General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumsmsanthrope
(37,549 posts)a big red penis to me, and I really don't have much more to say about it.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)Phentex
(16,334 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)leftofcool
(19,460 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)JustAnotherGen
(31,937 posts)GusBob
(7,286 posts)Just wait until she announcers her campaign manager, I hear he doesn't even wear a tie
House of Roberts
(5,189 posts)Cha
(297,799 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)oldandhappy
(6,719 posts)Nice giggle to start the day.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)about a candidate's concrete history.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It's gonna be political cartoonists' dream.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)And a stick-thin family in rags on the left side.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I think there are going to be many variations.
From the basic geometries that are involved there are going to be enormous possibilities.
But some marketers say, all attention is good attention when the goal is product recognition.
TexasProgresive
(12,159 posts)They should forget; pant suits, hair, logos (however lame), gender, age, weight - have I covered every "irrational, unreasonable, unsound, unreasoned, unjustifiable, groundless, unfounded; incorrect, erroneous, invalid, spurious, faulty, flawed, fallacious, unscientific; specious, sophistic, casuistic; absurd, preposterous, untenable; informal full of holes, off the wall" excuse for being against Ms. Clinton.
Those attacks are meaningless. If there are real reasons for objecting to her candidacy then they should be put out otherwise the haters got nothing.
I am surprised that I am defending Ms. Clinton but I really don't like these kind of attacks that are meant to denigrate a person without any real substance. As I said in the past I do not support Ms. Clinton in the primary but if she wins the nomination I WILL vote for her as president. My main reason for hoping for another person is that she will be a lightening rod as president that will draw all the ire the repuklicants had for Messrs. Clinton and Obama. If we think that the RWNJs wanted President Obama to be a failed president just wait to you see the obstructionism that she will attract.
treestar
(82,383 posts)This is DU.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]I'm always right. When I'm wrong I admit it.
So then I'm right about being wrong.[/center][/font][hr]
rock
(13,218 posts)Though I can see why you might think that. In fact the topic of the day is inability to distinguish directions. It seems practically everybody thinks that a left pointing arrow is poining to the right! To clarify let's have everyone stand up for a group photo and raise their LEFT hand. See?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)It's the Clinton Scarlet Arrow of Doom!
Sid
gollygee
(22,336 posts)I seem to remember that being a big issue when her husband was president. Or was it when she was running for senate? Or both?