General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHillary Clinton -"Social Security is not a luxury."
It is a necessity for the majority of people who draw from Social Security. So I think there will be some big political arguments about Social Security. And my only question to everybody who thinks we can privatize Social Security or undermine it in some way -- and what is going to happen to all these people who worked 27 years at the southern company? What is going to happen? It is just wrong. Everybody take a deep breath.
That's my Hillary. None of this retire at ninety bullshit coming from the Republicants.
(For clarification the baby pic is from her prior campaign. The quote is from yesterday.)
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Triana
(22,666 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)Well she doesn't really mean it. She intends to give the SS fund to the corporations.
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)Doesn't that make so much sense?
treestar
(82,383 posts)what is he waiting for?
cali
(114,904 posts)is she willing to talk about raising it?
but yes, she's clearly light years better than any republican.
from an article published a year ago:
Last month, Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) announced plans to introduce a bill to increase the annual cost-of-living adjustments for Social Security. He proposed to pay for it by raising the Social Security payroll tax rate of the wealthiest Americans -- those who make more than $250,000 per year -- closer to the rate already paid by middle and working class American workers.
Many people dont know that any income above $117,000 per year is not taxed by Social Security (this limit on the amount of earnings subject to the tax is adjusted annually to keep up with inflation). That means that someone who makes twice the cap this year $234,000 pays the tax on only half of his or her wages. And those lucky enough to make at least $1.2 million per year are taxed by Social Security on less than one-tenth of their income.
In other words, workers who make $117,000 or less per year the vast majority, as a recent analysis by the Center for Economic and Policy Research shows -- pay a higher Social Security payroll tax rate than the 5.6 percent who make more.
Merkley will be joining Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) and Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), who also have introduced bills to apply the Social Security payroll tax to wages above $250,000. These bills are similar to a proposal by Barack Obama during the 2008 presidential campaign. The Social Security Administrations Chief Actuary estimates that the payroll tax cap sections of these proposals would reduce the programs long-term budget shortfall by about 80 percent.
<snip>
http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/economy-budget/204996-scrapping-the-social-security-payroll-tax-cap
joshdawg
(2,648 posts)keep your hands off my Social Security.
I, for one, depend on SS. Cannot live without it. I paid for it. I earned it. And, it is not a luxury, believe me.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Americans forget that they pay into SSI through their pay checks every two weeks/month. SSI is earned. The GOPers have used the word "entitlement" as a misinformed weapon.
ProfessorGAC
(65,042 posts)They use entitlement like it's a curse word.
They want to call SS an entitlement, then they need to know that i'm damned well entitled to a program into which i paid in good faith that intended to take care of some people a bit now, so that i'll be a little better off later.
I've been capped out for well over a decade, and i would not have objected to having to pay the tax on a little extra income if it meant that the system was more robust. Then these idiots wouldn't constantly be talking about finding ways to muck it up.
SSI is seen as an entitlement as people not able to work and in poverty and have not contributed enough or never contributed to SS thru payroll deductions to receive SSDI (disability) or regular SS earned benefits can receive SSI. SSI is more of a poverty safety net since no earned income or deductions ever have to be made.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)on middle-class families and seniors.
Cha
(297,237 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NT
Overseas
(12,121 posts)Snotcicles
(9,089 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Some of Hillary Clinton's statements on Social Security
"And I will say, #1, dont cut benefits on current beneficiaries theyre already having a hard enough time."
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NT
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)if President Obama "changed", as you so blithely note in the first link; why, are you citing to the second?
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)He's even got a GOP Congress with which to do it.
Should be easy easy easy!
And that way, Hillary wouldn't have to GUT CUT SLASH Social Security.
When do you think Obama will work with Mitch to make it happen?
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)It'll be announced in the SOTU.
Bank on it.
Sid
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)NT
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)This thread shows that:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=439x761367
When you view our friend's posts with that in mind, they make a lot more sense.
Sid
It was in 2011 note this sentence:
In our friend's view, that was true.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)When you go into the voting booth with unrealistic expectations you are bound to be disappointed...
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)TheKentuckian
(25,026 posts)If you want to pitch me on "chess" or some bull, save your breath because it sure fooled me because in light of austerity committee after austerity committee and austerity gangs time and time again even when TeaPubliKlan cosponsors dropped he'd push and when one group failed he'd be right back leading the charge.
Then account for appointments not only to the austerity efforts but to power positions of corporate conservatives and the simplest answer such was his agenda.
He and Rmoney had nothing to debate, in an election season you don't want to back that loathsome crook into a corner with his most critical demographic?
That whole line of reasoning is naive fancy at best and bafflingly devoid of any logic other than what if any can be extracted from nearly religious and child like faith.
Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)want to do away with SS and yet the Haters are working day and night against HRC
MoonRiver
(36,926 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)Edit to remove request for link, just saw post #3.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Democracy depends on equality for all. Democracy is a ideal that is inclusive. Democracy is made up numerous opinions and thoughts that works for the betterment of all of society. Its not selfish, its not greedy, it does not hurt its people. Everyone shares in prosperity.
Constructive agreement and disagreement is healthy for a Democracy. Sometimes the DU reflects that.
Thanks for keeping hope alive!
samsingh
(17,598 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)"fake populism", my ass.
Sid
jwirr
(39,215 posts)- she is a Democrat and that is one of our mainstays.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Remember the CPI (Catfood Price Index?)
"We had to adjust the market basket a little. Hamburger is pretty much the same thing as steak, and when you come right down to it, a lot of old people really can't tell the difference between the better brands of pet food and hamburger, especially when they prepare it as meatloaf to stretch it out a little."
The Dems do not have a wonderful track record of maintaining ironclad defenses against things like the CPI.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)always mean to follow through.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)seems to legitimize it in a very unfortunate way. "Yeah, it's no big deal. Even Obama said so."
closeupready
(29,503 posts)sympathies. K&R
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)calling it a tax increase on seniors and middle-class families.
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)Thank you.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)ananda
(28,860 posts)People pay into SS and they have a right
to the payout after retirement.
Hekate
(90,686 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)I'd like to hear all that was said. TIA.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)There is a little bit of video from 2008 that has nothing to do with SS you might like, but other than that the commentators just enjoy hearing the sounds of their own voices and dissing her. Also they give a spot to Lindsey Graham!
I think MSM is going to be very negative toward her and try to stop her words from reaching the public, as they with Obama from Day Two.
I couldn't get your link to play, so found this, but it's no wonder most people don't know what she stands for if she goes to all these meetings and they keep on censoring her...
Disappointing. At the end of the webpage with your link there's a link of Mary Matalin, the GOP wife of James Carvile, saying she hopes she wins the nomination because 'she'll be easy to beat.'
This isn't in the bag by a long shot.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)Like Webster Tarpley, Alex Jones and the other RWNJs. Nice folks the CDS media are running with!
William769
(55,147 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)bvar22
(39,909 posts)I sat there watching my TV and realized that Hillary didn't have the 1st clue about America's Working Class.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)backed with action, I could find the pill easier to swallow.
zappaman
(20,606 posts)I remember reading on DU that Obama was going to gut SS.
If he hasn't yet, I'm sure he will soon!