Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 05:27 PM Apr 2015

Deal Reached on Fast-Track Authority for Obama on Trade Pact--NYT

Deal Reached on Fast-Track Authority for Obama on Trade Pact

By JONATHAN WEISMANAPRIL 16, 2015


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/business/obama-trade-legislation-fast-track-authority-trans-pacific-partnership.html

WASHINGTON — The leaders of Congress’s tax-writing committees reached agreement Thursday on legislation to give President Obama “fast track” authority to negotiate an ambitious trade accord with 11 other Pacific nations, beginning what is sure to be one of the toughest legislative battles of his last 19 months in office.

The “trade promotion authority” bill — likely to be unveiled Thursday afternoon — would give Congress the power to vote on the Trans-Pacific Partnership once it is completed, but would deny lawmakers the chance to amend what would be the largest trade deal since the North American Free Trade Agreement.

Senator Orrin G. Hatch, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, and Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin, chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, had to agree to stringent requirements for the trade deal to win over Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, the ranking Democrat on the finance panel. Those requirements included a human-rights negotiating objective that has never existed in trade agreements, according to lawmakers involved in the talks.


The legislation would also make any final trade agreement public for 60 days before the president signs it, and up to four months before Congress votes. If the agreement, negotiated by the United States Trade Representative, fails to meet the objectives laid out by Congress — on labor, environmental and human rights standards — a 60-vote majority in the Senate could shut off “fast track” trade rules and open the deal to amendments.

“We got assurances that U.S.T.R. and the president will be negotiating within the parameters defined by Congress,” said Representative Dave Reichert, Republican of Washington and a senior member of the Ways and Means Committee. Referring to the trade promotion authority, he added, “And if those parameters are somehow or in some way violated during the negotiations, if we get a product that’s not adhering to the T.P.A. agreement, then we have switches where we can cut it off.”



More at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/17/business/obama-trade-legislation-fast-track-authority-trans-pacific-partnership.html

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deal Reached on Fast-Track Authority for Obama on Trade Pact--NYT (Original Post) KoKo Apr 2015 OP
Kick... KoKo Apr 2015 #1
This is scary stuff. CaliforniaPeggy Apr 2015 #2
Corporate overlords can't wait! I am scared this will America and the Poor/middle class diabeticman Apr 2015 #3
I've always expected this shit from thugs pipoman Apr 2015 #4
Looks bad. nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #5
Here's a bit of hope from NYT article KoKo Apr 2015 #7
Thanks KoKo. Do you have a link to the whole article? nm rhett o rick Apr 2015 #12
Here for NYT: KoKo Apr 2015 #13
NAFTA on steroids central scrutinizer Apr 2015 #6
This is the ONE Obama initiative in the 6 years of his administration... bvar22 Apr 2015 #8
I know...shows it all up for what it is: Compromise Against the People.... KoKo Apr 2015 #10
If there was ANY bill that should require 60 votes .... Faryn Balyncd Apr 2015 #11
word.. G_j Apr 2015 #15
bought and sold bigtree Apr 2015 #9
Did we really have any doubt? American politicians are owned by American big business. liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #14
Anyone know if it includes a currency manipulation clause? JaneyVee Apr 2015 #16

CaliforniaPeggy

(149,688 posts)
2. This is scary stuff.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 05:34 PM
Apr 2015

I hate to see the damned thing get thisclose to approval of any sort, precautions in place or not.

I really want to see it deep-sixed.

Damn.

diabeticman

(3,121 posts)
3. Corporate overlords can't wait! I am scared this will America and the Poor/middle class
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 05:39 PM
Apr 2015

worse than what we imagine.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
4. I've always expected this shit from thugs
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 05:46 PM
Apr 2015

It is inexcusable from dems..."The Labor Party" is dead...let some party or person come into the 16 election cycle who actually is willing to be the voice of labor, and watch the former labor party sink into the failures of history. I say this because of the presumptive democratic nominee...she isn't now nor will she ever be a champion for labor, the middle class, or US jobs.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
7. Here's a bit of hope from NYT article
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:02 PM
Apr 2015

that I couldn't fit in with the copyright limit in the OP and even this is just a snip of the full article:

Even with those concessions, the fight to get the trade promotion bill to the president’s desk will be difficult and emotional, badly dividing the Democratic Party’s labor base and putting Hillary Rodham Clinton in a quandary. Many prominent Democrats have come out against one of the biggest priorities of their president. Representative Sander M. Levin of Michigan, the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, was notably absent from trade negotiations.

The A.F.L.-C.I.O. and virtually every major union have vowed a fierce fight, including a six-figure advertising campaign to pressure 16 selected senators and 36 House members to oppose trade promotion authority, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. announced on Thursday.

“We can’t afford to pass fast track, which would lead to more lost jobs and lower wages,” said Richard Trumka, the A.F.L.-C.I.O. president. We want Congress to keep its leverage over trade negotiations — not rubber stamp a deal that delivers profits for global corporations, but not good jobs for working people.”

Republican leadership is firmly behind the trade authority bill, an exception to the otherwise divisive relationship between Mr. Obama and congressional Republicans. But a sizable minority of Republicans — especially in the House — are reluctant to cede almost any type of authority to the president. Whether Republican leaders can get their troops in line, and how Mr. Obama can round up enough Democratic votes, is emerging as one of the larger legislative questions of the year.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
8. This is the ONE Obama initiative in the 6 years of his administration...
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:05 PM
Apr 2015

...that the Republicans won't filibuster or obstruct.
THAT should tell you something.

Who says Obama can't get anything done without 60 votes in the Senate?



You will know them by their WORKS.

KoKo

(84,711 posts)
10. I know...shows it all up for what it is: Compromise Against the People....
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 07:21 PM
Apr 2015

I did think the NYT extra snip about how hard Obama and Hillary are going to have explaining this was important though.

Up thread where I replied to "Rhett" about a "Little bit of Hope."

But, yeah....the best thing one can say is "Congress Shows its 'True Colors'" in this. All to give Obama his "face saving" with Prime Minister of Japan.

Post # 10 in case you missed the extra snip from NYT article:

Faryn Balyncd

(5,125 posts)
11. If there was ANY bill that should require 60 votes ....
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 07:52 PM
Apr 2015


... this would seem to be it. The only level at which the TPP can be subjected to a 60 vote requirement is at the Fast Track level (by filibustering Fast Track itself).


http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026519483









bigtree

(86,005 posts)
9. bought and sold
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 07:20 PM
Apr 2015

...so it's just a sham of resistance with 'assurances' that never, ever materialize into anything enforceable or real.

Now all that's left is to find the shut-off valve and hit it hard over the next few months left of this kabuki dance. Hopefully the presidential campaigns can influence Congress and shine some light on the end-runs around our democratic process contained in the bill. This 'fast track' is the most anti-democratic rule in our legislature giving almost all of their responsibility and authority to the Executive. This could spell the end of any comity left toward the President from progressives and the working class.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Deal Reached on Fast-Trac...