Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 02:56 PM Jun 2015

The kind of Democrat I endorse works to support the New Deal.

Those Democrats who've worked against the New Deal, not so much.

Case in point: The repeal of Glass-Steagall in 1999. That spelled disaster in the 2008 Bankster Bailout. The Democratic president who signed it into law was working in a spirit of bi-partisanship with his Republican Senate colleague to encourage new areas of banking by deregulating the financial industry cough gutting the New Deal protections of the Wall Street casino from using taxpayer-backed bank deposits.

See if you can spot some familiar names on this list:



They now work together at UBS -- which received uncounted billions in bailout money -- to specialize in some kind of "Weath Management."

PS: Forensic economist and former Fed regulator William K. Black wrote it reminds him of what happened during the Savings and Loans Crisis of the late 80s and early 90s. At the time, that was the greatest bank heist in history.

48 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The kind of Democrat I endorse works to support the New Deal. (Original Post) Octafish Jun 2015 OP
I was also looking at the savings and loan crap game Ichingcarpenter Jun 2015 #1
I read about it throughly in Mother Jones back then. FlatBaroque Jun 2015 #5
When they were loaning at 125% of appraised value Downwinder Jun 2015 #10
Silverado Neil Bush, BFEE Octafish Jun 2015 #13
grok Etymology.......... I forgot that term Ichingcarpenter Jun 2015 #15
Sunshine is the best disinfectant. Smooth talker, that Bush Sr was. But it doesn't fool anyone sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #40
Whitewashing the Bush boys Octafish Jun 2015 #46
it just keeps getting more terrible doesn't it. roguevalley Jun 2015 #14
Well actually I think that the curtain has become more transparent Ichingcarpenter Jun 2015 #16
The internet definitely made them more vulnerable. Makes you wonder why they allowed it to happen? sabrina 1 Jun 2015 #41
K & R L0oniX Jun 2015 #2
Social Security was part of the New Deal Octafish Jun 2015 #20
HUGE K & R !!! - THANK YOU !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #3
Ten Lessons We Must Learn from Charles Keating (Just-Us v Justice) Octafish Jun 2015 #21
Thank You For That !!! WillyT Jun 2015 #34
"It's just all one big club FlatBaroque Jun 2015 #4
Vonnegut, too, understood the System. Octafish Jun 2015 #43
thank you for the excerpt FlatBaroque Jun 2015 #45
Well there you have it whatchamacallit Jun 2015 #6
Even Bartcop went through the roof when Robert Parry mentioned it the first time. Octafish Jun 2015 #47
Mine would expand and update the New Deal to better reflect the 21st Century. Cerridwen Jun 2015 #7
FDR's 2nd Bill of Rights does IT for me, and is the reason I am a Democrat. bvar22 Jun 2015 #25
Ugh...All the Bankster stuff makes me sick. SoapBox Jun 2015 #8
Know your BFEE: Phil Gramm, the Meyer Lansky of the War Party, Set-Up the Biggest Bank Heist Ever. Octafish Jun 2015 #24
Paulson delivered the Extortion Note, and I have never forgotten. bvar22 Jun 2015 #26
...and Geithner drove the getaway car FlatBaroque Jun 2015 #31
I wish I could kick & rec this post. TM99 Jun 2015 #36
as always, Octafish - Kick, rec and thanks! NRaleighLiberal Jun 2015 #9
Agreed MissDeeds Jun 2015 #11
He did all this just in his first two years. pampango Jun 2015 #12
out of words. dpatbrown Jun 2015 #17
Never cared for Clinton either. bvar22 Jun 2015 #35
They don't even try very hard to hide it..... daleanime Jun 2015 #18
I didn't like that Glass-Steagall was repealed either, however let's not romanticize the past YoungDemCA Jun 2015 #19
African Americans and the New Deal: A Look Back in History Octafish Jun 2015 #22
Propaganda that suggests the New Deal harmed African Americans peecoolyour Jun 2015 #23
Great connection, there. Cato Institute? Octafish Jun 2015 #28
Nice try YoungDemCA Jun 2015 #37
Like when the Tag Team smears me as a ''Conspiracy Theorist'?' Which sounds nice. Octafish Jun 2015 #44
FDR also signed the papers that allowed BLack Men to obtain Officer Rank, bvar22 Jun 2015 #27
Wasn't just the enlisted corps from south of the Mason-Dixon line who resented that, either. Octafish Jun 2015 #29
It wasn't easy, especially after returning home. bvar22 Jun 2015 #33
Great thread, bookmarked for future reference. Thanks Octafish and other contributors. Scuba Jun 2015 #30
Agreed. As long as we're naming names here let's not forget Chris Dodd. pa28 Jun 2015 #32
KR&B...this thread should be required reading, Octafish! ms liberty Jun 2015 #38
This thread should be enshrined on DU's Home page. snagglepuss Jun 2015 #39
Huge K&R, SO with you on this CrawlingChaos Jun 2015 #42
K&R for the original post and subsequent informative posts and links. JEB Jun 2015 #48

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
1. I was also looking at the savings and loan crap game
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 03:40 PM
Jun 2015

and wondered why this went under the radar during the
election between Bush and Dukakis.



the Savings and Loan scandal



There are several ways in which the Bush family plays into the Savings and Loan scandal, which involves not only many members of the Bush family but also many other politicians that are still in office and still part of the Bush Jr. administration today. Jeb Bush, George Bush Sr., and his son Neil Bush have all been implicated in the Savings and Loan Scandal, which cost American tax payers over $1.4 TRILLION dollars (note that this is about one quarter of our national debt).

Between 1981 and 1989, when George Bush finally announced that there was a Savings and Loan Crisis to the world, the Reagan/Bush administration worked to cover up Savings and Loan problems by reducing the number and depth of examinations required of S&Ls as well as attacking political opponents who were sounding early alarms about the S&L industry. Industry insiders were aware of significant S&L problems as early 1986 that they felt would require a bailout. This information was kept from the media until after Bush had won the 1988 elections.

Jeb Bush defaulted on a $4.56 million loan from Broward Federal Savings in Sunrise, Florida. After federal regulators closed the S&L, the office building that Jeb used the $4.56 million to finance was reappraised by the regulators at $500,000, which Bush and his partners paid. The taxpayers had to pay back the remaining 4 million plus dollars.

Neil Bush was the most widely targeted member of the Bush family by the press in the S&L scandal. Neil became director of Silverado Savings and Loan at the age of 30 in 1985. Three years later the institution was belly up at a cost of $1.6 billion to tax payers to bail out.

The basic actions of Neil Bush in the S&L scandal are as follows:

Neil received a $100,000 "loan" from Ken Good, of Good International, with no obligation to pay any of the money back.

Good was a large shareholder in JNB Explorations, Neil Bush's oil-exploration company.

Neil failed to disclose this conflict-of-interest when loans were given to Good from Silverado, because the money was to be used in joint venture with his own JNB. This was in essence giving himself a loan from Silverado through a third party.

Neil then helped Silverado S&L approve Good International for a $900,000 line of credit.

Good defaulted on a total $32 million in loans from Silverado.

During this time Neil Bush did not disclose that $3 million of the $32 million that Good was defaulting on was actually for investment in JNB, his own company.

Good subsequently raised Bush's JNB salary from $75,000 to $125,000 and granted him a $22,500 bonus.

Neil Bush maintained that he did not see how this constituted a conflict of interest.

Neil approved $106 million in Silverado loans to another JNB investor, Bill Walters.

Neil also never formally disclosed his relationship with Walters and Walters also defaulted on his loans, all $106 million of them.

Neil Bush was charged with criminal wrongdoing in the case and ended up paying $50,000 to settle out of court. The chief of Silverado S&L was sentenced to 3.5 years in jail for pleading guilty to $8.7 million in theft. (Keep in mind that you can get more jail time for holding up a gas station for $50.)

Today Neil Bush is working on closing a deal in Florida, where his brother Jeb is governor, to sell a software package to schools with his startup company Ignite.

Update 11/28/2003: Some of Neil Bush's business deals have been exposed in his recent divorce case. For more on this see:

http://www.truthout.org/docs_03/112703A.shtml

http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2004/01/26/neil_bush/index.html

It should also be noted that shortly after news of Neil Bush’s involvement in the S&L scandal hit the press his father, George Bush Sr., announced the Desert Storm campaign in Iraq, which subsequently had the result of making Neil’s name quickly fade from the headlines. In addition, while Neil Bush's divorce proceeding were exposing more backroom Bush dealings, America was once again bombarded with war propaganda for Operation Iraq Freedom.


http://rationalrevolution.net/war/bush_family_and_the_s.htm

Dukakis Faults G.O.P. for Savings Crisis


In a statement released today, the Democratic nominee said the Reagan Administration had unleashed the savings industry into a deregulated environment without providing adequate supervision to avoid excessive speculation and risk taking. The statement said nearly 1,000 savings institutions are either insolvent or close to insolvency and losing almost $1 billiion a month.

''The Reagan-Bush Administration allowed thrifts to set aside the business of financing affordable homes and plunge head first into risky speculation,'' Mr. Dukakis's statement said. ''And then they relaxed all the oversight designed to protect depositors at savings and loans.''

''It's a crisis that George Bush could have headed off,'' he said. Return to 'Traditional Role'

The Massachusetts Governor added that in a Dukakis administration, ''We will see to it that savings and loans return to their traditional role of financing affordable homes for American families, instead of speculating in unsafe investments.'' But the Bush campaign rejected the Democrat's claims. ''He is trying to very hard to obscure where the blame really lies,'' said Mark Goodin, a Bush campaign spokesman. ''It lies with his own party. For 18 months they dragged their heals.'' He added that when the legislation passed, ''it was at a funding level substantially under what the Administration had recommended and attached a plethora of pet projects and new regulations, making it far more difficult for the Government to deal with the problem.''

Although many savings industry experts had anticipated that the crisis would eventually become part of partisan bickering, some of them had predicted that both sides would be hesitant to raise the issue. Many analysts trace ill-advised policies and legislation to both Republicans and Democrats, and few have come up with solutions other than a politically costly taxpayer bailout.

With 500 savings institutions insolvent and another 400 to 500 institutions close to insolvency, experts agree it is an issue that will have to be addressed by Congress and the new President. Dukakis First to Attack


http://www.nytimes.com/1988/09/30/us/dukakis-faults-gop-for-savings-crisis.html

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
5. I read about it throughly in Mother Jones back then.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 04:09 PM
Jun 2015

There was no internet so stories like this were more easily controlled by the media elite.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
13. Silverado Neil Bush, BFEE
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 04:51 PM
Jun 2015

It's almost an ENIGMA, what the rich and powerful say. It's to hide what they do.



Case in point: One Neil Mallon Pierce Bush, son of then-president George Herbert Walker Bush and caught with his hand in a billion-dollar S&L cookie jar called Silverado Savings & Loan. Here's what Poppy did for his Number 3 Son:



How the Elite Talk in Code

EXCERPT...

A perfect example of code talk comes from a true master insider, George H.W. Bush, when his son, Neil, was caught red handed in the middle of the S&L crisis as a director of Sliverado Bank.

Did Bush lay out his cards and call in his operatives and say pull some strings, get my son out of this investigation (Remember Bush was president at the time.) No. Bush is too smooth. In his published collection of letters, All The Best, George Bush, he shows us how the heat is delicately taken off Neil. On page 449, there is this letter to Thomas Ludlow Ashley.

Ashley is a Yale University grad, and member of the secret society Skull and Bones along with Bush. Here's the letter:

The Honorable Thomas Ludlow Ashley
Association of Bank Holding Companies
Washington, D.C. 20005

Dear Lud,

Thank you for your good memo December 8th.

I would appreciate any help you can give Neil. He tells me he never had any insider dealings. He got off the Board early--long before I was elected President. The Denver paper apparently ran a very nice editorial about him on that. He is an outside director, and thus I guess has liability, but I can't believe his name would appear in the paper if it was Jones not Bush. In any event, I know that the guy is totally honest. I saw him in Denver and I think he is worried about the publicity and the "shame". I tell him not to worry about that but any advice you can give as this matter unfolds would be greatly appreciated by me. If it turns out there has been some marginal call, or he has done something wrong, needless to say there will be no intervention from his dad. But, I'm quite confident this is not true...

Warm regards,

George


Notice how smooth. No talk about getting Ashley anything for taking care of the matter. The nice touch about if Neil "has done something wrong", but the clear finish, he didn't.

CONTINUED...

http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2009/07/how-elite-talk-in-code.html



When it comes to money and power, it really is a small world. We'd hear it more often, if only we were privy to the conversation.

I saw "The Imitation Game" at the cineplexbox. It's a bio-pic of Alan Turing and how he led the team that cracked the ENIGMA code used by the NAZIs. First-rate film, in every way, great story, acting, history, back stories, yada the whole yada. Turing had a hard time when confronted with lies. And that's the only way the spymasters could stay ahead of the codebreaker.

The public discovering the kinds of treason and corruptions these characters are perpetrating frightens the crooks like nothing else. Thanks for grokking, Ichingcarpenter: That's what I recommend for us and all DU -- just the Truth about Who's Who and What's What.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
15. grok Etymology.......... I forgot that term
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 05:07 PM
Jun 2015

Etymology[edit]

Robert A. Heinlein originally coined the term grok in his 1961 novel Stranger in a Strange Land as a Martian word that could not be defined in Earthling terms, but can be associated with various literal meanings such as "water", "to drink", "life", or "to live", and had a much more profound figurative meaning that is hard for terrestrial culture to understand because of its assumption of a singular reality.


According to the book, drinking water is a central focus on Mars, where it is scarce. Martians use the merging of their bodies with water as a simple example or symbol of how two entities can combine to create a new reality greater than the sum of its parts. The water becomes part of the drinker, and the drinker part of the water. Both grok each other.


Things that once had separate realities become entangled in the same experiences, goals, history, and purpose. Within the book, the statement of divine immanence verbalized between the main characters, "Thou Art God", is logically derived from the concept inherent in the term grok.


sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
40. Sunshine is the best disinfectant. Smooth talker, that Bush Sr was. But it doesn't fool anyone
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 02:51 AM
Jun 2015

really, when you read that letter. He was clearly very worried, not so much that his son had done wrong, but that he had been caught.

The corruption is so deep it will take decades and some very strong people to end it and then start the prosecutions. That is the only way they will be stopped, with severe consequences.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
46. Whitewashing the Bush boys
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 10:56 AM
Jun 2015

- by Stephen Pizzo
Mother Jones | March/April 1994

If Robert Fiske finds that Bill and Hillary have committed crimes in the so-called Whitewater-gate matter, they should pay the price. But according to our Special Prosecute-o-Meter (to come), it would seem that the Clintons' behavior is being measured differently from alleged banking misdeeds by the Bush family--Neil (Silverado Savings), $1 billion; Jeb (Broward Savings), $221.8 million; and George (BNL-Iraqgate), $5 billion. All proved a good deal more costly than the up-to-$50 million involved in the Madison Savings-Whitewater mess.

But while the national media--and specifically the New York Times--has focused its high-caliber lens on the Clintons, they apparently have forgiven and forgotten the Bushes' banking practices.

SNIP...

Had Dowd done her background work she would have found no shortage of decidedly unwacky Bush stories. Among others: a 1987 front-page article in the Wall Street Journal chronicling how Jeb helped a Cuban con man bilk Medicare out of millions of dollars; MoJo's Sept./Oct. 1992 cover story ("My Three Sons&quot on the Bush sons' long list of dubious business transactions (including George Jr.'s alleged violation of security laws governing insider stock sales when he sold his shares of Harken Oil on the eve of the Gulf War); and a recent New Yorker article detailing sleazy activities by Neil and number-four son Marvin Bush. The Times even ran an April 1992 story listing some of the Bushes' questionable deals (perhaps all motivated by the "Bush creed of competition" that Dowd notes approvingly).

When contacted by MoJo, Dowd wouldn't defend her story, saying, "Look, I'm not an investigative reporter, and clearly I wish now that I'd written a different piece. The Bush family never really liked me anyway." They may like her better now.

Short memories are also evident in Washington, D.C., where Bob Dole is complaining that House Banking Chairman Henry Gonzalez, D-Tex., is dragging his feet on Whitewater, but "held weeks of hearings" when Neil Bush got swept up in the failure of Silverado, even though he "had no direct involvement."

Actually, Neil sat on Silverado's board of directors until the thrift was declared functionally insolvent. That's about as "involved" as you can get.

Republicans are also upset over a Small Business Administration loan of $300,000,

CONTINUED...

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/1994/03/whitewashing-bush-boys

Pizzo was one of the True Greats. Mother Jones, too.

Ichingcarpenter

(36,988 posts)
16. Well actually I think that the curtain has become more transparent
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 05:19 PM
Jun 2015

revealing the naked emperors that have no clothes.
This wasn't possible at this level before the internet.

We now have citizen journalist that seek the truth vs being spoon fed their news that want us to consume to maintain their power.

people are becoming more conscious
and are waking up.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
41. The internet definitely made them more vulnerable. Makes you wonder why they allowed it to happen?
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 02:53 AM
Jun 2015

Didn't anticipate how effective a tool for the people it would be? I think that probably is true. They couldn't imagine how it would work against them, or work to do anything more than play computer games.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
20. Social Security was part of the New Deal
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:05 PM
Jun 2015

Look at Pete Peterson, the presidents' fiend...er, "friend."



We’ve written before about the billion dollar anti-Social Security lobby, led by Wall Streeter Pete Peterson and his myriad number of astroturf front groups, here, here and here. These CEO and Wall Street friendly groups are spending a lot of money to convince Congress that grandma and grandpa’s Social Security is to blame for our economic woes rather than talk about the real problem...$1 trillion in corporate loopholes and income inequality which is destroying the middle class.

Hats off to the Institute for Policy Studies and the Center for Effective Government for their new report detailing the truth behind America’s CEO-led campaign against Social Security. Thanks also to the Huffington Post for this terrific infographic highlighting the report’s key findings:



LOTS o' LINKS:

http://www.ncpssm.org/EntitledtoKnow/entryid/2040/Meet-the-CEO-s-Who-Want-to-Cut-Your-Social-Security



Friends. How many of us have them?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
21. Ten Lessons We Must Learn from Charles Keating (Just-Us v Justice)
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:21 PM
Jun 2015

By William K. Black

I knew Charles Keating, the head of Lincoln Savings, in my capacity as a financial regulator and as the subject of his wrath. His fraud schemes and the manner in which they targeted our system’s vulnerabilities in an era before Citizens United made the corruption of politicians by fraudulent CEOs child’s play remain the play book for the world’s most destructive financial frauds. Our failure to learn the ten lessons has caused immense suffering. Keating’s life, and the great harm he caused, will not have been in vain if we step back and use the occasion of his death to reflect on the changes we need to make.

I want to make clear up front that I have personal reasons to feel upset about Keating. He sued me in my individual capacity for $400 million, he hired private investigators to investigate me on at least two occasions that became public, he tried very hard, in league with Speaker of the House James Wright, Jr. to get me fired, he successfully extorted the pusillanimous heads of our regulatory agency to take the unprecedented, and disastrous step of removing the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco’s (FHLBSF) jurisdiction over Lincoln Savings, and he secretly issued this infamous written command to his chief political fixer.

“HIGHEST PRIORITY – GET BLACK

… KILL HIM DEAD

Yes, that is how the original reads – Keating was an “all caps” plus “underlining” kind of guy.

Keating was also a lawyer, so one of the typical, hilarious minor steps he took was withholding the memorandum that I just quoted from production in response to discovery commands on the grounds that it was an “attorney-client” communication. (His chief political fixer/leg breaker was a lawyer.)

Keating always claimed we (the FHLBSF) had a “vendetta” against him and that I was a leader of this vendetta. He thought our lives were focused on destroying him. The reality is that we were overwhelmed countering the epidemic of accounting control fraud that was driving the second, far more destructive, phase of the S&L debacle. Keating was one of roughly 300 fraudulent S&L heads from our perspective. Collectively, this very non-Spartan “300” and their political allies were vastly more powerful than we were. We also never dwelt on the personalities and did not classify fraudulent CEOs as “evil.” Keating was obsessed with us in ways we were never obsessed with him. So, let me begin by offering my condolences to his family and friends.

Overview

[font color="green"]The Savings and Loan debacle was the test bed for the epidemics of accounting control fraud that drove our subsequent financial crises. [/font color] The debacle was the only one that was “successfully” contained before it could cause a financial crisis. The debacle was widely described at the time as the “worst financial scandal is U.S. history,” so the phrase “successfully contained” is obviously one that could spark disbelief. The critical modifier is “before it could cause a financial crisis.” The S&L debacle did not lead to even a mild national recession. It did hyper-inflate regional real estate bubbles that pushed parts of the Southwest region into a serious economic decline. The Enron-era frauds substantially contributed (in conjunction with the related collapse of the dot com bubble) to a $7 trillion fall in market capitalization and the fraud epidemics hyper-inflated the largest bubble in history and drove a Great Recession that is projected to cost over $20 trillion in lost production. The S&L debacle, therefore, allows us to understand not only went wrong, but also how to prevent things from going wrong.

Keating was the poster child of the S&L debacle. One of the telling aspects of the current crisis is that it has no poster child. The elite CEOs that led the frauds that drove the crisis became wealthy through frauds that they led with total impunity because we forgot the lessons we learned at such a high price during the debacle.

CONTINUED...

http://neweconomicperspectives.org/2014/04/ten-lessons-must-learn-charles-keating.html

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
43. Vonnegut, too, understood the System.
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 09:55 AM
Jun 2015
From "God Bless You, Mr. Rosewater," by Kurt Vonnegut:

I think it's terrible the way people don't share things in this country. The least a government could do, it seems to me, is to divide things up fairly among the babies. There's plenty for everybody in this country, if we'd only share more.

"And just what do you think that would do to incentive?"

You mean fright about not getting enough to eat, about not being able to pay the doctor, about not being able to give your family nice clothes, a safe, cheerful, comfortable place to live, a decent education, and a few good times? You mean shame about not knowing where the Money River is?

"The what?"

The Money River, where the wealth of the nation flows. We were born on the banks of it. We can slurp from that mighty river to our hearts' content. And we even take slurping lessons, so we can slurp more efficiently.

"Slurping lessons?"

From lawyers! From tax consultants! We're born close enough to the river to drown ourselves and the next ten generations in wealth, simply using dippers and buckets. But we still hire the experts to teach us the use of aqueducts, dams, reservoirs, siphons, bucket brigades, and the Archimedes' screw. And our teachers in turn become rich, and their children become buyers of lessons in slurping.

"It's still possible for an American to make a fortune on his own."

Sure—provided somebody tells him when he's young enough that there is a Money River, that there's nothing fair about it, that he had damn well better forget about hard work and the merit system and honesty and all that crap, and get to where the river is. 'Go where the rich and powerful are,' I'd tell him, 'and learn their ways. They can be flattered and they can be scared. Please them enormously or scare them enormously, and one moonless night they will put their fingers to their lips, warning you not to make a sound. And they will lead you through the dark to the widest, deepest river of wealth ever known to man. You'll be shown your place on the riverbank, and handed a bucket all your own. Slurp as much as you want, but try to keep the racket of your slurping down. A poor man might hear.'

SOURCE: http://akkartik.name/post/money-river

PS: Thank you for remembering George Carlin, FlatBaroque. The guy understood and he did not abide.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
47. Even Bartcop went through the roof when Robert Parry mentioned it the first time.
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 11:08 AM
Jun 2015
Subject: Parry vs Hillary



Bart, I hear your criticism of Robert Parry, and maybe he is taking his attacks on
Hillary a bit far, but you left out the meat of his argument; that Bill let the Bush/Reagan
administrations slide regarding Iran/Contra and the ongoing investigations that Clinton
halted in the spirit of bi-partisanship.

Major legal, ethical, and Constitutional violations went uninvestigated and un-prosecuted,
including drug dealing, providing arms to terrorists, and others which we may never know of,
but hinted at in testimony by Ollie North and others.

The reason this is so important now, is that many of the crony neo con sleaze merchants
from Iran Contra found a warm reception in G.W. Bush's admoinistration. And a job.
They should still be in prison.

(snippage)

You seem to think Hillary is the one to take on this fight. That may be true, but Parry,
rightly so in my opinion, sees that after winning the election Hillary may be, like Bill was,
quite willing to let bygones be bygones, for the sake of unity, bi-partisanship, and....


Keep doing what you do.
Funky P in FLA



If Obama wins, I give you my money-backed, 100% Nancy Grace Guarantee that he
[font color="red"][font size="5"]WILL NOT[/font size][/font color] go after Bush crimes - and I'll bet my winnings that he'll be excused for doing that because everyone will then agree that it's a "new day" in America and all that crapola.

My biggest worry about Obama is he won't join the fight in the present,
so why should we expect him to look for past battles to re-visit?

If he wins, he's going to do exactly what Bill did - look forward - and get praised for it.

From the BARTCOP Collection: http://www.bartcop.com/2093.htm

Cerridwen

(13,260 posts)
7. Mine would expand and update the New Deal to better reflect the 21st Century.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 04:23 PM
Jun 2015

Mine would expand and update the New Deal to better reflect the 21st Century.

Cradle to grave education and healthcare across the board.
A change in the concept of work versus leisure. Leisure, the arts, the human portion of our lives, should be as important as the work portion of our lives.
Education should be the secular version of sacrosanct.
All politics and money influences should be completely removed from scientific research.
Environmental protections.
The "Fourth Estate" would have to work to maintain its position in the world of reporting.


There should not be one pocket of poverty in the entire US or its "holdings" and the populations of its "holdings" should be full US citizens with all the rights and responsibilities we all enjoy and occasionally, loathe.

There's probably a lot more I've missed since I'm listening to a video in another tab and somewhat distracted.

These are a good start, though. In my opinion.


bvar22

(39,909 posts)
25. FDR's 2nd Bill of Rights does IT for me, and is the reason I am a Democrat.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:58 PM
Jun 2015
In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be[font size=3] established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.[/font]

Among these are:

*The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

*The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

*The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

*The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

*The right of every family to a decent home;

*The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

*The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

*The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
FDR, State of the Union Address, 1944


Please note that the above are stipulated as Basic Human RIGHTS to be protected by our government,
and NOT as COMMODITIES to be SOLD to Americans by For Profit Corporations.

My vote and support WILL go to whoever BEST embodies these values.
I am too old and tired to again support the Least of the Worst.
Let the chips fall where they may.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
24. Know your BFEE: Phil Gramm, the Meyer Lansky of the War Party, Set-Up the Biggest Bank Heist Ever.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:39 PM
Jun 2015
The Sting

In the best rip-off, the mark never knows that he or she was set up for fleecing.
In the case of the great financial meltdown of 2008, the victim is the U.S. taxpayer.
Going by the lack of analysis in Corporate McPravda, We the People are in for a royal fleecing.



Don’t just take my word about the current situation between giant criminality and the politically connected.

[font color="green"][font size="5"]You see, there is evidence of conspiracy. An honest FBI agent warned us in 2004 about the coming financial meltdown and the powers-that-be stiffed him, too.[/font size][/font color]

The story’s below. And it’s not fiction. It is true to life.



The Set-Up

You don’t have to be a fan of Paul Newman or Robert Redford to smell a BFEE rat. The oily critter’s name is Gramm. Phil Gramm. He helped Ronald Reagan push through his trickle-down fiscal policy and later helped de-regulate the nation's once-healthy Saving & Loan industry. We all know how well that worked out: Know your BFEE: They Looted Your Nation’s S&Ls for Power and Profit.

In 1999, then-super conservative Texas U.S. Senator Gramm helped pass the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act. This law allowed banks to act like investment houses. Using federally-guaranteed savings accounts, banks now could make risky commercial and real-estate loans.

The law should’ve been called the Gramm-Lansky Act. To those who gave a damn, it was obviously a potential disaster. During the bill’s debate, the specter of a “taxpayer bail-out” was raised by Sen. Byron Dorgan of North Dakota, warning about what had happened to the deregulated S&Ls.

Gramm wasn’t alone on the deregulation bandwagon. The law passed, IIRC, like 89-9. More than a few of my own Democratic faves went along with this deregulation, “get-government-off-the-back-of-business” law.

Today we have their love child, MOAB—for the Mother Of All Bailouts.


The Mark

In a sting, someone has to supply the money to be ripped off. Crooks call that person the mark or target or mope. In the present case, that’s the U.S. taxpayer.

Today’s financial crisis seems like a re-run of what happened to the Savings & Loans industry in the late 1980s. Well it is a lot like what happened to the S&Ls. Then, as now, it’s the U.S. taxpayer who gets to pick up the tab for someone else’s party.

Don’t worry, U.S. taxpayer. You’re getting something (among several things) for your $700 billion. You’re getting all the bad mortgage-based paper on almost all of Wall Street. I’d rather have penny stocks, because if there ever was something of negative value it’s the complicated notes and derivatives based on this mortgage debt.



When it comes to Bush economic policy, left holding the bag are We the People, er, Mopes. Don’t worry, it can’t get worse. As St. Ronnie would say, “Well. Yes.” You see, what the bag U.S. taxpayers hold is less than empty. It’s filled with bad debt.


The Mastermind

Chief economist amongst these merry band of thieves and traitors was one Phil Gramm (once a conservative Democrat and then an ultraconservative Republican-Taxus). An economist by training and reputation, Gramm was one of the guiding lights of Reaganomics, the cut taxes, domestic spending, and regulations while raising defense-spending to new heights. In sum, it was a fiscal policy to enrich friends – especially the kind connected to the BFEE.




Foreclosure Phil

Years before Phil Gramm was a McCain campaign adviser and a lobbyist for a Swiss bank at the center of the housing credit crisis, he pulled a sly maneuver in the Senate that helped create today's subprime meltdown.


David Corn
MotherJones.com
May 28, 2008

Who's to blame for the biggest financial catastrophe of our time? There are plenty of culprits, but one candidate for lead perp is former Sen. Phil Gramm. Eight years ago, as part of a decades-long anti-regulatory crusade, Gramm pulled a sly legislative maneuver that greased the way to the multibillion-dollar subprime meltdown. Yet has Gramm been banished from the corridors of power? Reviled as the villain who bankrupted Middle America? Hardly. Now a well-paid executive at a Swiss bank, Gramm cochairs Sen. John McCain's presidential campaign and advises the Republican candidate on economic matters. He's been mentioned as a possible Treasury secretary should McCain win. That's right: A guy who helped screw up the global financial system could end up in charge of US economic policy. Talk about a market failure.

Gramm's long been a handmaiden to Big Finance. In the 1990s, as chairman of the Senate banking committee, he routinely turned down Securities and Exchange Commission chairman Arthur Levitt's requests for more money to police Wall Street; during this period, the sec's workload shot up 80 percent, but its staff grew only 20 percent. Gramm also opposed an sec rule that would have prohibited accounting firms from getting too close to the companies they audited—at one point, according to Levitt's memoir, he warned the sec chairman that if the commission adopted the rule, its funding would be cut. And in 1999, Gramm pushed through a historic banking deregulation bill that decimated Depression-era firewalls between commercial banks, investment banks, insurance companies, and securities firms—setting off a wave of merger mania.

But Gramm's most cunning coup on behalf of his friends in the financial services industry—friends who gave him millions over his 24-year congressional career—came on December 15, 2000. It was an especially tense time in Washington. Only two days earlier, the Supreme Court had issued its decision on Bush v. Gore. President Bill Clinton and the Republican-controlled Congress were locked in a budget showdown. It was the perfect moment for a wily senator to game the system. As Congress and the White House were hurriedly hammering out a $384-billion omnibus spending bill, Gramm slipped in a 262-page measure called the Commodity Futures Modernization Act. Written with the help of financial industry lobbyists and cosponsored by Senator Richard Lugar (R-Ind.), the chairman of the agriculture committee, the measure had been considered dead—even by Gramm. Few lawmakers had either the opportunity or inclination to read the version of the bill Gramm inserted. "Nobody in either chamber had any knowledge of what was going on or what was in it," says a congressional aide familiar with the bill's history.

It's not exactly like Gramm hid his handiwork—far from it. The balding and bespectacled Texan strode onto the Senate floor to hail the act's inclusion into the must-pass budget package. But only an expert, or a lobbyist, could have followed what Gramm was saying. The act, he declared, would ensure that neither the sec nor the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (cftc) got into the business of regulating newfangled financial products called swaps—and would thus "protect financial institutions from overregulation" and "position our financial services industries to be world leaders into the new century."

Subprime 1-2-3

Don't understand credit default swaps? Don't worry—neither does Congress. Herewith, a step-by-step outline of the subprime risk betting game. —Casey Miner

CONTINUED…

http://www.motherjones.com/news/feature/2008/07/foreclo...




A fine mind for modern Bushonomics. Kill the middle class. Then, rob from the poor to give to the rich.

The Mentor



Anyone who’s ever heard him talk knows that Gramm must’ve learned all this stuff from somebody. He could never think it all up on his own. He had to have help. That’s where Meyer Lansky, the man who brought modern finance to the Mafia, comes in.



Money Laundering

Answers.com


EXCERPT...

History

Modern development


The act of "money laundering" was not invented during the Prohibition era in the United States, but many techniques were developed and refined then. Many methods were devised to disguise the origins of money generated by the sale of then-illegal alcoholic beverages. Following Al Capone's 1931 conviction for tax evasion, mobster Meyer Lansky transferred funds from Florida "carpet joints" (small casinos) to accounts overseas. After the 1934 Swiss Banking Act, which created the principle of bank secrecy, Meyer Lansky bought a Swiss bank to which he would transfer his illegal funds through a complex system of shell companies, holding companies, and offshore accounts.(1)

The term "money laundering" does not derive, as is often said, from Al Capone having used laundromats to hide ill-gotten gains. It was Meyer Lansky who perfected money laundering's older brother, "capital flight," transferring his funds to Switzerland and other offshore places. The first reference to the term "money laundering" itself actually appears during the Watergate scandal. US President Richard Nixon's "Committee to Re-elect the President" moved illegal campaign contributions to Mexico, then brought the money back through a company in Miami. It was Britain's Guardian newspaper that coined the term, referring to the process as "laundering.&quot 3)


Process

Money laundering is often described as occurring in three stages: placement, layering, and integration.(3)

Placement: refers to the initial point of entry for funds derived from criminal activities.

Layering: refers to the creation of complex networks of transactions which attempt to obscure the link between the initial entry point, and the end of the laundering cycle.

Integration: refers to the return of funds to the legitimate economy for later extraction.

However, The Anti Money Laundering Network recommends the terms

Hide: to reflect the fact that cash is often introduced to the economy via commercial concerns which may knowingly or not knowingly be part of the laundering scheme, and it is these which ultimately prove to be the interface between the criminal and the financial sector

Move: clearly explains that the money launderer uses transfers, sales and purchase of assets, and changes the shape and size of the lump of money so as to obfuscate the trail between money and crime or money and criminal.

Invest: the criminal spends the money: he/she may invest it in assets, or in his/her lifestyle.

CONTINUED...

http://www.answers.com/topic/money-laundering



The great journalist Lucy Komisar has shone a big light on the subject:



Offshore Banking

The U.S.A.’s Secret Threat


Lucy Komisar
The Blacklisted Journalist
June 1, 2003

EXCERPT…

In 1932, mobster Meyer Lansky took money from New Orleans slot machines and shifted it to accounts overseas. The Swiss secrecy law two years later assured him of G-man-proof banking. Later, he bought a Swiss bank and for years deposited his Havana casino take in Miami accounts, then wired the funds to Switzerland via a network of shell and holding companies and offshore accounts, some of them in banks whose officials knew very well they were working for criminals. By the 1950s, Lansky was using the system for cash from the heroin trade.

Today, offshore is where most of the world's drug money is laundered, estimated at up to $500 billion a year, more than the total income of the world's poorest 20 percent. Add the proceeds of tax evasion and the figure skyrockets to $1 trillion. Another few hundred billion come from fraud and corruption.

Lansky laundered money so he could pay taxes and legitimate his spoils. About half the users of offshore have opposite goals. As hotel owner and tax cheat Leona Helmsley said---according to her former housekeeper during Helmsley's trial for tax evasion---"Only the little people pay taxes." Rich individuals and corporations avoid taxes through complex, accountant-aided schemes that routinely use offshore accounts and companies to hide income and manufacture deductions.

The impact is massive. The IRS estimates that taxpayers fail to pay in excess of $100 billion in taxes annually due on income from legal sources. The General Accounting Office says that American wage-earners report 97 percent of their wages, while self-employed persons report just 11 percent of theirs. Each year between 1989 and 1995, a majority of corporations, both foreign- and U.S.-controlled, paid no U.S. income tax. European governments are fighting the same problem. The situation is even worse in developing countries.

The issue surfaces in the press when an accounting scam is so outrageous that it strains credulity. Take the case of Stanley Works, which announced a "move" of its headquarters-on paper-from New Britain, Connecticut, to Bermuda and of its imaginary management to Barbados. Though its building and staff would actually stay put, manufacturing hammers and wrenches, Stanley Works would no longer pay taxes on profits from international trade. The Securities and Exchange Commission, run by Harvey Pitt---an attorney who for more than twenty years represented the top accounting and Wall Street firms he was regulating---accepted the pretense as legal.

"The whole business is a sham," fumed New York District Attorney Robert Morgenthau, who more than any other U.S. law enforcer has attacked the offshore system. "The headquarters will be in a country where that company is not permitted to do business. They're saying a company is managed in Barbados when there's one meeting there a year. In the prospectus, they say legally controlled and managed in Barbados. If they took out the word legally, it would be a fraud. But Barbadian law says it's legal, so it's legal." The conceit apparently also persuaded the Securities and Exchange Commission.

CONTINUED…

http://www.bigmagic.com/pages/blackj/column92e.html



Socialize the risk for Wall Street. Privatize the loss to Uncle Sam’s nieces and nephews. Congratulations, Dear Reader! Now you know as much as Phil Gramm.

The Diversion

Still, a global financial meltdown sounds like something bad. Making things worse, we’re hearing that Uncle Sam is broke! Flat busted. Tapped out.

That’s odd, though. We the People see the Treasury being emptied with tax breaks for the wealthy and checks to the companies they own that make money off of war. Want to know how to make a buck these days? Invest in the likes of Halliburton and Northrup Grumman. Anything in the warmongering business connected to Bush and his cronies will weather the downturn or depression.

The Wall Street Journal -- a paper owned and operated by Fox News’ head, Rupert Murdoch – was very quick to promote the crisis, as DUer JustPlainKathy observed. The paper was even faster to pounce on a solution: What’s needed is a safety net for banks. And quick as a wink, they found the answer!
Only the U.S. taxpayer has the wherewithal to prevent the collapse of the global financial system -- a global economic meltdown that would freeze up credit and investment and expansion and prosperity and a return to the Great Depression. Who can be against that?

Oh. Kay. Sounds about right – Rupert the Alien agreeing with what Leona Helmsley said: “Only the little people pay taxes.”



Gramm and McCain also are in favor of privatization. How nice is that?

The Getaway

George Walker Bush and his right-wing pals feel they can get away with this, their latest rip-off the American taxpayers. Who can blame them? When compared to their clear record of incompetence, lies, fraud, theft, mass-murder, warmongering and treason, what’s a few trillion dollar rip-off?



Still, it's weird how they act.
They must really think they’ll be welcomed with open arms in Paraguay and Dubai and Switzerland.
Going by the welcome the world gave the Shah of Iran, they’re in for a big surprise.

The FBI Guy

Don’t say we weren’t warned. An intrepid FBI agent with something sorely lacking in the rest of the Bush administration, integrity, blew the whistle on the bank thing…



FBI saw threat of mortgage crisis

A top official warned of widening loan fraud in 2004, but the agency focused its resources elsewhere.

By Richard B. Schmitt
Los Angeles Times Staff Writer

August 25, 2008

WASHINGTON — Long before the mortgage crisis began rocking Main Street and Wall Street, a top FBI official made a chilling, if little-noticed, prediction: The booming mortgage business, fueled by low interest rates and soaring home values, was starting to attract shady operators and billions in losses were possible.

"It has the potential to be an epidemic," Chris Swecker, the FBI official in charge of criminal investigations, told reporters in September 2004. But, he added reassuringly, the FBI was on the case. "We think we can prevent a problem that could have as much impact as the S&L crisis," he said.

Today, the damage from the global mortgage meltdown has more than matched that of the savings-and-loan bailouts of the 1980s and early 1990s. By some estimates, it has made that costly debacle look like chump change. But it's also clear that the FBI failed to avert a problem it had accurately forecast.

Banks and brokerages have written down more than $300 billion of mortgage-backed securities and other risky investments in the last year or so as homeowner defaults leaped and weakness in the real estate market spread.

SNIP…

Most observers have declared the mess a gross failure of regulation. To be sure, in the run-up to the crisis, market-oriented federal regulators bragged about their hands-off treatment of banks and other savings institutions and their executives. But it wasn't just regulators who were looking the other way. The FBI and its parent agency, the Justice Department, are supposed to act as the cops on the beat for potentially illegal activities by bankers and others. But they were focused on national security and other priorities, and paid scant attention to white-collar crimes that may have contributed to the lending and securities debacle.

Now that the problems are out in the open, the government's response strikes some veteran regulators as too little, too late.

Swecker, who retired from the FBI in 2006, declined to comment for this article.

But sources familiar with the FBI budget process, who were not authorized to speak publicly about the growing fraud problem, say that he and other FBI criminal investigators sought additional assistance to take on the mortgage scoundrels.

They ended up with fewer resources, rather than more.

CONTINUED…

http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-mortgagefraud25-2008aug25,0,6946937.story



We were warned and nothing happened.

Repeat: And nothing happened.

They must think We the People are really stupid. Are we supposed to believe that all that $700 billion in bad debt just happened? Where did all that money go? Who got all the money?

Meyer Lansky moved the Mafia’s money from the Cuban casinos to Switzerland. He did so by buying a bank in Miami. Phil Gramm seems to have done the same thing as vice-chairman of UBS, except the amounts are in the billions.

Who cares? He’s almost gone? Nope. That money still exists somewhere. I have a pretty good idea of where it might be. And George Bush and his cronies are poised to get away with a whole lot of loot.


Who Should Pay for the Bailout

If you are fortunate enough to be one, good luck American taxpayer! You’re in for a royal fleecing. Once the interest is figured into the bailout, we’re looking at a couple of trill.

The people who should pay for the bailout aren’t the American people. That distinction should go to the crooks who stole it -- friends of Gramm like John McCain and George Bush and the rest of the Raygunomix crowd of snake-oil salesmen. For them, the Bush administration -- and a good chunk of time since Ronald Reagan -- has not been a disaster. It’s been a cash cow.

The above was posted on DU on Sept. 21, 2008. (Check out the responses, lots of info from DUers.) What's changed since then? Nothing near what I'd hoped for, certainly.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x4055207

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
26. Paulson delivered the Extortion Note, and I have never forgotten.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:02 PM
Jun 2015

It took the Democratic Congress less than a week to deliver nearly a $TRILLION DOLLARS to Wall Street (in a brown paper bag?),
No Strings Attached after receiving the Extortion Note from Paulson.

[font color=white]........................[/font][font size=3]Paulson with Co-Conspirators[/font]

[font color=white]......................[/font][font size=3]Now THIS is bi-partisanship!
[font color=white]......................[/font][font size=3]Hahahahahahahahaha!
[/font]
[/font]

 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
36. I wish I could kick & rec this post.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 08:14 PM
Jun 2015

Super informative and damned scary!

Thanks for putting the information out for all to see. Many have not been paying attention over the last 40 years. They need to wake the fuck up NOW!

 

dpatbrown

(368 posts)
17. out of words.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 05:39 PM
Jun 2015

I'm running out of words to describe the power elite in this country(and all over the world). Repugnant?? I never did care much for Clinton. In 1992, the Dems were running only second tier candidates, because at the time Bush was looking too strong. Once Clinton got the nomination, the economy tanked. That's the biggest reason he won. He has always been about power and the money that goes with it.

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
35. Never cared for Clinton either.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:58 PM
Jun 2015

I remember losing my job,
car blowing up,
eviction notice on my door,
cards maxed.


....Bill comes on TV and with a sad face says, "I feel your pain.".

I damn near exploded.

 

YoungDemCA

(5,714 posts)
19. I didn't like that Glass-Steagall was repealed either, however let's not romanticize the past
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 05:54 PM
Jun 2015

The New Deal systematically excluded blacks and working women in many ways. Even as wages and benefits generally went up in that era for the working class, there was still a lot of legalized discrimination against women and blacks and other persons of color. LGBT rights were essentially non-existent.

Furthermore, it really depended on region, industry, and whether you were part of a union or not. Even at their peak, unions represented only about a third of the American working class. Much more than today, of course; but still a minority. Unionized workers, of course, had higher wages and benefits than non-union ones, and they were more likely to be dominated by white male workers; in that latter respect (diversity-wise), labor unions have changed for the better. The problem is that they're a lot weaker and fewer now, particularly in the private sector, where hostility to unions is visceral from corporate management (which has an enormous amount of influence over the lives and ideologies of workers these days), and it's not helped by the fact that many workers are hostile to unions as well.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
22. African Americans and the New Deal: A Look Back in History
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:32 PM
Jun 2015




African Americans and the New Deal: A Look Back in History

Roosevelt historian David Woolner shines a light on today’s issues with lessons from the past.

As we celebrate Black History Month and reflect on the decades of struggle that was required to bring the African American community into the mainstream of American life, it seems fair to ask what impact, if any, the New Deal had on the movement to secure equal rights for Blacks during the difficult years of the 1930s and beyond.

Judged from the standards of today, of course, there is much we can criticize about the New Deal/Roosevelt era. It did not bring to an end the tremendous injustices that African Americans had to suffer on a day-to-day basis, and some of its activities, such as the work of the Federal Housing Administration, served to build rather than break down the walls of segregation that separated black from white in Jim Crow America. Yet as Mary McLeod Bethune once noted, the Roosevelt era represented “the first time in their history” that African Americans felt that they could communicate their grievances to their government with the “expectancy of sympathetic understanding and interpretation.” Indeed, it was during the New Deal, that the silent, invisible hand of racism was fully exposed as a national issue; as a problem that at the very least needed to be recognized; as something the county could no longer pretend did not exist.

This shift in attitude, as Havard Sitkoff, the noted historian of the African American experience in the New Deal observes, helped propel the issue of race relations onto the national stage and usher in a new political climate in which “Afro-Americans and their allies could begin to struggle with some expectation of success.” In short, the New Deal, and the rhetorical support given to the cause of civil rights by both Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt gave the African American community hope; the chance to dream of a better future, no matter how difficult the struggle might be along the way.

It is also important to recognize that this hope was not merely based on empty promises of change, but on the actual words and deeds spoken by Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt and taken by the federal government at a time when racism was deeply seared into the American psyche. With respect to the critical issue of employment, for example, we know that by 1935, the Works Progress Administration (WPA) was employing approximately 350,000 African Americans annually, about 15% of its total workforce. In the Civilian Conservation Corps, the percentage of blacks who took part climbed from roughly 3% at its outset in 1933 to over 11% by the close of 1938 with a total of more than 350,000 having been enrolled in the CCC by the time the program was shut down in 1942. The National Youth Administration, under the direction of Aubrey Williams, hired more black administrators than any other New deal agency; employed African American supervisors to oversee the work the agency was doing on behalf of black youth for each state in the south; and assisted more than 300,000 Africa American youth during the Depression. In 1934, the Public Works Administration (PWA) inserted a clause in all government construction contracts that established a quota for the hiring of black laborers based on the 1930 labor census and as a consequence a significant number of blacks received skilled employment on PWA projects.

African Americans also benefited from the Federal Music Project, which funded performances of black composers; from the Federal Theatre and Writing Projects, which hired and featured the work of hundreds of African American artists; and from the New Deal’s educational programs, which taught over 1 million illiterate blacks to read and write and which increased the number of African American children attending primary school.

As the leader of a political party that was heavily represented in Congress by racist Southern Democrats who supported segregation and even opposed the adoption of a federal anti-lynching law as an infringement of state’s rights, FDR had to choose his battles carefully and at times appears timorous in the face of racial injustice-especially when viewed from today. But this is the President who appointed a far greater number of blacks to positions of responsibility within his government than any of his predecessors, so much so in fact that this group became known as the “Black Cabinet” or “Black Brain Trust” in the press. FDR was also the first president to appoint an African American as a federal judge; to promote a black man to the rank of Brigadier General in the Army; and, incredible as it might seem, the first president to publicly call lynching murder — “a vile form of collective murder”-which W.E B. Dubois applauded as something that sadly was long overdue. Overall FDR’s administration tripled the number of Africa Americans working for the federal government, including thousands of black engineers, architects, lawyers, librarians, office managers, and other professionals, and under his leadership, and with the strong support of Eleanor Roosevelt, the Democrats included the first specific African American plank in the party platform at the 1936 convention.

The New Deal was not perfect. It could not and did not eliminate segregation, or the pernicious discrimination in employment, wages, and working condition that plagued so many African Americans during the difficult years of the 1930s. Moreover, in spite of the best efforts of federal officials like Harry Hopkins to forbid discriminatory practices among neighborhood relief agencies, such practices often continued at the local level, especially in the South. But in spite of these and other shortcomings, the willingness of the Roosevelt Administration to recognize the existence of a racial problem in American and to take steps at the federal level to ameliorate that problem, was, as Sitkoff notes, unprecedented. It made it clear that the federal government had a responsibility to ensure the civil rights of all Americans were protected; rendered civil rights a core part of the liberal agenda; and inspired a generation of African American leaders to continue to pressure not only the federal government, but also the federal courts, to strike down the laws that underpinned the widespread racial injustice that African Americans had endured since the promise of reconstruction.

Braintruster David Woolner is senior vice president of the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute.

SOURCE w/links

http://www.rooseveltinstitute.org/new-roosevelt/african-americans-and-new-deal-look-back-history



That's nothing like what you said, YoungDemCA.
 

peecoolyour

(336 posts)
23. Propaganda that suggests the New Deal harmed African Americans
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 06:37 PM
Jun 2015

comes from the CATO Institute.

http://www.cato.org/publications/commentary/why-did-fdrs-new-deal-harm-blacks

The Cato Institute is a libertarian think tank founded by Charles G. Koch and funded by the Koch brothers. It is headquartered in Washington, D.C. The Institute states that it favors policies "that are consistent with the traditional American principles of limited government, individual liberty, and peace."[1] Cato scholars conduct policy research on a broad range of public policy issues and produce books, studies, op-eds, and blog posts. They are also frequent guests in the media.

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Cato_Institute

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
28. Great connection, there. Cato Institute?
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:11 PM
Jun 2015

Cato Institute is one of the think tanks that came into being post Powell Memorandum. Some people's concern just shows right through. One Dude really liked "Conscious Capitalism," which sounded nice for the lucky working stiffs, but really was nice for the Ownership Class.

Cato. A real laugh riot. Thank you for the heads-up, peecoolyour. A hearty welcome to DU!

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
27. FDR also signed the papers that allowed BLack Men to obtain Officer Rank,
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:08 PM
Jun 2015

and to fly some of the hottest fighters of the era.
Along with the Officer Rank went the mandatory salute (form white enlisted men)
and the use of "Sir" when addressing them or face charges of insubordination.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
29. Wasn't just the enlisted corps from south of the Mason-Dixon line who resented that, either.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:16 PM
Jun 2015

Officers and men from all over the country. From a biography of former Detroit Mayor Coleman Young:



Coleman was later hired at the Post Office but continued to organize autoworkers before joining the Army in 1942 where he was commissioned second lieutenant and served as a navigator in the prestigious Tuskegee Airmen unit. While in the service, Coleman demonstrated against the exclusion of blacks from segregated officer’s clubs and was arrested along with 100 other airmen, among them the late Thurgood Marshall. Young spent three days in jail for his part in the demonstration. A short time later, the clubs were opened to black officers. It was only through a secret strategy used by Young through a courier that the story was leaked to the black press and drew attention to the plight of the arrested black airmen. Though he had already established himself as a militant in the labor movement, Coleman Young had arrived as a social and civil rights activist.

SOURCE: http://www.is.wayne.edu/MNISSANI/ELEPHANT/Young.htm



The Freeman Field mutiny. Thank you for the heads-up, bvar22!

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
33. It wasn't easy, especially after returning home.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:49 PM
Jun 2015

Most of the soldiers overseas followed their orders, or spent time in the brig.
For the Black Fliers (Heroes all) it was a difficult returning home.
But I believe this move by FDR authorizing Officer Rank was the beginning of the Freedom Movement.

Two years later, in his State of the Union Address, FDR stated (in NO uncertain terms)

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be[font size=3] established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.[/font]

Among these are:

*The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;

*The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;

*The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;

*The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;

*The right of every family to a decent home;

*The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;

*The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;

*The right to a good education.

All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

[font size=3]America's own rightful place in the world depends in large part upon how fully these and similar rights have been carried into practice for all our citizens.[/font]


Please note that the above are stipulated as Basic Human RIGHTS to be protected by our government,
and NOT as COMMODITIES to be SOLD to Americans by For Profit Corporations.

Those were some BIG steps for the 40s.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
32. Agreed. As long as we're naming names here let's not forget Chris Dodd.
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 07:22 PM
Jun 2015

FORMER DEM SENATOR CHRIS DODD ADVISED EXECS TO GIVE TO GOP: “FUNDRAISING DOES HAVE AN IMPACT”

https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/17/chris-dodd-former-dem-presidential-aspirant-advises-clients-give-gop-fundraising-impact/

Dodd in particular encouraged industry executives to donate to Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, which has jurisdiction over intellectual property and copyright issues important to the movie industry. Dodd evidently had to overcome one hurdle, however: Squeamishness about giving money directly to the National Republican Congressional Campaign, whose goal was to increase the GOP House majority.

................

Dodd chose not to run for reelection to his Senate seat in 2010, after revelations that he had received a special discount mortgage from Countrywide’s “VIP program.” During his time in Congress, Dodd was a senior member of the Banking Committee, a position that oversaw mortgage lenders.

As he retired, he told the public he would not become a lobbyist — though he soon signed up for the job as the movie industry’s top lobbyist, a gig compensated at over $3.2 million a year.


https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/04/17/chris-dodd-former-dem-presidential-aspirant-advises-clients-give-gop-fundraising-impact/

I'm sure people here will suggest you are demanding a purity test by supporting new deal Democrats. However, if you look at the record of opportunistic third way types like Gramm and Dodd who have run the party for the last 25 years you can see why the party is standing on the brink of ruin.

ms liberty

(8,592 posts)
38. KR&B...this thread should be required reading, Octafish!
Mon Jun 1, 2015, 09:34 PM
Jun 2015

I had not thought of a lot of these events in quite a while. It's amazing and scary how all of this weaves into one very plausible, coherent narrative. Much on this thread to ponder. Thanks to you and the other contributors to the thread! Bookmarking.

snagglepuss

(12,704 posts)
39. This thread should be enshrined on DU's Home page.
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 02:44 AM
Jun 2015

Highly informative and helpful for understanding what has been happening. Your presentation of the facts is nothing less than brilliant.

Thanks for doing this.


K and R


CrawlingChaos

(1,893 posts)
42. Huge K&R, SO with you on this
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 03:54 AM
Jun 2015

And as always, thank you for everything you do here Octafish.

Outstanding thread.

 

JEB

(4,748 posts)
48. K&R for the original post and subsequent informative posts and links.
Tue Jun 2, 2015, 11:25 AM
Jun 2015

Posts and discussions like this is what keeps me coming back to DU. Important stuff.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The kind of Democrat I en...