Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:16 AM Apr 2015

TPP Poll

really simple poll.


27 votes, 0 passes | Time left: Unlimited
We don't know enough to judge its merits
2 (7%)
opposed
25 (93%)
support
0 (0%)
don't particularly care one way or the other. It's not an important issue
0 (0%)
Show usernames
Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
TPP Poll (Original Post) cali Apr 2015 OP
I'm trying to imagine what the Founders would have thought of this monstrosity... First Speaker Apr 2015 #1
Will Hillary vote in this poll so we can find out where she stands? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #2
Sadly, I'm pretty sure we know that. cali Apr 2015 #5
So would I. But, being politically coy is an art she has mastered. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #7
If she was against it, she would have already said so by now n/t Populist_Prole Apr 2015 #17
It is simple - but much of my opposition comes from my frustration at the secrecy surrounding it el_bryanto Apr 2015 #3
Opposed. H2O Man Apr 2015 #4
Lots of fearmongering, criticism of Obama, short-sightedness, misinformation, BS, etc. Hoyt Apr 2015 #6
Corporate lackeys are writing it. GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #8
Nope, US Trade Reps and their counterparts -- government officials in the other countries. Hoyt Apr 2015 #13
and who had access and input into it? cali Apr 2015 #14
Lots of folks, including darn near every major Union. I get they didn't listen to you, but . . . . . Hoyt Apr 2015 #15
bullshit obfuscating again. USTR labor committee memberbership does cali Apr 2015 #19
That junk is years old, there's even a new Trade Rep appointed by Obama. More misinformation. Hoyt Apr 2015 #20
Let's take a look at some of the organizations on that list of "605" that you fail to mention -- Hoyt Apr 2015 #23
The AFL-CIO refutes your statements about labor's role Jim Lane Apr 2015 #24
Corporations didn't have a seat either. I don't think it would be very productive to hold the Hoyt Apr 2015 #25
Published sources have stated that corporations DID have a seat. Jim Lane Apr 2015 #31
Hold it right there nadinbrzezinski Apr 2015 #37
Probably because foreign government officials were there, and right wing militia groups are Hoyt Apr 2015 #38
Really? Nope nadinbrzezinski Apr 2015 #41
Did you get any photos of corporate folks IN THE NEGOTIATING ROOMS? Hoyt Apr 2015 #43
Becuase those floors were out of the reach of ANY MEDIA nadinbrzezinski Apr 2015 #44
I bet you didn't get in on the Iran nuke talks, or even the Democratic convention, either. Hoyt Apr 2015 #46
wrong, I covered the state democratic convention nadinbrzezinski Apr 2015 #47
One last thing, you truly have no clue what you nadinbrzezinski Apr 2015 #45
it's a simple poll. If you think you could craft one that has a greater cali Apr 2015 #9
And the Tbaggers are against it, they don't like them "foreigners" and think America should close Hoyt Apr 2015 #16
how is that relevant when repub support of it as a whole is far, far greater cali Apr 2015 #30
Look, I worked for an organization like those once. There is no benefit in not screaming life is Hoyt Apr 2015 #32
pathetic to lump all those orgs together cali Apr 2015 #34
I don't like Norquist for his stand on taxes, as a board member of the racist NRA, and more.. Hoyt Apr 2015 #35
No matter what comes out, various water carriers will never think we know enough Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2015 #10
that is undoubtedly true cali Apr 2015 #12
K & R appalachiablue Apr 2015 #11
Oppose and I oppose anyone that stands for it. Autumn Apr 2015 #18
Opposed. lovemydog Apr 2015 #21
seems to me this is an inevitable part of a long-term equalization process 0rganism Apr 2015 #22
I personally don't know enough. I am currently opposed, but I must admit that I don't know enough Xyzse Apr 2015 #26
Here's what I don't get with TPTB. If TPP is so damn great, then why are they so damn RKP5637 Apr 2015 #27
Two respondants said the TPP isn't an important issue. Maedhros Apr 2015 #28
They are agreeing with Paul Krugman. Nye Bevan Apr 2015 #33
Krugman changed his mind. He now opposes it cali Apr 2015 #39
A meek opposition. Basically he wonders why Obama is trying to convince myopic people it's Hoyt Apr 2015 #49
Maybe they're not from a country affected by it. hughee99 Apr 2015 #40
It's rather like buying a Yugo. Your neighbors will know you're an Idiot. BlueJazz Apr 2015 #29
Opposed because transparency is absent. LiberalAndProud Apr 2015 #36
Opposed (nt) bigwillq Apr 2015 #42
A very small amount just don't know for sure lol. Rex Apr 2015 #48

First Speaker

(4,858 posts)
1. I'm trying to imagine what the Founders would have thought of this monstrosity...
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:18 AM
Apr 2015

...but the words are failing me...

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. Sadly, I'm pretty sure we know that.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:39 AM
Apr 2015

You know something weird, Tierra? (and I don't think you'll agree with me) If HRC would just be straight on such issues, I'd heartily disagree, but I'd have much more respect for her.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
7. So would I. But, being politically coy is an art she has mastered.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:56 AM
Apr 2015

Not to say that most politicians don't participate in the same art. The *nudge-nudge*, *wink-wink*, *maybe I will, maybe I won't dance * of "Practical" politics.

I believe that, in a Democracy we are supposed to be skeptical of politicians and scrutinize candidates and hold them accountable. And, I don't believe that doing that makes us "haters". It makes us citizens.

Thanks for your posts, cali. We've differed sometimes but I admire your tenacity and willingness to defend what you say.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
3. It is simple - but much of my opposition comes from my frustration at the secrecy surrounding it
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:37 AM
Apr 2015

Given the people involved I don't trust that it will be good for the American People, and as such I oppose it. There are probably aspects of it I would support; and I'm not opposed to all treaties, but I am suspicious.

Bryant

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
6. Lots of fearmongering, criticism of Obama, short-sightedness, misinformation, BS, etc.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 10:44 AM
Apr 2015

It's ludicrous to believe all the countries in the TPP and TTIP are corporate lackeys, and that Obama is trying to sell us into slavery. Christ, it's like listening to a bunch of Tbaggers.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
13. Nope, US Trade Reps and their counterparts -- government officials in the other countries.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 12:36 PM
Apr 2015
But why should you be accurate and/or honest, hardly anyone else is?

The TPP is a treaty that has been written behind closed doors by the corporate world -- Bernie Sanders.

Is he misinformed or just spreading chit? The USTR and participating States negotiate and write the agreements, not corporations. Obama appointed the top Reps, and the rest are pretty much career government officials.

Below are the names of USTR’s lead negotiators for the TPP.

Overall Leads
Lead Negotiator Barbara Weisel
Deputy Lead Negotiator Drew Quinn

Chapter Leads
Agriculture Roger Wentzel
Ag Market Access Japan Brian Grunenfelder
Capacity Building Drew Quinn/Lia Theodosiou-Pisanelli
Competitiveness Drew Quinn
Competition/SOE’s Daniel Watson
Customs Jason Bernstein
Development Drew Quinn/Lia Theodosiou-Pisanelli
E-Commerce Jonathan McHale
Environment Kelly Milton
Financial Services Christine Bliss
Government Procurement Drew Quinn
Industrial Goods Sushan Demirjian
Intellectual Property Rights Probir Mehta
Investment Daniel Bahar
Labor Lewis Karesh
Legal/Institutional Issues María Pagán
Regulatory Coherence Drew Quinn/Lia Theodosiou-Pisanelli
Rules of Origin Jason Bernstein
Services Todd Nissen
SMEs Sushan Demirjian
SPS Sharon Bomer
TBT Julia Doherty
Telecommunications Jonathan McHale
Textiles Gail Strickler
Trade Remedies Victor Mroczka


Here is background of Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Labor --
Lewis Karesh was named Assistant U.S. Trade Representative for Labor in August 2005. In this capacity, he oversees trade and labor issues for USTR, including serving as chief negotiator of labor provisions in multilateral, regional, and bilateral free trade agreements, formulating recommendations concerning countries' adherence to worker rights provisions of U.S. trade preference programs, and developing U.S. positions on the relationship between trade and labor in the International Labor Organization, World Trade Organization, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Inter-American Conference of Ministers of Labor, and other relevant international bodies.

Prior to joining USTR, Mr. Karesh spent 18 years with the U.S. Department of Labor, most recently serving as Director of the Office of Trade Agreement Implementation (OTAI). As head of OTAI, Mr. Karesh was responsible for administering U.S. obligations under the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation (the labor supplemental agreement to the North American Free Trade Agreement) and the labor chapters of bilateral and regional free trade agreements. While at the Department of Labor, Mr. Karesh served as the lead U.S. negotiator for the labor provisions of the U.S.-Morocco Free Trade Agreement and on U.S. labor and dispute settlement negotiating teams for similar agreements with Chile, Singapore, Australia, Central America, and Bahrain.

Mr. Karesh also served as an attorney for nine years with the Department of Labor's Office of the Solicitor where he acted as a legal advisor during negotiation and implementation of the North American Agreement on Labor Cooperation. He also served as legal counsel on matters involving the North American Free Trade Agreement, the World Trade Organization, and the International Labor Organization.

Mr. Karesh holds a J.D. from the University of North Carolina and a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from North Carolina State University.


Kelly Miltion -- Environment has primarily worked for government agencies, as well.


You guys can check out the other negotiators. Bernie should do the same.
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
14. and who had access and input into it?
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 12:41 PM
Apr 2015

denial, obfuscation and misrepresentation is hoyt's game.

and yes, hoyt, bernie knows a fuck of a lot more about the details than YOU, hoyt.

surely, hoyt, you'll admit that bernie and schumer and other senators and reps have more access than you do.

right, hoyt?

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
15. Lots of folks, including darn near every major Union. I get they didn't listen to you, but . . . . .
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 12:43 PM
Apr 2015

USTR Labor Advisory Committee Members

Clayola Brown National President, A. Philip Randolph Institute (APRI)
Thomas Buffenbarger International President, International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers (IAM)
Jim Clark President, International Union of Electronic, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers (IUE)
Leo Gerard International President, United Steelworkers (USW)
Raymond Hair
President, American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada (AFM), AFL-CIO/CLC

Joseph T. Hansen President, United Food & Commercial Workers (UFCW)
Mary Kay Henry International President, Service Employees International Union (SEIU)
Ed Hill International President, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW)
James P. Hoffa General President, International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT)
Ken Howard President, Screen Actors Guild/American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA)
Gregory Junemann International President, International Federation of Professional & Technical Engineers (IFPTE)
Richard Kline President,Union Label & Service Trades Department, AFL-CIO
Lee Moak President, International Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), AFL-CIO
Jorge Ramirez President, Chicago Federation of Labor
Cecil E. Roberts, Jr. President, United Mineworkers of America (UMWA)
Arturo Rodriguez President, United Farm Workers of America (UFW)
Sara Nelson International President, Association of Flight Atendants, AFL-CIO (CWA)
Lee Saunders President, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees (AFSCME)
Richard Trumka President, American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations (AFL-CIO)
Baldemar Velasquez President, Farm Labor Organizing Committee (FLOC)
Randi Weingarten President, American Federation of Teachers (AFT)
Dennis Williams President, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW)
Forthcoming President, Transportation and Trades Department, AFL-CIO

_____________

Those guys -- who I would vote for if they were in my area, despite their bull on this -- are playing politics.

Did you take me off Ignore?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
19. bullshit obfuscating again. USTR labor committee memberbership does
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 12:54 PM
Apr 2015

not mean they had either access or input into the TPP.

here is a list of who did.

http://sojo.net/blogs/2012/06/29/insider-list

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
20. That junk is years old, there's even a new Trade Rep appointed by Obama. More misinformation.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 01:00 PM
Apr 2015
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
23. Let's take a look at some of the organizations on that list of "605" that you fail to mention --
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 01:31 PM
Apr 2015

The American Association for Laboratory Accreditation
Africa-America Institute
Alliance of Western Milk Producers
American Butter Institute
American Farm Bureau Federation
American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF)
American Sheep Industry Association, Inc.
American Society of Civil Engineers
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Audubon Naturalist Society
Boston University
Brookings Institution
Business Software Alliance
Commissioner, Miami Dade County
Consumers Union
Council of Great Lakes Governors
Council of State Governments

Dept. of Economic Dev. & Commerce
Duke University
Florida Farm Bureau Federation
Georgia Agricultural Commodity Commission for Peanuts
Institute for International Economics
Land O’ Lakes, Inc.
Maine House of Representatives
Maryland Department of Agriculture
Maryland Port Administration
Mayor/ Orlando, Florida
Mayor/City of Doral, Florida
Mississippi Development Authority
National Association of Attorneys General
National Center for State Courts
National Conference of State Legislatures
National Governors Association
North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services
North Carolina Farm Bureau
Office of Governor of State of Washington
Office of Governor/New Jersey
Princeton Healthcare, Inc.
South Carolina Farm Bureau
South Carolina State Ports Authority
State of Arizona
State of Nevanda Global Trade & Investment
Supreme Court Chief Justice/Wisconsin
Texas A&M University
Texas Department of Agriculture
Texas Farm Bureau
Texas House of Representatives
The Humane Society of the United States
Treasurer, State of Nevada
United Auto Workers
United Farmers USA, Inc.
United Food and Commercial Workers Union (UFCW)

Washington State Potato Commission


Yea, there are some big businesses on there too. I'd be willing to be a bunch of folks right here work for them.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
24. The AFL-CIO refutes your statements about labor's role
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:30 PM
Apr 2015

I direct your attention to "Labor's So-Called 'Seat at the Table' at TPP Negotiations" on the AFL-CIO website.

The whole piece is very much worth reading but I'll note only the highlights. A couple specific questions are answered:

I’ve heard “labor” has a seat at the table and gets to see the TPP texts. Is this true?
No. {explanation snipped}

I’ve heard USTR say the AFL-CIO is satisfied with the level of transparency in the TPP negotiations. Is this true?
No. {explanation snipped}


The part that I will quote in full addresses the Advisory Committees that you make so much of:

As President Richard Trumka explained to Congress in February 2014, as it was becoming more clear that our policy recommendations were not being incorporated into the TPP texts: access is no substitute for meaningful participation:

More important than quantity of access, however, is quality of access. A seat on the LAC {Labor Advisory Committee} is not a seat at the negotiating table, much less an assurance that labor’s policy proposals will be incorporated into either the U.S. proposal or the final agreement. Because LAC members do not have access to the full negotiating texts, or to information regarding USTR priorities and choices, we cannot effectively influence the inevitable trade-offs in ways that would build the middle class and protect our democratic systems. And because we cannot share what little we do know with our membership or the larger public, we cannot use the traditional tools that civil society uses to offset the power of economic elites: education, organization, and mobilization of the public.

Perhaps the best proof, however, that the LAC has not been a valuable tool in creating people-centered trade agreements is the actual content of the final agreements. The AFL-CIO has criticized the vast majority of trade agreements since NAFTA. If these trade agreements worked to create good jobs for workers, the AFL-CIO would be fighting for them as hard as or harder than Wall Street and the global corporations do. The tragic fact is that—despite some marginal progress over the years in some chapters—the model hasn’t changed. This flawed model has led to many trade agreements that skew their benefits toward the 1% and have exacerbated trade deficits, wage suppression, the dismantling of our manufacturing sector and income inequality.


So, as to these window-dressing Advisory Committees, the old joke applies: Labor is holding the reins but they're not attached to the horses.
 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
25. Corporations didn't have a seat either. I don't think it would be very productive to hold the
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:54 PM
Apr 2015

negotiations in a big stadium with anyone there who wants to rant. Some folks would likely get killed.

 

Jim Lane

(11,175 posts)
31. Published sources have stated that corporations DID have a seat.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:12 PM
Apr 2015

Frankly, I don't think your mind is open on this subject, so I'm not going to go do more research, the way I did with regard to your comments about labor. My admittedly limited understanding of the facts is that the statement by Bernie Sanders is completely accurate. I haven't heard of there being any denial from the USTR. Nothing you've posted has caused me to question Sanders's statement.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
37. Hold it right there
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:41 PM
Apr 2015

so I did imagine the corp types at the San Diego Round of negotiations? I think, I and the rest of the press corp have an excellent imagination.

This should remind me to go get my eyes checked

And you still need to answer why the place was crawling with SWAT armed to the teeth, INSDE the hotel.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
38. Probably because foreign government officials were there, and right wing militia groups are
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:44 PM
Apr 2015

Nationalists and xenophobes.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
41. Really? Nope
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:46 PM
Apr 2015

wrong.

They were there to keep us middling types, with cameras, recorders, and other devices away from certain floors.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
43. Did you get any photos of corporate folks IN THE NEGOTIATING ROOMS?
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:14 PM
Apr 2015

Bet you didnt, unless you photoshopped them.

Must not have been a secret meeting if the "middlings" got inside the building.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
44. Becuase those floors were out of the reach of ANY MEDIA
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:25 PM
Apr 2015

nope, none of us did. In fact coming across the USTR, and the Mexican Rep was an accident. After that they took service elevators. You explain to me why. Since you think this is so open and transparent and great.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
46. I bet you didn't get in on the Iran nuke talks, or even the Democratic convention, either.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:51 PM
Apr 2015

But don't feel bad, I wasnt invited either. But I don't take it personally.

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
47. wrong, I covered the state democratic convention
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:16 PM
Apr 2015

and I must say, the state democratic convention had a far better media room than either Comicon, or my friends at the TTP. You'd think they would like to keep us more or less caffeinated. Just having water there and the worst wi fi on any floor was by design too. Now the starbucks downstairs did become a the de-facto news room.

Look, you are making this about how great with rainbows and farts and unicorns this is. The rest of us who actually remember how horrible the rest of them have been are going to continue to push back on you and your false narratives, and now cute, not original, just cute, personal attacks.

Ed, for clarity

 

nadinbrzezinski

(154,021 posts)
45. One last thing, you truly have no clue what you
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 08:26 PM
Apr 2015

are talking about. NOT A ONE.

And now I am expecting you to tell me just how angry real economists are with the administration. Go ahead, for your daily minute of hate on Robert Reich.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
9. it's a simple poll. If you think you could craft one that has a greater
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 11:07 AM
Apr 2015

degree of impartiallity, go for it.

and the irony of YOU comparing anyone else at all to teabaggers in any way, is delicious. so is your bitter whinging.

And gee, why the fuck would so many of us give more weight to the words of people like Bernie Sanders and Warren and Brown and Stiglitz over anything the likes of YOU has to say?

It's the repukes and repuke like dems that support this. Congressional dems do not.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
16. And the Tbaggers are against it, they don't like them "foreigners" and think America should close
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 12:51 PM
Apr 2015

its borders and kick em all out. Natonalism, No trade with foreigners, America First and all that junk.

Sound familiar?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
30. how is that relevant when repub support of it as a whole is far, far greater
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:43 PM
Apr 2015

than dem support of it?

And then there are such organizations as the Natural Resource Defense Council, The Sierra Club, 350.org, Medecins Sans Frontiere, not to mention Unions and many other liberal public interest groups and non-profits. All opposed. Oh, and several state democratic parties like Ohio and the AG of NY state and on and on.

pretending there's an equivalency is just nuts. and less than honest.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
32. Look, I worked for an organization like those once. There is no benefit in not screaming life is
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:18 PM
Apr 2015

awful. Complaining attracts new members and makes current members happy.

They are never satisfied with improvements.

Doing nothing does not advance their cause. From what I've seen so far, the TPP advances their cause, its just not good enough for them.

Please respond tohttp://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6544428

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
34. pathetic to lump all those orgs together
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:23 PM
Apr 2015

But hey hoyt, you go with your faith in heritage foundation and drumsticks like Grover norquist

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
35. I don't like Norquist for his stand on taxes, as a board member of the racist NRA, and more..
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:37 PM
Apr 2015

Fortunately, the Brookings Institute was on the list that you and Bernie Sanders said were all corporations.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
10. No matter what comes out, various water carriers will never think we know enough
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 11:14 AM
Apr 2015

until it's been passed and it's too late.

0rganism

(23,954 posts)
22. seems to me this is an inevitable part of a long-term equalization process
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 01:15 PM
Apr 2015

For a long time, tariffs and trade barriers enabled an artificial situation in which workers in country A could sustain a much higher quality of life than workers in country B. now those barriers are coming down, and while we sometimes see marginal improvements in the lot of those in country B, it seems like most of what we get is an erosion of the quality of life for workers in country A, because if an employer is free to seek the cheapest sources of labor between those two labor pools it's going to be hard to compete with country B's low low prices. in order to retain some fraction of their former quality of life, country A's workers have to point to less immediate benefits, like stable infrastructures and better education. However, in the long run, workers affected by such free trade agreements will share a situation quite close to what country B's workers started with.

Naturally it's a 2-edged sword, as said company can no longer market its goods at higher prices to a relatively well-off population in country A. As labor compensation gradually equalizes between A and B, the marginal utility of imported consumer goods will drop off in country A, driving down prices and forcing capitalists to dig even deeper into production's fixed costs (labor, cost of materials, regulatory compliance) to prop up obscene levels of economic profits for the owning class. This leads to a demand among the capitalist owning class for further "free trade" deals to continue lowering expectations for compensation and regulation.

This has been a consequence not only of the "free trade" fanaticism of the last 25 years, but also of our cold war antagonism towards labor rights and unionization which started long before. Such "free trade" deals are symptomatic of weakened and nonexistent solidarity among working classes of different nations; by failing to join in the struggle to enhance the lives of workers in country B, country A's workers will now see their own circumstances deteriorate. Whether this results in some global Marxian class struggle and the eventual overthrow of the super-wealthy remains to be seen.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
26. I personally don't know enough. I am currently opposed, but I must admit that I don't know enough
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:55 PM
Apr 2015

To fully stay opposed, depending on who can convince me with more info.

RKP5637

(67,108 posts)
27. Here's what I don't get with TPTB. If TPP is so damn great, then why are they so damn
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:06 PM
Apr 2015

secretive. Hence, I'm against it, because I don't trust secrets like this!

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
49. A meek opposition. Basically he wonders why Obama is trying to convince myopic people it's
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 09:20 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Tue Apr 21, 2015, 11:14 PM - Edit history (1)

important to our future. I applaud him.

hughee99

(16,113 posts)
40. Maybe they're not from a country affected by it.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:45 PM
Apr 2015

A lot of DUers are from other nations, although I'm not sure why someone who doesn't think it's a big issue would bother to come on this thread.

LiberalAndProud

(12,799 posts)
36. Opposed because transparency is absent.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:39 PM
Apr 2015

If this were a good agreement, I would think the specifics would be available to the general public.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»TPP Poll