Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:03 PM Apr 2015

How Barack Obama’s Trade Deal Puts Hillary Clinton in a Bind

<snip>

This odd-bedfellows moment backs Hillary Clinton, who announced this week that she is running for President, into a particularly uncomfortable corner — sandwiched between Republicans and centrist Democrats on one side, and the Democrats’ liberal, activist base on the other.

<snip>

Most Republicans, the Obama administration and a powerful coalition of business interests, some of whom have donated to Clinton’s campaign, would like to see the former Secretary of State champion the Trans-Pacific Partnership. They argue that the sweeping, 12-nation free trade pact, the largest-ever for the United States, would been a boon for the U.S. economy.

<snip>

Meantime, an increasingly vociferous coalition of liberal lawmakers, labor leaders and grassroots populists, whose support Clinton will need during the primary campaign, have warned Clinton that they deeply oppose the pact, which they describe as a job-killing sweetheart deal for global corporations.

<snip>

The populist base has also railed against the non-transparent, and sometimes downright secretive, process surrounding the Trans-Pacific Partnership negotiation process. As of last fall, a network of 566 stakeholders, 85% of whom represented industry and trade groups, were given limited access to the draft trade agreement, according to the Washington Post. Although more stakeholders have since been invited to access the document through a secure website, the details of the agreement, which will include twelve nations in the Asia-Pacific region, have not been made public or provided to the press. Even lawmakers have not been given copies of the draft plan.

<snip>

In the coming weeks, Clinton will be asked, probably repeatedly, to take a strong position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership. If she opposes it, she risks alienating a slew of powerful, corporate interests. But if she doesn’t, she risks the rage of the populist left. And if she does nothing, she’ll lose points with both sides and be criticized by pundits for ducking a major issue.

<snip>
http://time.com/3824912/hillary-clinton-free-trade-tpp/

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Barack Obama’s Trade Deal Puts Hillary Clinton in a Bind (Original Post) cali Apr 2015 OP
Come on... sendero Apr 2015 #1
I suspect she won't address it until after the vote on the TPA cali Apr 2015 #5
True, but she's trying to sell herself as a populist right now. Most folks don't know the history peacebird Apr 2015 #6
Maybe she has already cointd the votes. Thinkingabout Apr 2015 #2
She helped write it. That's makes it her problem. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #3
i have an idea Enrique Apr 2015 #4
Worked ... sendero Apr 2015 #8
Ding! Ding! Ding! Maedhros Apr 2015 #10
A strong position. tazkcmo Apr 2015 #7
http://cdn.billmoyers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/AP644633657014.jpg blkmusclmachine Apr 2015 #9

sendero

(28,552 posts)
1. Come on...
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:05 PM
Apr 2015

.. if it's a choice between the "populist left" and business interests, HRC will not break a sweat choosing the latter.

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
6. True, but she's trying to sell herself as a populist right now. Most folks don't know the history
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:15 PM
Apr 2015

She will want to duck it so she can sound all cozy & concerned about the little people.

Enrique

(27,461 posts)
4. i have an idea
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:13 PM
Apr 2015

she can pretend to oppose it, knowing that her donors know her real position, and then flip flop after she wins the primary and she doesn't have to care about liberals anymore. What are they going to do, vote for Jeb?

tazkcmo

(7,300 posts)
7. A strong position.
Thu Apr 16, 2015, 06:16 PM
Apr 2015

"In the coming weeks, Clinton will be asked, probably repeatedly, to take a strong position on the Trans-Pacific Partnership."

I believe she already has a strong position on the treaty she helped write.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Barack Obama’s Trade ...