Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:32 PM Apr 2015

PETA slams Al Gore for ‘hypocrisy and sheer laziness’ for not limiting Live Earth festival food to v

PETA slams Al Gore for ‘hypocrisy and sheer laziness’ for not limiting Live Earth festival food to vegan only

In a series of emails obtained by Buzzfeed, inflexible animal advocacy group PETA criticized former Vice President Al Gore for refusing to serve vegan only food at his upcoming Live Earth concert series.

While in Davos this year, Gore, along with popular musician Pharrell, announced the return of the eco-friendly worldwide music festival in 2015 which will feature over 100 artists performing on seven continents on June 18th.

In the emails, representatives from PETA pestered the concert organizers, asking if they plan to serve vegan only food at the events, eliminating all animal products including meat and dairy.

A representative for Live Earth explained they do not have complete control over the food served at the venues where their events will be taking place, citing pre-existing agreements between the venues and their vendors.

-snip-

http://www.rawstory.com/2015/04/peta-slams-al-gore-for-hypocrisy-and-sheer-laziness-for-not-limiting-live-earth-festival-food-to-vegan-only/
221 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
PETA slams Al Gore for ‘hypocrisy and sheer laziness’ for not limiting Live Earth festival food to v (Original Post) DonViejo Apr 2015 OP
Oh sure. So what are the other guests supposed to eat? yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #1
Because meat production is incredibly damaging to the environment JaneyVee Apr 2015 #5
Does not have anything to do with banning it yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #9
But its an environmental concert, besides... JaneyVee Apr 2015 #28
I think most attendees are glad to have a variety of foods yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #45
And now, due to the inventiveness of chefs/cooks, there is a huge variety of vegan cuisines- KittyWampus Apr 2015 #58
I'm sitting in a great vegetarian restaurant right now! Later: Venison burgers! Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #85
So why not have both Travis_0004 Apr 2015 #202
And those of us that can't eat dbackjon Apr 2015 #92
+1000 blackspade Apr 2015 #130
Tofu is much more environmentally friendly than meat. Unvanguard Apr 2015 #150
But it is a matter of degrees dbackjon Apr 2015 #153
And the magnitude of harm from meat is much greater. Unvanguard Apr 2015 #160
Almost all of the soy grown on earth chernabog Apr 2015 #162
Which brings up the argument... Adrahil Apr 2015 #188
I make spicy vegan sausage that my friends don't know is vegan until I tell them. KittyWampus Apr 2015 #57
That is your view still_one Apr 2015 #32
That is scientific consensus. JaneyVee Apr 2015 #44
Normally at these things the food is already made yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #46
Are you being serious? chernabog Apr 2015 #76
I Doubt they are making it themselves yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #79
Someone had to make it! chernabog Apr 2015 #82
Which is great so instead of going to waste they will now be eaten. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #100
I'm sorry that you are missing the point. chernabog Apr 2015 #101
I am sorry but we will just have to Agee to disagree yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #105
Take Away meat? chernabog Apr 2015 #107
I won't. It hasn't arrived yet though. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #109
Does that include all the fixings? evirus Apr 2015 #62
sweet, water is good for you! snooper2 Apr 2015 #66
lets do the math on your science NM_Birder Apr 2015 #120
It's not just the water the cow drinks chernabog Apr 2015 #124
LOL, are you serious ? NM_Birder Apr 2015 #132
Free range cows use much more water chernabog Apr 2015 #135
So I win...... and my victory is all the meat I can eat. NM_Birder Apr 2015 #137
No chernabog Apr 2015 #138
I'll let it go,... just a funnin witch ya NM_Birder Apr 2015 #140
say what? that makes no sense whatsoever. Kali Apr 2015 #189
Here's why chernabog Apr 2015 #191
wrong Kali Apr 2015 #192
My position has always been anti cruelty chernabog Apr 2015 #194
yet you throw out wild claims that are jsut factually wrong Kali Apr 2015 #200
Wow. You really think that figure represents *only* the amount of water a cow drinks? Sheldon Cooper Apr 2015 #129
600 galons its a wild ass guess used by a few, to support NM_Birder Apr 2015 #136
It takes over 600 gallons of water to yield 123 walnuts. pnwmom Apr 2015 #126
I would rather die, than live in a world NM_Birder Apr 2015 #139
Omnivores can eat vegan food. bananas Apr 2015 #10
Al Gore is having Vegan at the festival yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #11
PETA is right on this. nt bananas Apr 2015 #17
Sure, just like they were right when they were kissing the shitbag Arpaio's ass Major Nikon Apr 2015 #26
No they are not. still_one Apr 2015 #33
Are too! bananas Apr 2015 #35
My Dad is tougher than your Dad still_one Apr 2015 #43
Is too! Dorian Gray Apr 2015 #56
You win. LOL still_one Apr 2015 #63
Oh no way. You don't eliminate a whole segment of society. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #42
Newsflash chernabog Apr 2015 #71
But why should they? Hamburger won't hurt vegans either. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #78
It will cause heart disease chernabog Apr 2015 #81
Vegan advocacy--you're doing it wrong. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #91
I may understand that in this country we allow Americans to yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #99
So in your eyes chernabog Apr 2015 #103
When you are ready to debate I'll be waiting yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #106
It's very easy to choose not to consume animal products chernabog Apr 2015 #108
Have a good day lunch arrived. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #110
"Hamburger won't hurt vegans either." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #141
Now that is fucking hilarious. yewberry Apr 2015 #195
Newsflash GGJohn Apr 2015 #216
Oh my goodness, WHY are you posting when you don't even know what "vegan" is? CreekDog Apr 2015 #148
If you want to discriminate I can't stop you. yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #185
I'm not arguing that the menu needs to be vegan CreekDog Apr 2015 #203
I also don't care if they serve vegan but don't exclude a majority yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #206
PETA is right, but they're making the point in an alienating way. BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2015 #201
Not every omnivore can. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #21
It's a day festival. What is it, one meal? JaneyVee Apr 2015 #29
So if you come over to my house dbackjon Apr 2015 #95
No. You would obviously be an ignorant. insensitive asshat. alphafemale Apr 2015 #144
:) dbackjon Apr 2015 #152
My daughter got the opportunity to spend a college semester with a Maasai tribe alphafemale Apr 2015 #157
"supportive of a diet that makes you feel superior to others. " deek Apr 2015 #208
the posters in this thread. alphafemale Apr 2015 #210
Nobody requires meat. nt bananas Apr 2015 #31
who are you to decide what people should or should NOT eat? still_one Apr 2015 #34
If it's harming animals chernabog Apr 2015 #77
You harm animals with any type of mass-produced food. dbackjon Apr 2015 #154
I'm vegan. I know the benefits of a vegan diet. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #37
No human being requires meat & dairy at a FESTIVAL. Not one. KittyWampus Apr 2015 #59
No human being requires a FESTIVAL. Not one. cleanhippie Apr 2015 #68
No ones diet requires meat chernabog Apr 2015 #72
When it's winter and you can't afford foods fortified with vitamin D NuclearDem Apr 2015 #80
Doesnt meat cost more? chernabog Apr 2015 #84
No, it doesn't. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #86
Are you trying to tell me chernabog Apr 2015 #88
Who the hell said I'm buying meat? NuclearDem Apr 2015 #90
Whoever tells you they need meat to get vitamin D chernabog Apr 2015 #93
I see you take after the PETA School of Vegan Advocacy. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #94
that is the most honest vegan argument I've ever heard. NM_Birder Apr 2015 #96
Nooch does hit the spot chernabog Apr 2015 #98
LOL, ...... there is your problem NM_Birder Apr 2015 #102
So you've never had it chernabog Apr 2015 #104
I tried to BBQ NOOCH once NM_Birder Apr 2015 #112
Killing isn't Humane chernabog Apr 2015 #114
People who are gluten intolerant can't eat it betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #117
For the 1% that are gluten intolerant chernabog Apr 2015 #118
They will just fall thru the grill too. NM_Birder Apr 2015 #127
all gassy foods that people with stomach issues may have problems with. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #131
At least 1% have the specific condition called Celiac disease. Many more are gluten intolerant or sensitive. pnwmom Apr 2015 #134
killing is more humane that trying to eat it alive, christ that's barbaric. NM_Birder Apr 2015 #122
Do you season the flesh before you eat it? chernabog Apr 2015 #123
you do know that industrial farming dbackjon Apr 2015 #156
Yes I do know chernabog Apr 2015 #161
We need both dbackjon Apr 2015 #164
We do not need animal products chernabog Apr 2015 #165
In your opinion dbackjon Apr 2015 #166
You can get everything you need from plants. chernabog Apr 2015 #168
Good for you dbackjon Apr 2015 #170
Why don't you want to minimize animal cruelty? chernabog Apr 2015 #172
Yeoman's first post shows he doesnt know what "vegan" even means CreekDog Apr 2015 #145
Oh my goodness, it's pretty clear you don't even know what vegan food is CreekDog Apr 2015 #143
That's fine I can take criticism no big deal yeoman6987 Apr 2015 #184
And if they went along with non-vegan LiberalElite Apr 2015 #2
PETA isn't 'allowing' jack shit... It isn't their fest... Oktober Apr 2015 #22
exactly. still_one Apr 2015 #36
PETA shoots ... and misses. Again. AtomicKitten Apr 2015 #3
PETA is a group of total assholes. Archae Apr 2015 #4
Here is a PETA video Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #12
And here's a typical PETA ad. Archae Apr 2015 #14
You have a point Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #15
They steal pets and kill them. Not sure how good that is Major Nikon Apr 2015 #18
You have a point x 2 Omaha Steve Apr 2015 #23
They are not focused on adoption. They focus on cruelty prevention CrawlingChaos Apr 2015 #25
They were stealing healthy pets from people and killing them Major Nikon Apr 2015 #40
Do you understand the meaning of ad hominem? CrawlingChaos Apr 2015 #47
Actually that's exactly what it is Major Nikon Apr 2015 #49
WRONG CrawlingChaos Apr 2015 #51
You've GOT to be shitting me! Major Nikon Apr 2015 #65
You are making absolutely no sense whatsoever CrawlingChaos Apr 2015 #155
You stole my line! Major Nikon Apr 2015 #159
Why do you think this document is significant of anything? CrawlingChaos Apr 2015 #211
What? No more ad hominem? Major Nikon Apr 2015 #212
PETA are a bunch of fucking grifters...look at their annual budget snooper2 Apr 2015 #67
If it were only that, I wouldn't mind Major Nikon Apr 2015 #69
Gretchen Newkirk calls keeping pets 'slavery'. X_Digger Apr 2015 #207
Humans evolved as omnivores, they developed a belief system to become Vegans. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2015 #6
Exactly. LuvNewcastle Apr 2015 #13
They are still omnivores Major Nikon Apr 2015 #20
This. hifiguy Apr 2015 #24
I think it was the green Lamborghini seveneyes Apr 2015 #7
Fuck Peta pintobean Apr 2015 #8
PETA ain't vegan...they eat their own. Scurrilous Apr 2015 #16
Fuck PETA ismnotwasm Apr 2015 #19
PETA once again proves they're clueless. jeff47 Apr 2015 #27
I am a vegetarian, however, humans are omnivoires, and a vegetarian or vegan diet are not for still_one Apr 2015 #30
There's another round of live earth concerts? NobodyHere Apr 2015 #38
Yes, in June, about the same time GoreSat reaches SEL1 bananas Apr 2015 #41
That kind of intolerance Dirty Socialist Apr 2015 #39
A long, long time ago I joined PETA,but sadoldgirl Apr 2015 #48
I have no respect for PETA Hekate Apr 2015 #50
Yet another "activist" group gone nuts, and why they get affiliated with "the left" is beyond me. nt Tarheel_Dem Apr 2015 #52
Gore should just spend the rest of his days under an umbrella on a gorgeous beach somewhere. merrily Apr 2015 #53
PETA is the kardashians of activism. pansypoo53219 Apr 2015 #54
I consider such demands to be no different than the ones made by righwiingers beachbum bob Apr 2015 #55
You don't understand chernabog Apr 2015 #73
According to peta, not acording the real environmentalists. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #113
PETA isn't the only group chernabog Apr 2015 #116
all are vegan orgs or newspaper opeds, not environmental orgs. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #119
How about the UN? chernabog Apr 2015 #121
That is against feed lotted beef dairy specifically not all meat. betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #128
You don't understand that those of us that are meat eaters don't care what you say? eom. GGJohn Apr 2015 #217
Congrats chernabog Apr 2015 #220
I'm very good at not caring what you think about us meat eaters. eom. GGJohn Apr 2015 #221
Not a fan of PETA, but they are right on the hypocrisy. Wonderful opportunity was missed. KittyWampus Apr 2015 #60
The Festival is offering Vegan food dbackjon Apr 2015 #97
Extremism Is Unattractive ProfessorGAC Apr 2015 #61
How is it extreme chernabog Apr 2015 #75
Nobody said that. NuclearDem Apr 2015 #83
Shouldn't they also ban electricity? GeorgeGist Apr 2015 #64
Would PETA be ok if they served the cats and dogs PETA killed joeybee12 Apr 2015 #70
Al gets to live in massive mansions, fly private planes, and shill for big business. Romulox Apr 2015 #74
PETA and Al probably hit up the same Hollywood celebs. Eleanors38 Apr 2015 #87
+1 MosheFeingold Apr 2015 #133
The "Democrat" primaries, eh? Ron Obvious Apr 2015 #149
Yes, I've been outed as a Yankee MosheFeingold Apr 2015 #151
Damn Al for trying. lpbk2713 Apr 2015 #89
The Meat Industry and Climate Change AJH032 Apr 2015 #111
Pork and chicken are still meat. n/t betterdemsonly Apr 2015 #115
PETA has jumped the shark. blackspade Apr 2015 #125
Won't somebody think of the sharks?!?! Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #142
I heard they served shark meat at this festival. bigwillq Apr 2015 #146
LOL! blackspade Apr 2015 #174
Guard your plates! The Talivegans are coming! alphafemale Apr 2015 #147
Talivegans? chernabog Apr 2015 #163
You are not going to dictate what I eat. alphafemale Apr 2015 #167
Of course your diet trumps the environment chernabog Apr 2015 #169
Put meat eaters in concentration camps and kill us then alphafemale Apr 2015 #173
What the hell are you talking about? chernabog Apr 2015 #175
Yeah? GGJohn Apr 2015 #218
Animal cruelty? Do you know what animals do to each other? When it comes to eating Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #176
I'm talking About what humans do to animals chernabog Apr 2015 #177
You're moving the goalposts. You explicitly made a comment about animal cruelty. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #179
I never moved any goalposts chernabog Apr 2015 #180
"Any vegan realizes what happens in nature. You're just being ridiculous." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #181
Because humans have the concept of morality chernabog Apr 2015 #182
Humans also have the concept of God. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #183
Do you think humans should be cruel to animals? chernabog Apr 2015 #186
I think humans are capable of harvesting animals without being cruel. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #187
Harvest animals? chernabog Apr 2015 #190
You keep dodging. You want me to buy into your morality but your morality seems Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #193
You are inflicting pain and killing animals chernabog Apr 2015 #196
"Morality comes from wherever." Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #198
Why kill and exploit when you don't have to? chernabog Apr 2015 #199
Then suddenly it's a matter of personal convenience. Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #204
Doesn't food feed the world? chernabog Apr 2015 #213
The food systems we see today are the products of hundreds of thousands of years of humans Nuclear Unicorn Apr 2015 #214
Disagree AJH032 Apr 2015 #178
Also, I'm pretty sure I saw Al Gore wearing leather shoes. Nye Bevan Apr 2015 #158
PETA imbeciles do a lot more harm than good tabasco Apr 2015 #171
Oh noes, the poor meat-eaters might be forced to eat french fries at a festival!! yewberry Apr 2015 #197
+1 deek Apr 2015 #209
Except the OP is about poor PETA's conniption about people being allowed to eat meat Major Nikon Apr 2015 #215
Fuck PETA. n/t X_Digger Apr 2015 #205
Good. Quantess Apr 2015 #219
 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
1. Oh sure. So what are the other guests supposed to eat?
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:37 PM
Apr 2015

So much for inclusion of everyone. It would be different if they refused vegan food, I would not support that. I also don't believe in leaving out others who eat different foods. Why to go PETA trying to get a smaller participation at the event.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
5. Because meat production is incredibly damaging to the environment
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:41 PM
Apr 2015

They're just calling out the hypocrisy.

ETA: Although due to pre-existing contracts it seems they din't have control, unless they choose to relocate.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
9. Does not have anything to do with banning it
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:46 PM
Apr 2015

A ban is a horrible idea. Guests enjoy various foods at festivals. Nothing better then a spicy sausage on a roll with a beer. Plus burgers and dogs tend to be popular. There should never be discrimation at these things. And the committee pretty much said they were going to have variety. Not everyone in America is a vegan.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
28. But its an environmental concert, besides...
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:56 PM
Apr 2015

Im sure it wouldn't kill them to skip a meat lunch. People are attending for the music and the cause, not the lunch.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
45. I think most attendees are glad to have a variety of foods
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:53 PM
Apr 2015

Intolerance is horrible no matter who you are.

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
58. And now, due to the inventiveness of chefs/cooks, there is a huge variety of vegan cuisines-
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:38 AM
Apr 2015

all of which is delicious.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
202. So why not have both
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:44 PM
Apr 2015

You have some vegan food, I'll have a steak. I"m not against a vegan menu, I just don't think it should be the only menu.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
92. And those of us that can't eat
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:39 PM
Apr 2015

Tofu, or are allergic to mushrooms, which seems to be a component of most vegan "Meat" substitutes?



And do you understand how destructive soybean mono-culture is? Tofu is NOT an environmentally friendly product - about the same as meat.



So don't get all preachy.

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
130. +1000
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:12 PM
Apr 2015

I have an allergy to onions....which seem to end up in everything these days, especially vegan foods.
Vegan restaurants are a nightmare for me.

Unvanguard

(4,588 posts)
150. Tofu is much more environmentally friendly than meat.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:51 PM
Apr 2015

Which isn't to say that it's an environmentally friendly product. But its carbon impact, for example, is far smaller.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
153. But it is a matter of degrees
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:36 PM
Apr 2015

Vegans make tofu out to be some green product with no impact, when in fact, it is VERY destructive to the environment.

And if everyone switched to Tofu, well, that wouldn't be very pretty.



And tofu is NOT organic.

Unvanguard

(4,588 posts)
160. And the magnitude of harm from meat is much greater.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 06:37 PM
Apr 2015

I agree, it's a matter of degree--that's the point.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
188. Which brings up the argument...
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:55 PM
Apr 2015

If its about the musuc and th cause, why shove that vegan crap down everyone's throat?

Few people get up my nose more than self-righteous vegans....

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
57. I make spicy vegan sausage that my friends don't know is vegan until I tell them.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:37 AM
Apr 2015

For a festival, it would have been very doable.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
46. Normally at these things the food is already made
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:55 PM
Apr 2015

No need for water at all except if someone is thirsty. They will probably have a variety of beverages to drink.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
76. Are you being serious?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:07 PM
Apr 2015

How do you think they made this already made food? Did it just appear out of thin air?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
105. I am sorry but we will just have to Agee to disagree
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:05 PM
Apr 2015

I am at TGI Fridays having the dipped pretzels, medium rare steak, Mac and cheese and a Cesar salad. I am not one to discuss taking away meat from those who enjoy it. I don't think I will ever support that.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
107. Take Away meat?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:09 PM
Apr 2015

Enjoy your factory farmed flesh. Try not to think about what it took to make your meal.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
120. lets do the math on your science
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:48 PM
Apr 2015

Ideal age of cow to be at time of slaughter = 36 months give or take
rough weight of live cow at 36 months = 1,100 pounds usually want them fatter, so this is a smaller than average, for your benefit.
roughly 800 lbs of meat after slaughter, again fair average of meat to waste.

1 hamburger = 8oz pre cooked weight.
800lbs of meat = roughly 1,600 1/2 lb burgers.

each burger "scientifically" proven to require 600 gallons of water to produce = 960,000 gallons of water in 3year time (1600 burgers x 600 gallon)

960,000 gallons of water divided by 1,097days (36 months) = 876 gallons of water per day,.... per animal.

Your "science says a cow drinks a gallon of water,.... per minute,......... every minute,... for 17 hours per day, .......every day, .....for three years ?

your "science" and baloney, ................. they have something in common. Both are manufactured, and neither are any good.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
124. It's not just the water the cow drinks
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:03 PM
Apr 2015

Cows need to eat. The water is also figured in to how much it takes to grow what the cow eats, how much water is used in slaughter, etc. Try to think before you post.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
132. LOL, are you serious ?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:16 PM
Apr 2015

So in essence, ........your argument with my consumption of slaughtered carcass ends,.............. if I only eat open range cows, and slaughter them with less water ?


the 600 gallons of water is a crock pot full of lentils and yeast.
 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
137. So I win...... and my victory is all the meat I can eat.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:26 PM
Apr 2015

and meat is again available for all.

Your argument is now based on water consumption, so........................................

Desalinize the ocean, halt global warming from raising the oceans, reduce the number of hurricanes due to warmer/higher ocean temperatures, plenty of water for your yeast and oats, new industry, more jobs,


And all thanks to simply preserving my right to eat meat.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
138. No
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:32 PM
Apr 2015

My argument has always been about stopping cruelty towards animals. I was only expounding on the previous posters comments.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
189. say what? that makes no sense whatsoever.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:05 PM
Apr 2015

you just mentioned water for feed, free range don't eat farmed/processed feed. confined cattle are the consumers of feed, range cattle eat what grows naturally from sun and rain. you counting rainfall in your silly water budget?

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
191. Here's why
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:16 PM
Apr 2015

Free range require more water to drink because they are getting much more exercise. Unless grass-fed cows are being raised in a tropical area, they still need to be fed grain during the lean or winter months. And if they are being raised in a tropical area (the Amazon) you are clearing Millions of acres of rainforest to raise them.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
192. wrong
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:42 PM
Apr 2015

free range means free range - no grain, little supplemental feed at all. confined feeding is 100% crops. water consumption for crops is the major usage, all cattle drink about the same - the main variability is weather/temperature not EXERCISE.

raising (and eating) beef can be an extremely sustainable and environmentally ENHANCING process. I am not saying it all is by any means, but cattle natually consume lower on the food chain than other meats and can convert undigestible-by-humans plant matter from land that is NOT arable or productive for food in any other way. Managed correctly they can enhance biodiversity, nutrient cycles, ground cover, mitigate erosion, help sequester C02, AND provide delicious high quality nutritious protein (and other useful products).

your simplistic and extremist approach is not based in reality.

Kali

(55,014 posts)
200. yet you throw out wild claims that are jsut factually wrong
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:16 PM
Apr 2015

personally, I would be concerned about my credibility - especially if I had some cause I was wanting other people to buy into.

when you err on such basic information people tend to question what other claims might be incorrect.

Sheldon Cooper

(3,724 posts)
129. Wow. You really think that figure represents *only* the amount of water a cow drinks?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:12 PM
Apr 2015

I have no idea if 600 gallons is needed/burger, frankly that sounds a bit high. But honestly, your math exercise is just plain silly. And I'm an omnivore who has no use for PETA.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
136. 600 galons its a wild ass guess used by a few, to support
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:22 PM
Apr 2015

wanting to dictate what the many eat.

De-salinize the ocean, .......use the water to raise more beef.......save the planet.

thank me later, but come around back on week-ends, follow the smell of the BBQ, and for gods sake...leave the soy patties at home.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
126. It takes over 600 gallons of water to yield 123 walnuts.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:08 PM
Apr 2015

Last edited Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:18 PM - Edit history (1)

Which yields a lot less protein than beef.

http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/02/wheres-californias-water-going

Should we stop growing walnuts?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
11. Al Gore is having Vegan at the festival
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:51 PM
Apr 2015

But thankfully they are going to have a wide variety of food for those who are not vegan. The committee knows what's best. PETA is being discrimary. I guess I should say tried to be.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
26. Sure, just like they were right when they were kissing the shitbag Arpaio's ass
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:52 PM
Apr 2015

Forcing your dietary preferences on those who don't share them makes one an asshole.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
81. It will cause heart disease
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:22 PM
Apr 2015

Harm the environment, and cause harm to the animal which it came from. Are you that selfish you can't understand?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
99. I may understand that in this country we allow Americans to
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:53 PM
Apr 2015

Make their own choices and never force them on others especially liberals.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
106. When you are ready to debate I'll be waiting
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:08 PM
Apr 2015

What you are doing is nonsense. I'm at Friday's enjoying my lunch with coworker friends and yes we are having a nutritious lunch with all food groups involved.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
108. It's very easy to choose not to consume animal products
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:11 PM
Apr 2015

It was for me, Once you realize how much it hurts the creatures you are using.

yewberry

(6,530 posts)
195. Now that is fucking hilarious.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:52 PM
Apr 2015

I haven't eaten meat since the 80s. Do you have even the vaguest idea what happens if I get hold of chicken stock or bacon grease?

Two exits, no waiting. I can't even imagine the pain that would be involved in eating actual meat. Jesus.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
216. Newsflash
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 12:08 AM
Apr 2015

I don't want to eat vegan food, I like my meat, things like venison, elk, wild hog, wild turkey, chucker, dove, quail, etc.
You can stick to your vegan food, I'll stick to my meat and potatos food.
Oh, and we do enjoy a nice, thick Ribeye steak cooked on the BBQ every now and then.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
148. Oh my goodness, WHY are you posting when you don't even know what "vegan" is?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:43 PM
Apr 2015

You keep saying things like "eat vegan", "refuse vegan food".

You think vegan is a product.

OMG.

And you CANNOT stop yourself from commenting. It's like you're posting about Dumbo and don't realize we're talking about elephants.

Holy moly.

Nobody is making you post. Why on this topic? Oy

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
203. I'm not arguing that the menu needs to be vegan
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:49 PM
Apr 2015

I'm annoyed that you're posting and arguing aboutserving a vegan nenu when it's obvious you don't even know what the term "vegan" means. Why not learn a basic definition before posting?

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
206. I also don't care if they serve vegan but don't exclude a majority
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 11:27 PM
Apr 2015

Of concert goers is all I am saying. Accept everybody including those who have a burger once in a while. What if they said were only serving meat with no sides. The tune would change quick.

BlancheSplanchnik

(20,219 posts)
201. PETA is right, but they're making the point in an alienating way.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:20 PM
Apr 2015

Or should I say, Obnoxious way.

I wish they'd take a break with the ultra hostile approach, though.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
95. So if you come over to my house
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:41 PM
Apr 2015

And nothing I serve is vegan, it's still just one meal - you will be polite and eat it?

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
144. No. You would obviously be an ignorant. insensitive asshat.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:33 PM
Apr 2015

With no regard at all for dietary whims of your guests.

///sarcasm///



Good googly moogly

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
157. My daughter got the opportunity to spend a college semester with a Maasai tribe
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:46 PM
Apr 2015

She was a vegetarian at the time she left.

I told her that, that would have to change.

That her diet would be largely animal protein for a time.

Another year she spent a summer working in Denali national park.

Also not exactly an area supportive of a diet that makes you feel superior to others.

She is not a vegetarian anymore.

deek

(3,414 posts)
208. "supportive of a diet that makes you feel superior to others. "
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 12:46 AM
Apr 2015


why is it meat eaters feel vegetarians are like this?

bananas

(27,509 posts)
31. Nobody requires meat. nt
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:02 PM
Apr 2015
Well-planned vegan diets can reduce the risk of some types of chronic disease,[11] and are regarded as appropriate for all stages of the life-cycle by the American Dietetic Association, the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council, and Dietitians of Canada.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Veganism

cleanhippie

(19,705 posts)
68. No human being requires a FESTIVAL. Not one.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:13 AM
Apr 2015

While I enjoy a good festival as much as the next person, a festival generally uses way more resources than any human needs.

If you are so upset at the food being served, where is your outrage for all the other resources being wasted?

Or is that just too much for you to handle at one time?

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
86. No, it doesn't.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:27 PM
Apr 2015

Fortified foods are unbelievably expensive. I can afford them, but a vegan diet in general is very much out of some people's financial means.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
88. Are you trying to tell me
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:29 PM
Apr 2015

a box of cereal or a pack of nutritional yeast costs more than whatever meat you're going to buy? I'm not seeing that.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
93. Whoever tells you they need meat to get vitamin D
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:39 PM
Apr 2015

is full of shit. And if they are that lacking in Vitamin D, I'm sure they would be taking a supplement already.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
96. that is the most honest vegan argument I've ever heard.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:43 PM
Apr 2015

A box of cereal,....... a pack of "nutritional" yeast or....... some meat.


mmmmmmmmm, ....... cereal and "nutritional" yeast, ..................sure sound like they would hit the spot.

but BEEF ............it's what's for dinner.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
98. Nooch does hit the spot
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:46 PM
Apr 2015

Have you had it? its very versatile and can be used in many dishes.
Rotting cow carcass... yummm

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
102. LOL, ...... there is your problem
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:58 PM
Apr 2015

Nooch: "savory flavor, reminiscent of cheese" ...... tempting,.... but no, a pouch of raw gelatin sounds just as disgusting.

You need to eat a big fat marbled steak,....BEFORE it rots,..... I assume you eat your fruits and nuts BEFORE they rot right ?

I'm all for vegans eating whatever they want, just like vegans are just fine letting me have what I want. You can have all the yeast I'm supposed to be eating.

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
112. I tried to BBQ NOOCH once
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:24 PM
Apr 2015

but it just would not stay on the grill.

I guess I could upgrade the BBQ,.... to be big enough to grill a cow whole, while it's alive. But DAMN, that seems heartless, and there is no way we could eat a whole cow, shit, even in a week I don't think we could.

For what it's worth,......I guess it comes down to convenience for not BBQ-ing an animal alive. ... kill the animal first (it's only humane to kill it before eating it), .....butcher it into usable portions, ...... freeze and store the "carcass" to prevent it from rotting prior to consumption, then at almost any given time we can hear that phssssssssh sound of seared meat flipped over.

Because what I want is to eat the muscular tissue of an animal,...... and anything described as "reminiscent of cheese" sounds like fish bait, not food. ............also, I like some of the guts of a lot of animals too........Elk heart, nearly ALL liver, beef and lamb kidney. Never been fond of menudo, never tried brain, and never saw the big deal with tongue, but I would never tell someone else NOT to eat them.
 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
127. They will just fall thru the grill too.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:10 PM
Apr 2015

"Tempeh" is one of the healthiest things you can eat, I found that interesting.

The receipe for "tempeh batter" caught my eye, .....it might actually be worth trying for oyster, fish, clam .....or even chicken liver frying.





 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
131. all gassy foods that people with stomach issues may have problems with.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:15 PM
Apr 2015

bud out of other peoples lives.

pnwmom

(108,980 posts)
134. At least 1% have the specific condition called Celiac disease. Many more are gluten intolerant or sensitive.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:18 PM
Apr 2015

And researchers at Stanford have shown that many of them are highly sensitive to beans, also, and other foods that draw water to the intestines.

Good luck following the Fodmap died if you're a vegan:

https://stanfordhealthcare.org/content/dam/SHC/for-patients-component/programs-services/clinical-nutrition-services/docs/pdf-lowfodmapdiet.pdf

 

NM_Birder

(1,591 posts)
122. killing is more humane that trying to eat it alive, christ that's barbaric.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:56 PM
Apr 2015

I don't even want to care what seitan is, but I'll have to check. "wheat meat" ....that does not sound "cruelty free" ......it sounds like culinary cruel and unusual punishment................ no thanks.


I extend my hand, you eat all the earth given, healthy, .....yeast wheat meat you want, ......and I'll grill all the slaughtered animal carcasses I want.

But I'll compromise,......... I WILL consume a tremendous amount of wheat and oat fortified, fermented water based beverages, to wash down my rotting carcass.
 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
156. you do know that industrial farming
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:45 PM
Apr 2015

Which is the only way to get enough wheat, lentils, etc for a large number of people to eat

kills many, many animals.




If you want to be vegan, more power to you.


Just stop with the "meat is murder" bs, because for humans to survive (unless you want to kill off 95% of the world) millions of animals die in crop production.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
161. Yes I do know
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 06:46 PM
Apr 2015

The point of veganism is to minimize harm and cruelty. Humans need vegetables, they don't need meat. You are saving a ton more animals if you are vegan.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
166. In your opinion
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:09 PM
Apr 2015

But obviously you think you know what is the best diet for all 7 billion of us on this planet.



Sorry, but you are wrong - sorry if that is inconvenient for you.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
170. Good for you
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:24 PM
Apr 2015

If that is how you want to live your life


Just leave me, and my roast turkey alone.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
145. Yeoman's first post shows he doesnt know what "vegan" even means
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:36 PM
Apr 2015

He is posting dozens of times in a thread about vegan food and he literally has no idea what the term means.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
143. Oh my goodness, it's pretty clear you don't even know what vegan food is
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 04:25 PM
Apr 2015

When you ask what if people "refuse vegan food"???

How do people refuse vegan food?

That would mean they won't eat ANYTHING unless it has meat or dairy in it or if it hasn't been cooked in a meat-based oil.

They'd be refusing potato chips -they're vegan.

They'd be refusing coffee and soda and tea -all vegan

They'd be refusing bread

They would refuse to eat fruit.

I see your posts most days and it's as if you want to have the loudest, inaccurate and uninformed opinion here.

Would you PLEASE actually spend more time learning before posting nonsense?


 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
184. That's fine I can take criticism no big deal
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:42 PM
Apr 2015

However I should not be deprived of what I want to eat at a festival just as I would deprive others. We are supposed to be tolerant of everything. Not just what we want to be tolerant of.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
2. And if they went along with non-vegan
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:39 PM
Apr 2015

food they'd be called hypocrites. I've done animal rights activism and I'm not a PETA devotee but let's be honest. I can see the screaming (theoretical) headlines now: "PETA ALLOWS HAMBURGERS "

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
18. They steal pets and kill them. Not sure how good that is
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:35 PM
Apr 2015
TRUE: PETA associates have been involved in some incidents involving the alleged theft and/or euthanization of family pets.

http://www.snopes.com/critters/crusader/petakillspets.asp


Here's a report just for the state of Virginia. For just one year, out of 1553 cats they took in, they killed 1507 of them.

https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf



CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
25. They are not focused on adoption. They focus on cruelty prevention
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:51 PM
Apr 2015

They will step in to do painless euthanasia in cases where animals were headed for slaughter in a cruel and painful manner. Is that really as awful as you care to paint it?

And you'd think that people would know to be suspicious of a group calling itself "petakillsanimals" (hello agribusiness front group) but apparently the need to vilify Peta is stronger than the need to be fair or even-handed.

And before you paste one, I really don't care about their shock ads. I care about animal suffering.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
40. They were stealing healthy pets from people and killing them
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:30 PM
Apr 2015

On what planet does that qualify as caring about animals, suffering or otherwise?

The first link I posted was from snopes and was verified. So your ad hominem attack doesn't work so well there, eh? And neither does it work well on the other link either.

You wanna see the same info from Huffpo?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/02/05/pets-shelter-euthanization-rate_n_6612490.html

Huffpo not good enough? Here's the EXACT same data right from the state of Virginia's website.

https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010

How about the one for 2011? Same story:
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2011

2012?
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2012

2013?
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2013

2014?
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2014

Are you still going to call ad hominem on those links?

So they were just doing "painless euthanasia in cases where animals were headed for slaughter in a cruel and painful manner"?

Really?

Nonsense. PETA runs free euthanasia clinics. That's not what this was. This was a pet "shelter" that they were using for mass extermination of pets. Look at the forms and you'll see people were dropping their pets off and no doubt suspecting PETA would be the best choice to find a home for them and they were killing almost all of them. Your apologia just doesn't pass the smell test.



CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
47. Do you understand the meaning of ad hominem?
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:02 PM
Apr 2015

Me calling you out on posting hit pieces by agribusiness front groups in NOT an ad hominem.

Look at what you're doing. You are absolutely determined to ignore the good Peta does and sling every bit of mud you can find on the internets, and where Peta is concerned, there is no shortage. Some criticisms are fair, but the vast, vast majority are not. For instance it is not fair to judge Peta based on individual instances of poor judgement on the part of a single person.

Do you honestly believe YOUR efforts here pass the smell test??

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
49. Actually that's exactly what it is
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:13 PM
Apr 2015
An ad hominem (Latin for "to the man" or "to the person"[1]), short for argumentum ad hominem, means responding to arguments by attacking a person's character, rather than to the content of their arguments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

Here's the link you based your ad hominem attack on:

https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf

Here's the EXACT SAME FORM directly from the state of Virginia:

https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010

Now if you want to continue to prove you have no clue what ad hominem means, be my guest.

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
51. WRONG
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:45 AM
Apr 2015

My criticism of your post was specific and germane to the topic at hand. That is NOT an ad hominem. You are posting links to bogus front groups. Period.

In the link below you will find the facts about your source:

"The Center for Consumer Freedom, a lobbyist front group for some of the worst industries (e.g. tobacco, alcohol, animal agriculture, junk food, etc) created “PETA Kills Animals” to attempt to discredit People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals since getting people to be humane to animals is devastating to animal agriculture big business."

https://doespetakillsanimals.wordpress.com/

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
65. You've GOT to be shitting me!
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:03 AM
Apr 2015

Either explain what the differences are between these two documents, or stop being so butthurt over getting called out for ad hominem.

https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010

Please tell me you are just being obtuse. I'd hate to think this isn't deliberate for your sake.

You can say this isn't ad hominem till the cows come home, but when the source POSTS THE EXACT SAME INFORMATION as what comes directly from the STATE OF VIRGINIA, then you are simply making ad hominem, and not even good ad hominem but rather completely obvious and not just a bit ridiculous ad hominem.

Cheers!

CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
155. You are making absolutely no sense whatsoever
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:41 PM
Apr 2015

But by all means, throw your hands up and declare yourself the winner. I am familiar with this game and I'll just stand back and let you have at it.

And while you're at it, don't forget to pat yourself on the back for carrying water for some of the most evil interests out there.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
159. You stole my line!
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:55 PM
Apr 2015

You really crack me up. A screen capture from a state of Virginia website, which I PROVED came from that website = "carrying water for some of the most evil interests out there".

Here it is again, just cuz you ain't gonna run away from it:

https://www.petakillsanimals.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/PetaKillsAnimals.pdf
https://arr.va-vdacs.com/cgi-bin/Vdacs_search.cgi?link_select=facility&form=fac_select&fac_num=157&year=2010

Meanwhile when faced with the PROOF that PETA slaughters thousands of pets each year, some of them evidently stolen, you still think PETA isn't evil. If this wasn't enough, they just teamed up this year with serial torturer Arpaio.

So you might want to look in the mirror and figure out whose water you're carrying.



CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
211. Why do you think this document is significant of anything?
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 02:20 AM
Apr 2015

It's been established that humane euthanasia is part of what they do. They'll tell you that. I posted their response to this and you ignored it. You ignore everything that doesn't suit your framing.

I may not agree with everything PETA does but I do believe they're well-intentioned and there's no question they've done a lot of good for animals. They also provide extremely helpful resources to people wishing to adopt a vegan diet (they were personally helpful to me in this regard).

Are we to believe YOUR impassioned attacks on PETA stem from your own deep affection and concern for animals? I mean, since you're so OUTRAGED that they euthanize former pets? Do you really think anyone's going to believe that in a million years, based on your posts here?

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
212. What? No more ad hominem?
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 02:46 AM
Apr 2015

So now you finally acknowledge it's a real document after only how many times posting it from the original source. Color me surprised. Maybe you can be taught.

It's been established that humane euthanasia is part of what they do. They'll tell you that. I posted their response to this and you ignored it. You ignore everything that doesn't suit your framing.




Ignored it? I destroyed it and you ignored my response in favor of your half-fast ad hominem gibberish.


So they were just doing "painless euthanasia in cases where animals were headed for slaughter in a cruel and painful manner"?

Really?

Nonsense. PETA runs free euthanasia clinics. That's not what this was. This was a pet "shelter" that they were using for mass extermination of pets. Look at the forms and you'll see people were dropping their pets off and no doubt suspecting PETA would be the best choice to find a home for them and they were killing almost all of them. Your apologia just doesn't pass the smell test.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026572667#post40

I bet you feel pretty dumb about right now, eh? Perhaps if you hadn't been so quick to keep pretending you weren't slinging logical fallacies you might have noticed I sure as hell didn't ignore your PETA apologia. Now please do repeat your false claim, because I really enjoyed destroying it and would love to do so again.

Are we to believe YOUR impassioned attacks on PETA stem from your own deep affection and concern for animals? I mean, since you're so OUTRAGED that they euthanize former pets? Do you really think anyone's going to believe that in a million years, based on your posts here?


Spending half a dozen posts pretending their blatant ad hominem wasn't ad hominem is just not doing your credibility much good, nor is claiming I "ignored" something I obviously didn't. Obviously you pull things out of your...thin air, and then keep pretending to believe them after they have been thoroughly destroyed.

Sorry to burst your bubble, but what you do or don't believe is pretty low on my give a shit scale.
 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
67. PETA are a bunch of fucking grifters...look at their annual budget
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:10 AM
Apr 2015

get a couple naked celebs and rake in the cash from the sheeple!

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
69. If it were only that, I wouldn't mind
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 12:52 PM
Apr 2015

But they are raking in cash from the sheeple by convincing them they are rescuing animals, when in reality they are slaughtering 85-95% of their "shelter" pets. Meanwhile humane societies are managing to save 85-95% of the animals brought to them.

X_Digger

(18,585 posts)
207. Gretchen Newkirk calls keeping pets 'slavery'.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 11:29 PM
Apr 2015

And apparently, to PETA, being dead is better than being a 'slave' (I say as my master tells me to rub her belly.)

Agnosticsherbet

(11,619 posts)
6. Humans evolved as omnivores, they developed a belief system to become Vegans.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:41 PM
Apr 2015

Most of the people on the planet do not share their belief system.

LuvNewcastle

(16,846 posts)
13. Exactly.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:52 PM
Apr 2015

Most people eat meat and have no plans to give it up. Raising animals for food is taxing on the environment, but we'll be more likely to change that by devising alternative methods of raising animals than by trying to get everyone to give up meat. PETA needs to get a clue and realize that they're championing a lost cause.

 

seveneyes

(4,631 posts)
7. I think it was the green Lamborghini
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 08:42 PM
Apr 2015

And then in the trees I heard a twig snap
Warning lights flashed on my map
I opened my eyes and to my surprise

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
27. PETA once again proves they're clueless.
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 09:54 PM
Apr 2015

Let's see...we want to get more people to be concerned about climate change.

Should we target vegans, who are already extremely likely to be concerned about climate change, or should we target everyone else?

PETA: YOU HAVE TO TARGET THE VEGANS OR YOU ARE SCUM!!!



PETA is the perfect example of how not to change anything.

still_one

(92,219 posts)
30. I am a vegetarian, however, humans are omnivoires, and a vegetarian or vegan diet are not for
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:02 PM
Apr 2015

everyone.

I do not agree with PETA's view that Gore is a hypocrite because the festival does not limit the food only to vegan.

 

NobodyHere

(2,810 posts)
38. There's another round of live earth concerts?
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:16 PM
Apr 2015

Great, loved the last one!

Hope they can get Roger Waters again (and also Gilmour!)

bananas

(27,509 posts)
41. Yes, in June, about the same time GoreSat reaches SEL1
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 10:38 PM
Apr 2015

Hopefully we'll get some images for the concert.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_Space_Climate_Observatory

Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) (formerly known as Triana, unofficially known as GoreSat[3]) is a NOAA Earth observation and space weather satellite launched by SpaceX on a Falcon 9 launch vehicle on 11 February 2015 from Cape Canaveral.[4]

It was originally developed as a NASA satellite proposed in 1998 by then-Vice President Al Gore for the purpose of Earth observation. It is intended to be positioned at the Sun-Earth L1 Lagrangian point, 1,500,000 km (930,000 mi) from Earth, to monitor variable solar wind condition, provide early warning of approaching coronal mass ejections and observe phenomena on Earth including changes in ozone, aerosols, dust and volcanic ash, cloud height, vegetation cover and climate. At this location it will have a continuous view of the Sun and the sunlit side of the Earth. The satellite is planned to orbit the Sun-Earth L1 point in a six-month period, with a spacecraft-Earth-Sun angle varying from 4 to 15 degrees.[5] It will take full-Earth pictures about every two hours and be able to process them faster than other Earth observation satellites.[6]

DSCOVR has an expected arrival at L1 around the beginning of June 2015.[7]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Live_Earth#Live_Earth_2015

Live Earth 2015

On June 18, 2015, together with the United Nations, Live Earth will once again create a global series of events over 24 hours, on seven continents, anchored from Paris and New York. Live Earth Road to Paris will be broadcast across all major media platforms and supported by a yearlong campaign in partnership with the world's leading brands, NGOs and non-profits.


sadoldgirl

(3,431 posts)
48. A long, long time ago I joined PETA,but
Sun Apr 26, 2015, 11:03 PM
Apr 2015

when they came to our laboratory to tell us that we
should not kill bacteria, I cancelled.

I asked them to make sure not to take amoxycillin
against their strep throat problems, which they
promised me they would do.

Get a grip on reality PETA!

merrily

(45,251 posts)
53. Gore should just spend the rest of his days under an umbrella on a gorgeous beach somewhere.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:10 AM
Apr 2015

The more work he tries to do for the environment, the more shit he gets about his carbon footprint, food, whatever. Meanhile, those doing no work at all for the environment get no shit from environmentalists.

 

beachbum bob

(10,437 posts)
55. I consider such demands to be no different than the ones made by righwiingers
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 06:54 AM
Apr 2015

If you want vegan diet/food, bring it yourself and quite trying to force your own belief on others that don't share it.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
113. According to peta, not acording the real environmentalists.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:29 PM
Apr 2015

Peta doesn't believe in killing invasive species. They aren't motivated by caring for the environment. They just spew scewed stats which further their cause. Not clear what that is, since if they viewed animals as the same as humans they wouldn't euthanize so many of them.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/food/vegetarian-or-omnivore-the-environmental-implications-of-diet/2014/03/10/648fdbe8-a495-11e3-a5fa-55f0c77bf39c_story.html

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
128. That is against feed lotted beef dairy specifically not all meat.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:12 PM
Apr 2015

It recommends moving toward vegetarianism not forcing the vegan diet on people. BTW there is huge difference between plant based and vegetarian diets and veganism. I do believe forcing such diets on people will create mass malnutritoin particularly of b12 and taurine.

BTW the UN walked back on this recommendation http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8583308.stm

 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
60. Not a fan of PETA, but they are right on the hypocrisy. Wonderful opportunity was missed.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:40 AM
Apr 2015

It's too bad PETA is so polarizing.

 

dbackjon

(6,578 posts)
97. The Festival is offering Vegan food
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:45 PM
Apr 2015

Wouldn't the BEST way to do it is to not force it on everyone, but feature it to show all the options you can eat?



I don't know how the festival is set up, but a more reasonable approach would be to ask that the vegan food vendors be given prime locations.

ProfessorGAC

(65,075 posts)
61. Extremism Is Unattractive
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:45 AM
Apr 2015

Sorry, but the position is not that relevant to me. There's nothing logical about taking a position to such an extreme that it alienates potential allies. It just makes enemies. Look at the fractious nature of politics today. The RW spend the last 30 years taking extreme positions and now look.

 

NuclearDem

(16,184 posts)
83. Nobody said that.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:24 PM
Apr 2015

The extremism is PETA's dickbaggery. Frankly, they're doing more to hurt veganism and vegetarianism than help.

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
74. Al gets to live in massive mansions, fly private planes, and shill for big business.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 01:05 PM
Apr 2015

It's *different* when he does it!

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
133. +1
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 03:18 PM
Apr 2015

Gore is for whatever makes Gore rich.

Just for example, Fred Phelps (of Westboro Baptist "G-d Hates Fags" fame) was big 1988 sponsor of Al Gore in the Democrat primaries.

Photos of Tipper, Al, and Phelps are all over the internet.

MosheFeingold

(3,051 posts)
151. Yes, I've been outed as a Yankee
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 05:00 PM
Apr 2015

Frederic Gomes Cassidy and Joan Houston Hall. eds, Dictionary of American Regional English: Volume 2 (1991) pp. 37–38, 103

I'm not going to let Republicans rob me of my language. They started that crap in the 1950s, and I still don't buy it.

AJH032

(1,124 posts)
111. The Meat Industry and Climate Change
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 02:21 PM
Apr 2015
Research published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences has found that livestock emissions are on the rise and that beef cattle are responsible for far more GHGs than other animals, including chicken and pork. Meat production’s heavy environmental toll is not new, but the scale is surprising: The study found that beef requires 28 times more land to produce than pork or chicken, 11 times more water, and results in five times more GHG emissions


http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2014/07/22/3462537/meat-greenhouse-gases-study-high-emissions-beef/

PETA has a point here.
 

chernabog

(480 posts)
163. Talivegans?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 06:55 PM
Apr 2015

Your diet is confining and killing trillions of animals, fucking up ecosystems & biogeochemical cycles, destroying our reservoir of antibiotics, pumping massive amounts of greenhouse gas into the atmosphere, wasting unfathomable amounts of water & land, creating psychologically & physically unsafe jobs for people who have no other choice, establishing unbearable living conditions for low socioeconomic communities forced to live near factory farms, as well as just perpetuating the disgusting belief that all of this is normal and somehow justified by the fact that you like chicken nuggets.
How could I not care?

 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
167. You are not going to dictate what I eat.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:13 PM
Apr 2015

Eat what you want.

But when you want to dictate my diet I invite you to hammer wet sand up your ass.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
169. Of course your diet trumps the environment
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:24 PM
Apr 2015

And the importance of ending animal cruelty. Why shouldn't it?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
176. Animal cruelty? Do you know what animals do to each other? When it comes to eating
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:45 PM
Apr 2015

humans are one of the more human animals when it comes to killing other animals.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
177. I'm talking About what humans do to animals
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:54 PM
Apr 2015

Not what happens in nature. Humans have no need to consume animal products.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
179. You're moving the goalposts. You explicitly made a comment about animal cruelty.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:59 PM
Apr 2015

Animals can be extremely cruel to each other and for reasons not relating to food. They will kill each other cruelly, they will kill the offspring of rivals -- or even their own. Many times they lack the means to kill quickly and painlessly. Heck, chimps even engage in war, rape and torture.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
181. "Any vegan realizes what happens in nature. You're just being ridiculous."
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:11 PM
Apr 2015

You haven't answered the question. Why the double-standard between humans and animals?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
183. Humans also have the concept of God.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:21 PM
Apr 2015

If they are mistaken in the concept of God could they then also be mistaken in the concept of this morality you seem to share with a very narrow, self-selecting few?

If, however, they are correct in the concept of God wouldn't this morality you speak of come from God -- assuming the definition of God includes God being the source from which morality emanates?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
187. I think humans are capable of harvesting animals without being cruel.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 08:45 PM
Apr 2015

But you still haven't answered where this morality of yours comes from.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
190. Harvest animals?
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:10 PM
Apr 2015

You mean kill/ slaughter. Killing an animal to use it is cruel. I believe it is moral to not be cruel. Do you?

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
193. You keep dodging. You want me to buy into your morality but your morality seems
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:42 PM
Apr 2015

haphazard, unfounded and unfocused.

I'm against cruelty as a concept of inflicting pain for pleasure but killing is not necessarily cruel. Just because you call something cruel doesn't necessarily make it so. You don't get to drop buzz words and declare yourself the winner, you actually have to provide reasoning for your declarations.

As has been noted before, animals can be particularly cruel.

* Why are humans bound by this morality of yours but animals are exempt?

* Where does this morality come from?

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
196. You are inflicting pain and killing animals
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 09:54 PM
Apr 2015

For the pleasure of your tastebuds. Killing for exploitation is cruel. I have always said I am against cruelty by humans.

Humans are different than animals.
Morality comes from wherever.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
198. "Morality comes from wherever."
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:07 PM
Apr 2015

o-kay then.

My morality says that harvesting animals can and should be done as humanely as possible and that if done so there is no shame/sin in eating meat.


Humans are different than animals.

Cats are different from chimps but both will kill cruelly. I don't understand how the pain inflicted by a chimp that rapes and tortures a rival is morally exempt but harvesting chicken or beef as painlessly as possible is some moral offense.

You seem to be saying humanity bears a moral awareness but have no basis for doing so ("Morality comes from wherever.&quot . In this vast universe of countless galaxies filled with countless stars over tens of billions of years suddenly humanity has arisen and it has a moral duty to something not only unobserved in the rest of the universe but actually quite contrary in nature.

If humans are different they seem to be spectacularly different. So unique, in fact, one has to wonder if such a thing is/can be mere happenstance. If it is happenstance then "wherever morality" is useless because our existence is the product of the death of others. If it is design then, fine, let's talk that out and see what the mind of the Divine desires for humanity.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
204. Then suddenly it's a matter of personal convenience.
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:59 PM
Apr 2015

It's not even consistent with human experience. Humans live in every corner of the world for millions of years. Yet, only recently in the scant few technologically advanced nations have they been able to develop the means to produce enough food through agricultural means to support hundreds of millions. Meanwhile the rest of the world is still populated with hunter-gatherers, fishermen, herders and others who "exploit" animals. Even among advanced nations many people must consume whatever they can harvest.

Your wherever morality of convenience is a rich man's hobby, not a moral imperative. Elitism doesn't feed the world.

 

chernabog

(480 posts)
213. Doesn't food feed the world?
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 08:08 AM
Apr 2015

If all food crops were fed directly to humans instead of animals, around 70% more food would be added to the world’s supply, which would be enough to feed 4 billion additional people.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
214. The food systems we see today are the products of hundreds of thousands of years of humans
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 10:04 AM
Apr 2015

feeding themselves. What you're proposing is a massive, centralized effort for no particular reason except your own personal demands being imposed on others.

AJH032

(1,124 posts)
178. Disagree
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 07:54 PM
Apr 2015

Animals do not breed other animals by the billions each year and hold them in captivity for their entire lives, solely to be slaughtered for food.

I'm not saying that non-human animals are all vegans either, but humans' hunger for meat is anything but humane.

yewberry

(6,530 posts)
197. Oh noes, the poor meat-eaters might be forced to eat french fries at a festival!!
Mon Apr 27, 2015, 10:07 PM
Apr 2015

Should we not be mentioning that vegans usually get the choice of chips and salsa or fries at these events as a matter of course? Side salads at every wedding we've ever been to? Baked potato without toppings at many restaurants? Folks, I attended a picnic once where I got corn on a bun. Canned kernel corn... on a bun. And I ate it because that's what I got. I didn't make a big fucking stink about being discriminated against or call people names for "leaving out a portion of the population."

You're seriously bitching because you might be forced to eat vegan for one meal on one day if you decide to attend a concert? Really? Seriously, you sound like a bunch of evangelicals attending a conference where they hold a moment of silence instead of leading the group in the Lord's Prayer. So accustomed to being catered to (literally, in this case) that you find it shocking when you're not.

It's just felafel, not a judgment of you and what you choose to eat, for goodness' sake.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
215. Except the OP is about poor PETA's conniption about people being allowed to eat meat
Tue Apr 28, 2015, 11:02 AM
Apr 2015

If vegans weren't accommodated in the way you described, you might have something. Since Gore is a vegan himself I seriously doubt that's the case.

Your rant sounds a lot like "the poor meat-eaters" not being accommodated is social justice for you having to eat corn and potatoes.

Quantess

(27,630 posts)
219. Good.
Thu Apr 30, 2015, 01:24 AM
Apr 2015

They are exercising their 1st amendment rights.
Vegetarians and vegans should speak up more often.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»PETA slams Al Gore for ‘h...