I will be copy and pasting this often:

"Why is the right willing to spend over one billion dollars, endless time, and make up lies, write books full of lies, to defeat someone who is suppose to be republican lite?"



As to the allegations we see ALL the fucking time here and elsewhere.

a decent number of posts. You can still tell their agenda.

NT

You do realize you're having a conversation with yourself, right?

my guess...

oh, no, you dont have to

awesome

check

For every claim that I research and find to be garbage, I'm much less inclined to believe the next claim and more inclined to believe that the noise machine is at it again.

And if I may quote Owen from Jurassic World, "I don't think that's a good idea."

two jobs) do not have time. And those are only a few of the reasons why someone may not do the research.

had not woken up to the fact that she and Bill were not really working for the middle class.

Bill Clinton got away with many things that wouldn't fly these days. It was his great luck that during his two terms, the internet was not yet developed to the point where people could read about what was really going on.

Ross Perot's critiques of NAFTA turned out to be right. Yet it was Clinton, not some neo con Republican who got the measure passed. Sad to realize that Ms Clinton wants the TPP, and she lies through her teeth about how good it will be for the American worker.

It was Ms Clinton's State Department that put through the initial requests for the Keystone XL Pipeline, and she only came out against said pipeline when she knew that the Republicans would be controlling the house and that she didn't need to openly support it as the Republicans would do that for her.

Atmosphere of democracy, but a STASI-style, ONE BIG MONEY PARTY SYSTEM?

How did we get from the point in which both candidates for President promoted policies that were protective of the middle class (Such as what we had during the days of Eisenhower and Kennedy) to what we have now?

Big difference between the Democratic and Republican candidates running for the top offices these days - in the case of voting for the "R"'s you will have to eat two shit sandwiches a day, while if you vote for the "D"'s you only have to eat one shit sandwich a day... Is this democracy?

And your definition of liberal and my definition must be vastly different.

She worked for Sam Walton, during the 1980s, as his personal attorney, while Walmart destroyed mom and pop businesses all across America.

She stood with her husband on the pro-NAFTA platform.

She is pro-endless wars, pro-Monsanto, pro Wall Street, and pro-Super Surveillance State.

She is pro-TPP. She is also for keeping marijuana in the hands of industry.

However, everybody loves to sit in their little bubble and they no longer challenge themselves once their mind is made up. Critical thinking is a lost art. This is why we need to nip shitty narratives in the bud as soon as they occur and we need to set our own narrative. Stuff like this post ^^^^ should get wide distribution. I'll do my part by spreading it on social media.

we ever had', say many in the GOP. A quip, perhaps, but as Shakespeare wrote, many a truth is said in jest.

Which seems like something that might come up at least occasionally. You take the time with NAFTA, her husband's work, TPP, Obama's work which she has yet to endorse or reject, but not a mention of her Senate votes, not even the bad ones, but certainly not the good ones and obviously not the full picture.

When someone sputters stridently but leaves out the important facts, I do not fee respected by their sputtering.

It is hardly like my life depends on your accepting my views.

The limitless resources arrayed against another Clinton presidency don't need to persuade everybody of anything.

They peel off a few voters here, and keep a few more from straying over there. They have a myriad of tiny thumbs on the scale.

Nicely put.

It's getting hotter every day.

Maybe.

You keep replying to yourself about ignore.

Every time a false story is trumpeted, the author of that story has to be attacked, accused of various crimes and generally smeared (though telling the truth is not a smear), to turn the story around to be about them and their motives and connections and who is writing their paychecks

of the truth. Once a scandal is picked up by the MSM it is hard to educate the voters.

He didn't have anybody attacking the assholes who were behind the Swift Boat bullshit.

immediately to respond. That may help her depending on the spin that the MSM gives it.

Let's hope she knows how to manage it better than she has thus far.

Polls indicate she has 80+% support from Democrats.

Instead of being so subservient.

friends.

I tell them to look at this and that, articles debunking the article itself or the author's history and they all just ignore it. "Mediamatters" they are biased". Kos same thing. Not gonna learn what you don't wanna know...... FOX said it and that is all they know. NONE of them read one word of it but they know it is making her look bad.

where information is scarce and they react to 30 second blurbs they hear on the news, this is who these lies are targeted to.

Here at DU my goal was to work with others to maybe try and work against it, first it seems we have to deal with members here who believe this shit and spread it.

Clinton hate is kinda like Obama hate.

Not just FOX, even though they are the worst, but you don't see anyone debunking it, jsut reporting on it. All the same thing.