Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mwb970

(11,360 posts)
Sun May 6, 2012, 11:32 AM May 2012

Hilarious climate-change LTTE in Cleveland Plain Dealer

The greenhouse-gas hoax

Unbelievable! We are now going to replace trees with solar panels to reduce emissions, as indicated in the April 29 Business story "Should woodlands be sacrificed to make room for solar farms?" Talk about insanity. Are these not the same people who screamed about destruction of the rainforest not so long ago and who want to preserve nature?

Let's get serious: Greenhouse gases are present at only trace levels in the atmosphere and have no affect on the climate. If they did, they would block the sun's radiation (heat) from reaching the Earth, causing a cooling of the climate. Instead, we are to believe that the sun's heat passes through these gases to reach the Earth and then these same gases, by some unknown process, prevent this heat from escaping. Impossible.

An infrared spectral exam of carbon dioxide shows it to be almost completely transparent to infrared radiation and further proves it is not involved with any climate change. Carbon dioxide is targeted because it is linked to fossil fuels. The phony concern about greenhouse gases is nothing more than a smoke screen to conceal efforts to control and tax energy producers. Let's save the trees and stop wasting taxpayers' money on solar and wind farms.

John M. Sanders, Painesville


I wonder how Mr. Sanders explains the operation of actual greenhouses, which utilize the same "unknown process".
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Jim__

(14,076 posts)
3. I don't think that's very funny.
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:16 PM
May 2012

Corporations can spread lies effectively because of that type of ignorance. Sanders could inform himself on this issue with about 5 minutes worth of research, less time than it took him to write his LTTE.

I hope there is a tremendous response to his letter setting him straight on the science.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
7. sanders doesnt want to inform himself he has fox news giving him all the info he needs
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:33 PM
May 2012

the p.d. is still trying to connect the idiot5 (the kids who tried to blow up the bridge)with ows

petronius

(26,602 posts)
5. Actual greenhouses don't use the same mechanism - they inhibit
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:22 PM
May 2012

convection (mixing), keeping air inside the structure where it continues to warm...

Nikia

(11,411 posts)
6. In second grade, we learned that greenhouse gases were why Venus was hotter than Mercury
Sun May 6, 2012, 12:25 PM
May 2012

I suppose that climate change deniers think that was just environmentalist propaganda too.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
8. The first paragraph actually makes sense.
Sun May 6, 2012, 08:27 PM
May 2012

Destroying woodlands does cause a loss of wildlife habitat, regardless of whether the land is then used for a solar farm or a Wal-Mart.

It's interesting that the writer raises this valid concern in the first paragraph and then goes completely off the rails in the second paragraph.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hilarious climate-change ...