Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 03:38 PM Apr 2015

The right’s new Clinton obsession just went mainstream:How a sketchy Hillary “exposé” hooked the NYT

x posted in Politics.

The right’s new Clinton obsession just went mainstream: How a sketchy Hillary “exposé” hooked the New York Times

The right's propaganda machine duped the media on the Clintons once before. Now they could be doing it again

HEATHER DIGBY PARTON


As the week began, the big news that had the political media all aflutter was the release of a new book called “Clinton Cash” which the right is claiming will blow the lid off of the Clinton campaign and have the Democratic Party throwing in the towel on 2016 in no time. (Or, at the very least, they’ll soon be desperately begging for former Republican Lincoln Chafee to officially take up the banner, which amounts to the same thing.) The book is about the nefarious doings of the evil Clinton Foundation, a non-profit supposedly dedicated to doing good works around the globe, but which conservatives say is actually nothing more than a corrupt organization dedicated to selling out the interests of poor people everywhere so that Hillary Clinton can destroy the world. Or something.

It must be said at the outset that investigating the Clinton Foundation is entirely appropriate. It is a major fundraising organization, lots of wealthy people from around the globe have donated money, some of whom are not such nice fellows. Now, the taking of money from bad people and using it to better the lives of poor people around the world should not automatically be suspect. Some people might even call such a transaction a form of restitution. But it is certainly worth looking into even the possibility of an improper quid pro quo between Hillary Clinton and these nefarious actors when she was Secretary of State (or now). Responsible journalists can and will undoubtedly be looking at all of this throughout the campaign as they should.

However, the man who wrote this book “Clinton Cash” is not a responsible journalist. (Well, unless you consider his affiliations with Breitbart News an endorsement of his integrity.) The author, Peter Schweitzer, is a long time Republican political operative whose credibility rests on books such as “Architects of Ruin: How Big Government Liberals Ruined the Global Economy and Will Do It Again if We Don’t Stop Them” and ”Makers and Takers:Why conservatives work harder, feel happier, have closer families, take fewer drugs, give more generously, value honesty more, are less materialistic and envious, whine less … and even hug their children more than liberals.” That latter literary masterpiece was actually a sequel to his earlier work called ”Do as I Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy.” Let’s just say there’s no mistaking Schweitzer for an unbiased journalist.

(Media Matters has compiled a full dossier on Schweitzer’s far right connections. They are as deep as they are wide.)

The fact that a right-wing propagandist would publish an “exposé” on Hillary Clinton is as surprising as Bill O’Reilly proclaiming himself to be a war hero. This is just how the right rolls. You’ll undoubtedly recall the work of fiction called “Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry” by another far right operative by the name of Jerome Corsi which, when it was published in 2004 took the election by storm. It was an audacious move and it paid off. One can certainly understand why they’d try it again.

more
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/21/inside_the_rights_new_clinton_cash_obsession_the_sketchy_new_hillary_expose_that_hooked_the_new_york_times/

17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The right’s new Clinton obsession just went mainstream:How a sketchy Hillary “exposé” hooked the NYT (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2015 OP
Golly. zappaman Apr 2015 #1
I know of at least 2 OP's promoting this crap. Kingofalldems Apr 2015 #3
Read this thread carefully DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #4
DU'ers willing to embrace Swiftboating, huh. I wish I could say it surprises me. emulatorloo Apr 2015 #6
What they did to Kerry was a shame./NT DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author SidDithers Apr 2015 #10
This message was self-deleted by its author DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #13
And that book was praised here. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #2
Then it should be alerted on & I would expect DU to take a stand against it. misterhighwasted Apr 2015 #11
Well said! hrmjustin Apr 2015 #12
Wow, didn't see this coming! Major Hogwash Apr 2015 #5
Why aren't we not at all surprised? DemocratSinceBirth Apr 2015 #8
The silence from some is deafening. hrmjustin Apr 2015 #9
The 'Newspaper of Record' duped? No way... Scurrilous Apr 2015 #14
try this................ Historic NY Apr 2015 #15
Thanks for posting this. herding cats Apr 2015 #16
Waiting for someone to deconstruct the article... bvar22 Apr 2015 #17

Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #4)

Response to SidDithers (Reply #10)

misterhighwasted

(9,148 posts)
11. Then it should be alerted on & I would expect DU to take a stand against it.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:26 PM
Apr 2015

Rw propaganda, intentional that is, does not belong here as a tool to use against our own Party.

The RW has used this method before.I am certain DU remembers it.

I hold DU to the standards that they are named for.

This book was written & marketed for the specific timing of the Clinton campaign.

It is a hit piece based on invention to undermine a candidate.
The RW has done this exact thing before.
I call bull shit on any DUer that uses it as truth. It is not and they can take their propaganda hit piece to Free Republic where they will be with their own kind.

Spend as much effort in tearing apart the Rw candidates.
There is plenty there and they are the threat to the American Governing system.

It's high time to direct your loathing where it belongs.At the RW candidates and the organization who drives them.



DemocratSinceBirth

(99,710 posts)
8. Why aren't we not at all surprised?
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:09 PM
Apr 2015

Something about when you cast out your net you never know what you will find.




Scurrilous

(38,687 posts)
14. The 'Newspaper of Record' duped? No way...
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:31 PM
Apr 2015
Twitter Guy Says He Hoaxed NYT In Teen Vape Article

<snip>

"Yesterday’s New York Times features an A1 article written by science correspondent Sabrina Tavernise about the rise in popularity of vaping among teenagers. The story quotes at least four teens, one of whom is saying on Twitter that his entire interview was a hoax."

http://tktk.gawker.com/twitter-guy-says-he-hoaxed-nyt-in-teen-vape-article-1698560984


Take it from a daily reader, the NY Times A-section ain't @#$%. The rest, not so bad.

herding cats

(19,564 posts)
16. Thanks for posting this.
Tue Apr 21, 2015, 04:40 PM
Apr 2015

I deeply dislike seeing RW smears being promoted on a Democratic message board. I just hide that junk, but it's good to know it was RW smears like I suspected.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The right’s new Clinton o...