General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMattSh
(3,714 posts)FSogol
(45,488 posts)is a total lie, right?
Par for the course, unfortunately.
Wilms
(26,795 posts)pa28
(6,145 posts)She's the most progressive football holder ever!
pampango
(24,692 posts)Sometimes poorly designed or implemented ideas need to be improved not just thrown out, if the concept is good.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)Last edited Tue May 26, 2015, 01:27 AM - Edit history (1)
pampango
(24,692 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)because the United States did not participate.
Perhaps it would have failed anyway, who's to say? Would Japan have invaded Manchuria in 1931 (which was its pretext for dropping out of the League) if the United States had been an active participating member? Would France and Britain have extracted such a severe retribution from Germany if the United States had vigorously promoted Wilson's Fourteen Points through the League of Nations?
pampango
(24,692 posts)republican isolationism was already rearing its head right after the war. republicans in the senate did not like Article 10 in the League Covenant which required a response from members if another member was attacked.
As you said, would US membership and commitment to respond to an attack have made any difference to Japan and Germany? We will never know.
Response to AZ Progressive (Original post)
AZ Progressive This message was self-deleted by its author.