Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
Sun May 3, 2015, 07:40 PM May 2015

ANARCHY in the U.K.! Cambridge McDonald's to Start Using Breathalyzer Tests to Keep Out Drunks

McDonald’s to Start Using Breathalyzer Tests to Keep Out Drunks
A U.K. McDonald’s is taking steps to keep drunks out of its restaurant
May 3, 2015 | 12:41 PM By Elizabeth Licata, Writer



http://www.thedailymeal.com/cambridge-mcdonalds-breathalyzer-drunks/5315

McDonald’s provides some of the world’s favorite drunk foods, but one U.K. restaurant is doing its best to keep inebriated customers from getting nuggets and will actually be rolling out a breathalyzer in an attempt to keep drunk patrons out.

According to The Mirror, a McDonald’s in Cambridge is open 24 hours on weekends, but will no longer be a respite for late-night pub-crawlers, as the location is preparing to test patrons for inebriation. Anybody who is shown to have a blood alcohol level of twice the legal limit will be refused access to Big Macs and McNuggets. The alcohol-testing kits will also identify patrons who want to have alcohol with their food and bring in soda bottles spiked with liquor.

The effort is allegedly part of a push to combat excessive drinking, but students at the nearby university do not seem to be particularly thrilled by the news.

“This new measure is a flagrant and horrific violation of our human rights,” said Cambridge University freshman Declan Amphlett. “We’ll have to resort to smuggling sandwiches into clubs like a really primary school version of the drugs trade.”
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
1. Seems like the franchise owner is just trying to proctect property and workers.
Sun May 3, 2015, 07:48 PM
May 2015

I can't say I blame the owner for the policy. Alcohol certainly has a tendency to lead to fights.

Xipe Totec

(43,890 posts)
3. By keeping drunk people drunk, instead of giving them food that might soak up the excess alcohol
Sun May 3, 2015, 07:51 PM
May 2015

Nice job.


 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
5. Neither eating nor coffee sober you up once you are drunk. All myths.
Sun May 3, 2015, 07:59 PM
May 2015

After the alcohol is in your system it must be processed by the liver that takes time. Not food or caffeine. Only time will allow you to sober up.

Here are links to help dispel that and other myths.

http://www.hcs.calpoly.edu/content/pulse/booze-truths

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20080403195321AA0PPm9

On Edit:

Alcohol does not have to be processed through the intestines like other foods. It goes directly to your blood stream from your stomach. It is already

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
7. My position is denying them a chance to be obnoxious to workers and other patrons helps.
Sun May 3, 2015, 08:05 PM
May 2015

Denying them the chance to damage property and start fights helps.

If they need food - get them a cab home and let them eat there. If they're over twice the legal limit they're probably just going to throw up the food anyway.

 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
10. My position of a cab home also may keep them out of jail for Public Intoxication or worse
Sun May 3, 2015, 08:12 PM
May 2015

If you get them home, and they stay there (always a bit "if&quot for drunks, their chances of a brawl or a DUI are far less than allowing them to continue to roam around in public.

Historic NY

(37,451 posts)
2. Violation of their human rights.....
Sun May 3, 2015, 07:48 PM
May 2015

they should think of their health rights.

Most folks assume that a chicken nugget is just a piece of fried chicken, right? Wrong! Did you know, for example, that a McDonald's Chicken McNugget is 56% corn?

http://www.rense.com/general76/chk.htm

malaise

(269,054 posts)
9. No restaurant has the right to test any patron for anything
Sun May 3, 2015, 08:09 PM
May 2015

That is a violation of basic rights.
If you don't want pub crawlers, close your damned restaurant.

 

linuxman

(2,337 posts)
16. I was responding to the other part of your message.
Mon May 4, 2015, 07:02 AM
May 2015

If businesses don't want drunk assholes, they have every right to boot them. They shouldn't be expected to close because they don't want to risk harm to their clientel.

 

mythology

(9,527 posts)
12. Perhaps if drunken idiots weren't obnoxious and destructive
Sun May 3, 2015, 11:02 PM
May 2015

And no, a drunk doesn't actually have the right to enter a business. I'm pretty sure that being drunk isn't a protected class in Britain.

Stores have signs saying no shirt, no shoes, no service. That's clearly not a violation.

goldent

(1,582 posts)
13. In my experience people got denied service for being drunk all the time
Sun May 3, 2015, 11:48 PM
May 2015

And if they argued they would really get the business as they were getting thrown out. It was nasty and probably 100% illegal but I think the drunks were too far gone to later remember how they got banged up. Not sure if that still happens today.

Jesus Malverde

(10,274 posts)
14. LULZ..
Mon May 4, 2015, 01:20 AM
May 2015

The British nanny state knows no bounds, not surprised to see the corporate sector in the UK do this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»ANARCHY in the U.K.! Camb...