then did it, just 18 days BEFORE the tragedy in the Gulf.

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,699 posts)
21. Not an April Fool's Joke? I was hoping it was.
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 08:19 PM
Apr 2015

Shit.

Another horrible blunder by our President.

I am sickened by this.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
22. I actually support this - weird, I know, for an aging hippie -
Wed Apr 1, 2015, 08:44 PM
Apr 2015

but truth to tell, the Repukes have ripped off this state so badly, we need the jobs.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
38. Really, well we also need this planet and there are better ways to create jobs. More
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:37 AM
Apr 2015

jobs have been created eg, in the Solar industry over the past year than any other field.

Imagine an FDR Democrat at this time. I could see the creation of a huge Solar Industry throughout the nation right now.

But alas, we do not have an FDR to support such progress.

Teddy R. would have done the same.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
41. I'd LOVE to see solar get a real foothold here!
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:44 AM
Apr 2015

There's not much of an opportunity given the amount of dark we have 1/2 the year - but it does work, only no one can afford to transfer to it.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
42. It's beginning to get a foothold here in upstate NY. We even have a local Solar Company.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:49 AM
Apr 2015

How about Wind, we have that here too. It's the way of the future, the US is way behind, though some progress is being made and appears to be moving faster over the past year.

raven mad

(4,940 posts)
43. Not enough wind to deal with - we're in a "bowl" between mountain ranges.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:53 AM
Apr 2015

And the mountains seem to be sending any wind elsewhere!

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
44. I think they can overcome a lot of these things now. If the will is there to do it.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:56 AM
Apr 2015

Saw proposals for WV eg, that appeared to be extremely advanced in terms of overcoming obstacles to making that state totally oil free. Naturally they were rejected with a lot of help from the Coal Industry, for now.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
47. Anchorage is in a better position to take advantage of alternative energy.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 04:36 AM
Apr 2015

We've got wind (already 11 turbines on Fire Island), more sun than Fairbanks, plus they could do a lot with the tide if they put their minds to it. With one of the highest tides in the world, there's plenty of energy being generated in Cook Inlet. It's too bad there's not more geothermal energy up there like out at Chena Hot Springs. I love that place.

xenoturkey

(68 posts)
63. I'm with you Raven
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 01:55 AM
Apr 2015

Given Alaska's current issues; i'm glad Obama had this happen. I don't think a shell level of fail is that realistic.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
40. And 'Drill baby Drill' was a rallying cry for Obama supporters. Especially since he
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:39 AM
Apr 2015

swore he would not lift the ban on offshore drilling.

WATCH WHAT THEY DO, definitely NOT what they say in campaigns.

merrily

(45,251 posts)
53. Yep, which is why saying wait until Hillary tells us what she's running on is hilarious.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 12:04 PM
Apr 2015

And probably disingenuous.

Moreover, if you have to hire over 200 campaign advisors to help you figure out how to disguise describe what you stand for.....

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=394507

merrily

(45,251 posts)
57. I can't speak to the motivations of others.
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 12:55 PM
Apr 2015

Sometimes, I can't even speak to my own motivations with 100% accuracy and completeness.

Apparently, though, Reuters thinks it knows Obama's motivations. Does it? No clue.

http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/04/01/usa-shell-arctic-idUSKBN0MS54K20150401

Anansi1171

(793 posts)
39. This is a geopolitical move in Cold War 2 or WW3 or...
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 02:38 AM
Apr 2015

...whatever this contest of the Pax Americana and its continued viability is.

Please wake up, DU.

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
55. arctic oil spill away from catastrophe
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 12:16 PM
Apr 2015

...an accident waiting to happen.


...a U.S. government report, released in February, forecasts a 75 percent chance of a large oil spill occurring in the Arctic over a 77-year scenario. The forecast, in BOEM’s 780-page second final environmental impact statement on Shell’s lease sale, says a spill as huge as the 2010 Deepwater Horizon disaster in the Gulf of Mexico is “unlikely to occur,” but if it did, “the impacts would be substantial.”
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/energy/2015/03/150331-arctic-oil-drilling-shell-interior-permission/?sf8323268=1

hatrack

(59,592 posts)
58. And WHEN they fuck up, there will be no way - NONE - to clean it up
Thu Apr 2, 2015, 01:30 PM
Apr 2015

Valdez was practically tropical compared with the Chukchi Sea, and they haven't even gotten a fraction of the oil 26 years after the spill there.

xenoturkey

(68 posts)
64. As an Alaskan I tentatively support this and glad Obama approved it
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 01:57 AM
Apr 2015

There's definitely risk; but I don't think we should assume a shell level of fail from the past. Alaska needs drilling for better or worse. I hope we can diversify and soon; but for the here and now its necessary. 90% of alaska government revenue comes from oil taxes.

xenoturkey

(68 posts)
70. don't even get me started on the tax credits...
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 02:19 AM
Apr 2015

But that can be changed. Obviously doling out more than we get back is ludicrous. I'm hoping walker addresses it soon.

*edit* I just realized you meant drilling on federal lands. I believe you are correct; we receive nothing from the federal drilling. I'm not sure about the specifics though. If so then yeah; this is a waste and just a giveaway to the corporations.

Blue_In_AK

(46,436 posts)
71. I find it fascinating (and more than a little horrifying)
Sun Apr 5, 2015, 02:43 AM
Apr 2015

that those idiots in the legislature are busy chopping programs left and right and yet won't revisit SB21. And have you noticed that everything that the majority of Alaskans favor, Pete Kelly goes out of his way to oppose? I can't stand that holier-than-thou pompous fucker.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chorus of Outrage as Obam...