Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,998 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 02:41 PM Apr 2015

Thirty years in jail for a single hair: the FBI's 'mass disaster' of false conviction

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/21/fbi-jail-hair-mass-disaster-false-conviction
<snip>
George Perrot has spent almost 30 years in prison thanks to a single hair. It was discovered by an FBI agent on the bedsheet of a 78-year-old woman who had been raped by a burglar in her home in Springfield, Massachusetts, in 1985.

Perrot, then 17, was put on trial, despite the absence of physical evidence tying him to the crime scene. There was no semen. There was no blood. And so there was no way to conduct a conclusive DNA test.

Even the victim testified that the defendant looked nothing like her attacker: he had a short haircut and was clean-shaven, while Perrot had a long shaggy mop, a moustache and a goatee beard.

But there was that strand of hair. At a key stage in the 1992 rape and burglary trial, an FBI agent named Wayne Oakes took the witness stand, describing himself to the jury as an expert in hair and textile fibers – as would so many of the agency’s trial witnesses, in condemning hundreds of people to long prison sentences.
-----------------------------
Justice my ass - and yet there are folks who support the death penalty
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Thirty years in jail for a single hair: the FBI's 'mass disaster' of false conviction (Original Post) malaise Apr 2015 OP
Well, of COURSE we need the death penalty. Jackpine Radical Apr 2015 #1
Not to mention compensation malaise Apr 2015 #3
He deserved to go to Prison PeoViejo Apr 2015 #5
But that was exactly their thinking malaise Apr 2015 #6
If he wasn't guilty of that Crime PeoViejo Apr 2015 #9
Indeed malaise Apr 2015 #21
I was on a jury that thought that way. HubertHeaver Apr 2015 #29
Was? <G> Same hate and intolerance today, and more of a target rich environment. n/t jtuck004 Apr 2015 #18
I think there is still a lot of hate but there are way more people malaise Apr 2015 #22
Lol. Ok, I'll be looking for the evidence of a lack of people being murdered, interest rates on jtuck004 Apr 2015 #26
I am not denying that there is still violent establishment racism malaise Apr 2015 #28
On Rodney King, I was told by a GOP family friend, 'he was a bad guy anyway' closeupready Apr 2015 #12
Scary isn't it malaise Apr 2015 #23
Yup. closeupready Apr 2015 #24
The Rodney King trial is when I realized there is no hope. Tommy2Tone Apr 2015 #27
hey, some college deans say a false accusation builds character! MisterP Apr 2015 #19
THIS(!) is the problem with science...applied properly it undermines personal and political goals. HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #2
Justice appeared to be crazy blind for lots of people malaise Apr 2015 #4
So goes the old saying: PeoViejo Apr 2015 #7
And of course the highfaluting malaise Apr 2015 #8
...and, besides, "We always get our Man" PeoViejo Apr 2015 #11
You're right, and wrong - science isn't the problem erronis Apr 2015 #20
It's clear I just should give up at this... HereSince1628 Apr 2015 #25
I certainly hope not (that you give up) erronis Apr 2015 #30
Here is the main issue of this article Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #10
Really frightening malaise Apr 2015 #13
Except when we don't Kelvin Mace Apr 2015 #16
But wait!!! There's More!!! VScott Apr 2015 #14
They don't care whose life they destroy malaise Apr 2015 #15
kick Liberal_in_LA Apr 2015 #17

Jackpine Radical

(45,274 posts)
1. Well, of COURSE we need the death penalty.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 02:48 PM
Apr 2015

It sure as hell cuts down on all these embarrassing false conviction discoveries.

malaise

(268,998 posts)
3. Not to mention compensation
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:03 PM
Apr 2015

for falsely imprisoned mostly young men whose lives were stolen from them.
The long hair and beard did him in - count on it - those establishment MoFos hated folks with long hair.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
9. If he wasn't guilty of that Crime
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:14 PM
Apr 2015

he likely was of something even more vile. Either way, there's another Commie Mo Fo off the street.



HubertHeaver

(2,522 posts)
29. I was on a jury that thought that way.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 06:16 PM
Apr 2015

At least 10 of 12 thought that. "The cops hauled this guy in so he is guilty of something. They did their job and got him off the street, now we need to do ours and keep him off the street."

malaise

(268,998 posts)
22. I think there is still a lot of hate but there are way more people
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:40 PM
Apr 2015

who aren't prepared to tolerate it

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
26. Lol. Ok, I'll be looking for the evidence of a lack of people being murdered, interest rates on
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:49 PM
Apr 2015

loans being decided, wealth being allocated and sold, decisions on schools - a hundred things, all based on skin color becoming equal.

Just let me know when I can look, cause it ain't started yet. Lots of people running around shouting, but we are still filling body bags, still keeping whole generations of people mired in poverty with policy decisions that keep them there while we enrich others.

The people who really need to stop tolerating it are the ones who aren't shouting. They aren't doing much of anything, really, and probably aren't going to. They are the biggest part of the problem.


malaise

(268,998 posts)
28. I am not denying that there is still violent establishment racism
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:52 PM
Apr 2015

and it is true that most of the people who really need to stop tolerating it aren't shouting - but some are - and some are exposing establishment racism. We'll all have to keep fighting.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
12. On Rodney King, I was told by a GOP family friend, 'he was a bad guy anyway'
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:23 PM
Apr 2015

'He didn't deserve the beating he got, but he was driving drunk, and refused a direct order!'

Meaning, I guess, that you know, King's failings mitigate the abuse which was dished out by the LAPD. !

As it is with the Cameron Todd Willingham execution - people have gone on camera to say, 'well maybe he didn't do THAT, but he was a wife-beater and all-around bad guy, so who cares'.

This is a nation which was founded, in part, on human slavery. In contrast to France which was, in a modern form, founded on the supremacy of human RIGHTS (or any number of other modern states).

malaise

(268,998 posts)
23. Scary isn't it
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:41 PM
Apr 2015

We don't really value life and we pretend about values and due process of law - it's mostly BS.

Tommy2Tone

(1,307 posts)
27. The Rodney King trial is when I realized there is no hope.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:51 PM
Apr 2015

If the jury could watch that video and find those officers not guilty then anyone can be convicted of anything. Especially if they are a person of color.

MisterP

(23,730 posts)
19. hey, some college deans say a false accusation builds character!
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:18 PM
Apr 2015
Comins argues that men who are unjustly accused can sometimes gain from the experience. "They have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' "

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
2. THIS(!) is the problem with science...applied properly it undermines personal and political goals.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 02:52 PM
Apr 2015

I'm just gobsmacked that the hair testing wasn't done with double blind testing that made having the prosecutions' backs impossible.

malaise

(268,998 posts)
4. Justice appeared to be crazy blind for lots of people
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:05 PM
Apr 2015

because these fuckers made up shit rather than applying science properly.

 

PeoViejo

(2,178 posts)
7. So goes the old saying:
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:11 PM
Apr 2015

If you can't impress them with the facts, dazzle them with the bullshit.

The Forensics Examiner was obviously incompetent, and refused to acknowledge it, or he was just too stupid to know he was stupid.

erronis

(15,257 posts)
20. You're right, and wrong - science isn't the problem
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 05:25 PM
Apr 2015

It's the "supposed" science that is given in evidence in this case.

Maybe I'm misreading your headline since we are both arguing the same argument.

Science should be impartial. It should be totally documented and reproducible. The hoped-for outcome shouldn't have any bearing on the testing or reporting.

Getting to the second part of your headline:

Anywhere that science is supported by political interests (and I worked for the US HHS during BushW) there is always a tug to keep uncomfortable facts from appearing.

I'm sure that most of the respected research groups are largely untainted by the donors' bequests, but "most" and "largely" are still part of the equation.

erronis

(15,257 posts)
30. I certainly hope not (that you give up)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 07:52 PM
Apr 2015

I also hope that I didn't say something that contradicted your position. I merely wanted to add a couple of centimes worth of my opinion.

Science (and the facts that it relies on and searches for) is a wonderful thing. The interpretation of those facts can be open to discussion. Were the movements of the stars because of a celestial globe that surrounded us, or a fantastical set of mechanical gears and god-given orbs? Or were these perceived movements because the whole universe (as we know it) is in motion, not relative to us/Earth, but that's just the way it is. Maybe someday someone will say that we're just little jots in a semi-ethereal brownian-movement fluid. Maybe someday someone will say that rabbits in a distant galaxy are fooling with us. However "science" should still be able to work and try to figure these things out. Religion and credos already have everything under control.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
10. Here is the main issue of this article
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:14 PM
Apr 2015
Most shockingly, at least 35 defendants received the death penalty, 33 of which were the subject of false FBI testimony. Nine of the prisoners were executed and five died from other causes on death row.


I am not shocked, as I have known the police/FBI lie habitually for decades.

One more nail in capital punishment's coffin, but at the cost of 14 nails in real coffins.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
16. Except when we don't
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:34 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Wed Apr 22, 2015, 05:25 PM - Edit history (1)

and only to those who are the right color and have sufficient money.

 

VScott

(774 posts)
14. But wait!!! There's More!!!
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:28 PM
Apr 2015

This month lawyers acting for Bridges, with the backing of the Innocence Project, petitioned the county court of Mecklenburg calling for a retrial. The state attorney general is opposing such a measure, but has initiated a search for the hairs in hopes that DNA testing could be carried out that would provide reliable clues. Previously, the state had indicated that the hairs had been destroyed, in violation of North Carolina law.


That attitude from DA's and AG's is all too common.

It's rare that they'll ever admit they might have been wrong. Evidence and/or penalty be damned.

malaise

(268,998 posts)
15. They don't care whose life they destroy
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:30 PM
Apr 2015

and never admit they were wrong - they remind me of ReTHUGs

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Thirty years in jail for ...