General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPriest on Faux "news" says atheists can't be President...
Because they aren't afraid of going to hell.
Fox News Priest: Atheists Shouldnt Be President Because They Dont Fear Eternal Consequences
April 27, 2015 by Hemant Mehta 103 Comments
Over the weekend, in response to the Iowa Faith & Freedom Coalition summit attended by several Republican presidential candidates, Fox News Channels Father Jonathan Morris made clear that faith was a prerequisite for public office:
http://www.patheos.com/blogs/friendlyatheist/2015/04/27/fox-news-priest-atheists-shouldnt-be-president-because-they-dont-fear-eternal-consequences/?utm_source=SilverpopMailing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=friendlyatheist_042715UTC050410_daily&utm_content=&spMailingID=48532786&spUserID=MTE4MTY1MzAzMTE5S0&spJobID=663291371&spReportId=NjYzMjkxMzcxS0
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)The No Religious Test Clause of the United States Constitution is found in Article VI, paragraph 3, and states that:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.
NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)instead of fear of "Hell" should be a good thing.
I wouldn't let a heart surgeon work on me who said a few words to the Tooth Fairy before he cracked open my chest to work.
whatthehey
(3,660 posts)More people, by far, say they would refuse to vote for an atheist than for higher-profile discriminated-against groups such as blacks, women, Jews, gays, etc.
Bad Thoughts
(2,524 posts)... then you don't believe in consequences, either. (That is, of course, using Mr. Morris' logic.)
TexasProgresive
(12,157 posts)§3. Clerics are forbidden to assume public offices which entail a participation in the exercise of civil power.
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,321 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,321 posts)That's in the actual Wikipedia entry:
Youd think a decently self-aware presidential candidate would want to stay the heck away from such people in public, but these are Republicans. From Politico:
Steve King, the Republican congressman from northwest Iowa, devoted his entire speech at the event to arguing that a Supreme Court decision recognizing a right to gay marriage would be illegitimate. He compared such a decision to the 1857 Dred Scott decision, which upheld slavery and said African-Americans were not entitled to the protections of U.S. citizens.
Confirming, yet again, my conviction that Steve Pig Muck King is the best illustration of why the Iowa caucuses deserve to lose their arbitrary first-in-the-nation status.
http://www.balloon-juice.com/2015/04/27/monday-morning-open-thread-iowa-bad-faith-freedumb/
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)If we really believed in freedom of conscience this wouldn't be an issue; but to far to many, only Christians can be President. Hopefully we grow past this at some point.
Bryant