General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe right’s new Clinton obsession just went mainstream:How a sketchy Hillary “exposé” hooked the NYT
x posted in Politics.
The rights new Clinton obsession just went mainstream: How a sketchy Hillary exposé hooked the New York Times
The right's propaganda machine duped the media on the Clintons once before. Now they could be doing it again
HEATHER DIGBY PARTON
As the week began, the big news that had the political media all aflutter was the release of a new book called Clinton Cash which the right is claiming will blow the lid off of the Clinton campaign and have the Democratic Party throwing in the towel on 2016 in no time. (Or, at the very least, theyll soon be desperately begging for former Republican Lincoln Chafee to officially take up the banner, which amounts to the same thing.) The book is about the nefarious doings of the evil Clinton Foundation, a non-profit supposedly dedicated to doing good works around the globe, but which conservatives say is actually nothing more than a corrupt organization dedicated to selling out the interests of poor people everywhere so that Hillary Clinton can destroy the world. Or something.
It must be said at the outset that investigating the Clinton Foundation is entirely appropriate. It is a major fundraising organization, lots of wealthy people from around the globe have donated money, some of whom are not such nice fellows. Now, the taking of money from bad people and using it to better the lives of poor people around the world should not automatically be suspect. Some people might even call such a transaction a form of restitution. But it is certainly worth looking into even the possibility of an improper quid pro quo between Hillary Clinton and these nefarious actors when she was Secretary of State (or now). Responsible journalists can and will undoubtedly be looking at all of this throughout the campaign as they should.
However, the man who wrote this book Clinton Cash is not a responsible journalist. (Well, unless you consider his affiliations with Breitbart News an endorsement of his integrity.) The author, Peter Schweitzer, is a long time Republican political operative whose credibility rests on books such as Architects of Ruin: How Big Government Liberals Ruined the Global Economy and Will Do It Again if We Dont Stop Them and Makers and Takers:Why conservatives work harder, feel happier, have closer families, take fewer drugs, give more generously, value honesty more, are less materialistic and envious, whine less
and even hug their children more than liberals. That latter literary masterpiece was actually a sequel to his earlier work called Do as I Say (Not as I Do): Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy. Lets just say theres no mistaking Schweitzer for an unbiased journalist.
(Media Matters has compiled a full dossier on Schweitzers far right connections. They are as deep as they are wide.)
The fact that a right-wing propagandist would publish an exposé on Hillary Clinton is as surprising as Bill OReilly proclaiming himself to be a war hero. This is just how the right rolls. Youll undoubtedly recall the work of fiction called Unfit for Command: Swift Boat Veterans Speak Out Against John Kerry by another far right operative by the name of Jerome Corsi which, when it was published in 2004 took the election by storm. It was an audacious move and it paid off. One can certainly understand why theyd try it again.
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/21/inside_the_rights_new_clinton_cash_obsession_the_sketchy_new_hillary_expose_that_hooked_the_new_york_times/
zappaman
(20,606 posts)I wonder if anyone will be promoting this here?
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)emulatorloo
(44,124 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Response to DemocratSinceBirth (Reply #4)
SidDithers This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to SidDithers (Reply #10)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)misterhighwasted
(9,148 posts)Rw propaganda, intentional that is, does not belong here as a tool to use against our own Party.
The RW has used this method before.I am certain DU remembers it.
I hold DU to the standards that they are named for.
This book was written & marketed for the specific timing of the Clinton campaign.
It is a hit piece based on invention to undermine a candidate.
The RW has done this exact thing before.
I call bull shit on any DUer that uses it as truth. It is not and they can take their propaganda hit piece to Free Republic where they will be with their own kind.
Spend as much effort in tearing apart the Rw candidates.
There is plenty there and they are the threat to the American Governing system.
It's high time to direct your loathing where it belongs.At the RW candidates and the organization who drives them.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Major Hogwash
(17,656 posts)I'm so surprised, I'm speechless!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Something about when you cast out your net you never know what you will find.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)<snip>
"Yesterdays New York Times features an A1 article written by science correspondent Sabrina Tavernise about the rise in popularity of vaping among teenagers. The story quotes at least four teens, one of whom is saying on Twitter that his entire interview was a hoax."
http://tktk.gawker.com/twitter-guy-says-he-hoaxed-nyt-in-teen-vape-article-1698560984
Take it from a daily reader, the NY Times A-section ain't @#$%. The rest, not so bad.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)I deeply dislike seeing RW smears being promoted on a Democratic message board. I just hide that junk, but it's good to know it was RW smears like I suspected.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)..instead of just attacking the messenger.