Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Katashi_itto

(10,175 posts)
Mon May 25, 2015, 12:02 PM May 2015

CELEBRATE! REALITY TV IS GETTING VOTED OFF THE ISLAND AS REALITY SHOWS LOSE OUT ON STREAMING


The obvious appeal of instant streaming video may be the immediacy and wide-ranging choice it provides to viewers. But following viewing trends across the battle between hardwired networks and online video services may prove that another important factor of streaming is really all about quality.
When reality television hit it big in the US with shows like Survivor and Big Brother, the networks couldn’t have been happier. Reality shows cut production costs in a big way, and were instantly popular and in turn, profitable.

Companies like Amazon Prime and Netflix have seen enormous success from their original shows, including Titles like Transparent, House of Cards and Orange is the New Black. But from a business perspective, these companies don’t see see reality TV as a lucrative option when it comes to original content.

It’s just too hard to create lasting interest with reality TV, which means losing audience members quickly and missing out on building viewer loyalty.
http://www.techly.com.au/2015/05/25/celebrate-reality-tv-cant-survivor-as-reality-falls-out-of-favour-on-streaming-platforms/
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
CELEBRATE! REALITY TV IS GETTING VOTED OFF THE ISLAND AS REALITY SHOWS LOSE OUT ON STREAMING (Original Post) Katashi_itto May 2015 OP
This is very good news! Thanks! haikugal May 2015 #1
You get more realism in some of the fictional series than you do in all of the reality show crap. nt valerief May 2015 #2
We'll see BrotherIvan May 2015 #3
And yet the article in the OP is about new outlets and platforms for content that used to be 'TV' Bluenorthwest May 2015 #5
Netflix and Amazon are using the premium cable tactic BrotherIvan May 2015 #6
Hurrah! Why viewers want to see Damansarajaya May 2015 #4

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
3. We'll see
Mon May 25, 2015, 12:45 PM
May 2015

Reality TV is all about UNION BUSTING (in the article they gloss over it with "saving on production costs&quot . So not only do they not have to pay union crew, they don't have to pay union actors residuals either. The execs have known for years that reality tv loses out on syndication, which used to be the golden egg for any show. They turned away from that because they just loved paying the people who actually made the show shit and gave huge deals to the "creators" like Mark Burnett. Same theory we see at work in the corporations: pay the CEO huge salary and everyone else as little as possible while working them like slaves, and who cares if the product you turn out is crap. So we'll see if the networks figure it out any time soon.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
5. And yet the article in the OP is about new outlets and platforms for content that used to be 'TV'
Mon May 25, 2015, 02:11 PM
May 2015

content and the new powers at the new outlets don't like reality TV because they very correctly see that it limits their income streams while placing the reputation of their brand into the hands of random individuals who are being presented as real and chosen by the brand.
The larger competition shows, such as Survivor, are not more lucrative than good narrative TV for the networks that make them. Amazing Race costs a fortune to produce. The cheaper shows like TLC shows, well, the inherent brand risk with that sort of thing is very apparent this week. Touching Little Children Channel. Very tainted brand.
Top of this season, Fox put huge sums of money into 'Utopia' a reality show they planned to air twice a week for the first year while selling subscriptions to 'live feed content'. The show drew zero audience, did not survive for two months and left gaping holes for Fox to deal with in their weekly lineup.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
6. Netflix and Amazon are using the premium cable tactic
Mon May 25, 2015, 03:13 PM
May 2015

With HBO and Showtime, their original shows meant you had to pay a subscription to see it. That brought loyal customers who paid while their favorite shows were running. Shows like The Sopranos were HUGE money makers for that network, but they were still small potatoes compared the the major TV networks because of advertising and sponsorships.

I'll tell you, I would be more than happy to see the death of reality TV. That, outsourcing and H1B visas killed my career basically and forced a lot of us out of the business. It wasn't worth it to work those hours for no money and no benefits. But I know that reality TV like the crap shows on TLC bring in beaucoup bucks from advertisers and merchandising if they are successful and don't cost much it they aren't so they aren't going anywhere yet. The CEO of Discovery Channel (owns TLC) is one of the highest for CEOs in the world:

Discovery Communications president and CEO David Zaslav's 2014 compensation package was worth $156.08 million, compared with $33.3 million in 2013 and $49.9 million in 2012.


http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/discovery-ceo-david-zaslavs-pay-785352

So things aren't going to change anytime soon.
 

Damansarajaya

(625 posts)
4. Hurrah! Why viewers want to see
Mon May 25, 2015, 01:17 PM
May 2015

ordinary people bickering and staring at each other still remains a mystery to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CELEBRATE! REALITY TV IS ...