General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Guardian: boldest claims about the Clintons’ finances have been shown to be unsubstantiated
Compared with previous nemeses such as Kenneth Starr, the independent counsel who stalked Bill Clinton during his White House years, the man at the center of the current furor makes for a relatively easy opponent. For a start, Schweizer is unashamedly partisan. His previous books How Big Government Liberals Wrecked the Global Economy, Profiles in Liberal Hypocrisy, Reagans War: The Epic Story of His Forty-Year Struggle and Final Triumph over Communism speak for themselves, as does the fact that he used to work as a speechwriter for George W Bush and as foreign affairs tutor to the then Republican vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
He also makes the Clintons job easy for them by admitting in several places in the book that he has discovered no smoking gun.
If his aim were to show that Hillary Clinton was swayed in her decision-making while US secretary of state by money flowing to the Clintons from foreign governments and elites, then he has failed...
We cannot ultimately know what goes on in their minds and ultimately prove the links between the money they took in and the benefits that subsequently accrued to themselves, their friends, and their associates, Schweizer writes in the books conclusion.
... In an interview with the sympathetic Fox News (owned by Rupert Murdoch, who also owns Harper, the publisher of Clinton Cash) it was put to Schweizer that he hadnt nailed his thesis.
Details...
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/05/clinton-cash-bill-hillary-scandal-book
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)Just saying as it is indeed a horrid logo.
just so you have to look at it again and my two pictures which probably turn your stomach too
BlueMTexpat
(15,369 posts)awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to go straight to hell that might be a good thing
AtomicKitten
(46,585 posts)What the book did illuminate, however, is that Hillary repeatedly violated the Memorandum of Understanding she signed with the Obama Admin as a condition to taking the job as SOS promising to report all new/increased foreign donations. The purpose of the agreement was to protect the SOS from accusations of wrongdoing. In repeatedly violating the agreement, however, Hillary is now cloaked in the appearance of wrongdoing, a self-inflicted wound. Both the rightwing and ClintonWorld are arguing about the accusations of quid pro quo when the real issue is the agreement she signed and why she did not hold up her end of it.
murielm99
(30,741 posts)to Sarah Palin. What a job description. And it sounds like a job about as productive as trying to empty the ocean with a teaspoon.
Midnight Writer
(21,768 posts)The American corporate media are reporting this guy's book as if it is Gospel. Don't they remember the Whitewater fiasco, the Travelgate fiasco, the Troopergate fiasco, the Vince Foster fiasco, the Clinton Death List fiasco, the Rose law firm fiasco, all of which boiled down to Bubba being a philanderer.
But let Dubya and the Dick lie us into a war that we will be paying the consequences for generations, and they jump right on board.
Where is the apology for all of this bull they keep feeding us?
jeanmarc
(1,685 posts)This isn't as bad as the Judith Miller Iraq nonsense, but it's of the same cloak.
I guess there really has never been a good newspaper in this country.