Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Playinghardball

(11,665 posts)
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 03:58 PM Apr 2015

B. Sanders: Economic Policy estimates that NAFTA has led to the loss of more than 680,000 US jobs...

#TPP #NoFastTrack

http://www.epi.org/

Bernie Sanders @SenSanders
· 2h 2 hours ago
.@EconomicPolicy estimated that Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China led to the net loss of over 2.7 million American jobs. #TPP
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
B. Sanders: Economic Policy estimates that NAFTA has led to the loss of more than 680,000 US jobs... (Original Post) Playinghardball Apr 2015 OP
PNTR with China also permitted the purchase by Americans of cheap Apple and all those addictive electronic products in the millions. Fred Sanders Apr 2015 #1
In war, it's excused as collateral damage. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2015 #2
K&R liberal_at_heart Apr 2015 #3
K&R for Bernie and truth. woo me with science Apr 2015 #4

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
1. PNTR with China also permitted the purchase by Americans of cheap Apple and all those addictive electronic products in the millions.
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 04:01 PM
Apr 2015

In the tens of millions, thousands and thousands of a vast array of imported consumer products are purchased by Americans, as wealthy America always has - but America has always balanced its massive trade deficit by just simply and easily printing more of the world's only reserve currency, without much consequence, not even inflation.

Amazing.

Americans want cheap products, China can supply the Walmarts and Targets of America with these inexpensive products, American companies can not. Not at the price. American companies simply can not, not without lower production costs.

How can American companies supply the vast array of goods and things so desired by Americans, desired for cheap - when they can all be purchased by import, by using inflated value American currency, up 20 % just in the past year?

The alternative is trade protectionism - and much higher product costs and possibly lower quality leading to lower purchases....and loss of jobs in America as well.

There is a perfect balance between protectionism and all out free trade, maybe. Who is going to take a stab at finding it and then committing the decision to ink and paper?

I trust Obama, not to be perfect, but to be the perfect person most likely to find the balance and, as importantly, least likely not to totally screw it all up.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
2. In war, it's excused as collateral damage.
Thu Apr 23, 2015, 04:03 PM
Apr 2015

Obviously, those 680,000 people were just in the wrong place at the wrong time. So, it's actually their fault that they lost their jobs.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»B. Sanders: Economic Poli...