General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums“I am shaken to my bones”: Gay NYC real-estate baron apologizes for hosting Ted Cruz event
Both said they were "deeply sorry" for their "inconceivable" ignorance -- but the boycotts have already startedSCOTT ERIC KAUFMAN
Facing a furious backlash from the LGBT community, the two gay New York City real estate developers who own nearly three-quarters of the real estate in Fire Island Pines and LGBT-oriented hotel The OUT NYC issued an apology over the weekend for hosting a fundraiser for arch conservative Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX).
David Badash at the New Civil Rights Movement reported that Ian Reisner and Mati Weiderpass are furiously backtracking on their support for the Tea Party favorite and 2016 presidential hopeful, calling the fundraising dinner a terrible mistake.
I am shaken to my bones by the e-mails, texts, postings and phone calls of the past few days, Reisner said on Facebook Sunday night. I made a terrible mistake. I was ignorant, naive and much too quick in accepting a request to co-host a dinner with Cruz at my home without taking the time to completely understand all of his positions on gay rights. Ive spent the past 24 hours reviewing videos of Cruz statements on gay marriage and I am shocked and angry, Reisner continued. I sincerely apologize for hurting the gay community and so many of our friends, family, allies, customers and employees. I will try my best to make up for my poor judgement. Again, I am deeply sorry.
Mati Weiderpass echoed his sentiments, writing that I came to realize that I might have nullified my past efforts and accomplishments in just one week. On the eve of this momentous legal occasion at the Supreme Court, I dedicate myself to work even harder to advance our cause that I share with the LGBT community; our community.
But those who read these statements were having none of it. Keith Gibbons wrote that its inconceivable that any well-informed, aware adult in this country could not known where Ted Cruz stood issues affecting the LGBT community.
more
http://www.salon.com/2015/04/27/%E2%80%9Ci_am_shaken_to_my_bones%E2%80%9D_gay_nyc_real_estate_baron_apologizes_for_hosting_ted_cruz_event/
calimary
(81,322 posts)SUUUUUURE he had no idea what that crank ted cruz was all about. Uh-huh. Yeah, I'll believe that when I believe they'll be handing out nice new consciences at the next GOP CONvention.
cali
(114,904 posts)He has a lot of nerve claiming ignorance of Ted's anti-LGBT crap
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I was seeing lots of organizing in the boycott dept against these assholes on facebook amongst my NYC friends who always love to frequent Fire Island in the summer. it's all about the money for this bunch.
GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)Jamastiene
(38,187 posts)That should be a sitewide rule about Trump pictures. No HD pictures of him either without a warning. Ugh.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)marmar
(77,081 posts)we can do it
(12,189 posts)Boycott the self serving little pricks.
Shaken to the bones = oh my wallet might not be as fat tomorrow.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)Bull$hit.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)Israel and the Iran threat. I also read that a third investor with those two is a Republican, not sure if he"s gay or not. The fact is, an unknown quantity of Jewish Democrats will move to the Republican party over Israel.
The Daily Beast did a good article on it.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/26/why-are-two-wealthy-gay-men-hosting-a-benefit-for-ted-cruz-israel.html
Mr. Reisner and Kalman Sporn, who advises Mr. Cruzs Middle East team and served as the moderator for the evening, said the senator told the group that marriage should be left up to the states. The evening focused primarily on foreign policy, including a discussion of gay rights in Israel versus the rest of the Middle East, and opposition to President Obama.
In other words, this was about Israel.
Notice who the moderator was: Ted Cruzs Jewish/Israel point man, himself a gay Jewish man and longtime Republican consultant.
Nor was this the first time Ian Reisner has hosted a Republican benefit at his home for that reason. Earlier this month, his Central Park South penthousewhere, incidentally, a 23-year-old gay man was found dead of a drug overdose just a few months agohosted a fundraiser for Republican Senator Ron Johnson.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)So basically a foul human being should be given a pass because there's one topic on which I agree with that person.
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)Iran and Gays:
But its not one particular prejudice. Right-wing extremists are extremist through and through. Its a whole package.
And that includes Israel. Hard-right conservatives are hard-right on Israel for the same reasons theyre hard-right on anti-LGBT and anti-choice politics. Theyve got one extreme conservative narrative: Its us versus them, Americans versus the gays, Freedom Lovers versus Muslims, civilization versus barbarism. Iran, Palestinians, gay people, poor people, illegal immigrants, welfare queens, rowdy young black menthese are bad people. These kinds of dogmatic conservative values are clear, unmistakable, unshakeable.
To be sure, not every foreign policy hawk, Republican, or conservative thinks this way. But Ted Cruz is a moralist on Iran the same way he is a moralist on family values.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/04/26/why-are-two-wealthy-gay-men-hosting-a-benefit-for-ted-cruz-israel.html
pinto
(106,886 posts)Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)I mean, I get it, but really. The majority of people do not pay attention to politicans overall. Why would this be a surprise?
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)have been involved in gay rights struggles for 20 years, very heavily with gay marriage for at least the last ten years, know absolutely jack shit about opponents of gay marriage/the LGBT community? I don't think so.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)sense to have a pretty decent grasp of the views of the person you're raising funds for.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)If it didn't affect their bottom line, they wouldn't give a rat's ass...Keith Gibbons is right.
Prism
(5,815 posts)Money is a great insulator. Some wealthy LGBTers don't care about gay rights, because they don't feel threatened by discrimination on a personal level. Money protects their lives and their relationships.
That said, I don't care who these two host in their home and for what reason. Like it's any of my damn business. Social media are more and more resembling a dim-witted mob that can be summoned up with the thinnest of pretexts as long as it's smothered in a layer of outrage. We now go after people for literally anything at all. Suddenly everyone's business is our business. It's not healthy.
A lot of these activists are unironically sporting their Ready For Hillary bumper stickers. Yeah, because lord knows, no anti-gay business interests ever worked with her on unrelated matters.
So much burning stupid.
Erose999
(5,624 posts)that everyday LGBT people go through just isn't part of their lives. If you have 1% money, the laws don't apply to you. They're oblivious to the struggles of others because of this. "Fuck you, I got mine" etc.
Ted Cruz will say any number of hideous things about gay people, but he will never say anything bad about specific gay people with lots of money.
realFedUp
(25,053 posts)yardwork
(61,650 posts)The fact that two extremely wealthy, privileged gay men would do so does not surprise me. They probably didn't know or care what Cruz has to say about gay rights in Texas. Insulated in their fabulously wealthy bubble, what do they care?
We'll see more of this as equal rights progress. Our community will cease to be a community. We will divide along the usual lines. Too bad.
Eleanors38
(18,318 posts)Sounds like the Cruz camp. was trying a reassuring "don't worry about me" ploy as a signal to rich gays.
closeupready
(29,503 posts)NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)It is talked about here every day but people seem to be missing it here. I can see he wouldn't know where Cruz stands on certain issues if those specific issues aren't why the event was hosted. I would still think prominent people would check into who was being invited into their home. They were probably too excited over hosting their swanky little event. I am not going to question the voracity of their apology. I am willing to believe it without a second guess.
Jim Lane
(11,175 posts)I'll bet there was at least one other gay 1%er who attended this party and doesn't regret it. That person could point out that your headline assumes one set of interests to be the "correct" one for people (in this case, rich gays) to follow. A rich gay Cruz supporter might put the opposite spin on your headline and say that sexual orientation often blinds people.
The fact is that, if you're a greedy gay 1%er who wants to abolish both the estate tax and heteronormative marriage laws, you have no ready home in either the Democratic or Republican Party. The same is true of sincere religious people who are against war and want the hungry to be fed, but who believe that God also wants them to oppose abortion rights. Then there are the Ron Paul libertarians -- abolish the social safety net and stop the imperialistic wars of choice.
I agree completely with your comment, "They were probably too excited over hosting their swanky little event." As gay men, even rich gay men, they probably feel somewhat marginalized, and this was their chance to counter that.
NCTraveler
(30,481 posts)I'll bet there was at least one other gay 1%er who attended this party and doesn't regret it."
Because it was a moneyed event. Socioeconomic status overcomes almost all else in society on an individual level.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)I don't see Cruz with longevity in this business.
--imm
Initech
(100,081 posts)You know Liberty University - the "college" founded by Jerry Falwell, the televangelist who outed the Teletubbies? Yeah they bring out that kind of crowd.