General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould you have agreed with the criminal juries of the Greensboro massacre?
It seems like a lot of DUers would have sympathized with the murderers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greensboro_massacre
You excuse one incident of political/religious violence, it opens the door to others. And some of them wouldn't be what many think are acceptable targets.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Geller went out of her way to instigate death, and she got her wish, almost.
The shooters are guilty as hell and their guilt and her guilt are capable of coexisting.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)its the expectation that's the tragedy, not necessarily the message from the victims. Geller's an asshole, but everyone has the right to NOT be assaulted for what they say.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)and I reacted, we would both be guilty
(a little retro there to Smothers Brothers)
obviously the shooters are way way way more guilty, but the person creating the situation is as well
maybe not legally, but morally
I am an atheist, think ALL religion is bad and bullshit, BTW
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)I'm sorry, no excuses for violence, even non-violent provocation, is acceptable unless you are defending yourself or someone else from bodily harm.
I have actually been threatened with physical violence, on DU, because I criticized Christianity. Such immature people can go fuck themselves.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)VIOLENCE?
none?
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)a religious figure, committing blasphemy, or any number of other offensive shit. Being offensive is extremely subjective, quite literally in the eye of the beholder, violent reactions to it are wholly the result of poor socialization.
NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)yell the N word at his face from two feet away, the black man punches him
the KKK person owns zero responsibility for the punch?
not legal, moral responsibility
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)for a conservative punching them.
Its not acceptable, period. Is it really too hard to understand?
johnp3907
(3,732 posts)NoJusticeNoPeace
(5,018 posts)Mom Always liked You Best
genius
upaloopa
(11,417 posts)against each other. At times I think some people here are interested in us having a ridged ideology like the right has.
It has been said that organizing Dems is like herding cats.
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)upaloopa
(11,417 posts)you put out a bogus statement then argue for it when nobody said anything like it!
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)matters in rape cases.
For Fuck's Sake is right! What the fuck has this board devolved into?
cali
(114,904 posts)with the gunmen in Garland- (would be murderers, btw, not actual murderers)
No one here has excused or justified their murderous intent or expressed any regret that they were killed.
Yours, in utter disgust at your lack of honesty,
cali
Humanist_Activist
(7,670 posts)for the perpetrators, and excuses, including "fighting words" defense and "s/he asked for it" defense being used.
cali
(114,904 posts)is an excuse or sympathy for the fuckers who attacked.
And that's ALL I've seen.