General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA new phase in Anti-Obama Attacks - good read
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/12/opinion/sunday/a-new-phase-in-anti-obama-attacks.html?ref=opinion&_r=0<snip>
Perhaps the most outrageous example of the attack on the presidents legitimacy was a letter signed by 47 Republican senators to the leadership of Iran saying Mr. Obama had no authority to conclude negotiations over Irans nuclear weapons program. Try to imagine the outrage from Republicans if a similar group of Democrats had written to the Kremlin in 1986 telling Mikhail Gorbachev that President Ronald Reagan did not have the authority to negotiate a nuclear arms deal at the Reykjavik summit meeting that winter.
There is no functional difference between that example and the Iran talks, except that the congressional Republican caucus does not like Mr. Obama and wants to deny him any policy victory.
On April 3, Colbert King, a Washington Post columnist summarized a series of actions by Republicans attacking the presidents authority in areas that most Americans thought had been settled by the Civil War. Arizona legislators, for example, have been working on a bill that prohibits this state or any of its political subdivisions from using any personnel or financial resources to enforce, administer or cooperate with an executive order issued by the president of the United States that has not been affirmed by a vote of Congress and signed into law as prescribed by the United States Constitution.
The bill sounds an awful lot like John C. Calhouns secessionist screed of 1828, the South Carolina Exposition and Protest. Laurie Roberts of The Arizona Republic wrote that it was just one of a series of kooky measures aimed at declaring our independence from federal gun laws, from the Affordable Care Act, from the Environmental Protection Agency, from the Department of Justice, from Barack Obama.
Republicans defend this sort of action by accusing Mr. Obama of acting like a king and citing executive actions he has taken on immigration and pollution among other things. Thats nonsense. The same Republicans had no objection when President George W. Bush used his executive authority to authorize the torture of terrorism suspects and tap the phones of American citizens. It is not executive orders the Republicans object to; it is Mr. Obamas policies, and Mr. Obama.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)Civil Wars are like that. Culture wars. They go on.
Cha
(297,774 posts)is show us and history what nasty small minded men and women they are.
That and the current shite they pull.. and Obama just keeps on workin'... outshining them by light years.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)I am convinced, and have been since we lost Gov. Napolitano, that the AZ state legislature is batshit crazy - thanks to Laurie Roberts who injects a voice of sanity in our beautiful state. (retired from Massachusetts 20 years ago) - gov brewers only good deed was to accept ACA -
Me, I just keep moving forward with my support of the of our local DEM Legislative District - during the 2012 election season I worked for OFA - voter registration drive and the updating of the database....We have a good foundation with Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton, he was a Phoenix city councilman..
In recent years there are no DEM challengers most local elections - we came close to knocking down Arpaio, but there are just too many people who are not fully informed (being nice) regarding the tax payers funding arpaios nutty ideas - oh, not to mention the legal challenges that he has lost and we are paying for....
I am on board with the best DEM candidate that can beat the Republicons for POTUS....Too much is at stake to sit on the fence....all my efforts will go to voter registration drives....I am not one to knock on doors...but I do know how to work a computer and make phone calls...
Do I agree with everything Prez Obama has championed..NO - (TPP for one) but still, a republicon prez...no way no how -
And let's not forget the SCOTUS -
TNNurse
(6,929 posts)1) He is Black
2) He is a Democrat
3) He is not a hawk
4) He is sane
5) He actually believes in rights for all Americans
6) He is smarter than most of them and understands the Constitution
7) Did I mention he is Black?? And a Democrat...
malaise
(269,201 posts)He has shattered a carefully crafted caricature about the African-American male.
safeinOhio
(32,729 posts)the POTUS is half Irish, like me.
When I accuse them of that, they get a crazy look on their face and STFU.
malaise
(269,201 posts)Good one
a kennedy
(29,719 posts)gonna have to use that as I'm all Irish.
LMAO!
nakocal
(557 posts)Republicans do not object to President Obama's Policies. They object to the fact that an African-American forgot his place and not only ran for President of the US but won, twice. The fact that republican senators filibuster bills that they not only co-sponsored, but help write, proves this point.
And other proof, the Individual Mandate and Insurance Exchanges were the republican health care plan until President Obama decided to back it.