General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Barack Obama’s Trade Deal Puts Hillary Clinton in a Bind
<snip>
This odd-bedfellows moment backs Hillary Clinton, who announced this week that she is running for President, into a particularly uncomfortable corner sandwiched between Republicans and centrist Democrats on one side, and the Democrats liberal, activist base on the other.
<snip>
Most Republicans, the Obama administration and a powerful coalition of business interests, some of whom have donated to Clintons campaign, would like to see the former Secretary of State champion the Trans-Pacific Partnership. They argue that the sweeping, 12-nation free trade pact, the largest-ever for the United States, would been a boon for the U.S. economy.
<snip>
Meantime, an increasingly vociferous coalition of liberal lawmakers, labor leaders and grassroots populists, whose support Clinton will need during the primary campaign, have warned Clinton that they deeply oppose the pact, which they describe as a job-killing sweetheart deal for global corporations.
<snip>
The populist base has also railed against the non-transparent, and sometimes downright secretive, process surrounding the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiation process. As of last fall, a network of 566 stakeholders, 85% of whom represented industry and trade groups, were given limited access to the draft trade agreement, according to the Washington Post. Although more stakeholders have since been invited to access the document through a secure website, the details of the agreement, which will include twelve nations in the Asia-Pacific region, have not been made public or provided to the press. Even lawmakers have not been given copies of the draft plan.
<snip>
In the coming weeks, Clinton will be asked, probably repeatedly, to take a strong position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. If she opposes it, she risks alienating a slew of powerful, corporate interests. But if she doesnt, she risks the rage of the populist left. And if she does nothing, shell lose points with both sides and be criticized by pundits for ducking a major issue.
<snip>
http://time.com/3824912/hillary-clinton-free-trade-tpp/
sendero
(28,552 posts).. if it's a choice between the "populist left" and business interests, HRC will not break a sweat choosing the latter.
cali
(114,904 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)She will want to duck it so she can sound all cozy & concerned about the little people.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)she can pretend to oppose it, knowing that her donors know her real position, and then flip flop after she wins the primary and she doesn't have to care about liberals anymore. What are they going to do, vote for Jeb?
sendero
(28,552 posts)... for Obama.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Correct!
tazkcmo
(7,300 posts)"In the coming weeks, Clinton will be asked, probably repeatedly, to take a strong position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership."
I believe she already has a strong position on the treaty she helped write.