General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA couple of sentences in the bill to fix payments to doctors of Medicare patients bother me.
Second, it cuts billions of dollars from Medicare. It requires seniors who earn between $133,500 and $214,000 a year (and couples making twice that amount) to pay more for insurance and prescription drug coverage, and cuts spending on supplemental Medigap plans in order to discourage over-utilization of services on the taxpayer dime. It also modestly reduces long-term spending on providers of hospice care, home health services and nursing homes.
How can cutting billions from Medicare be a good thing for the elderly.
Hospice and home health care are life savers. Even "modestly" cutting them hurts.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/obama-signs-sweeping-medicare-overhaul-bill
I guess that would fall under the heading of one issue questions....but what a terribly important issue.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)was anticipated earlier. I doubt that is enough to hurt services, at least in the short-term. Agree with you that these are critical services.
Unfortunately, Congress has gotten into this idea that if they increase something here, they have to cut something there. Might work in some cases, but not all. I wish the "there" would become the military budget, but . . . . . . . .
Here's a more detailed discussion -- http://kaiserhealthnews.org/news/faq-could-congress-be-ready-to-fix-medicare-pay-for-doctors-2/
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)From your link:
Under the bill, the current reimbursement schedule would be replaced with payment increases for doctors for the next five years as Medicare transitions to a new system focused on quality, value and accountability. Existing payment incentive programs would be combined into a new Merit-Based Incentive Payment System while other alternative payment models would also be created.
Passage of this historic legislation finally brings an end to an era of uncertainty for Medicare beneficiaries and their physicians facilitating the implementation of innovative care models that will improve care quality and lower costs, said Dr. James L. Madara, chief executive officer of the American Medical Association. Patients will be able to get the care they need and deserve.
Maybe a formula like the one they use to judge teachers called VAM?
I've been wondering.
Here's the FL ValueAdded Formula.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)But, it's more like -- was the patient referred to an ophthalmologist when diabetes was diagnosed type thing.
I think outcomes measures are a reasonable approach with the proper adjustments for severity, age, etc.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)They are usually hesitant about being investigated for Medicare abuse. Yes, that is true.
They are limited very much in what medications they can prescribe. The CMS has declared many drugs not to be used after certain ages, and they monitor the doctor.
I like to think a doctor who has my life in his hands will be reimbursed fairly.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)I have several pals who are doctors and they all seem to be doing pretty well.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Some things are just self-evident.
tblue37
(65,483 posts)to pay that down. Many would like to serve undeserved communities--but unlike other countries, we saddle our professionals with humongous debt loads, so they have to earn enough to pay it off.