They specifically say they DON'T check for radiation?

I though "scientists" were supposed to be smart.

The scientists are plenty smart. But their paychecks ikely come from folks who don't want the radiation levels tested.

When they open their eyes.

They've pressured the Canadian government to ban Paul Watson,a Canadian citizen, from entering the country.

[div class="excerpt" style="margin-left:1em; border:1px solid #bfbfbf; border-radius:0.4615em; box-shadow:-1px -1px 3px #bfbfbf inset;"]... they specifically state they are not testing for radiation in the dead animals.

The scientists who are looking after the dead sea life.

There is not one report of the pathologists looking for radiation signs.

But there are reports of them stating they are not looking for radiation signs.

Weird, right?

This is of grave concern, would be nice to read up on the info.

Or maybe Mangano and Sherman. They're always good for a laugh.

Sid

is there a credible source? I am befuddled by this.

rad ocean is so out dated they even go so far as to lie about not finding Cs134, which was found. Sorry about that, I had thought theyd' be honest....

so here's the good stuff.....

http://www.vancouversun.comnews/Toxic+waters+Nuclear+radiation+found+pose+health+concerns/9606269/story.html




From:
http://www.fukuleaks.org/web/?p=14652

F#5049
Coordinates: 41.46, -126.18
Sample Date: Aug 07, 2014 12:00
Depth: 20
Thanks to: Captain Curtis Collins, RV Point Sur, Moss Landing Marine Lab.

Cs137*: 6.4 ± 0.2Bq/m3
Cs134*: 1.7 ± 0.1Bq/m3

I sure wouldn't.

Besides, just drinking a cubic meter of water in one day would kill a person.

The problem is that the sea life lives, rather, is dieing from the man made nuclear pollution, being as it lives in the slop and all its food absorbs not just cesium but a multitude of deadly material emitted from Fukushima.

radiation is measured in units, which ones are you referencing?

There is no fourth option.

Fukushima has increased the background radiation levels in the Pacific ocean by 600%.

Nope. Fukushima increased the background beta radiation (at the currently most contaminated spot off the West Coast) by a few hundredths of a percent.

So... you're only off by multiple orders of magnitude. Not your worst effort... but not exactly impressive.

All kinds of sea life is being washed up on the shores of the west coast and the scientists are befuddled, and they specifically state they are not testing for radiation in the dead animals.

That's because they're scientists... and they know beyond a shadow of a doubt that there's zero chance that radiation from Fukushima killed them.

Six what, Robert?

Oh dear, is this going to be fun.

It was a busy news day. Fukushima happened some time ago. It was bad. We get that. In the meantime, many other things are happening right now.

Panic about Fukushima now will not make it go away.

There is no 'was' bad. It is bad and has been bad for four years and now the level of rads in the ocean off California is at 600% increase. It is getting worse since rads are long lasting.

You should not panic. You should just sit back and enjoy what is left of life. Of course it's way too late for the sea life in the Pacific.

But only if there is a link to scientific data and discussion.

Anybody can post numbers and opinions. You need to back them up with proof.

The http://www.ourradioactiveocean.org/ has been sampling for cesium-137 in the Pacific. The level was 1 and now is above 7.

And more is on the way, since Fukushima is still dumping rads into the Pacific as it has been for four years now.

Since the only semi-consistent location tested on their map are locations near Los Angeles I've taken it as a point for comparison:

2011

Back when they started they even found a level of C-134 at 7 off the coast of SoCal. You had to hunt through about 10 pages to find it, but it was there. Now? hahahaha

Couple of months ago, from near Vancouver, data was presented and posted on DU LBN about C-137 level above 7.

Its here and it's only gonna get worse. Just look at all the dead and dieing sea life.

By - Associated Press - Wednesday, April 8, 2015

VICTORIA, British Columbia (AP) - Radiation from the leaking Fukushima Daiichi nuclear reactor has been detected on the shores of Vancouver Island, four years after a deadly earthquake and tsunami in Japan killed 16,000 people.

University of Victoria chemical oceanographer Jay Cullen said Monday that it’s the first time radiation has been found on the shorelines of North America since the quake and tsunami ravaged the Japanese north coast and disabled the nuclear reactor.

Low levels of the radioactive isotope Cesium-134, which scientists say can only come from Fukushima, were found in waters collected on Feb. 19 off a dock at Ucluelet, British Columbia, about 195 miles west of Victoria, Cullen said.

Last November, the first sample containing detectable radioactivity from Fukushima was discovered about 90 miles off the coast of northern California.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/apr/8/japanese-reactor-radiation-detected-off-bc-coast/

...........................

My memory was that a level 7 found, was Cs137.
Note that this report says they found Cs134, which the rad ocean link does NOT report. Which goes to show the rad ocean site is hiding something. I figured the rad ocean people by now would be reporting up to date data, but it is not. My bad for trusting them and using them as a source, because even the AP is a better source than them.

You're really not being fair with your standard of proof.

Then I agree with the other posters. Bull fucking shit.

Have a nice life.

Here's the location and date and data

F# UCSB-1
Date Mar 22, 2011 03:00
depth: surf

Cs137: 7.3

Cs134: 7.4

---------

If you care you can search for it but it has probably been scrubbed...??

I looked for the LBN post... no luck. Then I looked at another site and it wouldn't load. On that site was data that showed, well offshore, a level of close to 20 of Cs137. It's coming.

It's still there... you're just missing that that's from just a couple weeks after the explosions - when airborne contamination had just arrived, but before it diluted away (as shown by the most recent reading from the same area).

We had a convo about this a while back. Thanks for the confirmation that I am accurate about the deposition.

Lots of folks have ignored the fact that there was a lot of airborne deposition from the cores exploding and spreading around the world. But there is proof of the core material landing on the US. Thanks for backing me up!!

a die off of all aquatic life, up the west coast. Caused by global climate change. So it could be more of that.

the Gulf disaster too.

We can thank Obama for allowing Corexit to be used there. Killing multitudes of sea animals.

since at least 1978 when I saw them covering the beaches in WA and OR? These are the ones the omgpress is calling "alien sea creatures" and while they don't wash up regularly, they have been doing this for for 30 years that I know of personally.

Or do you mean sea lion pup starving due to warm waters causing lack of prey?
http://thinkprogress.org/climate/2015/03/13/3633743/sea-lion-pups-washing-ashore/