General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPETA slams Al Gore for ‘hypocrisy and sheer laziness’ for not limiting Live Earth festival food to v
PETA slams Al Gore for hypocrisy and sheer laziness for not limiting Live Earth festival food to vegan onlyIn a series of emails obtained by Buzzfeed, inflexible animal advocacy group PETA criticized former Vice President Al Gore for refusing to serve vegan only food at his upcoming Live Earth concert series.
While in Davos this year, Gore, along with popular musician Pharrell, announced the return of the eco-friendly worldwide music festival in 2015 which will feature over 100 artists performing on seven continents on June 18th.
In the emails, representatives from PETA pestered the concert organizers, asking if they plan to serve vegan only food at the events, eliminating all animal products including meat and dairy.
A representative for Live Earth explained they do not have complete control over the food served at the venues where their events will be taking place, citing pre-existing agreements between the venues and their vendors.
-snip-
http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/peta-slams-al-gore-for-hypocrisy-and-sheer-laziness-for-not-limiting-live-earth-festival-food-to-vegan-only/
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)So much for inclusion of everyone. It would be different if they refused vegan food, I would not support that. I also don't believe in leaving out others who eat different foods. Why to go PETA trying to get a smaller participation at the event.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)They're just calling out the hypocrisy.
ETA: Although due to pre-existing contracts it seems they din't have control, unless they choose to relocate.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)A ban is a horrible idea. Guests enjoy various foods at festivals. Nothing better then a spicy sausage on a roll with a beer. Plus burgers and dogs tend to be popular. There should never be discrimation at these things. And the committee pretty much said they were going to have variety. Not everyone in America is a vegan.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Im sure it wouldn't kill them to skip a meat lunch. People are attending for the music and the cause, not the lunch.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Intolerance is horrible no matter who you are.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)all of which is delicious.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)You have some vegan food, I'll have a steak. I"m not against a vegan menu, I just don't think it should be the only menu.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Tofu, or are allergic to mushrooms, which seems to be a component of most vegan "Meat" substitutes?
And do you understand how destructive soybean mono-culture is? Tofu is NOT an environmentally friendly product - about the same as meat.
So don't get all preachy.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I have an allergy to onions....which seem to end up in everything these days, especially vegan foods.
Vegan restaurants are a nightmare for me.
Unvanguard
(4,588 posts)Which isn't to say that it's an environmentally friendly product. But its carbon impact, for example, is far smaller.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Vegans make tofu out to be some green product with no impact, when in fact, it is VERY destructive to the environment.
And if everyone switched to Tofu, well, that wouldn't be very pretty.
And tofu is NOT organic.
Unvanguard
(4,588 posts)I agree, it's a matter of degree--that's the point.
chernabog
(480 posts)Is used to feed animals.
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)If its about the musuc and th cause, why shove that vegan crap down everyone's throat?
Few people get up my nose more than self-righteous vegans....
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)For a festival, it would have been very doable.
still_one
(92,219 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)It takes over 600 gallons of water to yield one hamburger.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)No need for water at all except if someone is thirsty. They will probably have a variety of beverages to drink.
chernabog
(480 posts)How do you think they made this already made food? Did it just appear out of thin air?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I am at TGI Fridays having the dipped pretzels, medium rare steak, Mac and cheese and a Cesar salad. I am not one to discuss taking away meat from those who enjoy it. I don't think I will ever support that.
chernabog
(480 posts)Enjoy your factory farmed flesh. Try not to think about what it took to make your meal.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Just finished the pretzels. Salad next.
evirus
(852 posts)And the fact that one cow can yeild multiple cuts of meat?
snooper2
(30,151 posts)LOL
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)Ideal age of cow to be at time of slaughter = 36 months give or take
rough weight of live cow at 36 months = 1,100 pounds usually want them fatter, so this is a smaller than average, for your benefit.
roughly 800 lbs of meat after slaughter, again fair average of meat to waste.
1 hamburger = 8oz pre cooked weight.
800lbs of meat = roughly 1,600 1/2 lb burgers.
each burger "scientifically" proven to require 600 gallons of water to produce = 960,000 gallons of water in 3year time (1600 burgers x 600 gallon)
960,000 gallons of water divided by 1,097days (36 months) = 876 gallons of water per day,.... per animal.
Your "science says a cow drinks a gallon of water,.... per minute,......... every minute,... for 17 hours per day, .......every day, .....for three years ?
your "science" and baloney, ................. they have something in common. Both are manufactured, and neither are any good.
chernabog
(480 posts)Cows need to eat. The water is also figured in to how much it takes to grow what the cow eats, how much water is used in slaughter, etc. Try to think before you post.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)So in essence, ........your argument with my consumption of slaughtered carcass ends,.............. if I only eat open range cows, and slaughter them with less water ?
the 600 gallons of water is a crock pot full of lentils and yeast.
chernabog
(480 posts)than factory farmed.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)and meat is again available for all.
Your argument is now based on water consumption, so........................................
Desalinize the ocean, halt global warming from raising the oceans, reduce the number of hurricanes due to warmer/higher ocean temperatures, plenty of water for your yeast and oats, new industry, more jobs,
And all thanks to simply preserving my right to eat meat.
My argument has always been about stopping cruelty towards animals. I was only expounding on the previous posters comments.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)eat whatever you want, and believe me, I will too.
Kali
(55,014 posts)you just mentioned water for feed, free range don't eat farmed/processed feed. confined cattle are the consumers of feed, range cattle eat what grows naturally from sun and rain. you counting rainfall in your silly water budget?
chernabog
(480 posts)Free range require more water to drink because they are getting much more exercise. Unless grass-fed cows are being raised in a tropical area, they still need to be fed grain during the lean or winter months. And if they are being raised in a tropical area (the Amazon) you are clearing Millions of acres of rainforest to raise them.
free range means free range - no grain, little supplemental feed at all. confined feeding is 100% crops. water consumption for crops is the major usage, all cattle drink about the same - the main variability is weather/temperature not EXERCISE.
raising (and eating) beef can be an extremely sustainable and environmentally ENHANCING process. I am not saying it all is by any means, but cattle natually consume lower on the food chain than other meats and can convert undigestible-by-humans plant matter from land that is NOT arable or productive for food in any other way. Managed correctly they can enhance biodiversity, nutrient cycles, ground cover, mitigate erosion, help sequester C02, AND provide delicious high quality nutritious protein (and other useful products).
your simplistic and extremist approach is not based in reality.
chernabog
(480 posts)So this makes no difference to me really.
Kali
(55,014 posts)personally, I would be concerned about my credibility - especially if I had some cause I was wanting other people to buy into.
when you err on such basic information people tend to question what other claims might be incorrect.
Sheldon Cooper
(3,724 posts)I have no idea if 600 gallons is needed/burger, frankly that sounds a bit high. But honestly, your math exercise is just plain silly. And I'm an omnivore who has no use for PETA.
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)wanting to dictate what the many eat.
De-salinize the ocean, .......use the water to raise more beef.......save the planet.
thank me later, but come around back on week-ends, follow the smell of the BBQ, and for gods sake...leave the soy patties at home.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)Last edited Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:18 PM - Edit history (1)
Which yields a lot less protein than beef.
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/02/wheres-californias-water-going
Should we stop growing walnuts?
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)without BBQ, and walnut brownies.
bananas
(27,509 posts)Also, Al Gore is vegan, so it would be appropriate for him to push for vegan food at the event.
http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/820999
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016117812
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)But thankfully they are going to have a wide variety of food for those who are not vegan. The committee knows what's best. PETA is being discrimary. I guess I should say tried to be.
bananas
(27,509 posts)Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Forcing your dietary preferences on those who don't share them makes one an asshole.
still_one
(92,219 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)Dorian Gray
(13,496 posts)(What can i say? My dad's a softie!)
still_one
(92,219 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)Non vegans can eat vegan food and it won't hurt them.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)Harm the environment, and cause harm to the animal which it came from. Are you that selfish you can't understand?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Make their own choices and never force them on others especially liberals.
chernabog
(480 posts)slavery is fine?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)What you are doing is nonsense. I'm at Friday's enjoying my lunch with coworker friends and yes we are having a nutritious lunch with all food groups involved.
chernabog
(480 posts)It was for me, Once you realize how much it hurts the creatures you are using.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If they eat meat or dairy products the vegan police will strip them of their psychic powers.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)I haven't eaten meat since the 80s. Do you have even the vaguest idea what happens if I get hold of chicken stock or bacon grease?
Two exits, no waiting. I can't even imagine the pain that would be involved in eating actual meat. Jesus.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)I don't want to eat vegan food, I like my meat, things like venison, elk, wild hog, wild turkey, chucker, dove, quail, etc.
You can stick to your vegan food, I'll stick to my meat and potatos food.
Oh, and we do enjoy a nice, thick Ribeye steak cooked on the BBQ every now and then.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)You keep saying things like "eat vegan", "refuse vegan food".
You think vegan is a product.
OMG.
And you CANNOT stop yourself from commenting. It's like you're posting about Dumbo and don't realize we're talking about elephants.
Holy moly.
Nobody is making you post. Why on this topic? Oy
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)I'm annoyed that you're posting and arguing aboutserving a vegan nenu when it's obvious you don't even know what the term "vegan" means. Why not learn a basic definition before posting?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)Of concert goers is all I am saying. Accept everybody including those who have a burger once in a while. What if they said were only serving meat with no sides. The tune would change quick.
BlancheSplanchnik
(20,219 posts)Or should I say, Obnoxious way.
I wish they'd take a break with the ultra hostile approach, though.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Plenty of people whose diets require meat and other non-vegan foods.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)dbackjon
(6,578 posts)And nothing I serve is vegan, it's still just one meal - you will be polite and eat it?
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)With no regard at all for dietary whims of your guests.
///sarcasm///
Good googly moogly
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)She was a vegetarian at the time she left.
I told her that, that would have to change.
That her diet would be largely animal protein for a time.
Another year she spent a summer working in Denali national park.
Also not exactly an area supportive of a diet that makes you feel superior to others.
She is not a vegetarian anymore.
deek
(3,414 posts)why is it meat eaters feel vegetarians are like this?
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veganism
still_one
(92,219 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)How could I not care?
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Some people can't go vegan.
KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)cleanhippie
(19,705 posts)While I enjoy a good festival as much as the next person, a festival generally uses way more resources than any human needs.
If you are so upset at the food being served, where is your outrage for all the other resources being wasted?
Or is that just too much for you to handle at one time?
chernabog
(480 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)yes, you do.
chernabog
(480 posts)NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Fortified foods are unbelievably expensive. I can afford them, but a vegan diet in general is very much out of some people's financial means.
chernabog
(480 posts)a box of cereal or a pack of nutritional yeast costs more than whatever meat you're going to buy? I'm not seeing that.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)You seem to have missed where I said I'm vegan myself.
chernabog
(480 posts)is full of shit. And if they are that lacking in Vitamin D, I'm sure they would be taking a supplement already.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)A box of cereal,....... a pack of "nutritional" yeast or....... some meat.
mmmmmmmmm, ....... cereal and "nutritional" yeast, ..................sure sound like they would hit the spot.
but BEEF ............it's what's for dinner.
chernabog
(480 posts)Have you had it? its very versatile and can be used in many dishes.
Rotting cow carcass... yummm
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)Nooch: "savory flavor, reminiscent of cheese" ...... tempting,.... but no, a pouch of raw gelatin sounds just as disgusting.
You need to eat a big fat marbled steak,....BEFORE it rots,..... I assume you eat your fruits and nuts BEFORE they rot right ?
I'm all for vegans eating whatever they want, just like vegans are just fine letting me have what I want. You can have all the yeast I'm supposed to be eating.
chernabog
(480 posts)ok.
Why can't you have what you want without an animal having to die?
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)but it just would not stay on the grill.
I guess I could upgrade the BBQ,.... to be big enough to grill a cow whole, while it's alive. But DAMN, that seems heartless, and there is no way we could eat a whole cow, shit, even in a week I don't think we could.
For what it's worth,......I guess it comes down to convenience for not BBQ-ing an animal alive. ... kill the animal first (it's only humane to kill it before eating it), .....butcher it into usable portions, ...... freeze and store the "carcass" to prevent it from rotting prior to consumption, then at almost any given time we can hear that phssssssssh sound of seared meat flipped over.
Because what I want is to eat the muscular tissue of an animal,...... and anything described as "reminiscent of cheese" sounds like fish bait, not food. ............also, I like some of the guts of a lot of animals too........Elk heart, nearly ALL liver, beef and lamb kidney. Never been fond of menudo, never tried brain, and never saw the big deal with tongue, but I would never tell someone else NOT to eat them.
chernabog
(480 posts)You can BBQ seitan. It's cruelty free and delicious.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)you are fools.
chernabog
(480 posts)Try lentils, black beans, soy, tempeh
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)"Tempeh" is one of the healthiest things you can eat, I found that interesting.
The receipe for "tempeh batter" caught my eye, .....it might actually be worth trying for oyster, fish, clam .....or even chicken liver frying.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)bud out of other peoples lives.
pnwmom
(108,980 posts)And researchers at Stanford have shown that many of them are highly sensitive to beans, also, and other foods that draw water to the intestines.
Good luck following the Fodmap died if you're a vegan:
https://stanfordhealthcare.org/content/dam/SHC/for-patients-component/programs-services/clinical-nutrition-services/docs/pdf-lowfodmapdiet.pdf
NM_Birder
(1,591 posts)I don't even want to care what seitan is, but I'll have to check. "wheat meat" ....that does not sound "cruelty free" ......it sounds like culinary cruel and unusual punishment................ no thanks.
I extend my hand, you eat all the earth given, healthy, .....yeast wheat meat you want, ......and I'll grill all the slaughtered animal carcasses I want.
But I'll compromise,......... I WILL consume a tremendous amount of wheat and oat fortified, fermented water based beverages, to wash down my rotting carcass.
chernabog
(480 posts)If so, why?
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Which is the only way to get enough wheat, lentils, etc for a large number of people to eat
kills many, many animals.
If you want to be vegan, more power to you.
Just stop with the "meat is murder" bs, because for humans to survive (unless you want to kill off 95% of the world) millions of animals die in crop production.
chernabog
(480 posts)The point of veganism is to minimize harm and cruelty. Humans need vegetables, they don't need meat. You are saving a ton more animals if you are vegan.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)We evolved as omnivores.
chernabog
(480 posts)I'm sorry that the facts are inconvenient for you.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)But obviously you think you know what is the best diet for all 7 billion of us on this planet.
Sorry, but you are wrong - sorry if that is inconvenient for you.
chernabog
(480 posts)Meat is not necessary.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)If that is how you want to live your life
Just leave me, and my roast turkey alone.
chernabog
(480 posts)Why is change and progress so scary to you?
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)He is posting dozens of times in a thread about vegan food and he literally has no idea what the term means.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)When you ask what if people "refuse vegan food"???
How do people refuse vegan food?
That would mean they won't eat ANYTHING unless it has meat or dairy in it or if it hasn't been cooked in a meat-based oil.
They'd be refusing potato chips -they're vegan.
They'd be refusing coffee and soda and tea -all vegan
They'd be refusing bread
They would refuse to eat fruit.
I see your posts most days and it's as if you want to have the loudest, inaccurate and uninformed opinion here.
Would you PLEASE actually spend more time learning before posting nonsense?
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)However I should not be deprived of what I want to eat at a festival just as I would deprive others. We are supposed to be tolerant of everything. Not just what we want to be tolerant of.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)food they'd be called hypocrites. I've done animal rights activism and I'm not a PETA devotee but let's be honest. I can see the screaming (theoretical) headlines now: "PETA ALLOWS HAMBURGERS "
Oktober
(1,488 posts)still_one
(92,219 posts)AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)Archae
(46,335 posts)Just look at the ads they run, comparing meat eaters to Nazis.
Omaha Steve
(99,659 posts)Archae
(46,335 posts)Omaha Steve
(99,659 posts)But they do good work too.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/petakillspets.asp
Here's a report just for the state of Virginia. For just one year, out of 1553 cats they took in, they killed 1507 of them.
https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
Omaha Steve
(99,659 posts)CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)They will step in to do painless euthanasia in cases where animals were headed for slaughter in a cruel and painful manner. Is that really as awful as you care to paint it?
And you'd think that people would know to be suspicious of a group calling itself "petakillsanimals" (hello agribusiness front group) but apparently the need to vilify Peta is stronger than the need to be fair or even-handed.
And before you paste one, I really don't care about their shock ads. I care about animal suffering.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)On what planet does that qualify as caring about animals, suffering or otherwise?
The first link I posted was from snopes and was verified. So your ad hominem attack doesn't work so well there, eh? And neither does it work well on the other link either.
You wanna see the same info from Huffpo?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/05/pets-shelter-euthanization-rate_n_6612490.html
Huffpo not good enough? Here's the EXACT same data right from the state of Virginia's website.
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010
How about the one for 2011? Same story:
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2011
2012?
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2012
2013?
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2013
2014?
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2014
Are you still going to call ad hominem on those links?
So they were just doing "painless euthanasia in cases where animals were headed for slaughter in a cruel and painful manner"?
Really?
Nonsense. PETA runs free euthanasia clinics. That's not what this was. This was a pet "shelter" that they were using for mass extermination of pets. Look at the forms and you'll see people were dropping their pets off and no doubt suspecting PETA would be the best choice to find a home for them and they were killing almost all of them. Your apologia just doesn't pass the smell test.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)Me calling you out on posting hit pieces by agribusiness front groups in NOT an ad hominem.
Look at what you're doing. You are absolutely determined to ignore the good Peta does and sling every bit of mud you can find on the internets, and where Peta is concerned, there is no shortage. Some criticisms are fair, but the vast, vast majority are not. For instance it is not fair to judge Peta based on individual instances of poor judgement on the part of a single person.
Do you honestly believe YOUR efforts here pass the smell test??
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem
Here's the link you based your ad hominem attack on:
https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
Here's the EXACT SAME FORM directly from the state of Virginia:
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010
Now if you want to continue to prove you have no clue what ad hominem means, be my guest.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)My criticism of your post was specific and germane to the topic at hand. That is NOT an ad hominem. You are posting links to bogus front groups. Period.
In the link below you will find the facts about your source:
"The Center for Consumer Freedom, a lobbyist front group for some of the worst industries (e.g. tobacco, alcohol, animal agriculture, junk food, etc) created PETA Kills Animals to attempt to discredit People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals since getting people to be humane to animals is devastating to animal agriculture big business."
https://doespetakillsanimals.wordpress.com/
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Either explain what the differences are between these two documents, or stop being so butthurt over getting called out for ad hominem.
https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010
Please tell me you are just being obtuse. I'd hate to think this isn't deliberate for your sake.
You can say this isn't ad hominem till the cows come home, but when the source POSTS THE EXACT SAME INFORMATION as what comes directly from the STATE OF VIRGINIA, then you are simply making ad hominem, and not even good ad hominem but rather completely obvious and not just a bit ridiculous ad hominem.
Cheers!
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)But by all means, throw your hands up and declare yourself the winner. I am familiar with this game and I'll just stand back and let you have at it.
And while you're at it, don't forget to pat yourself on the back for carrying water for some of the most evil interests out there.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)You really crack me up. A screen capture from a state of Virginia website, which I PROVED came from that website = "carrying water for some of the most evil interests out there".
Here it is again, just cuz you ain't gonna run away from it:
https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010
Meanwhile when faced with the PROOF that PETA slaughters thousands of pets each year, some of them evidently stolen, you still think PETA isn't evil. If this wasn't enough, they just teamed up this year with serial torturer Arpaio.
So you might want to look in the mirror and figure out whose water you're carrying.
CrawlingChaos
(1,893 posts)It's been established that humane euthanasia is part of what they do. They'll tell you that. I posted their response to this and you ignored it. You ignore everything that doesn't suit your framing.
I may not agree with everything PETA does but I do believe they're well-intentioned and there's no question they've done a lot of good for animals. They also provide extremely helpful resources to people wishing to adopt a vegan diet (they were personally helpful to me in this regard).
Are we to believe YOUR impassioned attacks on PETA stem from your own deep affection and concern for animals? I mean, since you're so OUTRAGED that they euthanize former pets? Do you really think anyone's going to believe that in a million years, based on your posts here?
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)So now you finally acknowledge it's a real document after only how many times posting it from the original source. Color me surprised. Maybe you can be taught.
Ignored it? I destroyed it and you ignored my response in favor of your half-fast ad hominem gibberish.
So they were just doing "painless euthanasia in cases where animals were headed for slaughter in a cruel and painful manner"?
Really?
Nonsense. PETA runs free euthanasia clinics. That's not what this was. This was a pet "shelter" that they were using for mass extermination of pets. Look at the forms and you'll see people were dropping their pets off and no doubt suspecting PETA would be the best choice to find a home for them and they were killing almost all of them. Your apologia just doesn't pass the smell test.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026572667#post40
I bet you feel pretty dumb about right now, eh? Perhaps if you hadn't been so quick to keep pretending you weren't slinging logical fallacies you might have noticed I sure as hell didn't ignore your PETA apologia. Now please do repeat your false claim, because I really enjoyed destroying it and would love to do so again.
Spending half a dozen posts pretending their blatant ad hominem wasn't ad hominem is just not doing your credibility much good, nor is claiming I "ignored" something I obviously didn't. Obviously you pull things out of
Sorry to burst your bubble, but what you do or don't believe is pretty low on my give a shit scale.
snooper2
(30,151 posts)get a couple naked celebs and rake in the cash from the sheeple!
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)But they are raking in cash from the sheeple by convincing them they are rescuing animals, when in reality they are slaughtering 85-95% of their "shelter" pets. Meanwhile humane societies are managing to save 85-95% of the animals brought to them.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)And apparently, to PETA, being dead is better than being a 'slave' (I say as my master tells me to rub her belly.)
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Most of the people on the planet do not share their belief system.
LuvNewcastle
(16,846 posts)Most people eat meat and have no plans to give it up. Raising animals for food is taxing on the environment, but we'll be more likely to change that by devising alternative methods of raising animals than by trying to get everyone to give up meat. PETA needs to get a clue and realize that they're championing a lost cause.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)...regardless of what they believe.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)And also, PETA are morans.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)And then in the trees I heard a twig snap
Warning lights flashed on my map
I opened my eyes and to my surprise
pintobean
(18,101 posts)Scurrilous
(38,687 posts)ismnotwasm
(41,989 posts)They're the bloody experts on hypocrisy -- they just need to look in a mirror
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Let's see...we want to get more people to be concerned about climate change.
Should we target vegans, who are already extremely likely to be concerned about climate change, or should we target everyone else?
PETA: YOU HAVE TO TARGET THE VEGANS OR YOU ARE SCUM!!!
PETA is the perfect example of how not to change anything.
still_one
(92,219 posts)everyone.
I do not agree with PETA's view that Gore is a hypocrite because the festival does not limit the food only to vegan.
NobodyHere
(2,810 posts)Great, loved the last one!
Hope they can get Roger Waters again (and also Gilmour!)
bananas
(27,509 posts)Hopefully we'll get some images for the concert.
Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) (formerly known as Triana, unofficially known as GoreSat[3]) is a NOAA Earth observation and space weather satellite launched by SpaceX on a Falcon 9 launch vehicle on 11 February 2015 from Cape Canaveral.[4]
It was originally developed as a NASA satellite proposed in 1998 by then-Vice President Al Gore for the purpose of Earth observation. It is intended to be positioned at the Sun-Earth L1 Lagrangian point, 1,500,000 km (930,000 mi) from Earth, to monitor variable solar wind condition, provide early warning of approaching coronal mass ejections and observe phenomena on Earth including changes in ozone, aerosols, dust and volcanic ash, cloud height, vegetation cover and climate. At this location it will have a continuous view of the Sun and the sunlit side of the Earth. The satellite is planned to orbit the Sun-Earth L1 point in a six-month period, with a spacecraft-Earth-Sun angle varying from 4 to 15 degrees.[5] It will take full-Earth pictures about every two hours and be able to process them faster than other Earth observation satellites.[6]
DSCOVR has an expected arrival at L1 around the beginning of June 2015.[7]
Live Earth 2015
On June 18, 2015, together with the United Nations, Live Earth will once again create a global series of events over 24 hours, on seven continents, anchored from Paris and New York. Live Earth Road to Paris will be broadcast across all major media platforms and supported by a yearlong campaign in partnership with the world's leading brands, NGOs and non-profits.
Dirty Socialist
(3,252 posts)Is usually reserved for the right wing.
I'll take my steak medium, please!
sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)when they came to our laboratory to tell us that we
should not kill bacteria, I cancelled.
I asked them to make sure not to take amoxycillin
against their strep throat problems, which they
promised me they would do.
Get a grip on reality PETA!
Hekate
(90,714 posts)Tarheel_Dem
(31,234 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)The more work he tries to do for the environment, the more shit he gets about his carbon footprint, food, whatever. Meanhile, those doing no work at all for the environment get no shit from environmentalists.
pansypoo53219
(20,978 posts)beachbum bob
(10,437 posts)If you want vegan diet/food, bring it yourself and quite trying to force your own belief on others that don't share it.
chernabog
(480 posts)That a vegan diet is best for the environment?
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)Peta doesn't believe in killing invasive species. They aren't motivated by caring for the environment. They just spew scewed stats which further their cause. Not clear what that is, since if they viewed animals as the same as humans they wouldn't euthanize so many of them.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/vegetarian-or-omnivore-the-environmental-implications-of-diet/2014/03/10/648fdbe8-a495-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html
chernabog
(480 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)It recommends moving toward vegetarianism not forcing the vegan diet on people. BTW there is huge difference between plant based and vegetarian diets and veganism. I do believe forcing such diets on people will create mass malnutritoin particularly of b12 and taurine.
BTW the UN walked back on this recommendation http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8583308.stm
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)chernabog
(480 posts)Not caring is something you are very good at.
GGJohn
(9,951 posts)KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)It's too bad PETA is so polarizing.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)Wouldn't the BEST way to do it is to not force it on everyone, but feature it to show all the options you can eat?
I don't know how the festival is set up, but a more reasonable approach would be to ask that the vegan food vendors be given prime locations.
ProfessorGAC
(65,075 posts)Sorry, but the position is not that relevant to me. There's nothing logical about taking a position to such an extreme that it alienates potential allies. It just makes enemies. Look at the fractious nature of politics today. The RW spend the last 30 years taking extreme positions and now look.
chernabog
(480 posts)To not use animal products?
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)The extremism is PETA's dickbaggery. Frankly, they're doing more to hurt veganism and vegetarianism than help.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)joeybee12
(56,177 posts)at their "shelters" ?
Romulox
(25,960 posts)It's *different* when he does it!
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Gore is for whatever makes Gore rich.
Just for example, Fred Phelps (of Westboro Baptist "G-d Hates Fags" fame) was big 1988 sponsor of Al Gore in the Democrat primaries.
Photos of Tipper, Al, and Phelps are all over the internet.
Ron Obvious
(6,261 posts)How revealing.
MosheFeingold
(3,051 posts)Frederic Gomes Cassidy and Joan Houston Hall. eds, Dictionary of American Regional English: Volume 2 (1991) pp. 3738, 103
I'm not going to let Republicans rob me of my language. They started that crap in the 1950s, and I still don't buy it.
lpbk2713
(42,759 posts)If they think that's something wait till they see his pickup truck.
AJH032
(1,124 posts)http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/07/22/3462537/meat-greenhouse-gases-study-high-emissions-beef/
PETA has a point here.
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Scolds like this make me want to eat MORE meat.
chernabog
(480 posts)Your diet is confining and killing trillions of animals, fucking up ecosystems & biogeochemical cycles, destroying our reservoir of antibiotics, pumping massive amounts of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, wasting unfathomable amounts of water & land, creating psychologically & physically unsafe jobs for people who have no other choice, establishing unbearable living conditions for low socioeconomic communities forced to live near factory farms, as well as just perpetuating the disgusting belief that all of this is normal and somehow justified by the fact that you like chicken nuggets.
How could I not care?
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Eat what you want.
But when you want to dictate my diet I invite you to hammer wet sand up your ass.
chernabog
(480 posts)And the importance of ending animal cruelty. Why shouldn't it?
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Except you actually lack the courage.
chernabog
(480 posts)You sound like some crazy libertarian
And you sound like some crazy RW authoritarian telling others what to eat.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)humans are one of the more human animals when it comes to killing other animals.
chernabog
(480 posts)Not what happens in nature. Humans have no need to consume animal products.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)Animals can be extremely cruel to each other and for reasons not relating to food. They will kill each other cruelly, they will kill the offspring of rivals -- or even their own. Many times they lack the means to kill quickly and painlessly. Heck, chimps even engage in war, rape and torture.
chernabog
(480 posts)Any vegan realizes what happens in nature. You're just being ridiculous.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)You haven't answered the question. Why the double-standard between humans and animals?
chernabog
(480 posts)And the responsibility to do what's right.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)If they are mistaken in the concept of God could they then also be mistaken in the concept of this morality you seem to share with a very narrow, self-selecting few?
If, however, they are correct in the concept of God wouldn't this morality you speak of come from God -- assuming the definition of God includes God being the source from which morality emanates?
chernabog
(480 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)But you still haven't answered where this morality of yours comes from.
chernabog
(480 posts)You mean kill/ slaughter. Killing an animal to use it is cruel. I believe it is moral to not be cruel. Do you?
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)haphazard, unfounded and unfocused.
I'm against cruelty as a concept of inflicting pain for pleasure but killing is not necessarily cruel. Just because you call something cruel doesn't necessarily make it so. You don't get to drop buzz words and declare yourself the winner, you actually have to provide reasoning for your declarations.
As has been noted before, animals can be particularly cruel.
* Why are humans bound by this morality of yours but animals are exempt?
* Where does this morality come from?
chernabog
(480 posts)For the pleasure of your tastebuds. Killing for exploitation is cruel. I have always said I am against cruelty by humans.
Humans are different than animals.
Morality comes from wherever.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)o-kay then.
My morality says that harvesting animals can and should be done as humanely as possible and that if done so there is no shame/sin in eating meat.
Cats are different from chimps but both will kill cruelly. I don't understand how the pain inflicted by a chimp that rapes and tortures a rival is morally exempt but harvesting chicken or beef as painlessly as possible is some moral offense.
You seem to be saying humanity bears a moral awareness but have no basis for doing so ("Morality comes from wherever." . In this vast universe of countless galaxies filled with countless stars over tens of billions of years suddenly humanity has arisen and it has a moral duty to something not only unobserved in the rest of the universe but actually quite contrary in nature.
If humans are different they seem to be spectacularly different. So unique, in fact, one has to wonder if such a thing is/can be mere happenstance. If it is happenstance then "wherever morality" is useless because our existence is the product of the death of others. If it is design then, fine, let's talk that out and see what the mind of the Divine desires for humanity.
chernabog
(480 posts)Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)It's not even consistent with human experience. Humans live in every corner of the world for millions of years. Yet, only recently in the scant few technologically advanced nations have they been able to develop the means to produce enough food through agricultural means to support hundreds of millions. Meanwhile the rest of the world is still populated with hunter-gatherers, fishermen, herders and others who "exploit" animals. Even among advanced nations many people must consume whatever they can harvest.
Your wherever morality of convenience is a rich man's hobby, not a moral imperative. Elitism doesn't feed the world.
chernabog
(480 posts)If all food crops were fed directly to humans instead of animals, around 70% more food would be added to the worlds supply, which would be enough to feed 4 billion additional people.
Nuclear Unicorn
(19,497 posts)feeding themselves. What you're proposing is a massive, centralized effort for no particular reason except your own personal demands being imposed on others.
AJH032
(1,124 posts)Animals do not breed other animals by the billions each year and hold them in captivity for their entire lives, solely to be slaughtered for food.
I'm not saying that non-human animals are all vegans either, but humans' hunger for meat is anything but humane.
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)Shame, shame on him.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)for their own causes.
yewberry
(6,530 posts)Should we not be mentioning that vegans usually get the choice of chips and salsa or fries at these events as a matter of course? Side salads at every wedding we've ever been to? Baked potato without toppings at many restaurants? Folks, I attended a picnic once where I got corn on a bun. Canned kernel corn... on a bun. And I ate it because that's what I got. I didn't make a big fucking stink about being discriminated against or call people names for "leaving out a portion of the population."
You're seriously bitching because you might be forced to eat vegan for one meal on one day if you decide to attend a concert? Really? Seriously, you sound like a bunch of evangelicals attending a conference where they hold a moment of silence instead of leading the group in the Lord's Prayer. So accustomed to being catered to (literally, in this case) that you find it shocking when you're not.
It's just felafel, not a judgment of you and what you choose to eat, for goodness' sake.
.
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)If vegans weren't accommodated in the way you described, you might have something. Since Gore is a vegan himself I seriously doubt that's the case.
Your rant sounds a lot like "the poor meat-eaters" not being accommodated is social justice for you having to eat corn and potatoes.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)They are exercising their 1st amendment rights.
Vegetarians and vegans should speak up more often.