Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,657 posts)
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:09 AM May 2015

If the Democratic Debate schedule is being rigged for HRC, why isn't Sanders complaining?

I was told he wasn't afraid of speaking his mind and challenging authority. Instead, all we have is an unnamed "advisor" (not even a campaign staffer) for an unnamed campaign. Is it possible that Bernie is fully aware and supportive of the arrangements?

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

KittyWampus

(55,894 posts)
4. I am waiting for the "O'Malley is draining votes from Bernie to help Hillary" posts-
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:18 AM
May 2015

If O'Malley enters it will happen.

m-lekktor

(3,675 posts)
13. actually he gets snappy if you question him about his pro Israel stance I have heard.
Wed May 6, 2015, 09:08 AM
May 2015

I say that as a supporter of him.

Vinca

(50,299 posts)
3. I think Bernie will take things as they come.
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:16 AM
May 2015

He doesn't need the game to be rigged in any way. He's going to say what he thinks whether there is 1 debate or 20 debates. His advantage is his willingness to appear anywhere and take any questions at any time from anybody.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
5. first of all rigged isn't the right word; it implies shady and underhanded
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:19 AM
May 2015

or even illegal.

Secondly, how do you know he's not registering objections? Thirdly, if he's not, perhaps it's because he prefers to choose his battles.

Finally, I doubt he's fully supportive of such a limiting arrangement.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
6. The exclusivity requirement is new GOP bullshit and attempts to limit free speech to what the DNC
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:25 AM
May 2015

wants. Period.



"While a six sanctioned debate schedule is consistent with the precedent set by the DNC during the 2004 and 2008 cycles, this year the DNC will further manage the process by implementing an exclusivity requirement," the statement announcing the debates explained. "Any candidate or debate sponsor wishing to participate in DNC debates, must agree to participate exclusively in the DNC-sanctioned process. Any violation would result in forfeiture of the ability to participate in the remainder of the debate process."


~Snip~

Having just six Democratic debates is a far cry from 2008 when there were over 20. However, the majority of the debates in that election were hosted by other organizations. The Republican National Committee is hosting more than six 2016 debates. It will sanction at least nine debates and may add up to three more. The RNC also has an exclusivity requirement for debate participants.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/clinton-rival-dnc-rigged-debate-schedule-to-help-hillary-2015-5#ixzz3ZMPmaGxr

global1

(25,261 posts)
10. Is The Debate Schedule Out?....
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:47 AM
May 2015

What are the dates of these 6 debates?

One way one could deal with this is to appear at all 6 DNC sanctioned debates then after they're completed - participate in any debate that may come.

There would be no forfeiture in the remainder of the debate process - because the 6 DNC sanctioned debates would be completed.

The only way that would not work is if they run the 6 debates right up to the DNC convention and don't allow time for additional debates to occur.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
11. The last DNC debate is tentatively scheduled for Jan 2016. Iowa caucus starts February 1st 2016
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:59 AM
May 2015
http://www.uspresidentialelectionnews.com/2016-debate-schedule/2016-democratic-primary-debate-schedule/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries,_2016#Schedule_of_primaries_and_caucuses

{Edit} So outside of some major changes there will be 6 debates before the first caucus. They had 11 debates before the Iowa caucus in 2008 and 9 debates after the caucuses and primaries started in 2008. The Iowa caucus was on Jan 3rd in 2008.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democratic_Party_presidential_debates,_2008



onehandle

(51,122 posts)
7. Possible and probable.
Wed May 6, 2015, 08:26 AM
May 2015

Bernie has been a politician for a long time. He knows what he's doing.

And months out, anything can change.

Some people are feeling pre-oppressed.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
12. If Hillary is so well-qualified to be POTUS, why did she vote for a war BASED ON LIES? Is she
Wed May 6, 2015, 09:06 AM
May 2015

just a dumbass or something worse? I am told she's a great liberal, in the tradition of FDR, Hubert Humphrey and George McGovern. So why does she have almost as much blood on her hands as her pal Henry Kissinger?

See how that works?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
16. Probably because he knows....
Wed May 6, 2015, 09:23 AM
May 2015

a series of two-minute mini-speeches that never actually answer the damn question isn't really a "debate."

Modern political debates are pretty damned useless, IMO. Especially when there are more than two candidates on stage.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If the Democratic Debate ...