There does not exist a less credible voice on the Internet. Samples of his work include:

and alternet, a site i know third way types don't care for but still. I am googling and searching for a wiki entry or a "larouche connection" so far to no avail. the "larouche connection" alone is enough for me to dismiss him if true.

impeached.

in power than when Republicans have control. You don't find that credible? Interesting.

http://www.amazon.com/THEYRE-NOT-EVEN-CLOSE-Democratic-ebook/dp/B008DZO7C6/ref=la_B001KC9V7U_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1433797389&sr=1-2

"The Democratic and Republican Parties are virtual opposites of each other in their economic records, going back to the earliest period for which economic data were available, around 1910. More than a dozen studies have been done comparing economic growth, unemployment, average length of unemployment, stock market performance, inflation, federal debt, and other economic indicators, during Democratic and Republican presidencies and congresses, and they all show stunningly better performance when Democrats are in power, than when Republicans are. These studies are all available online, and they are all summarized and discussed in this path-breaking book, which settles, once and for all, the question of whether there’s any significant economic difference between the two Parties. Not only is there a difference, but – shockingly – it always runs in favor of Democrats in power. There might be other types of reasons for voting Republican, but all of the economic reasons favor voting for Democrats. Regarding economic performance, the two Parties aren’t even close."

Kooks like this guy can't be wrong about everything, even though they try.

above simply show Larouche sites that have published his work. Given that anyone can publish just about anything on the internet these days, that's not much in the way of evidence. I don't see anything on Google that suggests Zuesse is a Larouche supporter. Since you've made the accusation, can you please post somethhing a little more dispositive to back up what you said? Thanks.

to be impeached fall under the rubric of the LaRouchie banner.

If that's the kind of author whose voice you think best represents rational dialogue, that's on you. You're the one who dragged this barking moonbat nutjob's rantings onto DU.

the confirmation.

sucking up to Moscow, as well as the "Impeach Nazi Obama" drivel.

As if that makes your affinity for him any more defensible.

contradiction in the Obama administration regarding its Ukraine policy. What's not defensible is lying to fellow DUers in order to bias the reaction to the article. If you didn't have any evidence Zuesse was a follower of LaRouche, you probably shouldn't have made the accusation, right?

I know insults are your thing, but it is possible to respond to the substance of an article. Is Zuesse wrong in how he portrays Kerry's position? Nuland's? Maybe you could even point out Kerry and Nuland are addressing different audiences and it's possible there's really no significant contradiction in policy. But I guess that's asking too much. LaRouchie! and Putin-humper! it shall be.

Ergo his willful distortion of events, wherein Nuland and Kerry both are stating Obama's stance--that Crimea is part of Ukraine, and that any resolution should be by diplomatic channels, not via armed conflict--into one where Obama has 'sidelined' Kerry by refusing to fire Nuland. Even though Nuland said nothing that Kerry would disagree with.

Because, if Obama thinks Crimea is part of Ukraine, that means he wants World War III. That's the theory in this sick bastard's imagination, anyways.

The entire article is a trainwreck of anti-US, anti-Obama, pro-Putin, and Nuland Derangement Syndrome gibberish.

Kerry--http://www.state.gov/secretary/remarks/2015/05/242214.htm

Nuland--http://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/265997.html

that one thinks Ukraine should try to take it back by force.

the official Obama administration position--that Crimea is part of Ukraine--as meaning Obama has sidelined Kerry because Kerry doesn't think Ukraine should launch a ground offensive to retake Ukraine (newsflash: neither does Ukraine's government--Poroschenko is engaging in stupid rhetoric he has no ability to deliver on)/

What the fuck is this shit

I think I'm reading The National Enquirer