Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,070 posts)
Mon May 18, 2015, 07:54 PM May 2015

President Obama Lowers The Boom On Republicans By Threatening To Veto Anti-Science Bill

BRAVO!!!

http://www.politicususa.com/2015/05/18/president-obama-veto-republican-anti-science-bill.html

President Obama Lowers The Boom On Republicans By Threatening To Veto Anti-Science Bill
By: Sarah Jones
Monday, May, 18th, 2015, 7:46 pm


President Obama issued a veto threat to yet another Republican attempt to starve and deny science and science-based programs.

If put on his desk as is, the President will veto science-slayer Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX)’s bill, H.R. 1806, the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015, in part because it “would set an extremely harmful precedent of political interference in the scientific integrity of the regulation process”.

The Republican bill takes partisan aim at things like climate change research at the 
Department of Energy, so the reality based community would prefer it if Republicans like Congressman Smith kept his nose out of things he doesn’t understand or respect.

From the White House:

The Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.R. 1806, the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015, which would undermine critical investments in science, technology, and research. The Administration believes that H.R. 1806 would be damaging to the Administration’s actions to move American competitiveness, innovation, and job growth forward through a world-leading science, technology, and innovation enterprise.
The Administration strongly opposes the bill’s appropriation authorizations for the Department of Energy (DOE), the National Science Foundation (NSF), the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), and the Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) that would establish maximum funding levels significantly below those provided in the President’s FY 2016 Budget. For example, H.R. 1806 would weaken investments in critical clean energy research and development and grid modernization by providing authorization levels at less than half of the funding levels proposed in the President’s Budget for DOE’s Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, and Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability. Additionally, the legislation would shortchange efforts to support fundamental research to address diverse and critical global challenges by providing an authorization level for the DOE Office of Science biological and environmental research program far short of the funding levels proposed in the President’s Budget. The America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015 would also establish NSF authorizations levels for geosciences, education and human resources, international and integrative activities, and administrative activities well below the funding levels proposed in the President’s Budget, as well as an NSF authorization for social, behavioral, and economic sciences research that is 58 percent below the President’s Budget. Additionally, the legislation would undermine efforts to implement sound science and technology policies by providing an authorization level for OSTP nearly 20 percent below the President’s Budget.

In addition to its strong opposition to the authorized funding levels in H.R. 1806, the Administration has serious concerns with several other provisions in the bill and looks forward to working with the Congress to address its concerns. For example, the Administration opposes barring Federal regulatory authorities from relying on the results of certain Federally-supported research and development. This provision would set an extremely harmful precedent of political interference in the scientific integrity of the regulation process, which would undermine the value of the Federal research and development enterprise as a whole. The Administration also objects to the increased administrative burdens that the bill imposes on NSF and its awardees without commensurate benefit. In addition, the Administration opposes reducing oversight at the DOE National Laboratories, which would increase the exposure of the Federal Government to risk and liabilities while also conflicting with the execution of the DOE mission.

H.R. 1806 undermines key investments in science, technology, and innovation and imposes unnecessary and damaging requirements on Federal support of research. If the President were presented with H.R. 1806, his senior advisors would recommend that he veto the bill.


snip//

Republicans are trying to kill science any way they can. On one hand they are busy denying science as a thing, favoring the childish notion of equating the opinion of financially invested parties with the opinion of experts and on the other, they are killing through defunding. Or, as they call it when running for office, “sustaining” a program by not outright murdering it, which would be bad press.

Republicans prefer to starve programs instead, so that when the program stops working due to lack of funds, Republicans can use that dysfunction to validate their ideology that government is unnecessary. This, of course, is a big win for big business, but a big loss for science and other reality based programs.

Luckily, President Obama is in the White House and can put a stop to this anti-science Republican nonsense.

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
President Obama Lowers The Boom On Republicans By Threatening To Veto Anti-Science Bill (Original Post) babylonsister May 2015 OP
KnR! sheshe2 May 2015 #1
Well he can veto it. But can he force them to fund science? n2doc May 2015 #2
He can do the best he can. And yes, hopefully a veto. nt babylonsister May 2015 #4
Interesting earlier post on DU about the rationale for defunding science/infrastructure erronis May 2015 #11
Yes, our "Trojan Horse" President.. lol Thanks Obama! Cha May 2015 #3
You keep on keeping on, my friend! Mahalo! xoxox nt babylonsister May 2015 #5
U2, sistah! Cha May 2015 #6
Speaking of the Trojan Horse Post Hobo May 2015 #7
Hey Hobo.. I think in this case Cha May 2015 #9
LOL, yes. Those posts are sophomoric & dishonest. lovemydog May 2015 #16
+1 JoePhilly May 2015 #18
First, bravo to President Obama. lovemydog May 2015 #8
Lamar Smith is my Rep (unfortunately) They_Live May 2015 #13
Oh, that stinks. lovemydog May 2015 #15
VETO it so forcefully, the GOP chokes on its remnants benld74 May 2015 #10
Bravo indeed. Hekate May 2015 #12
When MJJP21 May 2015 #14
He does that most every week. lovemydog May 2015 #17
Babylonsister ... shake it! lovemydog May 2015 #19

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
2. Well he can veto it. But can he force them to fund science?
Mon May 18, 2015, 08:50 PM
May 2015

I suspect the GOP will be more than happy to just shut down NIH, NSF, and the other 3 letter agencies. So long as they get their Defense and Farm Pork, they are probably happy.

The President has to veto the things they want in order to get leverage.

erronis

(15,290 posts)
11. Interesting earlier post on DU about the rationale for defunding science/infrastructure
Tue May 19, 2015, 03:56 PM
May 2015

While this may be obvious to most of the smarter readers, the post made such obvious sense.
Just found it - thanks, scuba: http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026693381

They want to kill any nationally funded programs that make people's lives better.

Why?

Because they can then say that the government has been doing a shitty job and only their corporate friends can make everything ok.

You want good/safe rail service? Then don't ride on those old Amtrak rails.

You want to get across the country in comfort? Use an executive jet service - bypass those horrible airport terminals.

You want to drive down a nice highway that may have better bridges?

You want a police force that cares about *YOU*, then live in our special community.

You want a foreign policy that is geared towards the moneyed class ---- already done.

You want an armed force that is used for capitalist adventures --- you got it.

Public parks --- collect fees at the gate.


Hobo

(757 posts)
7. Speaking of the Trojan Horse Post
Tue May 19, 2015, 04:22 AM
May 2015

I think there was a saying: Once is an accident. Twice is coincidence. Three times is an enemy action. I believe it is the 3rd slam on President Obama

Hobo



lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
16. LOL, yes. Those posts are sophomoric & dishonest.
Wed May 20, 2015, 08:56 AM
May 2015

I'm glad many of us see through that regressive nonsense.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
8. First, bravo to President Obama.
Tue May 19, 2015, 04:34 AM
May 2015

Second, please vote in Congressional elections so we don't keep getting bills like this anti-science garbage.

They_Live

(3,233 posts)
13. Lamar Smith is my Rep (unfortunately)
Tue May 19, 2015, 10:42 PM
May 2015

last election there was no Democratic candidate running against him, much to my dismay. His squid-like district squirms through part of Austin way down to San Antonio and has tentacles that stretch out to the west of the I-35 corridor through whatever red spots can be found. He is a putty head Koch Tool. Gerrymandering sucks.

lovemydog

(11,833 posts)
15. Oh, that stinks.
Wed May 20, 2015, 08:41 AM
May 2015

Yeah, gerrymandering sucks. Keep up the good fight They_Live! I hope things get better in your area and you get a rep who represents us people and not big corporate interests.

 

MJJP21

(329 posts)
14. When
Wed May 20, 2015, 04:26 AM
May 2015

When is the president going to simply address the nation on radio and tv and put out what the right wing is doing and trying to do the country?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»President Obama Lowers Th...