General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAn abortion rights loss in Texas and a WIN in Virginia
First the good news:
NO ONE was misled three years ago when Virginias then-attorney general, Ken Cuccinelli II, a Republican, twisted legal logic to the breaking point by trying to shutter abortion clinics that had operated legally and safely for years. Mr. Cuccinelli, a crusading culture warrior, advanced a rationale as flawed as it was novel: He argued that a 2011 law, applying stringent hospital construction standards to small, outpatient abortion clinics, should apply not only to new structures but also to existing ones a departure from long-standing practice for health-care facilities in Virginia.
The Democrats, who swept statewide elections in 2013, including Attorney General Mark R. Herring, campaigned on a promise to reverse Mr.?Cuccinellis cockeyed advice. On Monday, Mr. Herring made good on that promise, clearing the way for new regulations.
In a watertight official opinion, Mr. Herring laid waste to Mr. Cuccinellis reasoning and gave the green light for state regulators to restore common-sense rule-making. Assuming the state Board of Health heeds his advice, it is now free to rewrite the regulations to lift the threat of closure from the states existing abortion clinics.
<snip>
http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/an-abortion-rights-win-in-virginia/2015/05/05/16db5e3e-f29d-11e4-84a6-6d7c67c50db0_story.html
And the bad news:
Texas state senate approves legislation banning insurance coverage for abortion purchased through a health care exchange.
What a world it would be, if it were even a little bit surprising that the Texas Senate just approved a measure to prohibit health insurance companies from covering abortion in all cases except for medical emergencies.
Alas, that is not the world we live in, and thus I have unsurprising news: On Tuesday, the Texas Senate gave its preliminary approval for SB 575, a bill to eliminate insurance coverage for elective abortions.
The measure, proposed by Republican State Sen. Larry Taylor, would prevent both private health insurance plans and federal plans offered through the Affordable Care Act marketplace from providing any coverage for abortion save for cases of medical emergency, such as a threat to the pregnant womans life or major physical function. SB 575 explicitly excludes psychological and emotional conditions in its medical emergency guidelines, and also prohibits coverage for a potential future medical condition that may result from a voluntary act of the woman or minor such as, perhaps, attempting suicide in lieu of being able to terminate a pregnancy.
This is not a ban on elective abortions, Taylor explained in a committee hearing last month. In fact, this bill is all about choice.
<snip>
http://www.salon.com/2015/05/05/texas_gop_lawmaker_pushes_to_ban_insurance_coverage_for_all_elective_abortions/
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)rest there life. Lets not forget the law that wants to ban the practice outright so women can die or go to jail. Yes, I have family members that would be damaged by this law, because their employers are threatening to transfer them to Texas to get tax breaks, and because they have had this unfortunate tragedy happen to them. I don't care whether Texans here like this but employers who transfer their employees to Texas are threatening their personal wellbeing.
Moving businesses down there hasn't moderated texas at all. My family would be economically devastated by this law, so fuck the Texas economy, and fuck businesses that move there.
This is more of a violation against rights than lack of gay marriage. When are the business community going to threaten states that kill women?.
Gothmog
(145,427 posts)Texas is adopting a ton of unconstitutional stuff and most GOP know that they are going to lose
betterdemsonly
(1,967 posts)and its time to encourage businesses to leave the state. The courts won't save abortion rights.. Roe isn't stopping this stuff at all. There needs to be a backlash that costs them if they do this shit. Passing laws against abortion after the first trimester and against insurance for abortions for fetal abnormality are within the purview of Roe. We need to get beyond Roe. Roe just gives women down there false confidence, when they have to take the political system into their hands. The courts make prochoice conservatives lazy.
Vinca
(50,299 posts)And what the heck ever happened to our "freedoms?" Now we aren't allowed to purchase insurance?????