General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThirty years in jail for a single hair: the FBI's 'mass disaster' of false conviction
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/21/fbi-jail-hair-mass-disaster-false-conviction<snip>
George Perrot has spent almost 30 years in prison thanks to a single hair. It was discovered by an FBI agent on the bedsheet of a 78-year-old woman who had been raped by a burglar in her home in Springfield, Massachusetts, in 1985.
Perrot, then 17, was put on trial, despite the absence of physical evidence tying him to the crime scene. There was no semen. There was no blood. And so there was no way to conduct a conclusive DNA test.
Even the victim testified that the defendant looked nothing like her attacker: he had a short haircut and was clean-shaven, while Perrot had a long shaggy mop, a moustache and a goatee beard.
But there was that strand of hair. At a key stage in the 1992 rape and burglary trial, an FBI agent named Wayne Oakes took the witness stand, describing himself to the jury as an expert in hair and textile fibers as would so many of the agencys trial witnesses, in condemning hundreds of people to long prison sentences.
-----------------------------
Justice my ass - and yet there are folks who support the death penalty
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)It sure as hell cuts down on all these embarrassing false conviction discoveries.
malaise
(268,998 posts)for falsely imprisoned mostly young men whose lives were stolen from them.
The long hair and beard did him in - count on it - those establishment MoFos hated folks with long hair.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)Fukin' Hippie, Drug Addict and sexual pervert.
Jus' kiddin'
malaise
(268,998 posts)PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)he likely was of something even more vile. Either way, there's another Commie Mo Fo off the street.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)At least 10 of 12 thought that. "The cops hauled this guy in so he is guilty of something. They did their job and got him off the street, now we need to do ours and keep him off the street."
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)malaise
(268,998 posts)who aren't prepared to tolerate it
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)loans being decided, wealth being allocated and sold, decisions on schools - a hundred things, all based on skin color becoming equal.
Just let me know when I can look, cause it ain't started yet. Lots of people running around shouting, but we are still filling body bags, still keeping whole generations of people mired in poverty with policy decisions that keep them there while we enrich others.
The people who really need to stop tolerating it are the ones who aren't shouting. They aren't doing much of anything, really, and probably aren't going to. They are the biggest part of the problem.
malaise
(268,998 posts)and it is true that most of the people who really need to stop tolerating it aren't shouting - but some are - and some are exposing establishment racism. We'll all have to keep fighting.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)'He didn't deserve the beating he got, but he was driving drunk, and refused a direct order!'
Meaning, I guess, that you know, King's failings mitigate the abuse which was dished out by the LAPD. !
As it is with the Cameron Todd Willingham execution - people have gone on camera to say, 'well maybe he didn't do THAT, but he was a wife-beater and all-around bad guy, so who cares'.
This is a nation which was founded, in part, on human slavery. In contrast to France which was, in a modern form, founded on the supremacy of human RIGHTS (or any number of other modern states).
malaise
(268,998 posts)We don't really value life and we pretend about values and due process of law - it's mostly BS.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)Tommy2Tone
(1,307 posts)If the jury could watch that video and find those officers not guilty then anyone can be convicted of anything. Especially if they are a person of color.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)I'm just gobsmacked that the hair testing wasn't done with double blind testing that made having the prosecutions' backs impossible.
malaise
(268,998 posts)because these fuckers made up shit rather than applying science properly.
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)If you can't impress them with the facts, dazzle them with the bullshit.
The Forensics Examiner was obviously incompetent, and refused to acknowledge it, or he was just too stupid to know he was stupid.
malaise
(268,998 posts)pseudo- scientific language impressed the jurors
PeoViejo
(2,178 posts)..well, we get somebody...
erronis
(15,257 posts)It's the "supposed" science that is given in evidence in this case.
Maybe I'm misreading your headline since we are both arguing the same argument.
Science should be impartial. It should be totally documented and reproducible. The hoped-for outcome shouldn't have any bearing on the testing or reporting.
Getting to the second part of your headline:
Anywhere that science is supported by political interests (and I worked for the US HHS during BushW) there is always a tug to keep uncomfortable facts from appearing.
I'm sure that most of the respected research groups are largely untainted by the donors' bequests, but "most" and "largely" are still part of the equation.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)erronis
(15,257 posts)I also hope that I didn't say something that contradicted your position. I merely wanted to add a couple of centimes worth of my opinion.
Science (and the facts that it relies on and searches for) is a wonderful thing. The interpretation of those facts can be open to discussion. Were the movements of the stars because of a celestial globe that surrounded us, or a fantastical set of mechanical gears and god-given orbs? Or were these perceived movements because the whole universe (as we know it) is in motion, not relative to us/Earth, but that's just the way it is. Maybe someday someone will say that we're just little jots in a semi-ethereal brownian-movement fluid. Maybe someday someone will say that rabbits in a distant galaxy are fooling with us. However "science" should still be able to work and try to figure these things out. Religion and credos already have everything under control.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Most shockingly, at least 35 defendants received the death penalty, 33 of which were the subject of false FBI testimony. Nine of the prisoners were executed and five died from other causes on death row.
I am not shocked, as I have known the police/FBI lie habitually for decades.
One more nail in capital punishment's coffin, but at the cost of 14 nails in real coffins.
malaise
(268,998 posts)But we believe in freedom, democracy and due process of law
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Last edited Wed Apr 22, 2015, 05:25 PM - Edit history (1)
and only to those who are the right color and have sufficient money.
VScott
(774 posts)That attitude from DA's and AG's is all too common.
It's rare that they'll ever admit they might have been wrong. Evidence and/or penalty be damned.
malaise
(268,998 posts)and never admit they were wrong - they remind me of ReTHUGs