General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTed Cruz’s demented strategy: He doesn’t need to win the White House to push America rightward
Blocking legislation, defunding the government and thwarting compromise is the real mission and he's winning
Ted Cruzs candidacy highlights a fundamental rift in the Republican Party, a rift that observers often misunderstand as simply a tug-of-war between different gradations of conservatism. It is a gulf far more profound than this. Most Republicans recognize that the government must regulate some aspects of American capitalism, providing Social Security, veterans benefits, workplace safety, and basic infrastructure at the very least. But Cruz belongs to a reactionary wing of the party that rejects the idea that the government has any role at all to play in the American economy. Since the 1950s, the leaders of Cruzs wing have been fighting to take the American government back to the days before FDRs New Deal.
After unregulated capitalism sparked the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing 10-year Depression, Democrats and most Republicans came to accept the idea that the federal government must protect workers, provide jobs and establish a social safety net to keep people from starving. But big business leaders in the Republican Party loathed these programs. New Deal labor laws required businessmen to obey basic rules about safety, wages and hours, cutting into profits. New laws gave workers the right to unionize, and the right to join in a political faction strong enough to counter organizations of businessmen. At the same time, the New Deal raised taxes to pay for the new social safety net. Republican businessmen howled that these laws prevented them from making and keeping as much money as possible. They were soak the rich programs that would crack the timbers of the Constitution. The New Deal was socialism, pure and simple, they insisted.
<snip>
In 1951, fresh out of Yale, the son of a wealthy oil man launched a radical movement to break the popular New Deal consensus and take the party back to the pro-business government policies of Herbert Hoover. Speaking for the nations wealthy businessmen, William F. Buckley Jr. insisted that government must never interfere with either Christianity or freedom, a word he turned inside out. In Buckleys worldview, American freedom no longer meant personal liberty; it meant the right of the wealthy to accumulate as much money as possible. He excoriated regulation and taxes as collectivism that redistributed wealth, and warned that welfare legislation destroyed individualism. Bemoaning the extraordinary popularity of Americas new government activism, he maintained that it was leading the nation to full-blown communism. He called for right-minded Americans to reverse the tide and restore the economic freedom he insisted was Americas fundamental principle. But Buckley and his ilk made little headway at first, for a mere 11 years after the Depression, very few Americans still believed in wholly unfettered capitalism.
<snip>
It is an error to dismiss the Cruz candidacy as quixotic. Political observers make the mistake of thinking that he and his ilk are simply at the far right of the same political spectrum that the rest of the country reflects. They are not. Most Americans, Republicans as well as Democrats, accept some version of the New Deal. They believe the government must regulate modern capitalism so that hard-working individuals can rise. Republicans and Democrats often disagree on how to accomplish that goal, but members of the two parties share a basic view that the government has a role to play in society. Many Republicans believe they can work together with Democrats to hash out legislation. These are the people Cruz disdains as the mushy middle. In contrast, Movement Conservatives like Cruz believe that rich businessmen are societys proper leaders and that any government activism to level the economic playing field destroys freedom. They believe their view is absolutely right; to compromise on anything would lose everything.
Cruz does not have to win the White House to win the war. So long as he can grab headlines and whip up voters, Movement Conservatives can continue to hold enough congressional seats to continue to block legislation and defund the government. Then they can do as Buckley hoped: stand athwart history and make it stop.
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/05/ted_cruzs_demented_strategy_he_doesnt_need_to_win_the_white_house_to_push_america_rightward/
Orsino
(37,428 posts)He's a symptom.
America is doing just fine marching rightward with no political leadership pushing back against the corporation.
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...as will the rabid base of republican voters who have signaled their preference for Cruz, Huckabee, Walker, and Paul's bigoted politics over any moderation eigned by bush or others in their party.
Most Americans do not support their politics, despite this article's suggestion that there's something about their positions which has some mass appeal. He's 'winning' his party's direction and initiative in their majority, but he's only as successful as the next election, which, by the history of such extremes in power, should be met in the next election with a massive backlash and reversal.
1939
(1,683 posts)He and the GOP lost big that year, but paved the way for Ronald Reagan.
Bluenorthwest
(45,319 posts)Good lord.