Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 07:32 AM Jun 2015

The TPP Fast-Track Vote Wasn't About Obama, It Was About Failed Trade Policies

The TPP Fast-Track Vote Wasn't About Obama, It Was About Failed Trade Policies
6/12/15

The fight over Trade Promotion Authority was never about Barack Obama, despite the best efforts of the White House and many in the media to portray it as such. The president's effort to obtain congressional consent to "fast track" a sweeping Trans-Pacific Partnership agreement, which failed Friday amid a complex flurry of House votes, was about something that runs far deeper: frustration on the part of Americans with race-to-the-bottom trade policies as defined by the North American Free Trade Agreement and extended across ensuing agreements.

This is something the president and his allies need to recognize as they revisit fast track and trade issues—not just in advance of an expected "revote" on a key measure Tuesday but in the weeks and months to come. America is moving beyond the point where a politics of partisanship or personality is sufficient to secure support for "free trade" policies that have not worked and that will not work.


***The free-trade model that has been promoted for decades by Democratic and Republican presidents, along with Wall Street interests and multinational corporations, has failed American workers and communities—and millions of Americans who were part of the president's winning coalitions in 2008 and in 2012 recognize this.***

...

On the critical vote Friday, House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi was a "no," and in declaring her opposition she spoke the sentiments of most Democrats, saying, "Whatever the deal is with other countries, we want a better deal for America's workers."

It wasn't that the Democrats wanted to deal Obama a defeat, as the vapid headlines suggested Friday afternoon. This wasn't the personality contest that pundits so enjoy. Many of the "no" votes came from the president's earliest and most sincere allies: House members such as Michigan's John Conyers, Minnesota's Keith Ellison, and California's Barbara Lee. The issue was trade policy, and most Democrats in the House share the view of labor, farm, environmental, and human-rights groups that believe our trade policies must be radically altered.
...

http://m.thenation.com/blog/209825-tpp-fast-track-vote-wasnt-about-obama-it-was-about-failed-trade-policies
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
1. It's both.
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 07:41 AM
Jun 2015

It's a "no confidence" vote in Obama's ability to negotiate a good deal. Very hard to spin this as anything other than a personally humiliating defeat.

Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
2. +1. Americans need to think about what jumps off the page, who benefits? Why is it consistently out
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 07:54 AM
Jun 2015

of proportion and favors the elite? When I e-mailed my congressman Himes who gave his vote
to Obama if he could tell me how anything Sanders has said here is inaccurate or misleading, you
know what his response was? No response.


SENATOR BERNIE SANDERS: THE TRANSPACIFIC TRADE (TPP) AGREEMENT MUST BE DEFEATED
The Trans Pacific Partnership is a disastrous trade agreement designed to protect the interests of the largest
multi national corporations at the expense of workers, consumers, the environment and the foundations of
American democracy. It will also negatively impact some of the poorest people in the world.

The TPP is a treaty that has been written behind closed doors by the corporate world.
Incredibly, while Wall Street, the pharmaceutical industry and major media companies have full knowledge as to what
is in this treaty, the American people and members of Congress do not. They have been locked out of the process.
Further, all Americans, regardless of political ideology, should be opposed to the “fast track” process which
would deny Congress the right to amend the treaty and represent their constituents’ interests.

The TPP follows in the footsteps of other unfettered free trade agreements like NAFTA, CAFTA and the
Permanent Normalized Trade Agreement with China (PNTR).

These treaties have forced American workers to compete against desperate and low
wage labor around the world. The result has been massive job losses in the
United States and the shutting down of tens of thousands of factories.
These corporately backed trade agreements have significantly
contributed to the race to the bottom, the collapse of the American middle class
and increased wealth and income inequality.

The TPP is more of the same, but even worse.

During my 23 years in Congress, I helped lead the fight against NAFTA and PNTR with China.
During the coming session of Congress, I will be working with organized labor, environmentalists, religious organizations,
Democrats, and Republicans against the secretive TPP trade deal.

Let’s be clear: the TPP is much more than a “free trade” agreement.
It is part of a global race to the bottom to
boost the profits of large corporations and Wall Street by outsourcing jobs; undercutting worker rights;
dismantling labor, environmental, health, food safety and financial laws; and allowing corporations to challenge
our laws in international tribunals rather than our own court system.

If TPP was such a good deal for America,
the administration should have the courage to show the American people exactly what is in this deal, instead of
keeping the content of the TPP a secret.10 Ways that TPP would hurt Working Families

1.
TPP will allow corporations to outsource even more jobs overseas.
According to the Economic Policy Institute, if the TPP is agreed to, the U.S. will lose more than
130,000 jobs to Vietnam and Japan alone.
But that is just the tip of the iceberg.
·∙
Service Sector Jobs will be lost.
At a time when corporations have already outsourced over 3
million service sector jobs in the U.S., TPP includes rules that will make it even easier for
corporate America to outsource call centers; computer programming; engineering; accounting;
and medical diagnostic jobs.
·∙
Manufacturing jobs will be lost.
As a result of NAFTA, the U.S. lost nearly 700,000 jobs.
As a result of Permanent Normal Trade Relations with China, the U.S. lost over 2.7 million jobs.
As a result of the Korea Free Trade Agreement, the U.S. has lost 70,000 jobs.
The TPP would make matters worse by providing special benefits to firms that offshore jobs and by reducing the risks
associated with operating in low wage countries.
2.
U.S. sovereignty will be undermined by giving corporations the right to challenge our laws
before international tribunals.

The TPP creates a special dispute resolution process that allows corporations to challenge any
domestic laws that could adversely impact their “expected future profits.”
These challenges would be heard before UN and World Bank tribunals which could require taxpayer
compensation to corporations.
This process undermines our sovereignty and subverts democratically passed laws including those
dealing with labor, health, and the environment.

3.
Wages, benefits, and collective bargaining will be threatened.
NAFTA, CAFTA, PNTR with China, and other free trade agreements have helped drive down the
wages and benefits of American workers and have eroded collective bargaining rights.
The TPP will make the race to the bottom worse because it forces American workers to compete with
desperate workers in Vietnam where the minimum wage is just 56 cents an hour.

4.
Our ability to protect the environment will be undermined.
The TPP will allow corporations to challenge any law that would adversely impact their future
profits.Pending claims worth over $14 billion have been filed based on similar language in other
trade agreements.Most of these claims deal with challenges to environmental laws in a number of countries.

The TPP will make matters even worse by giving corporations the right to sue any of the
nations that sign onto the TPP.
These lawsuits would be heard in international tribunals bypassing domestic courts.

5.
Food Safety Standards will be threatened.
The TPP would make it easier for countries like Vietnam to export contaminated fish and seafood into
the U.S.
The FDA has already prevented hundreds of seafood imports from TPP countries because of salmonella, ecoli, methyl
mercury and drug residues. But the FDA only inspects 12 percent of food
imports and will be overwhelmed by the vast expansion of these imports if the TPP is agreed to.

6.
Buy America laws could come to an end.
The U.S. has several laws on the books that require the federal government to buy goods and services
that are made in America or mostly made in this country.
Under TPP, foreign corporations must be given equal access to compete for these government contracts with
companies that make products in America.
Under TPP, the U.S. could not even prevent companies that have horrible human rights
records from receiving government contracts paid by U.S. taxpayers.

7.
Prescription drug prices will increase, access to life saving drugs will decrease, and the profits of
drug companies will go up.
Big pharmaceutical companies are working hard to ensure that the TPP extends the monopolies they
have for prescription drugs by extending their patents (which currently can last 20 years or
more).

This would expand the profits of big drug companies, keep drug prices artificially high, and
leave millions of people around the world without access to life saving drugs.
Doctors without Borders stated that “the TPP agreement is on track to become the most harmful trade pact ever for
access to medicines in developing countries.”

8.
Wall Street would benefit at the expense of everyone else.
Under TPP, governments would be barred from imposing “capital controls” that have been
successfully used to avoid financial crises.
These controls range from establishing a financial speculation tax to limiting the massive flows of speculative
capital flowing into and out of countries responsible for the Asian financial crisis in the 1990s.

In other words, the TPP would expand the rights and power of the same Wall Street firms that nearly
destroyed the world economy just five years ago and would create the conditions for more financial instability
in the future.
Last year, I cosponsored a bill with Sen. Harkin to create a Wall Street speculation tax of just 0.03
percent on trades of derivatives, credit default swaps, and large amounts of stock.
If TPP were enacted, such a financial speculation tax may be in violation of this trade agreement.

9 The TPP would reward authoritarian regimes like Vietnam that systematically violate human
rights.The State Department, the U.S. Department of Labor, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty
International have all documented Vietnam’s widespread violations of basic international standards
for human rights.
Yet, the TPP would reward Vietnam’s bad behavior by giving it duty free access to
the U.S. market.

10.
The TPP has no expiration date, making it virtually impossible to repeal.
Once TPP is agreed to, it has no sunset date and could only be altered by a consensus of all of the countries that
agreed to it. Other countries, like China, could be allowed to join in the future.
For example, Canada and Mexico joined TPP negotiations in 2012 and Japan joined last year

http://www.sanders.senate.gov/download/the-trans-pacific-trade-tpp-agreement-must-be-defeated?inline=file



Jefferson23

(30,099 posts)
6. Bernie put it together and I agree, I wish more Americans read it too.
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 08:03 AM
Jun 2015

Send it to your reps and ask them, why support such a thing?

 

djean111

(14,255 posts)
8. Please make this into an OP on its own. Apologise if already done,
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 09:04 AM
Jun 2015

I am just starting to read GD starting with earliest first. I would like to see the "rebuttals".

 

orpupilofnature57

(15,472 posts)
3. It was a vote against Fascism, the 1%, and Elected misanthropes .
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 07:57 AM
Jun 2015

This has not as much to do with Trade, more it's another expeirment to see how much they can get away with, while spinning an elaborate reason why .

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
5. So elaborate. It's been hard to watch the spin. And its going to be harder to accept
Sat Jun 13, 2015, 08:02 AM
Jun 2015

the eventual consequences once it passes, the elaborate spin won't help US then. There will be a new way to distort reality at that point.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The TPP Fast-Track Vote W...