Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
Wed May 20, 2015, 11:40 AM May 2015

I wrote my Senator about my concerns about the TPP and she responded with nothing but rhetoric.

The following is her letter with my comments in bold.

Dear Senator,

Thank you for responding to my concerns about this potentially disastrous agreement. But with due respect, your response didn't provide any specifics on how this Agreement will help American workers. You include a lot of "firmly believes", " I have consistently supported " , "I do not want to see" and “I firmly believe," and more of the same. This is just rhetoric to be nice about it. Here are some of my specific comments (bolded) about your response. The bottom line is whether or not you will insist that so-called Free Trade Agreements help American workers or you won't vote for them.

“Trade supports almost 12 million American jobs and more than one million jobs in Washington state. Our agriculture and food industry generates $49 billion and employs more than 160,000 people. Wheat alone accounts for more than $1 billion in production value, with 80 to 90 percent exported each year. Our aerospace industry supports nearly 140,000 jobs and exports approximately $60 billion, and our computer software and IT services industry, which supports more than 90,000 jobs, exports $16 billion. “

“Given the importance of trade to our state's economy, I have consistently supported efforts to expand market access for Washington state products. 95 percent of the world's consumers and 80 percent of the world's purchasing power reside outside the U.S. Each year, the number of foreign customers of U.S. products grows.”


Ok, we've established that trade is important. How specifically will the TPP help American workers?

“According to the World Trade Organization, there are more than 400 regional and bilateral trade agreements in effect around the world - and many more being negotiated. By comparison, the United States has only 14 free trade agreements with 20 countries. Since 2007, when Trade Promotion Authority last expired, Japan, the European Union, China and Canada have together executed over 30 trade deals. I do not want to see American companies losing market share to other countries that have trade agreements in place.”


Again, we agree that trade is important, but again, how specifically will the TPP help American workers?

“I firmly believe, however, that any trade agreement must ensure fair competition for domestic industries and requires trading partners to adopt labor standards and environmental protections.”


I also believe this but how specifically is the TPP going to do this? How will this be enforced?

“Further, an active trade policy must be accompanied by expanded educational and job-training opportunities to better prepare our workforce, including workers displaced by trade, to meet the challenges of the global economy.”


You say “must be” will you ensure that it is? Will you vote against it if it isn't?
Will taxpayers pay for these expanded educational and job-training opportunities in lieu of Corporations? Are we taking it for granted that we are going to lose jobs from the TPP? “including workers displaced by trade,”


“On April 16, 2015, Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) introduced the Bipartisan Congressional Trade Priorities and Accountability Act of 2015 (S. 995). If enacted, this legislation would renew Trade Promotion Authority for four years, with an option for an additional three-year renewal. It also includes enforceable negotiating objectives that would require U.S. trade agreements to ensure strong labor, environmental, intellectual property standards, and, for the first time, require prospective trade partners to protect human rights. The legislation also creates a new mechanism to withdraw TPA procedures, should any trade deal fail to meet these standards.”


This says “if enacted”. If it isn't enacted, will you vote no on the Agreement?

“This legislation was referred to the Senate Finance Committee, on which I serve, and was considered by the Committee on April 22, 2015. During that session, I offered several amendments which were approved by the committee, including a new measure to require employers to report occupational data to expand understanding of the labor market as international trade increases, and identify the skills in highest demand within particular industries. I also offered an amendment to significantly increase funding for the enforcement of our free trade agreements by creating a new, $30 million enforcement and capacity building fund to ensure our trading partners uphold their commitments. I was also proud to support several amendments to further protect our environment, prevent human trafficking, provide for equal pay, defend Buy American provisions, and remove investor state dispute settlement as a negotiating objective.”

You say here that you have “offered several amendments”. While that commendable, will you vote no if those amendments are not included? It's one thing to offer it's quite another to insist.

The Committee also considered a reauthorization of the Trade Adjustment Assistance (TAA) program. I am a strong supporter of Trade Adjustment Assistance, which provides income support and job training services to workers who have lost their jobs due to foreign trade and shifting production outside the United States. In FY 2013, an estimated 2,715 Washington workers received TAA benefits and services, including 2,198 Washington workers who participated in training. TAA helps workers access the skills training and income support they need to get back into the workforce. Please be assured that I will consider your opinions as my colleagues and I continue to discuss Trade Promotion Authority and Trade Adjustment Assistance.


Again, this looks like we are admitting that we are going to lose American jobs and the taxpayers are going to compensate them in lieu of corporations.

Please put American workers before Corporations.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I wrote my Senator about ...