General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDeal Reached on Fast-Track Authority for Obama on Trade Pact--NYT
Deal Reached on Fast-Track Authority for Obama on Trade Pact
By JONATHAN WEISMANAPRIL 16, 2015
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/business/obama-trade-legislation-fast-track-authority-trans-pacific-partnership.html
WASHINGTON The leaders of Congresss tax-writing committees reached agreement Thursday on legislation to give President Obama fast track authority to negotiate an ambitious trade accord with 11 other Pacific nations, beginning what is sure to be one of the toughest legislative battles of his last 19 months in office.
The trade promotion authority bill likely to be unveiled Thursday afternoon would give Congress the power to vote on the Trans-Pacific Partnership once it is completed, but would deny lawmakers the chance to amend what would be the largest trade deal since the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Senator Orrin G. Hatch, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, had to agree to stringent requirements for the trade deal to win over Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the ranking Democrat on the finance panel. Those requirements included a human-rights negotiating objective that has never existed in trade agreements, according to lawmakers involved in the talks.
The legislation would also make any final trade agreement public for 60 days before the president signs it, and up to four months before Congress votes. If the agreement, negotiated by the United States Trade Representative, fails to meet the objectives laid out by Congress on labor, environmental and human rights standards a 60-vote majority in the Senate could shut off fast track trade rules and open the deal to amendments.
We got assurances that U.S.T.R. and the president will be negotiating within the parameters defined by Congress, said Representative Dave Reichert, Republican of Washington and a senior member of the Ways and Means Committee. Referring to the trade promotion authority, he added, And if those parameters are somehow or in some way violated during the negotiations, if we get a product thats not adhering to the T.P.A. agreement, then we have switches where we can cut it off.
More at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/business/obama-trade-legislation-fast-track-authority-trans-pacific-partnership.html
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,688 posts)I hate to see the damned thing get thisclose to approval of any sort, precautions in place or not.
I really want to see it deep-sixed.
Damn.
diabeticman
(3,121 posts)worse than what we imagine.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)It is inexcusable from dems..."The Labor Party" is dead...let some party or person come into the 16 election cycle who actually is willing to be the voice of labor, and watch the former labor party sink into the failures of history. I say this because of the presumptive democratic nominee...she isn't now nor will she ever be a champion for labor, the middle class, or US jobs.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)that I couldn't fit in with the copyright limit in the OP and even this is just a snip of the full article:
The A.F.L.-C.I.O. and virtually every major union have vowed a fierce fight, including a six-figure advertising campaign to pressure 16 selected senators and 36 House members to oppose trade promotion authority, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. announced on Thursday.
We cant afford to pass fast track, which would lead to more lost jobs and lower wages, said Richard Trumka, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. president. We want Congress to keep its leverage over trade negotiations not rubber stamp a deal that delivers profits for global corporations, but not good jobs for working people.
Republican leadership is firmly behind the trade authority bill, an exception to the otherwise divisive relationship between Mr. Obama and congressional Republicans. But a sizable minority of Republicans especially in the House are reluctant to cede almost any type of authority to the president. Whether Republican leaders can get their troops in line, and how Mr. Obama can round up enough Democratic votes, is emerging as one of the larger legislative questions of the year.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)KoKo
(84,711 posts)central scrutinizer
(11,661 posts)hello banana republic
bvar22
(39,909 posts)...that the Republicans won't filibuster or obstruct.
THAT should tell you something.
Who says Obama can't get anything done without 60 votes in the Senate?
You will know them by their WORKS.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)I did think the NYT extra snip about how hard Obama and Hillary are going to have explaining this was important though.
Up thread where I replied to "Rhett" about a "Little bit of Hope."
But, yeah....the best thing one can say is "Congress Shows its 'True Colors'" in this. All to give Obama his "face saving" with Prime Minister of Japan.
Post # 10 in case you missed the extra snip from NYT article:
Faryn Balyncd
(5,125 posts)... this would seem to be it. The only level at which the TPP can be subjected to a 60 vote requirement is at the Fast Track level (by filibustering Fast Track itself).
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026519483
you got that right!
bigtree
(86,005 posts)...so it's just a sham of resistance with 'assurances' that never, ever materialize into anything enforceable or real.
Now all that's left is to find the shut-off valve and hit it hard over the next few months left of this kabuki dance. Hopefully the presidential campaigns can influence Congress and shine some light on the end-runs around our democratic process contained in the bill. This 'fast track' is the most anti-democratic rule in our legislature giving almost all of their responsibility and authority to the Executive. This could spell the end of any comity left toward the President from progressives and the working class.