Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:23 PM May 2015

Would you have agreed with the criminal juries of the Greensboro massacre?

It seems like a lot of DUers would have sympathized with the murderers.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_massacre

You excuse one incident of political/religious violence, it opens the door to others. And some of them wouldn't be what many think are acceptable targets.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would you have agreed with the criminal juries of the Greensboro massacre? (Original Post) Humanist_Activist May 2015 OP
Who is excusing what? This about Geller? NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #1
Just like gay pride marches in Russia expect the same... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #4
If you went out of your way, knowing it would piss me off, to yell CHOCOLATE NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #5
No we wouldn't, you for reacting in a violent fashion, would be the guilty party here. Humanist_Activist May 2015 #8
YOu assign ZERO moral guilt to Geller going out of her way to KNOWINGLY INSTIGATE NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #12
That is correct, None, you shouldn't have to expect violence due to drawing... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #15
So a KKK dressed in a hood show up at a black man's house NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #16
No more so than someone wearing a rainbow pin would be morally responsible... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #19
Thanks for the SB reference! johnp3907 May 2015 #11
I remember the back record jacket, Jack Benny discovered them. NoJusticeNoPeace May 2015 #13
Why do we have to engage in pitting DUers upaloopa May 2015 #2
I generally find excusing violence to be unacceptable, didn't know that was too divisive. Humanist_Activist May 2015 #3
You are an echo chamber. Like a lot of people upaloopa May 2015 #6
Post 5 seems to debunk your claim. n/t Humanist_Activist May 2015 #9
OFFS. The one troll who did express sympathy for the terrorists has been banned nt geek tragedy May 2015 #7
Really? I just got into an argument with a long time DUer over whether the intent of the victim... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #10
Your post is really not honest and it is despicable. NO DUers have sympathized cali May 2015 #14
I've seen several posts here that express , at the very least, a type of understanding... Humanist_Activist May 2015 #17
She wants a war. She's a hate monger. She incites violence. NONE of that cali May 2015 #18
OK then. n/t Humanist_Activist May 2015 #20

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
1. Who is excusing what? This about Geller?
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:27 PM
May 2015

Geller went out of her way to instigate death, and she got her wish, almost.

The shooters are guilty as hell and their guilt and her guilt are capable of coexisting.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
4. Just like gay pride marches in Russia expect the same...
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:30 PM
May 2015

its the expectation that's the tragedy, not necessarily the message from the victims. Geller's an asshole, but everyone has the right to NOT be assaulted for what they say.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
5. If you went out of your way, knowing it would piss me off, to yell CHOCOLATE
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:33 PM
May 2015

and I reacted, we would both be guilty


(a little retro there to Smothers Brothers)

obviously the shooters are way way way more guilty, but the person creating the situation is as well

maybe not legally, but morally

I am an atheist, think ALL religion is bad and bullshit, BTW

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
8. No we wouldn't, you for reacting in a violent fashion, would be the guilty party here.
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:47 PM
May 2015

I'm sorry, no excuses for violence, even non-violent provocation, is acceptable unless you are defending yourself or someone else from bodily harm.

I have actually been threatened with physical violence, on DU, because I criticized Christianity. Such immature people can go fuck themselves.

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
15. That is correct, None, you shouldn't have to expect violence due to drawing...
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:20 PM
May 2015

a religious figure, committing blasphemy, or any number of other offensive shit. Being offensive is extremely subjective, quite literally in the eye of the beholder, violent reactions to it are wholly the result of poor socialization.

NoJusticeNoPeace

(5,018 posts)
16. So a KKK dressed in a hood show up at a black man's house
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:22 PM
May 2015

yell the N word at his face from two feet away, the black man punches him

the KKK person owns zero responsibility for the punch?

not legal, moral responsibility

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
19. No more so than someone wearing a rainbow pin would be morally responsible...
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:39 PM
May 2015

for a conservative punching them.

Its not acceptable, period. Is it really too hard to understand?

johnp3907

(3,732 posts)
11. Thanks for the SB reference!
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:50 PM
May 2015
I needed the laugh. The dumb around here lately is so thick you can cut it with a spoon.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
2. Why do we have to engage in pitting DUers
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:28 PM
May 2015

against each other. At times I think some people here are interested in us having a ridged ideology like the right has.
It has been said that organizing Dems is like herding cats.

upaloopa

(11,417 posts)
6. You are an echo chamber. Like a lot of people
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:33 PM
May 2015

you put out a bogus statement then argue for it when nobody said anything like it!

 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
10. Really? I just got into an argument with a long time DUer over whether the intent of the victim...
Wed May 6, 2015, 06:50 PM
May 2015

matters in rape cases.

For Fuck's Sake is right! What the fuck has this board devolved into?

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
14. Your post is really not honest and it is despicable. NO DUers have sympathized
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:01 PM
May 2015

with the gunmen in Garland- (would be murderers, btw, not actual murderers)

No one here has excused or justified their murderous intent or expressed any regret that they were killed.

Yours, in utter disgust at your lack of honesty,

cali


 

Humanist_Activist

(7,670 posts)
17. I've seen several posts here that express , at the very least, a type of understanding...
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:22 PM
May 2015

for the perpetrators, and excuses, including "fighting words" defense and "s/he asked for it" defense being used.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
18. She wants a war. She's a hate monger. She incites violence. NONE of that
Wed May 6, 2015, 07:25 PM
May 2015

is an excuse or sympathy for the fuckers who attacked.

And that's ALL I've seen.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would you have agreed wit...