General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChuck Todd Responds: Looking at Whether Meet the Press Mentioned Sanders or Not Is 'Arbitrary'
A follow up to this:http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026624291
For Meet the Press, Bernie Sanders Is He Who Must Not Be Named
May 4, 2015
````
Chuck Todd Responds: Looking at Whether Meet the Press Mentioned Sanders or Not Is 'Arbitrary'
http://us10.campaign-archive2.com/?u=8c573daa3ad72f4a095505b58&id=2cc78b9cff&e=ae188e3081
Chuck Todd Responds: Looking at Whether Meet the Press Mentioned Sanders or Not Is 'Arbitrary'
Meet the Press host Chuck Todd responded to a complaint about his failure to mention Sen. Bernie Sanders announcement that he was running for the Democratic presidential nomination (FAIR Action Alert, 5/4/15):
I had him on the show talking up running before any other Sunday show did in October. And I plan on to have him on again.
And if you spent a few minutes on our website during the week, youd also see how much time we spent covering him.
Some media site decided to come up with some arbitrary way to judge the show and cherry-picked facts to create a false narrative. Careful of click-bait false impressions.
FAIRs Action Alert noted that Todd had had Sanders on his show last yearnot in October, but in September (9/14/15)and that his name hasnt been uttered on the show since.
Meet the Press covers Bernie Sanders presidential announcementbut only on the Web, not on the show itself.
We did not note Web-only features Meet the Press ran on Sanders, like this video (whose first on-screen headline was Long Odds for Bernie), because Meet the Press is primarily a broadcast TV show, watched by roughly 4 million viewers every week, and its Web features are unlikely to be seen by more than a small fraction of that audience. But if Meet the Press is covering Sanders repeatedly on the Web, that only raises the question of why hes then not worth mentioning on TV.
Todd may think seeing whether or not someone has been mentioned on Meet the Press is some arbitrary way to judge the show, but it seems to us to be a fairly straightforward way to gauge who the show thinks is an important part of the political discussion and who is not. And a tally of the shows mentions of potential presidential candidates so far in 2015 is revealing.
At the top of the list is Hillary Clinton, mentioned on 16 episodes of Meet the Press this year. (Seventeen episodes have aired so far in 2015.) Then there is a top tier of Republican presidential candidates: Jeb Bush (13 shows), Scott Walker (12), Chris Christie (11), Rand Paul and Mike Huckabee (10 each). Bringing up the rear of this top group is Ted Cruz, mentioned on eight shows.
Next comes Elizabeth Warren, who has seemingly made clear that she will not run for president in 2016, but has still been mentioned seven times this year on Meet the Press.
Below that is a middle tier of GOP hopefuls: Marco Rubio and Rick Santorum (mentioned on 6 shows apiece), Bobby Jindal (5), John Kasich, Ben Carson and Rick Perry (4 each). Also mentioned on four shows is Vice President Joe Biden, who is still considering a presidential run.
Bringing up the rear are those Meet the Press treats as long shots, like Democrats Martin OMalley (3) and Jim Webb (2), along with a string of Republicans: Carly Fiorina (3); Sarah Palin, John Bolton and Mike Pence (2 each); and Jim Gilmore, George Pataki and Peter King (1 each).
So may we infer that Meet the Press considers Bernie Sanders presidential bid to be a less important part of the 2016 election story than any of these politiciansmany of whom poll lower, have less experience, have raised less money and have taken fewer steps toward an actual campaign than Sanders has?
Alternatively, perhaps Meet the Press isnt talking about the candidates it thinks are most important. But why would that be?
Meet the Presss Chuck Todd can be reached at Chuck.Todd@NBCUni.com, or via Twitter @ChuckTodd. Please remember that respectful communication is the most effective.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)The same ones insisting that the evidence is not yet clear that the Republican Party has not gone fully insane with "ideas" and members top to bottom who are factually and logically just very wrong, on everything.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)Toad
okaawhatever
(9,462 posts)gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Next, we'll see the phenomenon of "denying the prize" as Chuck Todd explains how being mentioned or not mentioned by him on his show isn't that big a deal, and really, Sen. Sanders' supporters aren't the type of people who watch Meet the Press anyway. As if Meet the Press *is* on the DVRs of Mike Huckabee's constituents.
blm
(113,063 posts).
Wellstone ruled
(34,661 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I love FAIR, they are excellent.
I took the time to write an email to Chuck Todd, was civil but made the case for Bernie coverage. It couldn't hurt for more of us to do the same.
Bernie won't have ad buys like the other candidates, he needs us as his supporters to have his back and do whatever we can to help get his message out.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)or so it says, could be a staffer, I don't know. Anyway, curious to see if anyone else received the exact same message. I responded, pushing back on the B.S., matter of factly and without hostility.
edit to add: I reread the OP, this response is in there, I guess he sent it to FAIR and copies it to anyone who emails him. Maybe they will notice if enough of us push back. I pointed out that Bernie coverage would make for interesting viewing, I know they have an ideological bias against what Bernie stands for but they also like high ratings for their shows.
Thanks for the email. A few missing facts from the blog post generating this idea that somehow MTP has ignored Sanders. To the contrary. I had Sanders on the show talking up running before any other Sunday show did in October. First major Sunday show interview was on MTP. And I plan on to have him on again.
And if you spent a few minutes on our web site during the week, you'd also see how much time we spent covering him.
Some media site decided to come up with some arbitrary way to judge the show and cherry picked facts to create a false narrative. Careful of click bait false impressions.
And yes, I chose to leave Sanders out of a discussion at the very end of the show about the GOP field. Because the focus of the segment was about the Gop field, not the Dem primary
Chuck Todd
NBC News
@chucktodd
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Oh sure,....because we're barely capable of finding the power switch on our computer.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)That is a click bait false impression.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Not much content to it, he seems to find FAIR to be disingenuous, much as I find him to be. Here's his reply:
They were searching for controversy. And created an artificial standard.
I was the first sunday show to have sanders on as a presidential aspirant. To dismiss it means they don't like the narrative that undermines.
Chuck Todd
NBC News
@chucktodd
So basically I was talking to a wall. If anyone follows up on this with him (I think I'll let it rest here), they might go into the nuts and bolts of what does or doesn't make FAIR's analysis a substantive observation, Chuck seems to think they just wanted to get attention for themselves. There might be some of that, that's how non-profits often work. I've known FAIR for a long time, Jeff Cohen started it, I think Norman Solomon was also a founder, not entirely sure about Norman's relationship to FAIR though, anyway FAIR is an organization I have a ton of respect for, and we all know how Meet The Press stacks its lineup and agenda, so it's pretty clear to me Chuck is full of it.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)Tell him one more like that and he'll get sent over to FOX "News".
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Which is why they came to John Stewart first offering whatever he wants turned them down saying it wouldn't be appropriate for me or you which actually makes him more appropriate that whoever they can find. NBC is terrible in terms of on air talent, firing off their most popular hosts Donahue (highest rated but his stance on Iraq War cost him his job) & Keith Olbermann. They luck out sometimes but are terrible job of managing overall. They gave Jim Kramer a job and CNBC is a disaster (a reporter shouting asking literally the Wall Street crowd if people losing their homes should get a bailout)The only thing smart is prison shows (I personally find them very informative) which beats Fox reairs.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)G_j
(40,367 posts)Thank you for taking the time to write. I like FAIR too, they have been a consistent watchdog of the media for many years, they certainly deserve support.
progressoid
(49,991 posts)kairos12
(12,862 posts)Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)tavernier
(12,389 posts)It's puke!
Jack Rabbit
(45,984 posts)[center]
[/center]
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)Oh, my...
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)being asked question about Hillary Clinton answered it spectacular fashion.
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)only candidate in the race who consistently talks about their takeover of the media, Congress and just about all of our government at this point.
Which is why we need media reform. We need to at least go back to the Fairness Doctrine (thanks Clinton) and then improve it from there.
If anything proves that without a free and open press you cannot have a democracy, the years since six Corporations took over our media, prove it beyond a doubt.
onecaliberal
(32,861 posts)I asked a respectful valid question on twitter that he didn't like so he blocked me.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)positions are unfavorable to the networks' owners. Enough said.