Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 01:55 PM Jun 2015

Why America Might be Stuck With More Unhappy Part-Timers


Why America Might be Stuck With More Unhappy Part-Timers
Working too few hours? You may have met a new economic reality.


(Bloomberg) The share of workers who wish they were working more but can't land full-time jobs might remain elevated even as the economy improves, new research suggests.

The share of the labor force working part-time for economic reasons, rather than by choice, shot up to a peak of more than 6 percent in the wake of the 2007-09 recession, from around 3 percent prior to the downturn.

While a weak economy increased the share of involuntary part-timers by about 2 percentage points between 2006 and 2010 — the year the rate peaked — long-term changes in the economy have also played a role. Structural shifts in the labor market might have swelled the group by an extra percentage point over the same period, according to research released Monday by Rob Valletta and Catherine van der List at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. .................(more)

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-06-08/why-america-might-be-stuck-with-more-unhappy-part-timers




1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why America Might be Stuck With More Unhappy Part-Timers (Original Post) marmar Jun 2015 OP
Shot up to 6 from a pre-recession 3? whatthehey Jun 2015 #1

whatthehey

(3,660 posts)
1. Shot up to 6 from a pre-recession 3?
Mon Jun 8, 2015, 03:42 PM
Jun 2015

Sounds terrible. Lucky for us it is improving like most employment metrics and has been hovering in the low 4s for quite a while. Strange that a midyear 2015 article would not mention that while posting a chart image that ends in 2013.... Did the writer think we wouldn't notice, or would just jump on doomerism without wondering what it's done in the last couple of years?



Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why America Might be Stuc...