Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMitt Romney’s Bigotry Needs No Spokesman
(Bloomberg) Mitt Romney didnt exactly fire Ric Grenell, who is gay, as his foreign policy spokesman. But when the religious right got wind of Grenells hiring, his job started to shrink.
Grenell was told to sit in on conference calls with reporters and not say anything, which is tantamount to firing him. He was told to be silent not merely on gay issues. He was told not to talk about anything, even foreign policy. A spokesman who is not allowed to speak -- even internally -- doesnt have much of a job. So Grenell quit, three weeks after he was hired.
For Romney, this is the first big flub of the general election campaign. Until now, his smooth-running machine was one of the more impressive things about his candidacy. It made you think that maybe, as a businessman, he really could bring some efficiency to the White House, if not to the government as a whole.
Besides being offensive, however, this episode is remarkably inept. Grenell apparently was completely open about his sexuality. Why did Romney appoint him in the first place if he was going to hang the guy out to dry as soon as there was any criticism? (And there never was much.) If youre going to be a bigot, at least be smart about it. ...................(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-05-03/mitt-romney-s-bigotry-needs-no-spokesman.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1310 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney’s Bigotry Needs No Spokesman (Original Post)
marmar
May 2012
OP
cali
(114,904 posts)1. I don't know if Romney's a bigot
but he's perfectly willing to cater to bigots if he thinks there's some advantage for him to do so.
longship
(40,416 posts)3. Of course, cali.
But the outcome, the extent to which it is indistinguishable from bigotry, speaks for itself.
We all know here that this would not happen in a Dem campaign. We all know this is an important difference.
Keep on, cali.
monmouth
(21,078 posts)2. A phone call from Tony Perkins may have done that trick. Awful people..n/t